Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Zawiyah: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam Rausyan Fikr: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Ushuluddin dan Filsafat Rausyan Fikr: Jurnal Ilmu Studi Ushuluddin dan Filsafat
Amir Sahidin
Universitas Darussalam (UNIDA) Gontor Ponorogo Jawa Timur
Religion Humanities Social Sciences Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
PROBLEM OTENTITAS HADITS (Kritik Musthafa Azami terhadap Pemikiran Ignaz Goldziher) Abdul Rohman; Amir Sahidin; Yusuf Al Manaanu; Muhammad Nasiruddin
Zawiyah: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam Vol 7, No 1 (2021): Juli 2021
Publisher : IAIN Kendari

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31332/zjpi.v7i1.3008

Abstract

Makalah ini akan membahas mengenai keraguan Ignaz Goldziher atas keotentikan hadits Nabi. Dengan metodologi kritik historis dia meragukan keotentikan hadits. Pandangan ini tentunya membuat kegelisahan bagi sarjana Muslim, karena sudah menjadi kesepakatan bahwa hadits adalah sumber hukum Islam kedua. Untuk menjawab keraguan tersebut Musthafa Azami melakukan kritik terhadap pemikirannya. Oleh karenanya penulis akan membahas tentang kritik Musthafa Azami terhadap pemikiran Ignaz Goldziher terkait keotentikan hadits. Artikel ini berjenis studi pustaka (library research). Dengan metode kualitatif dan pendekatan deskriptif-analisis kritis dapat disimpulkan beberapa hal penting: Pertama, pernyataan Goldziher bahwa kodifikasi hadits baru dilakukan setelah beberapa abad wafatnya Nabi itu tidak benar, karena sudah ada beberapa sahabat yang mencatat hadits Nabi meskipun sedikit; Kedua, hadits hanyalah refleksi doktrinal dari perkembangan politik itu tidak tepat, karena tidak ditemukannya data yang otentik dari apa yang dipaparkan Goldziher; Ketiga, tuduhan pelarangan penulisan hadits itu keliru, karena faktanya Nabi hanya melarang jika hadits ditulis dalam satu tempat bersama ayat al-Qur’an untuk menghindari tumpang-tindihnya hadits dengan ayat al-Qur’an; Keempat, tudingan bahwa ahli hadits hanya berfokus pada kritik sanad itu salah, karena sejak dahulu terdapat dua tradisi kritik hadis yakni kritik sanad dan kritik matan yang keduanya tidak dapat dipisahkan dalam menentukan keshahihan hadis.
قضية خلق القرآن عند الجبرية والمعتزلة وأهل السنة : (دراسة مقارنة نقدية) Amir Sahidin; Abdul Rohman
Rausyan Fikr: Jurnal Ilmu Studi Ushuluddin dan Filsafat Vol. 17 No. 2 (2021): Juli - Desember 2021
Publisher : Fakultas Ushuluddin, Adab dan Dakwah, Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Datokarama Palu, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (591.464 KB) | DOI: 10.24239/rsy.v17i2.766

Abstract

The discussion of khalqul qur'an is a very crucial issue among the Mutakallimin. The Jabariyyah and Mu'tazilah groups say that the Qur'an is a creature in order to purify Allah from human-like characteristics. In fact, saying khalqul qur'an (the Qur'an is a creature) is the same as negating the nature of God, in the form of kalam. Belief like this will lead to three imperatives: first, as if God as the essence of the nature is a creature. Second, Allah is a mute Rabb, while being mute is a deficiency trait. Third, Allah's knowledge is a creature, because the Qur'an is His knowledge, then how could Allah have created knowledge first in order to have knowledge. Therefore the scholars of the Ahli Sunnah are unanimously agreed that the Qur'an is kalamullah. Among the scholars of the Ahli Sunnah who are very firm in defending the beliefs of the Sunnah are Imam Ahmad bin Hanbal. He not only gave strong arguments, but also refuted the group that said khalqul qur'an with a solid rebuttal. Based on a qualitative method and a comparative critical approach, it was found that, first, Jabariyyah and Mu'tazilah agreed that the Qur'an was a creature. Second, the Sunnah experts in general and Imam Ahmad bin Hanbal in particular insist that the Qur'an is the kalamullah. Third, when their arguments are found, the strongest is the opinion of the Ahli Sunnah. The basis for this difference of opinion is based on their beliefs about the nature of Allah.
قضية خلق القرآن عند الجبرية والمعتزلة وأهل السنة : (دراسة مقارنة نقدية) Amir Sahidin; Abdul Rohman
Rausyan Fikr: Jurnal Ilmu Studi Ushuluddin dan Filsafat Vol. 17 No. 2 (2021): Juli - Desember 2021
Publisher : Fakultas Ushuluddin, Adab dan Dakwah, Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Datokarama Palu, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24239/rsy.v17i2.766

Abstract

The discussion of khalqul qur'an is a very crucial issue among the Mutakallimin. The Jabariyyah and Mu'tazilah groups say that the Qur'an is a creature in order to purify Allah from human-like characteristics. In fact, saying khalqul qur'an (the Qur'an is a creature) is the same as negating the nature of God, in the form of kalam. Belief like this will lead to three imperatives: first, as if God as the essence of the nature is a creature. Second, Allah is a mute Rabb, while being mute is a deficiency trait. Third, Allah's knowledge is a creature, because the Qur'an is His knowledge, then how could Allah have created knowledge first in order to have knowledge. Therefore the scholars of the Ahli Sunnah are unanimously agreed that the Qur'an is kalamullah. Among the scholars of the Ahli Sunnah who are very firm in defending the beliefs of the Sunnah are Imam Ahmad bin Hanbal. He not only gave strong arguments, but also refuted the group that said khalqul qur'an with a solid rebuttal. Based on a qualitative method and a comparative critical approach, it was found that, first, Jabariyyah and Mu'tazilah agreed that the Qur'an was a creature. Second, the Sunnah experts in general and Imam Ahmad bin Hanbal in particular insist that the Qur'an is the kalamullah. Third, when their arguments are found, the strongest is the opinion of the Ahli Sunnah. The basis for this difference of opinion is based on their beliefs about the nature of Allah.
Co-Authors Abdul Rohman Abdul Rohman Muhammad Nasiruddin Yusuf Al Manaanu