Dinny Wirawan Pratiwie
Universitas Widya Gama Mahakam Samarinda

Published : 9 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 9 Documents
Search

PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN KEPALA DESA KARANG TUNGGAL KECAMATAN TENGGARONG SEBERANG KABUPATEN KUTAI KARTANEGARA DALAM HAL PENGELOLAAN KEUANGAN DAN ASET DESA (DITINJAU DARI UNDANG-UNDANG REPUBLIK INDONESIA NOMOR 6 TAHUN 2014 TENTANG DESA) Andreas Susanto Marbun; Dinny Wirawan Pratiwie
Yuriska: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 10 No. 2 (2018): August
Publisher : Law Department, University of Widya Gama Mahakam Samarinda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24903/yrs.v10i2.351

Abstract

The Unitary Republic of Indonesia's Republic of Indonesia in organizing the system of government embraces the principle of Decentralization by providing opportunities and freedom to the regions to organize Regional Autonomy. Indonesia is a regional entity consisting of central government and local government, as regulated in the provisions of Article 18 paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution which states that the Unitary State of the Republic of Indonesia is divided into provinces and provinces are divided into districts and city, where each province, district, and city have local government, which is regulated by law. The district / municipality government comprises the subdistrict area, and each sub-district has village / village in it, the village's new face becomes the hope of accompanying the establishment of Law No. 6 of 2014 on the Village which becomes the starting point of the village's hope to be able to determine the position, role and authority over himself so that the village can be politically and politically swayed as the foundation of village democracy, as well as economically and culturally dignified as the face of village self-reliance and rural development. Article 26 has given the village chief the opportunity to manage the finances and assets owned by the village. The stages of the village financial management have been regulated by the Minister of Home Affairs Regulation No. 113 of 2014 on Village Financial Management, and the Regulation of the Minister of Home Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia No. 1 of 2016 on Village Asset Management regulates the procedures for managing village assets. The management of village finances and assets can’t be separated from the ability of the Village Head and other village apparatus. The responsibility of the Village Head in managing village finances and assets properly, transparently and in accordance with applicable laws and regulations is necessary to promote the development and economy of the village, including Karang Tunggal village as one of government under Kutai Kartanegara.
Efektifitas Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Perilaku “Ngelem” Pada Anak Remaja Sebagai Pelaku Sekaligus Korban (Self Victimizing) Di Kawasan Kampung Zombie Kota Samarinda Dinny Wirawan Pratiwie; Ayu Linanda
Yuriska: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 11 No. 1 (2019): February
Publisher : Law Department, University of Widya Gama Mahakam Samarinda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24903/yrs.v11i1.453

Abstract

Keberadaan salah satu kawasan kampung di wilayah Kota Samarinda yang menjadi pusat atau markas dari anak remaja untuk melakukan aktivitas menghisap lem,  yang sebelumnya dikenal dengan istilah Kampung Zombie, terletak di Kelurahan Mangkupalas, Kecamatan Samarinda Seberang Kota Samarinda, menjadi sebuah fenomena sosial yang cukup memprihatinkan. Dalam menyikapinya, diperlukan korelasi yang bersinergi dengan semua stakeholder dalam rangka mewujudkan efektifitas penegakan hukum terhadap perilaku ngelem pada anak remaja melalui upaya-upaya penegakan hukum terhadap perilaku “ngelem” yang menjadi tolak ukur keberhasilan penegakan hukum pada perilaku anak remaja “ngelem” sebagai pelaku sekaligus korban (self victimizing) khususnya di Kawasan Kampung Zombie, Kota Samarinda.
ANALISIS YURIDIS PENGAMBILALIHAN SAHAM PT PRIMA TOP BOGA OLEH PT NIPPON INDOSARI CORPINDO, TBK DARI PERPEKTIF UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 5 TAHUN 1999 (Studi Kasus Putusan Komisi Pengawas Persaingan Usaha Nomor: 07/KPPU-M/2018) Suradiyanto suradiyanto; Dinny Wirawan Pratiwie
Yuriska: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 11 No. 2 (2019): August
Publisher : Law Department, University of Widya Gama Mahakam Samarinda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24903/yrs.v11i2.521

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to review and analyze the legal consequences of acquisitions made on limited liability companies; and based on theconsiderations used by KPPU to determine that PT Nippon Indosari Corpindo, Tbk. Has violated Law Number 5 of 1999 .This research is normative legal research. Secondary data collection in library research is done by studying documents. The data analysis method used in this study is descriptive and analyzed qualitatively.The results of this study are: (1) Acquisition or Acquisition of Limited Liability Companies can also provide legal consequences affecting the Limited Liability Company. The legal consequences referred to in the Limited Liability Company are the legal consequences both institutionally, namely shareholders, employees, and third parties, as well as the legal consequences of certain parties, especially to third parties or creditors from the acquired limited liability company. In practice that has happened so far, the status of creditors' receivables in a limited liability company that has been acquired is the responsibility of the new Shareholders ; and (2) In the reading of the decision it was also explained that the reported party had acquired / taken over shares of PT Prima Top Boga on January 24, 2018, amounting to 32,051 shares (issuance of new shares) taken over by adding capital worth Rp31,499,722,800 , 00 (thirty one billion four hundred ninety nine million seven hundred twenty thousand eight hundred rupiahs) by Pt Nippon Indosari Corpindo, Tbk. After a long process, through the Merger Directorate, it was conveyed that based on the calculation of calendar days, notices of the takeover of shares of the PT Prima Top Boga company should be notified to the Commission no later than March 23, 2018. However, the reported report took place on March 29, 2018. In accordance with PP No. 57 of 2010 that the reported party is obliged to notify the Commission of the acquisition of shares no later than 30 (thirty) working calendar days from the date the juridically effective Business Entity, Business Entity Consolidation or Takeover of Company Shares are effective.  
Perlindungan Hukum Persaingan Usaha Terhadap Indikasi Persekongkolan Tender Jack Up Drilling Rig Services Antara HUSKY-CNOOC MADURA LIMITED Dengan PT COSL INDO (Analisis Putusan KPPU No. 03/KPPU-L/2016) suradiyanto suradiyanto; Dinny Wirawan Pratiwie
Yuriska: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 12 No. 1 (2020): February
Publisher : Law Department, University of Widya Gama Mahakam Samarinda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24903/yrs.v12i1.824

Abstract

Conspiracy use various way for coordinate activities they like through settings production, determination price horizontally, collusive tendering, division area, division consumer as a non-territorial, and division share market, even though similarly we need realize it that effective conspiracy it is not easy for achieved. However there trend the perpetrators business will always attempted maximizing profit his company respectively. Must there is some requirement in occurrence a conspiracy is must existence deal agreement or collusion between perpetrators effort. There is two form collusion in conspiracy, namely: collusion explicit, where the member communicate and coordinate deal they on real/live can declared with some document agreement already they agree, the data regarding the joint audit, management conspiracy, policies-policies writing, sales data and other data. There is also collusion secretly, where the perpetrators business member conspiracy no communicate on blatant, usually meetings too held on secret. And regular use as the media is association industry, so meetings member conspiracy camouflaged with legal meetings such as meeting associations. Form the second collusion this very difficult for detected by enforcer law. However experience from various country prove that at least 30% of conspiracy is involve associations.
Pembuktian Penyalahguna Narkotika Dalam Rangka Penerapan Asas Restorative Justice: (Studi Perkara Tindak Pidana Nomor: 396/Pid.Sus/2021/PN Smr) Rustiana; Dinny Wirawan Pratiwie
Yuriska: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 14 No. 2 (2022): Agustus
Publisher : Law Department, University of Widya Gama Mahakam Samarinda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24903/yrs.v14i2.1001

Abstract

Kejahatan narkotika saat ini terus mengalami perkembangan bahkan telah menyerang segala bidang kehidupan apalagi saat ini banyak melibatkankan generasi muda. Teori restorative justice merupakan salah satu teori dalam hukum untuk menutup celah kelemahan dalam penyelesaian perkara pidana konvensional yaitu pendekatan represif yang sebagaimana dilaksanakan dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis empiris yaitu bahwa dalam menganalisis permasalahan dilakukan dengan cara memadukan bahan-bahan hukum yang merupakan data sekunder dengan data primer yang diperoleh di lapangan yang berkaitan dengan pembuktian penyalahguna narkotika dalam rangka penerapan asas restorative justice. Hasil Penelitian Studi Kasus Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Nomor : 396/Pid.Sus/2021/PN Smr yang didakwa karena telah ditemukannya Narkotika jenis sabu - sabu yang beratnya seberat 0,62 gr (nol koma enam puluh dua) gram bruto atau yang tidak melebihi 1 gram, dan tujuan penggunaan Narkotika jenis sabu - sabu untuk diri sendiri seharusnya dilakukan assesment terlebih dahulu agar dapat di terapkannya keadilan restorative. Namun faktanya terlihat bahwa tidak semua orang yang kedapatan menggunakan Narkotika jenis sabu - sabu yang beratnya tidak melebihi 1 gram dengan tujuan penggunaan Narkotika jenis sabu – sabu tersebut untuk diri sendiri dapat dikategorikan sebagai penyalahguna atau pengguna. Kesimpulan pembuktian penyalahguna narkotika dalam rangka penerapan asas restorative justice dalam pelaksanaannya dalam sistem peradilan pidana Indonesia masih belum optimal. Upaya pembuktian terhadap penyalahguna atau pecandu adalah pembuktian jumlah Narkotika tidak melebihi dari yang ditentukan dalam Keputusan Dirjen Badilum MA No. 1691/DJU/SK/PS.00/12/2020, keterangan saksi-saksi saat dalam penyidikan, dan saksi yang melihat yang mengetahui dan mendengar bahwasanya seseorang itu telah mengkonsumsi narkotika.
Kajian Yuridis Unidroit Dalam Hukum Kontrak di Indonesia suradiyanto; Dinny Wiirawan Pratiwie
Yuriska: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 12 No. 2 (2020): August
Publisher : Law Department, University of Widya Gama Mahakam Samarinda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24903/yrs.v12i2.1378

Abstract

Tujuan dari prinsip UNIDROIT adalah untuk mengharmonisasikan hukum kontrak komersial di negara-negara yang ingin menerapkannya, sehingga materinya difokuskan pada persoalan yang dianggap netral. Ruang lingkup yang diatur oleh prinsip UNIDROIT adalah kebebasan berkontrak, mengingat asas kebebasan berkontrak dalam UNIDROIT ini berusaha untuk mengakomodasikan berbagai kepentingan yang diharapkan dapat memberikan solusi persoalan perbedaan sistem hukum dan kepentingan perekonomian lainnya. Kaidah-kaidah hukum memaksa (mandatory rules) yang diberlakukan oleh negara dalam hukum nasionalnya, atau untuk melaksanakan suatu konvensi internasional atau yang digunakan oleh sebuah organisasi internasional, tidak dapat dikesampingkan oleh asas-asas UNIDROIT. Bila para pihak memasukkan prinsip-prinsip UNIDROIT sebagai syarat dalam kontrak maka syarat-syarat itu tidak dapat mengesampingkan kaidah memaksa dari lex causae atau lex fori negara ketiga yang memiliki kaitan yang erat dengan kontrak. Bila (khususnya dalam proses arbitrase) asas-asas UNIDROIT diberlakukan sebagai hukum yang berlaku, maka UNIDROIT tidak dapat mengesampingkan kaidah-kaidah memaksa dari sistem hukum yang seharusnya berlaku berdasarkan pendekatan Hukum Perdata Internasional (HPI).
PENINDAKAN PELANGGARAN PEMILIHAN UMUM OLEH BADAN PENGAWAS PEMILU KOTA SAMARINDA Dinny Wirawan Pratiwie; Tumbur Ompu Sunggu; Gabriel Satw Satw
Yuriska: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 16 No. 2 (2024): Agustus
Publisher : Law Department, University of Widya Gama Mahakam Samarinda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24903/yrs.v16i2.3094

Abstract

Based on the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, the implementation of general elections is a reflection of the application of the concept of democracy which is emphasized in Article 1 paragraph (2) which reads "sovereignty is in the hands of the people and is implemented according to the Constitution", which is further confirmed in Article 22 E paragraph (1) which states that "general elections are held directly, publicly, freely and secretly". During elections, the possibility of violations or unlawful acts does not rule out the possibility. Bawaslu is an ad hoc institution formed during the first stage of the election, namely at the voter registration stage which begins and is disbanded after the candidates selected in the election have been inaugurated. An election supervisory committee (Panwaslu) was formed to supervise the election stages, receive complaints, and handle cases of administrative violations and criminal election violations. The approach method used is a doctrinal approach, using primary legal materials and secondary legal materials, which are then analyzed qualitatively and described. Forms of violations included in supervision by Bawaslu consist of Election Administration Violations, Election Crime Violations, Violations of the Code of Ethics. The form of action against election violations is basically that the City Bawaslu provides recommendations according to the level of the violation.
OPTIMALISASI PERAN KOMISI PENYIARAN INDONESIA DAERAH (KPID) DALAM MENGHADAPI TANTANGAN DI ERA DIGITAL Dinny Wirawan Pratiwie; Nainuri Suhadi
Yuriska: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 17 No. 1 (2025): Februari
Publisher : Law Department, University of Widya Gama Mahakam Samarinda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24903/yrs.v17i1.3311

Abstract

Background: The development of information and communication technology in the digital era has brought about quite significant changes in the world of broadcasting, both in terms of technical, regulatory and public consumption patterns of media. The presence of digital platforms such as streaming services, social media and other internet-based channels has challenged the existence of conventional broadcast media. This condition demands adaptation from broadcasting institutions and strengthening the role of institutions that supervise and regulate broadcasting, such as the Indonesian Broadcasting Commission (abbreviated as KPI). In East Kalimantan, the potential and challenges of digital broadcasting are increasingly visible with the increasing need for locally based information. However, if it is not balanced with clear regulations and synergy between stakeholders, local broadcasting could be threatened by digital content that is not in accordance with regional characteristics. Therefore, optimizing the role of Regional KPIs is very important to answer challenges in the digital era. Research Method: Research uses normative legal research methods, by examining applicable regulations or norms to find answers to the problems studied. The approach to this research is a statutory regulation approach. The legal materials used are primary legal materials in the form of statutory regulations. secondary legal materials in the form of journals, books and papers related to problems. Legal materials were collected using document studies and literature studies, while the data analysis technique used was qualitative analysis techniques. Findings: Increasing competition with digital platforms which come with all the ease of access and reach, has made KPID strive to increase synergy, especially with broadcasting institutions by accelerating the process of migrating analog broadcasts to digital in accordance with the mandate of the Job Creation Law as outlined in the Analog Switch Off (ASO) policy. With this policy, it requires adjustments to broadcasting regulations and institutional strengthening of KPI and KPID as independent broadcasting supervision institutions. Collaboration and coordination between KPID, broadcasting institutions and the government is increasingly strengthened, especially in terms of monitoring digital broadcast content. Conclusion: The Analog Switch Off policy is present in the context of digital information development, which influences aspects of broadcast supervision which is the task of KPID. Adjusting regulations and strengthening the Central KPI and KPID institutions is very important. Synergy between KPID, Regional Government and Broadcasting Institutions is an important point to optimize the role of broadcasting supervision. Synergy in terms of monitoring and developing content that is quality, educational and still represents local wisdom, as well as resolving disputes is the main key to facing broadcasting challenges in the digital era.
Teknik Penyusunan Peraturan Desa di Desa Manunggal Jaya Kecamatan Tenggarong Seberang, Kabupaten Kutai Kartanegara Wahyuni Safitri; Dinny Wirawan Pratiwie
Jurnal Abdimas Mahakam Vol. 3 No. 1 (2019): Januari
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24903/jam.v3i1.412

Abstract

Peraturan Desa tidak diatur dalam Undang-undang No.12 Tahun 2011 Tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-undangan tetapi pembentukan peraturan Desa diatur dengan Permendagri Nomor 111 Tahun 2014.  Adapun jenis peraturan di Desa ada 3 (tiga) yaitu : Peraturan Desa, Peraturan Bersama Kepala Desa dan Peraturan Kepala Desa. Pembentukan peraturan di Desa melalui tahapan : perencanaan, penyusunan, pembahasan, penetapan, pengundangan, penyebarluasan, evaluasi dan klarifikasi. Teknik penyusunan peraturan di Desa diatur dengan pasal 32 Permendagri No.111 Tahun 2014 tentang ketentuan mengenai teknik  penyusunan peraturan di Desa dan keputusan Kepala Desa sesuai dengan ketentuan Undang-Undang tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-undangan dan ketentuan teknis lebih lanjut mengenai tata cara penyusunan peraturan di Desa diatur dalam Peraturan Bupati/Walikota. Kerangka Penyusunan peraturan perundang-undangan mencakup Judul, Pembukaan, Batang Tubuh, Penutup, Penjelasan (jika diperlukan) dan lampiran (jika diperlukan).