Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search
Journal : Ilmu Hukum Prima

PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA RUMAH SAKIT TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA PEMALSUAN JUMLAH TAGIHAN UANG KEPADA BADAN PENYELENGGARA JAMINAN SOSIAL (BPJS) Sonya Airini Batubara; Mazmur Septian Rumapea; Yusriando Yusriando
Ilmu Hukum Prima (IHP) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2020): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM PRIMA
Publisher : jurnal.unprimdn.ac.id

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34012/jihp.v3i1.935

Abstract

PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA RUMAH SAKIT TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA PEMALSUAN JUMLAH TAGIHAN UANG KEPADA BADAN PENYELENGGARA JAMINAN SOSIAL (BPJS) sonyaairinibatubara@unprimdn.ac.id mazmursrumapea@unprimdn.ac.id Departemen Hukum Pidana, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Prima Indonesia Jl. Sekip Simpang Sikambing, Medan, Sumatera Utara, 20112 Abstract Hospital is an institution that provides comprehensive health services that are preventive, promotive, curative and rehabilitative for the general public as stipulated in Article 1 paragraph (3) of Law Number 44 Year 2009 concerning Hospitals, which says "Comprehensive health services including promotive health services , preventive, curative, and rehabilitative services In addition, hospitals are institutions that are capital, technology and human resource intensive, so that they have the potential to cause problems both internal and external.The hospital was previously considered a social institution that provides medical assistance to the public, but At present the position of the hospital has undergone a change, which has shaped a social institution into an institution in the form of a corporation established under the law that has rights and obligations as a legal entity that leads to a dominant profit - the search for health services. in the present, in the case of k In hospitals, patients file a doctor's case, especially criminal law, and never ask the hospital for responsibility for corporate crime that its establishment has a legal entity (rechts persoon). That the authors are interested in reviewing whether a hospital as a corporation can be held liable for criminal liability. This study aims (1) To find out the sanctions imposed on hospitals for criminal acts of counterfeiting the amount of money bills to the Social Security Organizing Agency (BPJS) (2) To determine the responsibility of hospitals for criminal acts of counterfeiting the amount of money bills to the Social Security Administering Board (BPJS). The method used in this research is analytical descriptive using a normative juridical approach supported by an empirical juridical approach. The data used are (1) primary data in the form of interviews with Sari Mutiara Hospital, (2) secondary data through a literature study on various laws and regulations / books / journals to obtain expert opinions. The results of this study are expected to be published through (1) scientific articles in the Accredited National Journal and (2) teaching materials in Criminal Law courses at the Faculty of Law, University of Prima Indonesia. The results of this study indicate that hospitals are criminally responsible because hospitals as corporations are legal entities (rechts persoon) that have rights and obligations. Through this publication it is hoped that sanctions and accountability by hospitals for falsification of the amount of bills given to BPJS are clearer so that they do not incur losses in large costs that must be borne by the state. Keywords: Criminal Liability, Hospital, Counterfeiting Intisari Rumah sakit adalah lembaga yang menyediakan layanan kesehatan yang komprehensif di preventif, promotif, kuratif dan rehabilitatif untuk masyarakat pada umumnya diatur dalam Pasal 1 ayat (3) UU Nomor 44 Tahun 2009 Tentang Rumah Sakit, yang mengatakan "Kesehatan menyeluruh layanan layanan kesehatan yang termasuk promotif, preventif, kuratif , dan layanan rehabilitatif. Selain itu, rumah sakit adalah institusi yang padat modal, teknologi dan sumber daya manusia, sehingga berpotensi menimbulkan masalah baik internal dan eksternal. Rumah sakit sebelumnya dianggap sebagai lembaga sosial yang memberikan bantuan medis kepada publik, tetapi saat ini posisi rumah sakit telah mengalami perubahan, yang sudah berbentuk sebuah sosial lembaga menjadi sebuah institusi di bentuk dari sebuah korporasi yang didirikan di bawah hukum yang memiliki hak dan kewajiban sebagai badan hukum yang mengarah ke sebuah dominan keuntungan - pencarian kesehatan jasa . Masalah yang muncul di masa sekarang, dalam kasus kesalahan rumah sakit, pasien mengajukan perkara dokter, khususnya hukum pidana, dan tidak pernah menanyakan tanggungjawab rumah sakit terhadap kejahatan korporasi bahwa pendiriannya memiliki badan hukum (rechts persoon). Bahwa penulis tertarik untuk meninjau apakah rumah sakit sebagai sebuah korporasi dapat dimintakan pertanggungjawaban pidananya. Penelitian ini bertujuan (1) Untuk mengetahui sanksi yang diberikan kepada rumah sakit terhadap tindak pidana pemalsuan jumlah tagihan uang kepada Badan Penyelenggara Jaminan Sosial (BPJS) (2) Untuk mengetahui pertanggungjawaban pidana rumah sakit terhadap tindak pidana pemalsuan jumlah tagihan uang kepada Badan Penyelenggara Jaminan Sosial (BPJS). Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah deskriptif analitis dengan menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif yang didukung oleh pendekatan yuridis empiris. Data yang digunakan adalah (1) data primer berupa hasil wawancara terhadap Rumah Sakit Sari Mutiara, (2) data sekunder melalui studi pustaka terhadap berbagai peraturan perundangan serta buku/jurnal untuk memperoleh pendapat para ahli. Hasil penelitian ini diharapkan dapat dipublikasikan melalui (1) artikel ilmiah pada Jurnal Nasional Terakreditasi dan (2) bahan ajar pada mata kuliah Hukum Pidana di Fakultas Hukum Universitas Prima Indonesia. Dari hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan rumah sakit bertanggung jawab secara pidana karena rumah sakit sebagai korporasi merupakan badan hukum (rechts persoon) yang memiliki hak dan kewajiban. Melalui publikasi tersebut diharapkan agar sanksi dan pertanggunggjawaban oleh rumah sakit atas perbuatan pemalsuan jumlah tagihan yang diberikan kepada BPJS lebih jelas sehingga tidak menimbulkan kerugian beban biaya besar yang harus ditanggung oleh negara.
KEPATUHAN HUKUM KONSULTAN PAJAK KOTA MEDAN TERHADAP KEWAJIBAN PENDAFTARAN BPJS KETENAGAKERJAAN: FAKTOR PENYEBAB DAN KONSEKUENSI HUKUM Brahmana, Herman; Rumapea, Mazmur Septian; Siburian, Sukses Marhasak Panungkunan; Kuara, Glenessa; Sunjoyo, Alexandra Martha Santoso; Irawan, Agus
Ilmu Hukum Prima (IHP) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM PRIMA
Publisher : jurnal.unprimdn.ac.id

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34012/jihp.v6i2.4202

Abstract

BPJS Ketenagakerjaan is a public legal entity formed to conduct Social Security programs in the Employment Sector. Participation is mandatory for workers and companies. A tax consultant also acts as an employee and is not exempt from such BPJS obligations. The public often does not comply with regulations due to various obstacles, including many Medan Tax Consultants. The problem in this research is how Medan Tax Consultants comply with such BPJS registration, factors that cause compliance or non-compliance, and legal consequences resulting from such non-compliance. The research is located in Medan and is empirical descriptive-analytical. Samples were taken using a purposive sampling technique of 10% out of 172 population. Data sources consist of primary and secondary data. The research was preceded by a library study and thennterviews (with questionnaires). Then, qualitative analysis is applied, and conclusions are drawn using the deductive approach. The results show that Medan Tax Consultant’s compliance level still needs to be higher. The main factor causing compliance is to get rid of sanctions, while the leadingause of non-compliance is the need to understand the BPJS regulations. The effectiveness of such BPJS regulations among Medan City Tax Consultants is still low and requires continuous supervision from BPJS.
Analisis Perbandingan Penegakan Hukum Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia Dengan Singapura: Pendekatan Normatif Terhadap Kriteria Keberhasilan Penindakan Korupsi Harefa, Jevan Edberd; Pandia, Evan Vaskal Ateta Pandia; Situmorang, Andrean Stefhan; Rumapea, Mazmur Septian
Ilmu Hukum Prima (IHP) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM PRIMA
Publisher : jurnal.unprimdn.ac.id

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34012/jihp.v7i1.5135

Abstract

Corruption law enforcement has become the main focus for many countries to eradicate rampant corrupt practices. Indonesia and Singapore, two Southeast Asian countries, have different approaches to law enforcement regarding corruption. This research compares corruption law enforcement in Indonesia and Singapore using a normative approach to evaluate success criteria in prosecuting corruption. This approach includes aspects such as the quality of legislation, the effectiveness of law enforcement agencies, compliance with the law, and the level of disclosure and prosecution of corruption cases. The research method used is comparative descriptive analysis, which collects secondary data from various sources, including laws, research reports, and official documents related to corruption law enforcement in both countries. This analysis compares the legal framework, law enforcement processes, and results of corruption law enforcement in Indonesia and Singapore. The results show significant differences between Indonesia and Singapore regarding corruption law enforcement. Singapore has a stricter legal framework, more effective law enforcement agencies, higher levels of compliance with the law, and better disclosure and prosecution rates of corruption cases compared to Indonesia. The implication of this finding is the importance of the quality of laws, the effectiveness of law enforcement agencies, and the level of compliance with the law in determining the success of corruption law enforcement.
KEPATUHAN HUKUM KONSULTAN PAJAK KOTA MEDAN TERHADAP KEWAJIBAN PENDAFTARAN BPJS KETENAGAKERJAAN: FAKTOR PENYEBAB DAN KONSEKUENSI HUKUM Brahmana, Herman; Rumapea, Mazmur Septian; Siburian, Sukses Marhasak Panungkunan; Kuara, Glenessa; Sunjoyo, Alexandra Martha Santoso; Irawan, Agus
Ilmu Hukum Prima (IHP) Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM PRIMA
Publisher : jurnal.unprimdn.ac.id

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34012/jihp.v6i2.4202

Abstract

BPJS Ketenagakerjaan is a public legal entity formed to conduct Social Security programs in the Employment Sector. Participation is mandatory for workers and companies. A tax consultant also acts as an employee and is not exempt from such BPJS obligations. The public often does not comply with regulations due to various obstacles, including many Medan Tax Consultants. The problem in this research is how Medan Tax Consultants comply with such BPJS registration, factors that cause compliance or non-compliance, and legal consequences resulting from such non-compliance. The research is located in Medan and is empirical descriptive-analytical. Samples were taken using a purposive sampling technique of 10% out of 172 population. Data sources consist of primary and secondary data. The research was preceded by a library study and thennterviews (with questionnaires). Then, qualitative analysis is applied, and conclusions are drawn using the deductive approach. The results show that Medan Tax Consultant’s compliance level still needs to be higher. The main factor causing compliance is to get rid of sanctions, while the leadingause of non-compliance is the need to understand the BPJS regulations. The effectiveness of such BPJS regulations among Medan City Tax Consultants is still low and requires continuous supervision from BPJS.
Analisis Perbandingan Penegakan Hukum Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia Dengan Singapura: Pendekatan Normatif Terhadap Kriteria Keberhasilan Penindakan Korupsi Harefa, Jevan Edberd; Pandia, Evan Vaskal Ateta Pandia; Situmorang, Andrean Stefhan; Rumapea, Mazmur Septian
Ilmu Hukum Prima (IHP) Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM PRIMA
Publisher : jurnal.unprimdn.ac.id

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.34012/jihp.v7i1.5135

Abstract

Corruption law enforcement has become the main focus for many countries to eradicate rampant corrupt practices. Indonesia and Singapore, two Southeast Asian countries, have different approaches to law enforcement regarding corruption. This research compares corruption law enforcement in Indonesia and Singapore using a normative approach to evaluate success criteria in prosecuting corruption. This approach includes aspects such as the quality of legislation, the effectiveness of law enforcement agencies, compliance with the law, and the level of disclosure and prosecution of corruption cases. The research method used is comparative descriptive analysis, which collects secondary data from various sources, including laws, research reports, and official documents related to corruption law enforcement in both countries. This analysis compares the legal framework, law enforcement processes, and results of corruption law enforcement in Indonesia and Singapore. The results show significant differences between Indonesia and Singapore regarding corruption law enforcement. Singapore has a stricter legal framework, more effective law enforcement agencies, higher levels of compliance with the law, and better disclosure and prosecution rates of corruption cases compared to Indonesia. The implication of this finding is the importance of the quality of laws, the effectiveness of law enforcement agencies, and the level of compliance with the law in determining the success of corruption law enforcement.