Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

Implementasi PERMA No. 2 Tahun 2015 di Pengadilan Negeri Yogyakarta Bambang Sutiyoso; Ayu Atika Dewi; Fuadi Isnawan
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 26 No. 1: JANUARI 2019
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol26.iss1.art9

o overcome the barriers in the dispute settlement in court, the Supreme Court issued a new mechanism for the settlement of civil cases, called as simple civil claims. The procedure mechanism was introduced through the issuance of PERMA No. 2 of 2015 concerning Simple Civil Claim. The researcher in this study intended to observe the implementation of the PERMA of Simple Civil Claim in Yogyakarta DistrictCourt, along with the obstacles. The study was conducted using the empirical juridical research methodand analytical descriptive data analysis. From the research results, it can be concluded that the implementation of PERMA No. 2 of 2015 concerning Simple Civil Claim in Yogyakarta District Court is still ineffective in practice. This has been determined by various factors such as the rule of law, legal officers, facilities and infrastructure and community. The researcher also found a number of obstaclesfaced in implementing PERMA, some of which were related to the existence of options to choose the procedure mechanism, tight case qualifications that could be submitted through simple program procedures and lack of PERMA socialization.

PEMIHAKAN HAKIM TERHADAP KEADILAN SUBSTANTIF DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA KEPEMILIKAN TANAH Bambang Sutiyoso
Jurnal Yudisial Vol 5, No 3 (2012): MERENGKUH PENGAKUAN
Publisher : Komisi Yudisial RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29123/jy.v5i3.126

ABSTRAKTulisan ini mengkaji putusan hakim tingkat banding di Pengadilan Tinggi Yogyakarta dalam perkara perdata Nomor 44/PDT/2011/PTY terkait sengketa kepemilikan tanah. Pengkajian putusan dilakukan secara komprehensif, dengan mencermati kasus posisinya, dasar hukum yang digunakan, pertimbangan hukum, amar putusannya dan selanjutnya dilakukan analisis dengan merujuk pada data primer dan sekunder. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian, dapat dikemukakan beberapa kesimpulan. Pertama, putusan hakim secara umum telah mengikuti prosedur hukum acara perdata yang berlaku dan dapat membuktikan unsur-unsur yang ada dalam gugatan atau jawaban gugatan dengan berpedoman pada bukti-bukti yang diatur dalam hukum acara perdata. Kedua, putusan hakim telah mencerminkan penalaran hukum yang logis dalam pertimbangan hukumnya dan telah berupaya menggali nilai-nilai nonyuridis yang ada dalam masyarakat. Meskipun demikian, harus diakui dalam putusan tersebut belum sepenuhnya mengakomodasi sumber-sumber hukum secara lengkap, misalnya yurisprudensi dan doktrin. Terakhir, hakim banding dalam sikapnya ternyata lebih berpihak pada keadilan substantif dibandingkan keadilan prosedural. Hal ini dapat terlihat ketika akta jual beli tanah dalam kasus ini dianggap tidak sah dan memiliki kekuatan hukum karena akta jual beli Nomor 299/2008 yang dibuat di hadapan Notaris/PPAT itu diperoleh dengan surat kuasa mutlak yang substansinya bertentangan dengan Instruksi Menteri Dalam Negeri Nomor 14 Tahun 1992.Kata kunci: kepemilikan tanah, keadilan substantif.ABSTRACTThis article discusses a land ownership dispute revealed in decision of the Yogyakarta’s Appealate Court Number 44/PDT/2011 PTY. The author scrutinizes all aspects of the decision ranging from the fundamentum petendi, legal basis, petitum up to the dictum and enriches his analyses by using both primary and secondary data. He concludes that: (1) in general, this decision has been in line with all essentials of civil procedural law and the panel of judges has been succesful to disclose all elements of the arguments either those of the plantiff or of the defendant; (2) the decision shows the implementation of appropriate legal reasoning and the ability to explore living values in our society. Unfortunately, the panel of judges still presents it based upon a lack of references like precedential decisions and/or legal doctrines. In this case, the panel takes the substantive justice into account rather than procedural justice. This preference can be seen as the panel of judges ignores the validity of the notary public’s deed Number 2999/2008 in which it was conveyed based on the absolute power of attorney that is considered against the Home Affairs Minister’s Instruction Number 14 Year 1992.Keywords: land ownership, substantive justice.

Pembentukan Mahkamah Konstitusi Sebagai Pelaku Kekuasaan Kehakiman di Indonesia Bambang Sutiyoso
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 7, No 6 (2010)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Establishment of the Constitutional Court marks a new era in the power of the judiciary system in Indonesia. Some areas that had not been touched (Untouchables) by law, such as judicial review issues on the Constitution, can now be done by the Constitutional Court, including the authority, other authority provided for in the 1945 Constitution after the amendment. Besides, the existence of the Constitutional Court must also be equipped with a clear organizational structure, adequate procedural law, legal principles and sources of law that the Constitutional Court made reference in carrying out its duties and judicial authority. The emergence of the Constitutional Court as a principal judicial authorities are expected to become entry points which promote the establishment of a modern system of judicial authority in Indonesia.

Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Pemakzulan Presiden dan/atau Wakil Presiden di Indonesia Bambang Sutiyoso
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 7, No 1 (2010)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

The idea of impeachment (pemakzulan) towards the incumbent president of Indonesia surfaces recently. This could be the cause of two main grounds. First, regarding the ongoing investigation process of the Century Bank case. In the beginning, the presumption charges merely towards the monetary policy officials and the concerning president’s assistants, but during the further investigations, a number of political parties, in not so vigorously manner pointed the charges to the incumbent presidents because of the indication of responsibility toward the bailout process of Century Bank. Second, the idea of presidential impeachment got its nudge when the Constitutional Court also declaring that its components are ready in processing the impeachment petition, after it has surfaced the Constitutional Court Rule (Peraturan Mahkamah Konstitusi) No. 21/PMK/2009 on the Guidelines in Judicial Procedures in Hearing the Parliamentary Petition in Violation Charges Towards President of the Republic and/or Vice President of the Republic. Third, Presidential and / or Vice Presidential Impeachments has already been occurred in the history of Indonesian nation, namely towards past Indonesian Presidents such as Sukarno, Suharto and KH. Abdurrahman Wahid.This writing attempts to discuss issues regarding presidential impeachment in Indonesia, such as the power of the Constitutional Court in impeachment process, the legal grounds of impeachments, reasons for impeachments and the procedural mechanism of impeachment. Constitutionally, the procedures and mechanism of presidential and / or vice presidential impeachment has been regulated comprehensively in the Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, specifically in Article 7 B, Article 24 (2), and Article 24 C of the 1945 Constitution after the Third Amendment. Based on these regulations, impeachment is not a simple process, but requires a long process and involving a number of high state institutions, namely People’s Representative Council (DPR), The Constitutional Court, and People Consultative Assembly (MPR). The involvement of the Constitutional Court in the impeachment process can be related toward historical experiences and as a logical consequence of the constitutional transformation of Indonesia. Beside that, the idea of presidential and / or vice presidential impeachment should not be based merely on political motivation, but should also have the reasonable legal grounds and rationale.

Peran Dan Tanggung Jawab Organisasi Bantuan Hukum Dalam Memberikan Akses Keadilan Secara Prodeo Di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta Bambang Sutiyoso; Atqo Darmawan Aji; Guntar Mahendro
Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Vol. 30 No. 1: JANUARI 2023
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/iustum.vol30.iss1.art10

Legal aid is a crucial instrument in the justice system as it serves the part in the protection of human rights for every citizen, including people who cannot afford it. This study examines and analyzes the roles and responsibilities of legal aid organizations (OBH) in providing access to justice for free legal services in the Special Region of Yogyakarta (DIY), as well as the obstacles that occur in providing the free legal services. The type of research used is empirical juridical, supported by primary, secondary and tertiary data sources. The method used comprises of sociological, statutory, and conceptual approaches. The results of the study concluded that the role of OBH in DIY in providing free legal services has been carried out in accordance with the provisions of the law. The procedure for providing legal aid on a free basis is still based on several requirements, including that the applicant must apply for legal aid on a free basis, including a Certificate of Disadvantage (SKTM) from the village administration. The provision of legal assistance by OBH is carried out through litigation and non-litigation. There are two responsibilities of OBH in providing legal assistance on a free basis, namely responsibility to institutions/foundations and responsibilities as an advocate so that in providing legal assistance must be professional. Obstacles faced by OBH are both in juridical and non-juridical barriers.Key Words: Legal aid organizations; justice; prodeo AbstrakBantuan hukum merupakan instrumen penting dalam sistem peradilan, karena merupakan bagian dari perlindungan hak asasi manusia bagi setiap warga negara, termasuk masyarakat yang tidak mampu. Penelitian ini mengkaji dan menganalisis peran dan tanggung jawab organisasi bantuan hukum (OBH) dalam memberikan akses keadilan atas pelayanan hukum gratis di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta (DIY), serta hambatan yang terjadi dalam memberikan pelayanan hukum gratis. Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis empiris, didukung sumber data primer, sekunder dan tersier. Metode pendekatan yang digunakan adalah pendekatan sosiologis, perundang-undangan, dan konseptual. Hasil penelitian menyimpulkan bahwa peran OBH di DIY dalam memberikan pelayanan hukum secara gratis telah dilaksanakan sesuai dengan ketentuan undang-undang. Tata cara pemberian bantuan hukum secara prodeo masih didasarkan pada beberapa persyaratan, antara lain pemohon harus mengajukan permohonan bantuan hukum secara prodeo, antara lain Surat Keterangan Tidak Mampu (SKTM) dari kelurahan. Pembrian bantuan hukum oleh OBH dilaksanakan secara litigasi maupun nonlitigasi. Tanggung jawab OBH dalam memberikan bantuan hukum secara prodeo ada dua, yaitu bertanggung jawab kepada lembaga/yayasan dan tanggung jawab sebagai seorang advokat sehingga dalam memberikan bantuan hukum harus secara profesional. Hambatan yang dihadapi OBH adalah hambatan yuridis dan non yuridis.Kata-Kata Kunci: Organisasi bantuan hukum; keadilan; prodeo

Beyond Confidentiality: Advocates’ Reporting Duties in the War Against Money Laundering Adinda, Fadhel Arjuna; Rahmawati, Ema; Suparman, Eman; Sutiyoso, Bambang; Hamzah, Rosyidi; Woodward, John
Indonesian Journal of Advocacy and Legal Services Vol. 7 No. 1 (2025): The Global Challenges on Advocacy and Law Enforcement
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ijals.v7i1.21893

The Principle of Recognizing Service Users (Prinsip Mengenali Pengguna Jasa, PMPJ), as outlined in Article 3 of Government Regulation No. 61 of 2021 concerning Amendments to Government Regulation No. 43 of 2015 on Whistleblowers in the Prevention and Eradication of Money Laundering Crimes, underscores the role of advocates as mandatory whistleblowers. This creates legal challenges regarding its implementation, resulting in a dialectical tension with the central argument that while PMPJ obligations are firmly grounded in normative legal frameworks, advocates—who are explicitly required to uphold these provisions—find no compelling legal basis for such duties in Law No. 18 of 2003 on Advocates (the Advocate Law). The principle of Lex Superior Derogat Legi Inferior further complicates this issue, as it suggests that the Advocate Law, being of a higher legal order, supersedes the obligations imposed by PMPJ. The primary objective of this study is to critically analyze the implementation of PMPJ, specifically focusing on the supporting and inhibiting factors in the context of preventing and combating money laundering crimes. The findings highlight that the failure to optimally implement PMPJ within the advocate profession is largely due to the unresolved legal dialectic surrounding the obligations of advocates. This issue has not been addressed in prior studies, representing a novel contribution of this research. Consequently, this study proposes the need for a reformulation of the Advocate Law, emphasizing the explicit inclusion of advocates' obligations regarding the implementation of PMPJ principles.

Application of the Principle of Consensuality and its Legal Implications In Electronic Contracts at Shopee SUTIYOSO, Bambang; PARMITASARI, Indah
International Journal of Environmental, Sustainability, and Social Science Vol. 4 No. 4 (2023): International Journal of Environmental, Sustainability, and Social Science (Jul
Publisher : PT Keberlanjutan Strategis Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38142/ijesss.v4i4.694

Abstract This study aims to examine and analyze the application of the principle of consensuality in electronic contracts at Shopee: and how the legal implications of the application of the principle of consensuality in electronic contracts at Shopee. The research method used is normative juridical with a statutory and conceptual approach, using secondary legal data and analyzed with a qualitative descriptive method. The results showed that in electronic contracts at Shopee, the principle of consensualism has been applied. In this case, the electronic contract is carried out by means of a click-wrap agreement, namely to determine the agreement in the e-contract is when the party receiving the offer "clicks" on the agreement section. E-contract in Shopee can be said to be an agreement between computer users (users) in interacting with producers or electronic service providers. The application of the principle of consensuality in electronic contracts at Shopee, raises several legal implications, namely: 1) the existence of consensualism gives birth to an electronic contract; 2) the enactment of the principle of Pacta Sun Servanda, meaning that the agreed electronic contract is fully binding and therefore must be obeyed; 3) and for the transfer of rights, consensualism must be followed by a material contract (zakelijke overeenkomst), with the concrete form of this material contract being the act of delivery (levering) of the object in question from the seller's hands to the buyer's hands. Keywords: Application, Consensuality Principle, Electronic Contract, Shope

Urgensi Pengaturan Khusus Online Dispute Resolution dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia Ashari, Nurul Fajar; Rahman, Muhammad Gazali; Sutiyoso, Bambang
SANGAJI: Jurnal Pemikiran Syariah dan Hukum Vol 10 No 1 (2026)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah IAI Muhammadiyah Bima

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52266/sangaji.v10i1.6886

Perkembangan teknologi informasi telah mengubah pola transaksi bisnis dan memunculkan kebutuhan akan mekanisme penyelesaian sengketa yang lebih cepat, efisien, dan adaptif. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis peran Online Dispute Resolution dalam penyelesaian sengketa bisnis di Indonesia dengan menggunakan kerangka teori tujuan hukum dari Gustav Radbruch yang menekankan keadilan, kepastian hukum, dan kemanfaatan. Metode yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan konseptual dan perundang-undangan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa ODR mampu meningkatkan efisiensi, memperluas akses penyelesaian sengketa, serta menyesuaikan proses hukum dengan karakter transaksi digital. Namun, implementasinya belum optimal. Dari aspek keadilan, masih terdapat risiko bias teknologi dan kesenjangan akses digital. Dari aspek kepastian hukum, belum adanya regulasi khusus menimbulkan ketidakjelasan terkait eksekusi putusan, yurisdiksi lintas batas, dan validitas bukti digital. Dari aspek kemanfaatan, manfaat ODR belum dirasakan secara merata karena keterbatasan infrastruktur dan literasi digital. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa diperlukan penguatan regulasi, standar teknis, dan pemerataan akses digital agar pemanfaatan teknologi dalam penyelesaian sengketa bisnis dapat berjalan efektif serta menjamin keadilan dan kepastian hukum.

The Application of Humanization, Liberation, and Transcendence in Indonesian Courts Sutiyoso, Bambang
Prophetic Law Review Vol. 8 No. 2 December 2026
Publisher : Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/PLR.vol8.iss2.art3

Indonesian judicial law combines commitments to legality, justice, responsiveness to living legal values, and reasoned decision-making. A persistent challenge, however, lies in translating these commitments into the adjudication of hard cases without allowing substantive justice to develop into unconstrained judicial discretion. This study develops a prophetic approach to judicial reasoning through normative legal research, drawing on statutory, conceptual, prophetic-jurisprudential, and case-law approaches. It identifies an operational normative gap between Indonesia’s justice-oriented judicial mandates and the methodological tools available for incorporating human dignity, structural injustice, and ethical responsibility into judicial reasoning. To address this gap, the study proposes the Prophetic Judicial Reasoning Framework (PJRF), which integrates legal identification, interpretation, judicial discretion, balancing, and reasoned justification within three interrelated prophetic dimensions. Humanization requires judicial reasoning to protect human dignity, substantive equality, and the concrete interests of persons affected by legal decisions. Liberation directs judges to identify and respond to structural injustice, domination, discrimination, and unequal power relations while remaining anchored in legally permissible reasoning. Transcendence provides an ethical orientation that connects judicial authority with moral responsibility, integrity, and accountability beyond merely formal compliance with positive law. These prophetic dimensions operate as evaluative criteria throughout the reasoning process, while legal anchoring, reason-giving, proportionality, consistency, and reviewability function as institutional safeguards against arbitrary discretion. The PJRF therefore contributes to prophetic-law scholarship by shifting its analytical focus from retrospective evaluations of judicial outcomes to a structured methodology that helps judges justify legally available choices in a manner that is simultaneously juridical, humane, emancipatory, and ethically accountable.

Peran Mediator dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Harta Waris dalam Mediasi di Pengadilan Agama Kabupaten Madiun Ananda Sekar Ayu Windi Aprilia; Bambang Sutiyoso
Hukum Inovatif : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sosial dan Humaniora Vol. 3 No. 4 (2026): Hukum Inovatif: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Sosial dan Humaniora
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/humif.v3i4.3565

The low success rate of mediation in the Madiun Regency Religious Court in cases of inheritance disputes can be influenced by several factors including the mediator factor. The purpose of this study is to examine and analyze the role of the mediator in resolving inheritance property disputes and the factors that influence the mediator in resolving inheritance property disputes at the Madiun Regency Religious Court. This research is empirical juridical research using a case approach. Based on the results of the study, it can be concluded that the role of the mediator at the Madiun Regency Religious Court in resolving inheritance property disputes is not optimal based on the benchmarks made. The benchmarks include the mediator being able to lead mediation by creating a conducive atmosphere, being able to understand the problem material that occurs, playing an active role and digging up information to the root of the problem not only being a formality, and being able to provide suggestions or peace options. However, based on the results of the research that mediators at the Madiun Regency Religious Court have not played an optimal role because they get cases that are not actually their field due to the limitations of certified judge mediators. To provide peace advice requires an understanding of the material of the case being handled. Supporting factors include infrastructure, the goodwill of the parties, the ability of the mediator. While the inhibiting factors include the parties, juridical factors, mediation time, mediators, and lawyers.

Title

Found 20 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 20 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 20 Documents
Search