Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.982
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL MAGISTER HUKUM UDAYANA Sosiohumaniora JURNAL LITIGASI (e-Journal) LAW REVIEW Jurnal Asy-Syari'ah Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Anterior Jurnal Kosmik Hukum Amwaluna Jurnal Ekonomi dan Keuangan Syariah Dialogia Iuridica Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Indonesian Journal of Social Science Research JUSTICIA SAINS: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Bandung Conference Series: Law Studies Amwaluna: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Keuangan Syariah
Yeti Sumiyati
Universitas Islam Bandung
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Medicine & Pharmacology Social Sciences Other

Published : 34 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Dialogia Iuridica

 1 
RELEVANSI PENGECUALIAN PRAKTIK MONOPOLI TERHADAP PERUSAHAAN BUMN DALAM MERGER TIGA BANK SYARIAH BUMN Chandra Manungsa Alit; Yeti Sumiyati
Dialogia Iuridica Vol. 13 No. 1 (2021): Journal Dialogia Iuridica Vol 13, No.1 Year 2021
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Maranatha Christian University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28932/di.v13i1.3618

Abstract

This study examines the following issues: first, whether the merger of 3 state-owned sharia banks is included in the criteria for monopolistic practice as an activity prohibited in the Law on monopolistic practices and unfair business competition. Second, what is the relevance of the provisions of the exclusion of monopolistic practices on BUMN in the Law on monopolistic practices and unfair business competition to the merger of 3 BUMN sharia banks. This study uses a normative juridical method. The results showed that the merger or merger of 3 state-owned sharia banks could potentially lead to monopolistic practices and unfair business competition as prohibited by Law Number 5 of 1999 concerning Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition.
PENERAPAN PRINSIP BUSINESS JUDGEMENT RULE TERHADAP DIREKSI ATAS PERBUATAN MELAWAN HUKUM KARYAWAN KARENA MENETAPKAN DISKON PEMBELIAN EMAS ANTAM SECARA SEPIHAK Indriyani Kusumawati; Yeti Sumiyati
Dialogia Iuridica Vol. 13 No. 1 (2021): Journal Dialogia Iuridica Vol 13, No.1 Year 2021
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Maranatha Christian University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28932/di.v13i1.3880

Abstract

Unlawful acts cannot be separated by a violation of one's rights. This research is based on the phenomenon of directors who are penalized for unlawful acts committed by their employees. In 2021, PT Antam appealed to the court because the board of directors felt aggrieved by the judge's decision to impose damages on the directors of PT Antam. In fact, those who do illegal acts to the detriment of consumers are Eksi Anggraeni and the two employees, Misdianto and Ahmad Purwanto through the lure of discounts without the approval of the company. Limited Liability Companies Law implicitly regulates the concept of legal protection that is already known in some countries, namely the principle of Business Judgement Rule. This principle can be used by directors as a basis for legal protection to achieve justice. Therefore, the purpose of this research is to review the responsibility of the board of directors for actions against employee law that stipulates discounts on the purchase of Antam gold unilaterally associated with the law of limited liability companies and review the application of the principles of Business Judgement Rule to directors who must be responsible for actions against the law of employees. The results of this study concluded that the directors of PT Antam cannot be held accountable. Furthermore, the application of the Business Judgement Rule principle has not been applied to this case, so legal protection to the board of directors is still ignored by the judge and has not shown justice.
Co-Authors Abdul Wahab Adinda Nabila Diva Pramestya Ali, Syuhaeda Aeni Mat Annisa Fitriyah Salsabila Arif Firmansyah Ashila Azzahra Darmawan Britney Azzahra Wiguna Budiyono Budiyono Caecielia Wagiono Chandra Manungsa Alit Devia Oktaviandra Devina Ambarani Diana Wiyanti Efik Yusdiansyah Hafidz Nur Indriyani Kusumawati Irma Sylviyani Herdian Jejen Hendar M. Faiz Mufidi Meisa Mohamad Iqbal Fauzi Mohamad Zen, Luthfi Mufidi, Faiz Mufidi, M. Faiz Muhammad Ilman Abidin Nandang Sambas Raden Nurul Fadlilah Roshadi Ramli, Taty A. Ratna Januarita Rimba Supriatna Rizki Aliah Yasmin Wibiksana Rusli K. Iskandar Sahnaz Adillah Fajriah Suhada, Ahmad Syauqi Suseno Adi Wibowo Syifa Khoerunnisa Tatty A Ramli Tatty A Ramli Tatty A Ramli, Tatty A Tatty A. Ramli Tatty AR Tatty Aryani Ramli Taty A. Ramli Tiara Salzhabilla Titik Vivi Nur Arzy Yoghi Arief Susanto Zalza Puti Kamila