Tatiek Sri Djatmiati
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Airlangga

Published : 7 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurisprudentie

PENGELOLAAN LINGKUNGAN HIDUP DALAM PENGALIHAN FUNGSI KAWASAN HUTAN UNTUK USAHA PERTAMBANGAN Nur Nashriany Jufri; Tatiek Sri Djatmiati; Lilik Pudjiastuti
Jurisprudentie: Jurusan Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Vol 7 No 1 (2020)
Publisher : Jurusan Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum uin alauddin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/jurisprudentie.v7i1.12924

Abstract

Abstrak Kawasan hutan merupakan salah satu penyokong kelestarian lingkungan hidup. Hutan juga merupakan tempat berkembang biak flora dan fauna yang menjadi unsur sumber daya alam. Dalam perkembangan, kawasan hutan beralih fungsi menjadi tempat usaha pertambangan. Usaha pertambangan di kawasan hutan tidak hanya mendatangkan keuntungan ekonomi bagi daerah dan negara tetapi juga dapat membuka lapangan kerja dan kerja sama dengan para investor. Namun, pengalihfungsian kawasan hutan untuk usaha pertambangan yang tidak terkendali dapat merusak lingkungan hidup yang tentunya akan mengancam keberlanjutannya. Oleh karena itu, insturmen hukum sangat diperlukan dalam melihat isu ini. Bagaimana substansi, struktur, dan budaya hukum berperan dalam mewujudkan pengelolaan lingkungan hidup di kawasan hutan dalam kegiatan pertambangan. Bahwa pencemaran dan kerusakan lingkungan diharapkan dapat diantisipasi dan diminimalisir melalui penegakan hukum yang mencerminkan keadilan antar generasi.Kata Kunci: Hutan; Pertambangan; Lingkungan Hidup.AbstractForest area is one of the supporters of environmental sustainability. Forests are also a breeding ground for flora and fauna which are elements of natural resources. In its development, the forest area has been converted into a mining business. Mining business in the forest area not only brings economic benefits to the local government and the state but also can open employment and cooperation with investors. However, the conversion of forest areas for uncontrolled mining businesses can damage the environment which will certainly threaten its sustainability. Therefore, legal insturment is needed in seeing this issue. How the substance, structure, and legal culture play a role in realizing environmental management in forest areas in mining activities. That pollution and environmental damage are expected to be anticipated and minimized through law enforcement that reflects inter generational justice.Keywords: Forest; Mining; Living Environment.
Reflecting the Special Autonomy of Papua Province in the Perspective of Law and Human Rights Roni Sulistyanto luhukay; Tatiek Sri Djatmiati; Emanuel Sujatmoko
Jurisprudentie: Jurusan Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Vol 9 No 2 (2022): Volume 9 Nomor 2 Desember 2022
Publisher : Jurusan Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum uin alauddin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/jurisprudentie.v9i2.31843

Abstract

The practice of administering the particular autonomy government of the Papua Province seems to be centralized even though the state's policy has given the Special Autonomy status to the Papua Province. It can be proven that the authority regulated in the Special Autonomy Law cannot be adequately implemented because central government intervention is very dominant in carrying out certain authorities. Even though the changes in the legislation from Law No. 21 of 2001 to Law No. 2 of 2021 regarding special autonomy for Papua Province also cannot provide many changes regarding the achievement of special autonomy. The birth of Law No. 2 of 2021 concerning the second amendment to Law No. 21 of 2001 concerning special autonomy for the province of Papua. Provide at least 20 amendments to articles regarding the authority of local government, MRP, DPRK, increase in Papua special autonomy funds, expansion of Papua provinces and districts, and establishment of implementing regional regulations of the Special Autonomy Law. The formation of this regulatory change has not provided a concept for protecting indigenous Papuans, considering the potential for centralization of authority to occur still. In addition, this regulatory change also does not provide an overview of the cultural aspects of the indigenous Papuans themselves, and this can be seen by not involving the MRP, which is a representation of the Papuan people. For example, in article 76, paragraphs 1 and 2 regarding the division of the province and district without involving the MRP as a representative of the indigenous Papuans.