Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.835
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal Analytica Islamica Jurnal Komprehenshif Hukum Inovatif : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sosial dan Humaniora Politika Progresif : Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Humaniora Demokrasi: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Politik
Sukiati Sukiati
Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara Medan
Religion Humanities Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
Batas Usia Perkawinan dalam Hukum Islam dan Hukum Negara: Studi Perbandingan Antara Indonesia dan Malaysia Husnul Furqon; Sukiati Sukiati; Iwan Nasution
Politika Progresif : Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Juni : Politika Progresif : Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Humaniora
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/progres.v3i2.3149

Abstract

This study analyzes the minimum age of marriage in Islamic jurisprudence and compares it with the positive law regulations in Indonesia and Malaysia. Using a normative legal method with comparative and conceptual approaches, the study draws on primary sources, including the Qur'an, hadith, Law Number 16 of 2019 on Marriage in Indonesia, and the Islamic Family Law (Federal Territories) Act 1984 in Malaysia. The analysis focuses on how Islamic legal principles concerning marriage eligibility are interpreted and incorporated into contemporary legal frameworks in both countries. The findings reveal that Islamic jurisprudence (fiqh) associates marital readiness with the concept of baligh (puberty) without prescribing a specific numerical age, whereas state law establishes fixed minimum age requirements to safeguard the rights and welfare of women and children. Indonesia sets the minimum marriage age at 19 years for both males and females, while Malaysia prescribes 18 years for males and 16 years for females, with judicial dispensation available in both jurisdictions under certain circumstances. These legal arrangements demonstrate each country's effort to harmonize classical Islamic jurisprudence with contemporary social protection objectives through institutional ijtihad, reflecting a balance between religious principles, legal certainty, and public welfare in regulating marriage.
Analisis Faktor Penyebab Meningkatnya Angka Cerai Gugat di Mahkamah Syar’iyah Kutacane Irda Djesra Mukhdalifa; Sukiati Sukiati; Dhiauddin Tanjung
Hukum Inovatif : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sosial dan Humaniora Vol. 3 No. 3 (2026): Hukum Inovatif : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sosial dan Humaniora
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/humif.v3i3.3288

Abstract

This study was motivated by the increasing number of divorce petitions filed by wives at the Kutacane Syar’iyah Court in recent years, indicating challenges to family resilience and the effectiveness of resolving marital conflicts. This study aims to analyze the factors contributing to the rise in divorce petitions, examine their impact on society, and identify the judges’ considerations in deciding divorce cases at the Kutacane Syar’iyah Court. The research employed an empirical juridical approach. Data were collected through interviews with judges and court staff, case documentation, and literature review, and were analyzed using descriptive qualitative methods. The findings indicate that the increase in divorce petitions is influenced by several factors, including economic problems, husbands’ lack of responsibility, prolonged marital disputes, infidelity, domestic violence, and poor family communication. The increase in divorce petitions has social, psychological, and economic impacts on families, particularly on children's welfare. Judges base their decisions on facts presented during the trial, available evidence, applicable legal provisions, and the principle of public benefit to achieve justice for the parties involved. This study is expected to provide valuable input for strengthening family resilience and optimizing mediation efforts to reduce divorce rates.
A REVIEW OF QUR’ANIC VERSES ON MAHR IN ISLAMIC FAMILY LAW Nasywa Nabilah Nugroho; Sukiati Sukiati; Fatimah Fatimah
Journal Analytica Islamica Vol 15, No 1 (2026): ANALYTICA ISLAMICA
Publisher : Program Pascasarjana UIN Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30829/jai.v15i1.28521

Abstract

This study examines the concept of mahr in Islamic marriage by analyzing Qur’anic verses that affirm mahr as a fundamental right of women and a binding obligation upon men. Rather than viewing mahr solely as a normative legal requirement, this research highlights its function as an instrument of protection, welfare, and honor for women. Using a literature-based approach, the study explores key Qur’anic passages such as QS al-Nisā’ 4, QS al-Baqarah 237, and QS al-Nisā’ 24, supplemented with classical tafsīr and contemporary fiqh scholarship. The findings indicate that the Qur’an emphasizes that mahr must be given sincerely and through mutual agreement, reflecting core principles of justice, consent, and marital commitment. Beyond its material form, mahr carries symbolic and spiritual value, serving as a tangible expression of goodwill and respect. It also functions as a financial safeguard, particularly in cases of divorce. This research concludes that the Qur’anic framework of mahr remains highly relevant in addressing modern social, economic, and cultural challenges surrounding marriage practices, and provides a normative foundation for implementing mahr that is equitable, proportional, and conducive to the well-being of contemporary Muslim families.
Konstruksi Hukum Nafkah dalam Keluarga Islam: Analisis Tafsir Ayat-Ayat Waris Fadlan Harmein Harahap; Sukiati Sukiati; Fatimah Fatimah
Komprehensif Vol 4 No 1 (2026)
Publisher : CV Edu Tech Jaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Salah satu landasan utama hukum keluarga Islam, nafkah, erat kaitannya dengan pembagian keadilan di dalam rumah tangga, hubungan gender, dan sistem tanggung jawab. Konsep nafkah sering dipertanyakan dalam praktik sosial modern sebagai respons terhadap perubahan peran ekonomi yang dimainkan oleh suami dan istri. Melalui pendekatan interpretatif terhadap ayat-ayat warisan, esai ini bertujuan untuk mengeksplorasi struktur hukum nafkah dalam rumah tangga Islam. Secara khusus, esai ini meneliti hubungan normatif antara tanggung jawab nafkah dan konsep Al-Qur'an tentang pembagian harta. Dengan menggunakan ayat-ayat warisan dalam Surah al-Nisā' dan tafsir dari para mufassir klasik maupun modern, studi ini menerapkan metode kualitatif dengan pendekatan teologis-normatif dan analisis tafsir tematik (tafsir maudhu‘i). Karena pembagian warisan yang proporsional didasarkan pada kewajiban ekonomi yang terkait dengan laki-laki, hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa ayat-ayat warisan tidak dapat dipisahkan dari pembentukan kewajiban untuk memberikan dukungan finansial. Oleh karena itu, hukum keluarga Islam memandang keadilan sebagai hal yang fungsional rather than sekadar matematis. Untuk menjaga konsep keadilan substansial dalam dinamika keluarga Muslim kontemporer, penelitian ini menyoroti pentingnya pembacaan komprehensif dan kontekstual terhadap ayat-ayat hukum.
Dinamika Hak Asuh Anak di Negara Al- Jazair dan Indonesia: Analisis Perbandingan terhadap Regulasi dan Praktik Sosial Noer Zaini Khalis; Sukiati Sukiati; Iwan Iwan
Demokrasi: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Politik Vol. 3 No. 3 (2026): Juli : Demokrasi: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Politik
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/demokrasi.v3i3.1772

Abstract

This study analyzes the dynamics of child custody (hadhanah) in Algeria and Indonesia through a comparative examination of legal regulations and social practices in both countries. This topic is important because post-divorce child custody is closely related to the protection of children’s rights, legal certainty, and the application of the principle of the best interests of the child. The study employs a normative legal research method with a comparative law approach. Data were collected through a literature review of legislation, Islamic legal literature, scholarly articles, and relevant legal documents. The findings indicate that both Indonesia and Algeria use Islamic law as a foundation in regulating hadhanah, although their legal constructions differ. In Indonesia, the Compilation of Islamic Law prioritizes custody rights for mothers for children who are not yet mumayyiz. In contrast, Algeria, which is strongly influenced by the Maliki school of thought, provides more detailed rules regarding the hierarchy of custodians and custody conditions. In practice, both countries face similar challenges, including custody disputes after divorce, considerations of child welfare, and changes in modern family structures. Nevertheless, the best interests of the child remain the primary principle in custody decisions. The study concludes that differences in hadhanah regulations are shaped by variations in Islamic jurisprudence, national legal systems, and social contexts, highlighting the need to strengthen child protection mechanisms.
Co-Authors Dhiauddin Tanjung Fadlan Harmein Harahap FATIMAH FATIMAH Fatimah Fatimah Husnul Furqon Irda Djesra Mukhdalifa Iwan Iwan Iwan Nasution Nasywa Nabilah Nugroho Noer Zaini Khalis