Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.754
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal SALAM: Jurnal Sosial dan Budaya Syar-i Perspektif : Kajian Masalah Hukum dan Pembangunan Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia IJEBD (International Journal Of Entrepreneurship And Business Development) Jurnal Jatiswara JURNAL HUKUM dan KENOTARIATAN Sapientia Et Virtus YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains
Moh. Saleh
Department Of Law, Narotama University, Indonesia
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Health Professions Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 24 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 24 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
The validity of the Decree of Members of the Regional House of Representatives (DPRD) as a Credit Guarantee for the Bank Jatim Ita Primaria Lestari; Moh Saleh
YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains Vol. 16 No. 1 (2020): Juni
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Merdeka University Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Loans are one of the main functions of banks in their operations by asking for the surrender of collateral, problems arise if the decree of appointment of DPRD cannot be qualified as a collateral object. Then the bank must base Article 1b and 1c of the Decree of the Board of Directors of Bank Indonesia N 23/69 / KEP / DIR on February 28, 1991, concerning Credit Provision Guarantees stated that the bank's trust in the debtor's ability to repay the loan in accordance with what was promised. Article 3 The decree stipulates that guarantees can be in the form of goods, projects or claim rights financed with credit, and other items, securities or risk guarantees added as additional collateral. 2) Legal Position of Appointment of DPRD Member Decree Credit agreement at Bank Jatim is a binding guarantee (only as an authentic document that must be fulfilled), which arises because of the underlying agreement.
Juridical Implication of Falsification of Signature in Minutes of Deed of Notary Position (Study of the Supreme Court's Decision Number 1234 K / Pid / 2012) Reza Ardiyanto,S.H; Moh Saleh
YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains Vol. 16 No. 2 (2020): September
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Merdeka University Surabaya, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Problems in this study, first: how is the juridical implications forged the signatures on the minutes of the deed of the Notary on the Supreme Court judgment No. 1234 k / PID / 2012? Second, how is the legal effect of the Minuta Deed falsified by a notary? This study is normative, normative legal research. The study concluded, first: implications for the post of notary can be categorized into four (4) aspects namely,i) the implications of the engagement deed, ii) Aspects of the administrative office; iii) Professional Aspects of the Membership; vi), the criminal aspect. Second, as a result of the Law of Minuta certificates were forged by a Notary which resulted in deed only has the strength of evidence as the deed under hand, if the parties could prove the authentic act proficiency level in the trial court and resulted in the deed can be canceled and the strength of evidence as the deed under hand will not apply continuing involvement.
Notary Criminal Responsibility In Terms of Notary Workers Doing Criminal Following Letters Oktadevi Nurfildzah; Moh Saleh
YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains Vol. 16 No. 2 (2020): September
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Merdeka University Surabaya, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Writing this journal aims to analyze and examine how accountability notary in the case of workers committed the crime of forgery. In Article 1, paragraph 1 of Law notary mention that Notary Public Officials authorized to make authentic act and have more authority as referred to this Act or under another Act. Notary otherwise authorized by the attribution of the State through Law Notary. That is, authority attached to office of notary. Carrying out his duties as well as the Notary Public in general assisted by Notary workers. In terms of preparing everything what is needed in the manufacture of an authentic deed. One of the documents tobe prepared by notary public workers is letter. Notary workers only be assistance in carrying out his job. Responsibility for authentic act remains the responsibility of notary. If the workers notary committed the crime of forgery that resulted his disability certificate is authentic, then it possible the notary must responsible. Forgery that can occur because the fake letter, fake powers and authority of the contents of the letter. Forms Criminal Liability Notary notary worker if proof acriminal act of forgery is acriminal participation in the crime of forgery contained in Article 55 Juncto Article 263 paragraph 1 and (2) Penal Code or Article 264 or Article 266 of the Criminal Code, and Article 56 paragraph 1 and Article 263 paragraph 1,2 Penal Code or Article 264 or 266 of the Criminal Code. Because Notary considered negligent in carrying out his duties as well.
Due To The Law On The Purchase of Land Rights That Have Not Been Certified If Bound By The Government Ah City of Surabaya (Case Study Number: 678 K/PID.SUS/2019 Jo 87/Pid.Sus/TPK/2018/PN.Sby Abror Prima Putra; Moh.Saleh
YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains Vol. 17 No. 2 (2021): September
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Merdeka University Surabaya, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The immovable property belongs to the state while related to administration, the control of the institution is used with the term “in beheer” or “in control” where this can be evidence that the land parcel is under the control of a certain institution, and certain institutions are said to have a budget which appears from the government to finance the maintenance of the land parcels. Land is state or regional property, if this land is purchased or obtained at the expense of the APBN/APBD, or the land comes from other legitimate acquisitions, for example obtained through a grant/contribution, obtained as law or obtained based on court decisions that have legally binding. The purpose of being published is for the benefit of the right holder based on physical data and juridical data as registered in the land book. Meanwhile, uncertified land is land that does not have valid proof as a strong means of evidence regarding the physical data and juridical data contained.
Authority of Notary To Make A Declaration As A Condition For Anyone To Be An Organ Recipient / Recipient Anita Christiana; Moh Saleh
YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains Vol. 17 No. 2 (2021): September
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Merdeka University Surabaya, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

life of a human being is very valuable, as an effort to save someone from a disease or any cause, the method of organ transplantation is used which is a medical action based on religious, social, cultural values ​​while still referring to the rule of law. The rules regarding organ transplants have been regulated in statutory regulations to ensure legal certainty for the implementation of organ transplants and to avoid things that are against the law. Legislations give authority to notaries in making deed of statements as a prerequisite for registering prospective recipients. There are legal issues that can be drawn from this problem, namely the legal aspects of transplanting human organs and their supervision based on statutory regulations and the authority of a notary in making a statement deed as a prerequisite for someone to become a recipient. This type of research in legal research is normative legal research, which is a process to find legal rules, legal principles, and legal doctrines in order to answer legal issues at hand. The results of the study require a statement deed for prospective recipients, so both recipients and donors are expected not to provide funds and not make other agreements, this is purely a form of help.
Respect For Individual Limited Company (MSMEs) For Pailit Decision Sabrina Isnintias; Moh.Saleh
YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains Vol. 17 No. 3 (2021): December
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Merdeka University Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55173/yurisdiksi.v17i3.111

Abstract

Ratification of Law Number 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation (Job Creation Law) brings blessings to Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs) entrepreneurs. Because it provides convenience, protection, and empowerment to MSMEs, it is one of the objectives of the creation of the Job Creation Law which is outlined in the form of a derivative, namely Government Regulation (PP) Number 8 Year 2021. The Job Creation Law is one of the breakthroughs of the Indonesian Government to restore a sluggish economy during the Covid-19 Pandemic, many business sector sectors were hindered and suffered many losses due to the pandemic situation. The PP explains that a Limited Liability Company can be established by 1 (one) founder, specifically PT. Individuals (MSMEs), where this provision raises various questions, one of which is a form of responsibility to a third party (BANK) if PT Individuals (MSMEs) are declared In a state of bankruptcy, the purpose of this study is to identify and analyze the legal aspects of PT Perseorangan's bankruptcy settlement. The benefits of this research are addressed to individual PT directors and legal experts who face similar cases.
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI PEMBELI PROPERTI PERUMAHAN TERHADAP ADANYA PERBEDAAN LUAS OBJEK TANAH YANG ADA DI SERTIPIKAT DENGAN AKTA JUAL BELI YANG DIBUAT OLEH NOTARIS Dameria Tiodora Siahaan; Moh. Saleh
Perspektif Vol 27, No 2 (2022): Edisi Mei
Publisher : Institute for Research and Community Services (LPPM) of Wijaya Kusuma Surabaya University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30742/perspektif.v27i2.821

Abstract

Pertumbuhan penduduk yang semakin meningkat diikuti kebutuhan pembangunan perumahan yang semakin melonjak. Pengembang merencanakan pembagian luas tanah sesuai program yang akan ditawarkan kepada konsumen dengan luas tanah yang dibuat dalam Perjanjian Jual Beli. Jual beli antara Pengembang dan Konsumen lazimnya dimuat dalam perjanjian, dicatat dan dituangkan dalam bentuk Akta Jual Beli yang dibuat oleh Notaris/PPAT. Permasalahan hukum yang diangkat dalam penelitian ini adalah keabsahan akta yang tidak sesuai dengan akta jual beli dan perlindungan hukum bagi pembeli perumahan. Metode penelitian menggunakan metode pendekatan normatif dan pendekatan kasus, dengan menggunakan peraturan perundang-undangan yang memadukan antara peraturan perundang-undangan terkait dengan analisis kasus yang ada. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah menganalisa cara dan kelengkapan keabsahan sertipikat yang tidak sesuai dengan Akta Jual Beli dan Perlindungan Hukum bagi Pembeli Pengembang Perumahan. Sertipikat yang diterbitkan oleh Badan Pertanahan Nasional tidak sesuai dengan akta jual beli mengenai luas tanah, sertipikat tersebut tetap berlaku berdasarkan kewenangan yang dimiliki oleh BPN. Namun, eksposisi penerbitan sertipikat tersebut tidak prosedural, karena tidak melalui beberapa tahapan sesuai dengan hukum positif yang berlaku.The increasing population growth is followed by the increasing need for housing development. The developer plans the distribution of land area according to the program that will be offered to consumers with the land area made in the Sale and Purchase Agreement. The sale and purchase between the Developer and the Consumer is usually contained in an agreement, recorded and stated in the form of a Sale and Purchase Deed made by a Notary/PPAT. The legal issues raised in this study are the validity of the deed that is not in accordance with the deed of sale and purchase and legal protection for housing buyers. The research method uses a normative approach and a case approach, using laws and regulations that combine laws and regulations related to the analysis of existing cases. The results of this study are to analyze the method and completeness of the validity of the certificate that is not in accordance with the Sale and Purchase Deed and Legal Protection for Buyers of Housing Developers. The certificate issued by the National Land Agency is not in accordance with the deed of sale and purchase regarding the land area, the certificate remains valid based on the authority possessed by the BPN. However, the exposition of the certificate issuance was not procedural, because it did not go through several stages in accordance with the applicable positive law. 
COVERNOTE NOTARIS PPAT DALAM PERJANJIAN KREDIT PERBANKAN BERUJUNG PIDANA Awinda Nur Warsanti; M. Saleh
Jurnal Hukum dan Kenotariatan Vol 6, No 2 (2022)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (219.962 KB) | DOI: 10.33474/hukeno.v6i2.15720

Abstract

 Covernote merupakan surat keterangan yang dibuat oleh Notaris/PPAT pada Bank yang akan memberikan fasilitas kredit, sehingga timbul kepercayaan antara Bank dengan Nasabah/Debitur. Namun seiring maraknya penerbitan covernote yang berhubungan dengan perjanjian kredit terdapat persoalan hukum yang muncul hingga berujung pidana. Dalam penelitian ini penulis tertarik untuk mengkaji/menganalisa sejauh mana solusi dan mitigasi pembuatan covernote Notaris/PPAT. Metode Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normative mengacu kepada teori-teori, norma-norma, asas-asas yang terdapat dalam peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku sebagai landasan normative, dan penelitian ini bersifat deskriptif analitis, dengan yang berorientasi pada pemecahan masalah yang berkaitan dengan permasalahan yang akan dibahas. Kesimpulan pada penelitian ini Dari terbitnya Covernote tersebut, timbulah akibat hukum dan konsekuensi  hukum apabila Notaris/PPAT terlibat dalam pencairan fasilitas kredit dari Nasabah/Debitur kepada Kreditur/Bank dengan memberikan keterangan yang tidak sebenarnya  dalam menerbitkan covernote  akan berujung pidana, Maka Notaris/PPAT dalam menjalankan fungsi jabatannya harus berpegang teguh pada Sumpah Jabatan, Kode Etik, dan UUJN agar terhindar dari permasalahan hukumyang berujung pada pidana.Kata Kunci : Covernote, Notaris, PPAT, Perjanjian Kredit. Covernote is a statement made by a Notary/PPAT at a Bank that will provide credit facilities, so that trust arises between the Bank and the Customer/Debtor. However, along with the proliferation of covernote issuances related to credit agreements, there are legal issues that arise which can lead to criminal prosecution. In this study, the author is interested in studying/analyzing the extent of the solution and mitigation of making a Notary/PPAT covernote. This research method uses a normative juridical approach referring to the theories, norms, principles contained in the applicable laws and regulations as a normative basis, and this research is descriptive analytical, with a problem solving orientation related to the problem. will be discussed. Conclusions in this study From the publication of the Covernote, legal consequences and legal consequences arise if a Notary/PPAT is involved in disbursing credit facilities from a Customer/Debtor to a Creditor/Bank by providing false information in issuing a covernote which will result in a criminal offence. To carry out the function of his position, he must adhere to the Oath of Office, the Code of Ethics, and the UUJN in order to avoid legal problems that can lead to crime.Keywords: Covernote, Notary, PPAT, Credit Agreement.
PERAN NOTARIS DALAM PERJANJIAN KERJASAMA KEMITRAAN DI INDONESIA Rizky Rubyansyah; M. Saleh
Jurnal Hukum dan Kenotariatan Vol 6, No 2 (2022)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (287.029 KB) | DOI: 10.33474/hukeno.v6i2.13857

Abstract

 Penelitian ini membahas mengenai perjanjian sebagai salah satu bentuk instrumen yang sangat penting dalam aspek hukum bisnis, salah satunya dalam bisnis dalam kerjasama kemitraan .Oleh sebab itu dalam pembuatan perjanjian kerjasama kemitraan diperlukan persyaratan yang sesuai dengan peraturan yang berlaku. Dalam penerapannya sering melibatkan Notaris. Metode Penelitian hukum ini yaitu penelitian yuridis normatif, yaitu penelitian yang didasarkan pada pelaksanaan dalam upaya mendapatkan data primer yang didahului dengan meneliti bahan pustaka berupa buku-buku, artikel dan literatur lainnya untuk mendapatkan data sekunder, untuk menjawab permasalahan hukum yang dianalisis dengan menggunakan beberapa pendekatan yang akan menjawab permasalahan yaitu pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach) dan pendekatan konseptual (conceptual approach). Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menjelaskan kedudukan hukum perjanjian kerjasama kemitraan adalah sah dan karenanya perjanjian tersebut menjadi undang-undang bagi yang membuatnya, dan mengikat kedua belah pihak dan perjanjian tersebut merupakan perjanjian timbal balik yang baku karena masing-masing pihak mempunyai hak dan kewajiban yang sama mengedepankan pada keuntungan bersama. Dan memberikan penjelasan peran serta fungsi Notaris dalam pembuatan perjanjian kerjasama kemitraan.Kata-Kunci: Perjanjian, Kerjasama kemitraan, Notaris. This study discusses the agreement as a form of instrument that is very important in the legal aspect of business, one of which is in business in partnership cooperation. In its application it often involves a Notary. This legal research method is normative juridical research, namely research based on implementation in an effort to obtain primary data which is preceded by researching library materials in the form of books, articles and other literature to obtain secondary data, to answer legal problems which are analyzed using several approaches. that will answer the problem, namely the statutory approach and the conceptual approach. This study aims to explain the legal position of the partnership agreement is valid and therefore the agreement becomes law for those who make it, and binds both parties and the agreement is a standard reciprocal agreement because each party has the same rights and obligations prioritizing on mutual benefit. And provide an explanation of the role and function of the Notary in making a partnership agreement.Keywords: Agreement, Partnership, Notary.
Strength And Guarantee of Legal Certificate of Written Evidence After The Issuance of Permen ATR No. 6 Years 2018 Mohammad Saleh; Susakti Wibowo; Reinhard Yeremia
YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains Vol. 18 No. 1 (2022): June
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Merdeka University Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55173/yurisdiksi.v18i1.132

Abstract

Research with the topic of Strength and Guarantee of Legal Certainty of Certificates as Written Evidence after the issuance of Ministerial Regulation No. ATR. 6 of 2018, referring to the principle of publicity which is used to test the strength of proof of certificates, namely strong or not strong and absolute or not absolute, there is a ambiguity between land registration based on PP. 24 of 1997 according to Article 26 paragraph (1) PP No. 24 of 1997, notification to the public for 60 (sixty) days and the principle of publicity Article 11 paragraph (1) Permen ATR No. 6 of 2018 for 14 (fourteen) working days. The matter at issue is related to the strength and guarantee of legal certainty for the certificate as written evidence. Research using the approach to legislation and a concept approach obtained a conclusion, that: The principle of publicity in PP no. 24 of 1997 for a period of 60 working days and Permen ATR No. 6 of 2018 for 14 working days, both have not guaranteed legal certainty because the publications used are negative leading to positive, where the registrant is considered the owner and other parties can still file a cancellation lawsuit as long as they can prove that the registrant registered the land in bad faith.
Co-Authors Abror Prima Putra Agus Setia Wahyudi Agus Setia Wahyudi Agus Sukoco Andys Karismawan Ani Wulandari Anita Christiana Any Palaud Arasy Alimudin Awinda Nur Warsanti Dameria Tiodora Siahaan Dian Yunari Dwi Fajra Fakhrizal Handriono Ita Primaria Lestari Izack Rahareng Oktadevi Nurfildzah Petty Febrian Reinhard Yeremia Reza Ardiyanto,S.H Rizky Rubyansyah Rusdianto Sesung Sabrina Isnintias Sri Wiwoho Mudjanarko, Sri Wiwoho Susakti Wibowo Tirta Arista Kumara