Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

HUKUM PROGRESIF SEBAGAI PARADIGMA HUKUM DALAM PEMBERANTASAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI DI INDONESIA Muhammad Irwan; Slamet Sampurno Soewondo; Julianto Jover Jotam Kalalo
SOCIETAS Vol 7 No 1 (2018): Societas: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Dan Sosial
Publisher : Universitas Musamus, Merauke, Papua

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35724/sjias.v7i01.975

Abstract

This study aims to determine progressive law enforcement in an effort to eradicate corruption in Indonesia and the application of progressive law in the context of combating corruption in Indonesia. The type of research used, namely normative legal research. Data is obtained through primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. Data analysis was carried out qualitatively and presented descriptively. The results of this study indicate that (1) progressive law enforcement in the effort to eradicate corruption acts lies in the activities of aligning the values contained in the community then realizing those values into reality, where in its application is influenced by several factors including legal substance, structure law, legal culture, professionalism, and leadership. (2) A criminal act of corruption is a criminal act which is categorized as an extraordinary crime due to the impact of a very wide corruption, which is concerning the welfare of the people. KPK as a law enforcer must also be able to carry out more progressive and massive prevention and repression efforts so that it can minimize or even eradicate the nation's problems completely. In this case too, the KPK does not work alone, it also requires an active role of the community in carrying out preventive efforts for the realization of an anti-corruption community. Keywords: Law, Corruption, Progressive, Criminal.
HUKUM PROGRESIF SEBAGAI PARADIGMA HUKUM DALAM PEMBERANTASAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI DI INDONESIA Muhammad Irwan; Slamet Sampurno Soewondo; Julianto Jover Jotam Kalalo
SOCIETAS Vol 7 No 1 (2018): Societas: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Dan Sosial
Publisher : Universitas Musamus, Merauke, Papua

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35724/sjias.v7i01.975

Abstract

This study aims to determine progressive law enforcement in an effort to eradicate corruption in Indonesia and the application of progressive law in the context of combating corruption in Indonesia. The type of research used, namely normative legal research. Data is obtained through primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. Data analysis was carried out qualitatively and presented descriptively. The results of this study indicate that (1) progressive law enforcement in the effort to eradicate corruption acts lies in the activities of aligning the values contained in the community then realizing those values into reality, where in its application is influenced by several factors including legal substance, structure law, legal culture, professionalism, and leadership. (2) A criminal act of corruption is a criminal act which is categorized as an extraordinary crime due to the impact of a very wide corruption, which is concerning the welfare of the people. KPK as a law enforcer must also be able to carry out more progressive and massive prevention and repression efforts so that it can minimize or even eradicate the nation's problems completely. In this case too, the KPK does not work alone, it also requires an active role of the community in carrying out preventive efforts for the realization of an anti-corruption community. Keywords: Law, Corruption, Progressive, Criminal.
Analisis Normatif Kewenangan Peninjauan Kembali Oleh Kejaksaan Saputra, Imran Eka; Irwan, Muhammad; Rahman, Ali
Sawerigading Law Journal Vol. 1 No. 2 (2022): Maret 2022 - September 2022
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Sawerigading Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62084/slj.v1i2.222

Abstract

Mahkamah Konstitusi melakukan Uji Materil Pasal 263 ayat (1) KUHAP dengan memutuskan dalam putusan No. 33/PUU-XIV/2016 dengan menyatakan mengabulkan permohonan Pemohon bahwa Pasal 263 ayat (1) KUHAP` bertentangan dengan UUD 1945 secara bersyarat, yaitu sepanjang dimaknai lain selain yang secara eksplisit tersurat dalam norma a quo; Namun dalam Dalam Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 11 Tahun 2021 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia (selanjutnya disingkat UU 11/2021) Pasal 30C huruf h menentukan Kejaksaan mengajukan peninjauan kembali. Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi dituliskan dalam berita negara, sehingga putusan MK berkekuatan setara dengan UU. Oleh karena itu perumusan sebuah norma dalam perundang-undangan tidak dapat bertentangan dengan Putusan MK. Disisi lain putuan MK memiliki karakteristik final dan mengikat yang artinya sejak diputuskan di MK maka putusan MK tersebut menjadi undang-undang dan mengikat semua warga negara