Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.416
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Yustisia Merdeka : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Jurnal Daya Mas : Media Komunikasi dan Informasi Hasil Pengabdian dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Journal of Global Pharma Technology Blantika : Multidisciplinary Journal Sahaja : Journal Sharia and Humanities Buletin Pemberdayaan dan Pengembangan Masyarakat Jurnal Jurisprudence Sharia Oikonomia Law Journal
Anik Tri Haryani
Universitas Merdeka Madiun
Religion Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Medicine & Pharmacology Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 26 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 26 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
Legal Protection for Journalists Against Cyber Threats from the Perspective of the Press Law and the Electronic Information and Transactions Law Gilbran Rahardian; Krista Yitawati; Anik Tri Haryani
YUSTISIA MERDEKA : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 12 No. 1 (2026): JURNAL YUSTISIA MERDEKA
Publisher : Universitas Merdeka Madiun

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33319/yume.v12i1.374

Abstract

Introduction to the Problem: The development of information and communication technology has brought significant changes to journalistic practices in Indonesia, particularly through the utilization of digital media and cyberspace in press activities. On the other hand, such developments have also given rise to various cyber threats against journalists, including account hacking, digital intimidation, doxing, dissemination of personal data, and criminalization through electronic media. These conditions create legal issues concerning the protection of press freedom and the digital security of journalists in carrying out their journalistic functions. Purpose/Study Objectives: This study aims to analyze the forms of legal protection afforded to journalists against cyber threats based on Law Number 40 of 1999 concerning the Press and Law Number 1 of 2024 concerning the Second Amendment to Law Number 11 of 2008 on Electronic Information and Transactions (ITE Law), as well as to examine the legal certainty of journalist protection within the digital sphere. Design/Methodology/Approach: This study employs a normative legal research method using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. The legal materials consist of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal sources obtained through library research, which are subsequently analyzed qualitatively through methods of legal interpretation. Findings: The results of the study indicate that the Press Law and the ITE Law have normatively provided legal protection for journalists, both through guarantees of press freedom and regulations concerning cybercrime. However, such protection has not yet fully ensured legal certainty, as there remain overlapping regulations and the application of multi-interpretative provisions within the ITE Law that have the potential to criminalize journalists. Therefore, regulatory harmonization and the strengthening of digital security protection for journalists are necessary in order to safeguard press freedom and the protection of human rights in the digital era.
Juridical Analysis of the State Administrative Court of Surabaya’s Decision No. 32/G/2023/PTUN.SBY on Land Ownership Certificate Overlapping Sarjiyati Sarjiyati; Angga Pramodya Pradhana; Anik Tri Haryani; Bambang Sukarjono; Izyana Farhana Zulkarnain; Galuh Ayu Rahmawati
Jurnal Jurisprudence Vol. 14, No. 2, December 2024
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23917/jurisprudence.v14i2.6017

Abstract

ABSTRACT  Purpose of the Study: This research aims to analyze the State Administrative Court of Surabaya City judges’ basis of consideration in Decision No. 32/G/2023/PTUN.SBY in resolving the dispute of land ownership certificate overlapping through the litigation method and knowing the legal consequences of this decision. Methodology: This research employed the normative legal research method. The data were descriptively analyzed to obtain research results. It used applicable court decisions, legal regulations and the general principle of good governance as its basis of consideration. Results: In its relations with the Plaintiff's lawsuit, Judge Assembly stated that it had fulfilled the lawsuit’s formal aspect on deadlines in issuing the certificate which is the Defendant’s authority. However, in the issue of procedures and substances, there have been deviations that violate the applicable legal regulations and the general principle of good governance. Based on the author’s analysis, these judges have given accurate considerations. The legal consequences of State Administrative Court of Surabaya City's Decision No. 32/G/2023/PTUN.SBY are that the two land tenure certificates owned by Defendant II Intervention were revoked by Surabaya City's State Administrative Court. Apart from that, the Defendant and Defendant II Intervention are burdened with paying for the case fees. Applications of this study: This research becomes a reference for National Land Agency Officers to be more careful when issuing certificates to prevent administrative and/or juridical errors. Novelty/Originality of this study: This research analyzed the decision of Surabaya City’s State Administrative Court on the revocation of 2 (two) land ownership certificates issued by the Batu City Land Agency and the legal consequences of State Administrative Court of Surabaya City’s Decision No. 32/G/2023/PTUN.SBY. Keywords: Decision, overlapping, land tenure certificates, dispute resolution   ABSTRAK Tujuan Penelitian: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis dasar pertimbangan hakim Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Kota Surabaya dalam Putusan Nomor 32/G/2023/PTUN.SBY dalam menyelesaikan sengketa tumpang tindih sertifikat hak milik atas tanah melalui metode litigasi dan mengetahui akibat hukum dari putusan tersebut. Metodologi: Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif. Data dianalisis secara deskriptif untuk memperoleh hasil penelitian. Dasar pertimbangan yang digunakan adalah putusan pengadilan yang berlaku, peraturan perundang-undangan, dan asas umum pemerintahan yang baik. Hasil: Terkait gugatan Penggugat, Majelis Hakim menyatakan telah memenuhi aspek formil gugatan mengenai batas waktu penerbitan sertifikat yang merupakan kewenangan Tergugat. Namun, dalam masalah prosedur dan substansi masih terdapat penyimpangan yang melanggar peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku dan asas umum pemerintahan yang baik. Berdasarkan analisis penulis, para hakim telah memberikan pertimbangan yang tepat. Akibat hukum dari Putusan PTUN Kota Surabaya Nomor 32/G/2023/PTUN.SBY adalah dua sertifikat hak milik atas tanah milik Tergugat II Intervensi dicabut oleh PTUN Kota Surabaya. Selain itu, Tergugat dan Tergugat II Intervensi dibebani biaya perkara. Aplikasi penelitian ini: Penelitian ini menjadi acuan bagi Pejabat Badan Pertanahan Nasional agar lebih cermat dalam menerbitkan sertifikat untuk mencegah terjadinya kesalahan administratif dan/atau yuridis. Kebaruan/Orisinalitas penelitian ini: Penelitian ini menganalisis putusan PTUN Kota Surabaya atas pencabutan 2 (dua) sertifikat hak milik atas tanah yang diterbitkan oleh Badan Pertanahan Kota Batu dan akibat hukum dari Putusan PTUN Kota Surabaya Nomor 32/G/2023/PTUN.SBY. Kata kunci: Putusan, tumpang tindih, sertifikat hak milik atas tanah, penyelesaian sengketa
Age Limit for Regional Head Candidates and Legal Considerations from the Supreme Court Decision No. 23 P/HUM/2024 and Constitutional Court Decision No. 70/PUU-XXII/2024 Sarjiyati Sarjiyati; Taufiq Yuli Purnama; Anik Tri Haryani; Endang Murti; Izyan Farhana Zulkarnain; Vivi Frita Trisnani
Jurnal Jurisprudence Vol. 15, No. 2, December 2025
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23917/jurisprudence.v15i2.10187

Abstract

ABSTRACT Purpose of the Study: This research aims to analyze the legal consideration that influence differences in a Supreme Court Decision and a Constitutional Court Decision in the Regional Head Election process in 2024, and these decisions’ implications on the age limit for regional head candidates in the 2024 regional general election in creating checks and balances in the government. Methodology: This research utilizes the normative legal research method with the jurisprudential approach, statute approach, conceptual approach, and analytical approach. The data were descriptively analyzed to obtain the research results on the interpretation of age limits for regional head candidates in the 2024 regional general election in the two decisions, namely the Decision of the Supreme Court No. 23P/HUM/2024 and the Decision of the Constitutional Court No. 70/PUU-XXII/2024. These differences led to a lack of legal certainty and a misalignment with the general principle of good governance that is in line with the checks and balances principle in the government. Results: The Decision of the Supreme Court No. 23P/HUM/2024 determines that the age limit for regional head candidates is calculated since the inauguration, while the Decision of the Constitutional Court No. 70/PUU-XXII/2024 regulates that it is calculated since the determination of candidate pairs. Such differences led to a lack of legal certainty, which impacts the implementation of the 2024 Regional Head Election. The legal implications are that these differences may potentially disturb the democratic and political participation processes, especially for the younger generation. The 2024 Regional Head Election applied the Decision of the Constitutional Court No. 70/PUU-XXII/2024, which regulates that the minimum age of regional head candidates is 30 years old for candidate governors and candidate vice governors, and a minimum of 25 years old for candidate regents, candidate vice regents, candidate mayors, and candidate vice mayors. This is calculated since the determination of candidate pairs, as they have passed the stages of the 2024 Regional Head Election.                                                                   Applications of this Study: The state institution and the government are expected to be more careful when issuing interpretations through decisions that equally have final, binding, and erga ormes characteristics to prevent the occurrence of a lack of legal certainty. There should be efforts to align regulations to prevent legal dualism, which may lead to conflicts and issues in society. Novelty/Originality of this Study: It provides an analysis of the Decision of the Supreme Court No. 23P/HUM/2024 and the Decision of the Constitutional Court No. 70/PUU-XXII/2024 on the age limit for regional head candidates and the implications of these decisions in creating governmental checks and balances. Keywords: Decision, age limit, regional head election, checks and balances.   ABSTRAK Tujuan Penelitian: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perbandingan pertimbangan hukum yang mempengaruhi perbedaan dalam putusan Mahkamah Agung dan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam proses Pemilihan Kepala Daerah tahun 2024 dan implikasi putusan Mahkamah Agung dan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam ambang batas usia calon kepala daerah pada Pemilihan Kepala Daerah tahun 2024 dalam menciptakan checks and balances di pemerintahan. Metode: Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan yurisprudensi, pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan konseptual, dan pendekatan analisis. Data dianalisis secara deskriptif hingga diperoleh hasil penelitian bahwa perbedaan pada kedua putusan, baik Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 23P/HUM/2024 dan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 70/PUU-XXII/2024, dalam penafsiran ambang batas usia calon kepala daerah tahun 2024 berakibat pada ketidakpastian hukum dan ketidaksesuaian dengan asas umum pemerintahan yang baik yang sejalan dengan prinsip checks and balances pemerintahan. Hasil penelitian: Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 23 P/HUM/2024 menetapkan bahwa usia calon kepala daerah dihitung sejak pelantikan, sedangkan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 70/PUU-XXII/2024 menyatakan bahwa usia dihitung sejak penetapan pasangan calon. Perbedaan ini menciptakan ketidakpastian hukum yang berdampak pada pelaksanaan Pilkada 2024. Kedua lembaga memiliki argumen hukum dan ada implikasi dari putusan tersebut terhadap sistem checks and balances dalam pemerintahan. Perbedaan pandangan antara Mahkamah Agung dan Mahkamah Kosntitusi tidak hanya mencerminkan ketidakpastian hukum, tetapi juga berpotensi mengganggu proses demokrasi dan partisipasi politik, terutama bagi generasi muda. Pelaksanaan Pilkada tahun 2024 menggunakan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 70/PUU-XXII/2024, yang mengatur bahwa usia calon kepala daerah yaitu paling rendah 30 tahun untuk calon gubernur dan wakil gubernur, dan usia paling rendah 25 tahun untuk calon bupati dan wakil bupati serta calon walikota dan wakil walikota, yang dalam hal ini dihitung sejak penetapan pasangan calon karena telah melewati tahapan-tahapan Pilkada 2024. Penerapan Penelitian: Lembaga Negara dan Pemerintah diharapkan lebih teliti dalam menerbitkan penafsiran melalui putusan yang sama-sama bersifat final, mengikat, dan erga ormes, sehingga tidak terjadi adanya ketidakpastian hukum. Diharapkan adanya upaya harmonisasi peraturan untuk mencegah adanya dualism hukum, yang dapat menimbulkan konflik dan merugikan masyarakat. Kebaruan/Orisinalitas: Penelitian ini menelaah Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 23P/HUM/2024 dan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 70/PUU-XXII/2024 terkait ambang batas usia calon kepala daerah dan implikasi dari Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 23P/HUM/2024 dan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 70/PUU-XXII/2024 dalam menciptakan checks and balances di pemerintahan. Kata Kunci: Putusan, ambang batas usia, pemilihan kepala daerah, checks and balances
Legal Protection for the Community of Kedungputri Village, Paron Subdistrict, Ngawi Regency Against River Pollution Caused by Tofu Industry Waste Mayang Widianti; Anik Tri Haryani; Krista Yitawati; Sarjiyati
Blantika: Multidisciplinary Journal Vol. 4 No. 6 (2026): Blantika: Multidisciplinary Journal
Publisher : PT. Publikasiku Academic Solution

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57096/blantika.v4i6.524

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the form of legal protection for communities around river areas affected by pollution caused by the tofu manufacturing industry and the factors that hinder its implementation. This study (Legal Protection For The Community of Kedungputri Village, Paron Subdistrict, Ngawi Regency Against River Pollution Caused By Tofu Industry Waste) uses a normative legal method with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The legal materials used include primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials obtained through literature study. The analysis of legal materials was conducted qualitatively using a prescriptive analytical method. The results of the study indicate that legal protection for the community can be provided through preventive and repressive measures. Preventive protection is carried out through obligations to manage waste, the provision of Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) facilities, as well as supervision and guidance by the authorized regional government. Repressive protection is carried out through the application of administrative sanctions against perpetrators of pollution and the obligation to restore the environment in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. Obstacles in the implementation of legal protection include low levels of compliance by business actors with environmental regulations, limited waste treatment facilities, low public awareness, cultural factors that prioritize deliberation, and suboptimal enforcement of sanctions against environmental violations in the area.
Analisis Kelemahan Perlindungan Korban Perempuan Victim Blamming dalam Kekerasan Seksual Mohammad Krisna Wibowo; Sigit Sapto Nugroho; Anik Tri Haryani
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 7 No 7 (2026): Tema Hukum Pidana
Publisher : Himpunan Ilmu Hukum dan Ilmu Hukum Islam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v6i12.3232

Abstract

The implementation of Law Number 12 of 2022 concerning Sexual Violence Crimes (TPKS Law) and the Law on the Protection of Witnesses and Victims in addressing the practice of victim blaming. This study employs a normative legal method with statutory, conceptual and case approaches. The results show that, normatively, the TPKS Law and the Law on the Protection of Witnesses and Victims have provided a victim-oriented framework of protection. However, in practice, there are still obstacles in the form of social stigma, victim blaming practices and limited institutional capacity, which result in low case reporting and suboptimal legal protection for victims of sexual violence in Indonesia.
THE EFFECTIVENESS OF LEGAL PROTECTION FOR DEBTORS IN COLLATERAL EXECUTION: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF CREDIT AGREEMENTS AT KREDITPLUS FINANCE MADIUN BRANCH Inggit Septiyanto Noer Oemahati; Anik Tri Haryani; Krista Yitawati
Sharia Oikonomia Law Journal Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026)
Publisher : Yayasan Adra Karima Hubbi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70177/solj.v4i3.4094

Abstract

This study aims to comprehensively analyze the forms of legal protection for debtors regarding the imposition of late payment penalties in non-performing vehicle financing cases at the Madiun Branch of Kreditplus Finance. Using empirical legal research with a descriptive qualitative approach, the study reveals that legal protection is realized through preventive mechanisms, such as contract clause transparency, due date notifications, and credit restructuring, as well as repressive mechanisms via internal complaints, Financial Services Authority (OJK) mediation, and litigation. However, the implementation of this protection faces significant obstacles in the field. These obstacles include low debtor legal awareness, the dominance of unbalanced standard contracts, vulnerable economic conditions of the community, and technical banking operational constraints. In conclusion, although consumer protection regulations are available, the debtor's bargaining position in practice remains weak due to information asymmetry. Therefore, simplifying contract information and enhancing substantive oversight by the OJK are necessary to achieve justice and a sustainable balance of rights and obligations between creditors and debtors in the financial services sector.
Co-Authors Adilla Nila Krusita Aldo Ananda Abidin Angga Pramodya Pradhana Bambang Sukarjono Eko Muhyani Enda Warna Dyah A Endang Murti Endro Martono Farah Dina Sheilawati Fathkurrohman Galuh Ayu Rahmawati Gilbran Rahardian Heru Santoso Wahito Nugroho Ibnu Subarkah Inggit Septiyanto Noer Oemahati Izyan Farhana Zulkarnain Izyana Farhana Zulkarnain Khudzaifah Dimyati Krisnaldi Yitnugraha Krista Yitawati Krista Yitawati Mayang Widianti meirza aulia chairani Mohammad Krisna Wibowo Muhammad Candra Wijaya Ninik Mutiah Purwoko, Agus RETNO CATUR KUSUMA DEWI Retno Iswati Sarjiyati Sarjiyati Sarjiyati Sigit Sapto Nugroho Subadi Subadi Susiani Tri Wahyuningsh Taufiq Yuli Purnama Vivi Frita Trisnani Yashinta Mustika Wardani Yuni Purwati