Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.556
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum LEGALITY DE LEGA LATA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kamaya: Jurnal Ilmu Agama Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum International Journal Reglement & Society (IJRS) Iuris Studia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum SOSEK: Jurnal Sosial dan Ekonomi ABDI SABHA (Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat) International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research of Higher Education (IJMURHICA)
Ummi Salamah Lubis
Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara
Religion Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 11 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 11 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Comparative Authority in the Execution of Administrative Court Decisions: Institutional and Compliance Mechanisms in Indonesia and Thailand Fahira, Helda; Lubis, Ummi Salamah
International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research of Higher Education Vol 9 No 2 (2026): (April) Theme Education, Religion Studies, Social Sciences, STEM and Economic Dev
Publisher : Islamic Studies and Development Center in Collaboration With Students' Research Center Universitas Negeri Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24036/ijmurhica.v9i2.558

Abstract

This study examines the comparative authority of administrative court decision enforcement in Indonesia and Thailand, focusing on institutional frameworks and compliance mechanisms. Employing a normative juridical method through literature review and statutory analysis, the findings reveal fundamental differences in institutional arrangements. Thailand has established the Legal Execution Department under the Ministry of Justice as a specialized body to enforce court decisions, whereas Indonesia lacks a dedicated execution institution. In terms of compliance, Thailand applies the doctrine of contempt of court, enabling the imposition of criminal sanctions such as imprisonment or administrative fines on non-compliant officials. Indonesia, by contrast, relies primarily on coercive fines (dwangsom), whose effectiveness remains limited. Both countries share the use of dwangsom as a coercive instrument, yet differ in judicial hierarchy: Indonesia operates a three-tier system (First Instance, Appeal, and Cassation), while Thailand maintains a two-tier system (Administrative Court of First Instance and Supreme Administrative Court). This comparative analysis provides recommendations for strengthening Indonesia’s administrative justice system, particularly through the establishment of an execution authority, to ensure effective protection of citizens’ rights.
Co-Authors Atikah Rahmi Fahira, Helda Hamidah Azzahra S Lubis Koto, Ismail Lubis, Hamidah Azzahra Nalil Khairiah Rahmat Ramadhani, Rahmat Rajarif Syah Akbar Simatupang Ramadhani, Rahmat Solly Aryza Taufik Hidayat Lubis Taufika, Ryan