Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

POSITIVISTIC LEGAL DIALECTICS - POSITIVISTIC POST (Comparative Study of Law Towards Legal Reform ucuk agiyanto
Khairun Law Journal Vol 5, No 1 (2021): September 2021
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Khairun University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33387/klj.v5i1.3760

According to the post-positivist figures, basically post-positivists exist to dissect the mistakes made by positivists. Positive law based on objective, empirical and rational nature and supported by systematic, procedural and formal models has become a strong mainstream in Indonesia. The main stream makes legal science feel narrow and underdeveloped. This creates legal problems in society. On the other hand, there are new ideas that carry post-positivism in the field of law with a subjective, abstract and irrational paradigm and supported by theology and God. To overcome the legal problems mentioned above, a comparative dialectic of law between positivistic and post-positivistic law is needed so that it can form a new paradigm in law with an objective-subjective, empirical-abstract, rational-irrational nature and supported by wise systematic, procedural and formal patterns..

Law Enforcement in Indonesia: Exploration of the Concept of Justice in Islamic Dimension with Pancasila Ideology Ucuk Agiyanto
Al-Hayat: Journal of Islamic Education Vol 2 No 2 (2018): Al-Hayat: Journal of Islamic Education
Publisher : Al-Hayat Al-Istiqomah Foundation

Law enforcement in Indonesia is still not going well and is so alarming. The problem of law enforcement (law enforcement) always tends to be the imbalance of dynamic interactions between legal aspects in expectations or das swollen, with elements of the application of the law in reality das sein. The weakness of law enforcement in Indonesia today can be reflected in various resolutions of significant cases that have not been completed, one of which is the practice of corrupt corruption, but ironically the main actors are very few who are legally enforced. This fact is precisely the best compared to some cases involving small people. Judging from the study of philosophy, the reflection of legal philosophy is done to be able to know the irregularities that exist in the application of the law in looking at the value orientation of justice that concerns the view of human life. Because the code must always be returned to its original purpose to create justice, this study discusses Sidharta's conception of building and legal systems in examining the problem of law enforcement in Indonesia. The research method used in this paper is descriptive research, which aims to investigate law enforcement in Indonesia in terms of the study of the philosophy of law and law enforcement seen from the concept of Sidharta in creating justice law. Penegakan hukum di Indonesia masih belum berjalan dengan baik dan begitu memprihatinkan. Permasalahan penegakan hukum (law enforcement) selalu bertendensi pada ketimpangan interaksi dinamis antara aspek hukum dalam harapan atau das sollen, dengan aspek penerapan hukum dalam kenyataan das sein. Lemahnya penegakan hukum di Indonesia saat ini dapat tercermin dari berbagai penyelesaian kasus besar yang belum tuntas, salah satunya adalah praktek korupsi yang menggurita, namun ironisnya para pelaku utamanya sangat sedikit yang terambah hukum. Kenyataan tersebut justru berbanding terbaik dengan beberapa kasus yang melibatkan rakyat kecil. Dilihat dari kajian filsafat, refleksi filsafat hukum dilakukan untuk dapat mengetahui kejanggalan-kejanggalan yang ada dalam penerapan hukum dalam menilik orientasi nilai keadilan yang menyangkut pandangan hidup manusia. Sebab hukum harus selalu dikembalikan kepada tujuan awalnya untuk menciptakan keadilan. Penelitian ini membahas konsepsi Sidharta tentang bangunan dan sistem hukum dalam mengkaji masalah penegakan hukum di Indonesia. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penulisan ini adalah penelitian deskriptif, yang bertujuan untuk mengkaji penegakan hukum di Indonesia ditinjau dari kajian filsafat hukum dan penegakan hukum dilihat dari konsep Sidharta dalam menciptakan hukum yang berkeadilan.

POSITIVISTIC LEGAL DIALECTICS - POSITIVISTIC POST (Comparative Study of Law Towards Legal Reform Ucuk Agiyanto
Khairun Law Journal Volume 5 Issue 1, September 2021
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Khairun University

According to the post-positivist figures, basically post-positivists exist to dissect the mistakes made by positivists. Positive law based on objective, empirical and rational nature and supported by systematic, procedural and formal models has become a strong mainstream in Indonesia. The main stream makes legal science feel narrow and underdeveloped. This creates legal problems in society. On the other hand, there are new ideas that carry post-positivism in the field of law with a subjective, abstract and irrational paradigm and supported by theology and God. To overcome the legal problems mentioned above, a comparative dialectic of law between positivistic and post-positivistic law is needed so that it can form a new paradigm in law with an objective-subjective, empirical-abstract, rational-irrational nature and supported by wise systematic, procedural and formal patterns..

POSITIVISTIC LEGAL DIALECTICS - POSITIVISTIC POST (Comparative Study of Law Towards Legal Reform Ucuk Agiyanto
Khairun Law Journal Volume 5 Issue 1, September 2021
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Khairun University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33387/klj.v5i1.3760

According to the post-positivist figures, basically post-positivists exist to dissect the mistakes made by positivists. Positive law based on objective, empirical and rational nature and supported by systematic, procedural and formal models has become a strong mainstream in Indonesia. The main stream makes legal science feel narrow and underdeveloped. This creates legal problems in society. On the other hand, there are new ideas that carry post-positivism in the field of law with a subjective, abstract and irrational paradigm and supported by theology and God. To overcome the legal problems mentioned above, a comparative dialectic of law between positivistic and post-positivistic law is needed so that it can form a new paradigm in law with an objective-subjective, empirical-abstract, rational-irrational nature and supported by wise systematic, procedural and formal patterns..

Cumulated Lawsuit And Tort: Legal Reasoning of Judges and Major Decision’s Ratio Decidendi (Study of Supreme Court Decision No. 575 K/Pdt/1983 and Supreme Court Decision No. 2686/Pdt/1985) Aries Isnandar; Vanka Lyandova; Yogi Prasetyo; Ferry Irawan Febriansyah; Alfalachu Indiantoro; Ucuk Agiyanto
Jurnal Jurisprudence Vol. 12, No. 2, December 2022
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23917/jurisprudence.v12i2.1332

ABSTRACT Purpose of Study: This research aimed at analyzing Supreme Court Decision No. 575 K/Pdt/1983 and Supreme Court Decision No. 2686/Pdt/1985 concerning cumulative lawsuits and tort according to the judge's legal reasoning. Methodology: This is library research using the normative juridical method. The approach used was the statutory approach. The statutory approach was carried out by analyzing Supreme Court Decision No. 575 K/Pdt/1983 and Supreme Court Decision No. 2686/Pdt/1985 in the context of the cumulative lawsuit and tort section. Result: This research found that even though unlawful acts and contracts are conventionally separated, there are still issues regarding overlapping understandings of the concepts of tort, cumulative lawsuit, and default in law. For example, there is an act by one party that, on the one hand, can be classified as an unlawful act, but it also has a contractual element. Similarly, one party’s actions have contractual consequences for the other party, but they can also result in liability based on tort. This condition causes several parties to accumulate lawsuits for unlawful acts and defaults at the same time. Supreme Court accepted the cumulative lawsuit in decision No. 575 K/Pdt/1983 and Supreme Court Decision No. 2686/Pdt/1985, indicating that it does not violate procedural law. Applications of this study: This research is useful for analyzing Supreme Court Decision No. 575 K/Pdt/1983 and Supreme Court Decision No. 2686/Pdt/1985. These Supreme Court decisions have a ratio decidendi or jurisprudence that a cumulative lawsuit is permitted and it does not violate procedural law. Novelty: There are no previous researchers who conducted a legal analysis of the Supreme Court's decision, even though the Supreme Court is the jurisprudence in cases or legal issues of cumulative lawsuits and tort. Keywords: Cumulation, Against the Law, Default, Decision, Ratio Decidendi ABSTRAK Tujuan: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis Putusan Mahkamah Agung No. 575 K/Pdt/1983 dan Putusan Mahkamah Agung No. 2686/Pdt/1985 tentang gugatan kumulatif dan perbuatan melawan hukum menurut penalaran hukum hakim. Metodologi: Penelitian kepustakaan ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif. Pendekatan yang digunakan adalah pendekatan Perundang-undangan. Pendekatan perundang-undangan dilakukan dengan menganalisis Putusan MA No. 575 K/Pdt/1983 dan Putusan MA No. 2686/Pdt/1985 dalam konteks gugatan kumulatif dan pasal perbuatan melawan hukum. Hasil: Penelitian ini menemukan bahwa meskipun perbuatan melawan hukum dan perjanjian dipisahkan secara konvensional, masih terdapat permasalahan mengenai tumpang tindih pemahaman tentang konsep gugatan, gugatan kumulatif, dan wanprestasi dalam hukum. Misalnya, ada perbuatan salah satu pihak yang di satu pihak dapat digolongkan sebagai perbuatan melawan hukum, tetapi juga mengandung unsur perjanjian. Demikian pula, tindakan satu pihak memiliki konsekuensi kontraktual bagi pihak lain, tetapi tindakan tersebut juga dapat mengakibatkan pertanggungjawaban berdasarkan kesalahan. Kondisi ini menyebabkan beberapa pihak menumpuk tuntutan atas perbuatan melawan hukum dan wanprestasi secara bersamaan. Mahkamah Agung menerima gugatan kumulatif dalam putusan No. 575 K/Pdt/1983 dan Putusan MA No. 2686/Pdt/1985, yang berarti tidak melanggar hukum acara. Aplikasi penelitian ini: Penelitian ini berguna untuk menganalisis Putusan Mahkamah Agung No. 575 K/Pdt/1983 dan Putusan Mahkamah Agung No. 2686/Pdt/1985. Putusan Mahkamah Agung ini memiliki ratio decidendi atau yurisprudensi bahwa gugatan kumulatif diperbolehkan dan tidak melanggar hukum acara. Kebaruan/Orisinalitas: Belum ada peneliti terdahulu yang melakukan analisis hukum terhadap putusan MA, padahal MA merupakan yurisprudensi dalam perkara atau permasalahan hukum kumulatif gugatan dan perbuatan melawan hukum. Kata kunci: Kumulasi, Melawan Hukum, Wanprestasi, Putusan, Rasio Decidendi

Kesenjangan Norma Hukum Perdata dan Praktik Sosial dalam Perjanjian Bagi Hasil Pertanian di Desa Tranjang Melani Dwi Andini; Ucuk Agiyanto; Aries Isnandar
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 15 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30652/dqxp1b60

This study aims to analyze the gap between civil law norms and social practices in the implementation of agricultural sharecropping agreements between landowners and cultivators in Tranjang Village, Siman District, Ponorogo Regency. The study employs a juridical- empirical approach by combining normative legal analysis of statutory provisions with empirical field research through observation and in- depth interviews with 15 informants consisting of landowners, cultivators, and village authorities. The findings reveal that most sharecropping agreements in Tranjang Village are conducted verbally based on mutual trust between landowners and cultivators, without written contracts or official authorization by village authorities. Such practices are rooted in agrarian social values emphasizing kinship and mutual cooperation, but do not fully comply with formal legal standards stipulated in Law No. 2 of 1960. This gap is caused by low legal awareness, complex and costly administrative procedures, social and cultural values that prioritize trust over formal rules, and the passive role of village government in facilitating contract registration. The study recommends revitalizing the role of village authorities in facilitating agricultural contracts through the provision of simple contract formats that can be legalized quickly and affordably, legal socialization with participatory local cultural approaches, and revision of Law No. 2 of 1960 to be more adaptive to the social realities of agrarian communities while ensuring legal protection for cultivators.

Tanggung Jawab Pelaku Usaha Atas Kualitas Produk Dan Kepuasan Konsumen: Studi Kasus Miss Daster Indonesia Revi Mariska; Ucuk Agiyanto; Ferry Irawan Febriansyah
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 15 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30652/p9jy9069

This quantitative study aims to analyze the influence of business actors’ responsibility on product quality and consumer satisfaction, with Miss Daster Indonesia as the research focus. In the digital commerce era, the increasing number of marketplace transactions requires business actors to ensure product quality, accurate information disclosure, and consumer rights protection. This research employs a quantitative survey approach involving respondents who have previously purchased Miss Daster Indonesia products through online marketplaces. A Likert-scale questionnaire was used to measure variables such as product information accuracy, product quality, after-sales service effectiveness, and consumer satisfaction levels. The collected data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and regression tests to determine the influence of independent variables on consumer satisfaction. The findings show that business responsibility reflected in the accuracy of product descriptions, material quality, and responsiveness of after-sales service significantly affects consumer satisfaction. However, several issues, such as product discrepancies and slow complaint handling, were still identified and negatively influenced consumer perceptions. These results highlight the need for improved consistency in product quality, transparent information, and faster complaint-response mechanisms to strengthen consumer trust and satisfaction.

Demokrasi Desa Menurut Mohammad Hatta: Gagasan Pemilu Kerakyatan di Indonesia Saepul Rochman; Hery Dwi Utomo; Ucuk Agiyanto; Iwan Mariono
Prosiding Seminar Nasional Program Doktor Ilmu Hukum 2022: Prosiding Seminar Nasional Program Doktor Ilmu Hukum [Edisi Khusus]
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Mohammad Hatta adalah salah satu proklamator Negara Republik Indonesia (NRI) dan tokoh yang memperkenalkan konsep demokrasi desa atau kerakyatan yang cenderung mengafirmasi negara federal. Dalam makalah ini akan dituliskan mengenai penerapan gagasan demokrasi desa dalam konteks pemilihan umum, khususnya pemilihan eksekutif dan legislatif yang disebut demokrasi kerakyatan. Metode penulisan menggunakan metode doktrinal (normatif) dengan pendekatan konseptual yaitu mengimplementasikan konsep demokrasi desa dalam pemilu eksekutif dan legislatif. Data diperoleh melalui dokumentasi dan inventarisasi yang dianalisis secara deskriptif dengan tujuan untuk menggambarkan hasil penelitian. Hasil kajian terhadap Demokrasi Desa menunjukan bahwa pemilu eksekutif dan legislatif berbasiskan permusyawaratan yang dilaksanakan secara bertingkat (plebisit). Pemilu Kerakyatan dilaksanakan melalui musyawarah perwakilan yang bermula dari Desa, Kecamatan, Kabupaten/Kota, Provinsi dan Pemerintahan Pusat. Demikian juga pemilihan legislatif dilaksanakan mulai dari Dewan Perwakilan Desa (DPR-Des), Dewan Perwakilan Kecamatan (DPR-K), Dewan Perwakilan Daerah Kabupaten/Kota (DPRD), Dewan Perwakilan Daerah Provinsi (DPRD-Prov) hingga Dewan Perwakilan Rakrat Republik Indonesia (DPR-RI). Hanyasaja kekurangan Pemilu Kerakyatan tidak lagi memposisikan Partai sebagai lembaga yang sepenuhnya mewakili kedaulatan rakyat.

Title

Found 8 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 8 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 8 Documents
Search