Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL DIVERSITA Jurnal CENDIKIA ISNU Jurnal Sahabat ISNU SU Jurnal Cendikia ISNU SU
Khairunnisa Siregar
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Neuroscience Social Sciences

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
COPING STRESS PADA MAHASISWA YANG BEKERJA Rahmi Lubis; Nova Hapizsyah Irma; Rafika Wulandari; Khairunnisa Siregar; Nur Annisa Tanjung; Tia Agustina Wati; Miranda Puspita N; Diah Syahfitri
Jurnal Diversita Vol 1, No 2 (2015): JURNAL DIVERSITA DESEMBER
Publisher : Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Medan Area

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31289/diversita.v1i2.494

Abstract

This study aimed to describe the coping strategies by working students. Respondents are 5 working students. Data collected by interview and observation methods. The results showed that of the five respondents note that the source of stress is difficult to manage time on doing their tasks, workloads and schedules collide, and not easy to get permission to attend the classes. At respondents 2 and 5, less family support while respondents 4, co-workers who do not support. Respondents 5, there are transportation constraints. The coping strategies that do fifth respondent is to be open to the closest associates and families, assertive to the boss, and try to look at the issues more positively. In the second respondent also doing hobbies with friends and did not procrastinate. On 3 respondents anticipated by ditching college and make it a priority. In the fourth respondent, trying to avoid problems with sleep, surrender to God, and to receive advice from others. While the respondent 5, grateful and try to control his emotions. Can be seen on the respondents 1 and 3, their own colleagues and family support them so that they can solve the problems they face.Keyword: Working, Coping, Stress, College Student.
Legal Responsibility of Arbitrators and Arbitration Institutions in Cancelling Arbitration Awards Khairunnisa Siregar; Najwa Fadila; Nabila Putri Aulia; Randy Harahap; Mhd Imran Pradipta
Jurnal Sahabat ISNU SU Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): ISNU Sahabat Januari
Publisher : ISNU Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70826/jsisnu.v3i1.1253

Abstract

The annulment of an arbitration award in Indonesia is an exceptional legal mechanism and is strictly regulated in Article 70 of Law Number 30 of 1999 concerning Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution (AAPS Law). Although an arbitration award is final and binding, annulment can be carried out if forged documents, concealed decisive documents, or a decision born of deception are found. The submission mechanism is carried out in writing to the District Court within 30 days of the registration of the award, with supporting evidence. Arbitrators and arbitration institutions enjoy legal immunity, but liability can arise if there is a serious violation of the integrity of the process. This study discusses the legal basis for annulment, the forms of accountability of arbitrators and arbitration institutions, the submission mechanism, and the legal consequences of annulment of an award, to provide a comprehensive understanding of legal protection and legal certainty in arbitration.
Annulment of Arbitral Awards as an Extraordinary Legal Remedy: Distortion or Protection of Justice Khairunnisa Siregar; Nadilah Andini; Suci Hidayati Malau; Raja Muda Pahlevi Siregar; Ahmad Yasin Dongoran
Jurnal Cendikia ISNU SU Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): ISNU Cendikia Januari
Publisher : ISNU Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70826/jcisnu.v3i1.1304

Abstract

This paper examines the annulment of arbitral awards within the Indonesian legal system as an extraordinary legal remedy that intersects with the principles of arbitral autonomy and final and binding effect. The background of the study is grounded in the growing reliance on arbitration as an efficient and autonomous mechanism for resolving commercial disputes, alongside emerging controversies arising from judicial intervention in annulment proceedings. This research employs a normative legal method, using statutory and conceptual approaches. The research stages include identifying legal issues, collecting and classifying relevant legal materials, conducting normative analysis, and drawing deductive conclusions. The results and discussion demonstrate that Law Number 30 of 1999 strictly limits annulment to procedural defects of a fundamental nature, such as document forgery, decisive new evidence, or fraud, and does not permit substantive review of arbitral awards. However, judicial practice reveals interpretative inconsistencies that risk distorting arbitral finality. The study concludes that annulment should function as a procedural safeguard to protect justice without undermining the essence of arbitration.
Annulment of Arbitral Awards as an Extraordinary Legal Remedy: Distortion or Protection of Justice Khairunnisa Siregar; Nadilah Andini; Suci Hidayati Malau; Raja Muda Pahlevi Siregar; Ahmad Yasin Dongoran
Jurnal Cendikia ISNU SU Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): ISNU Cendikia Januari
Publisher : ISNU Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70826/jcisnu.v3i1.1304

Abstract

This paper examines the annulment of arbitral awards within the Indonesian legal system as an extraordinary legal remedy that intersects with the principles of arbitral autonomy and final and binding effect. The background of the study is grounded in the growing reliance on arbitration as an efficient and autonomous mechanism for resolving commercial disputes, alongside emerging controversies arising from judicial intervention in annulment proceedings. This research employs a normative legal method, using statutory and conceptual approaches. The research stages include identifying legal issues, collecting and classifying relevant legal materials, conducting normative analysis, and drawing deductive conclusions. The results and discussion demonstrate that Law Number 30 of 1999 strictly limits annulment to procedural defects of a fundamental nature, such as document forgery, decisive new evidence, or fraud, and does not permit substantive review of arbitral awards. However, judicial practice reveals interpretative inconsistencies that risk distorting arbitral finality. The study concludes that annulment should function as a procedural safeguard to protect justice without undermining the essence of arbitration.
Co-Authors Ahmad Yasin Dongoran Diah Syahfitri Mhd Imran Pradipta Miranda Puspita N Nabila Putri Aulia Nadilah Andini Najwa Fadila Nova Hapizsyah Irma Nur Annisa Tanjung Rafika Wulandari Rahmi Lubis Raja Muda Pahlevi Siregar Randy Harahap Suci Hidayati Malau Tia Agustina Wati