Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 12 Documents
Search

Penegakan Sempadan Sungai Dalam Mengurangi Persoalan Rob Di Kota Pekalongan Salman Al Farisi; Sri Puji Ningsih; Samian Samian; Izull Arob; Fajar Prasetyo; Ervi Ervi
Pena: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Teknologi Vol 37, No 2 (2023): PENA SEPTEMBER 2023
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/jurnalpena.v37i2.3553

Abstract

Kota Pekalongan merupakan salah satu kota dengan sungai yang cukup banyak ada  lima sungai yaitu : Sungai Loji, Sungai Asem Binatur, Sungai Meduri, Sungai Bremi dan Sungai Kalibanger yang mengalir membelah kota pekalongan dan sungai sungai kecil yang mengalirkan air sampai dengan area laut lepas yang ada di pesisir pantai Kota Pekalongan. Dengan sungai-sungai yang mengalir di Kota Pekalongan  sungai ini mestinya dapat mengontrol ekosistem lingkungan hidup dan Persoalan banjir dan ROB yang terjadi di kota PekalonganPeraturan pemerintah No. 38 tahun 2011 Tentang Sempadan sungai dimana sungai mempunyai peran penting dalam penangana banjir dan ROB Melalui sempadan sungai berbagai macam faktor yang di timbulkan dari tidak  adanya sempadan di sungai-suangai yang ada di Kota Pekalongan Terutama dalam penanganan dampak banjir atau rob yang masih menjadi sebuah problematika besar yang ada di Kota Pekalongan.
Efektivitas Penyelesaian Sengketa Kontrak Konstruksi di Indonesia dalam Analisis Hukum Implementasi dan Tantangan Proyek Infrastruktur Hapit Sugandi; Samian Samian; Adi Saputro
Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia Vol. 6 No. 3 (2025): Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia
Publisher : Publikasi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59141/japendi.v6i3.7349

Abstract

This study analyzes the effectiveness of the construction contract dispute resolution mechanism in the context of accelerating Indonesia's national infrastructure development. Through a normative juridical approach with the literature study method, the research examines the coherence of the legal framework and its implementation in the settlement of construction disputes. The results of the analysis revealed that although Indonesia already has a comprehensive legal instrument, there is a significant gap between regulations and practices in the field. The gap is mainly caused by three main factors: the complexity of modern construction contracts involving multiple stakeholders, the limited understanding of the parties to the legal aspects of construction, and structural obstacles in the execution of dispute resolution decisions. Based on these findings, the study recommends three optimization strategies: improving the legal framework through regulatory harmonization, strengthening the institutional capacity of dispute resolution, and developing alternative dispute resolution mechanisms that are more responsive to the characteristics of the construction industry. The implementation of this recommendation is expected to increase the effectiveness of construction dispute resolution and support the sustainability of national infrastructure development
Pendampingan Manajemen Pengelolaan BUMDes untuk Meningkatkan Kesejahteraan dan Pengembangan Ekonomi Lokal di Desa Purworejo Salman Al Farisi; Sami’an Sami’an; Sri Puji Ningsih; M. Fatkhul Ibad; Muhammad Syakif Arsilan; Nadinil Hasna
KREATIF: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Nusantara Vol. 5 No. 4 (2025): Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Nusantara
Publisher : Pusat Riset dan Inovasi Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/kreatif.v5i4.5997

Abstract

Village-Owned Enterprises (BUMDes) are institutions managed by village communities that operate in the field of village economic resources, with the aim of maximizing village assets. BUMDes can directly foster business opportunities, create employment, and increase village income. Villages can become self-reliant and capable of alleviating poverty by improving community welfare—provided that BUMDes are managed properly, effectively, and efficiently. However, there is still a low level of knowledge regarding the management of business organizations developed by BUMDes. Due to this condition, BUMDes have not yet functioned optimally as a source of economic growth for the organization itself, let alone for the wider community. Providing management training and developing professional human resources to manage BUMDes effectively is essential. This includes the management of BUMDes administrative governance, understanding relevant regulations and legal frameworks, and improving the economy and welfare through the buying and selling of local products, especially those produced by village rice farmers.
Peran Administrasi Kontrak dalam Mengelola Risiko Hukum pada Proyek Konstruksi di Indonesia Purnaning Siwi Kusumastuti; Samian Samian; Sarwono Hardjomuljadi
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025): (JIHHP) Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik
Publisher : Dinasti Review Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jihhp.v5i3.4120

Abstract

Di Indonesia, administrasi kontrak memiliki peran penting dalam mengelola risiko hukum pada proyek konstruksi yang sering menghadapi berbagai tantangan hukum akibat kompleksitas proyek. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis peran administrasi kontrak dalam mitigasi risiko hukum melalui studi literatur dan analisis dokumen, tanpa melibatkan wawancara. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan tiga temuan utama: (1) penyusunan kontrak konstruksi sering kali kurang optimal, ditandai dengan ambiguitas bahasa hukum dan klausul yang tidak mencakup perubahan lapangan; (2) terdapat ketidakseimbangan antara hak dan kewajiban pihak-pihak dalam kontrak, dengan posisi dominan pemilik proyek yang berpotensi merugikan kontraktor; (3) pengelolaan kontrak yang berkelanjutan melalui pencatatan, dokumentasi perubahan pekerjaan, dan pemanfaatan teknologi berkontribusi signifikan dalam memitigasi risiko hukum. Temuan ini menekankan pentingnya penerapan standar kontrak berbasis internasional, seperti FIDIC Red Book, peningkatan kompetensi sumber daya manusia, serta adopsi teknologi manajemen kontrak. Dengan langkah-langkah ini, risiko hukum pada proyek konstruksi dapat dikelola secara efektif, mendukung keberhasilan proyek, dan mengurangi potensi sengketa di masa depan. Penelitian ini memberikan kontribusi penting bagi pelaku industri dan pembuat kebijakan dalam memperbaiki tata kelola proyek konstruksi nasional.
Legal Understanding Regarding the Hazards of Drugs in the Framework of Community Development Sami’an Sami’an
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 20 No. 2 (2021): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v20i2.1728

Abstract

Drug misusse is a danger that is very alarming, because narcotics can damage the individual users, either physically or mentally. Misue and trafficking of narcotics illegally very detrimental to individuals and the wider community, particularly the younger generation, can even pose a greater danger for the life and cultural values of the nation that will ultimately undermine national security. Researchers divide the efforts of drug misuse prevention by the National Narcotics Agency part of the preventive and repressive. Both of these are key functions (operations) in accordance with the duties of the National Narcotics Agency. The misuse of and illicit traffic in narcotic drugs, psychotropic substances and other hazardous materials (drugs) with various implications and the negative impact is a global problem that threatens the life of the community, state and nation. The National Narcotics agency has mengakomidir theory such as that reflected from the division of tasks fields are categorized into the Areas of Prevention and Community Empowerment, Eradication, and Rehabilitation.
Legal Protection for Contractors Against Unilateral Termination by the Employer under Construction Contracts Moh. Choiru Syahil; Samian Samian; Sarwono Hardjomuljadi
Interdisciplinary Social Studies Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): Regular Issue: October-December 2025
Publisher : International Journal Labs

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55324/iss.v5i1.973

Abstract

This study examines legal protection for service providers against unilateral contract termination by service users in the construction sector in Indonesia. This problem arises from the imbalance in the legal and economic positions between the parties, as well as weak legal regulations that provide room for broad interpretation for service users. This study uses a normative juridical method with a statutory, conceptual, case, and comparative legal approach. The analysis was conducted on the Civil Code (KUHPerdata), Law Number 2 of 2017 concerning Construction Services, and Presidential Regulation Number 16 of 2018, then compared with the legal systems of the European Union, China, and South Korea. The results of the study indicate that legal protection in Indonesia is still administrative and formalistic, not guaranteeing proportional contractual justice for service providers. Therefore, this study recommends a balanced contractual protection model, which emphasizes compensation obligations, the principle of good faith, and the establishment of an independent contract mediation institution as a solution towards a fair, transparent, and sustainable contractual legal system.
Comparative Analysis of the FIDIC Red Book Contract 2017 (Reprinted 2022) and the Indonesian National Construction Contract Wahyu Moerhadi Nugroho; Sami’an Sami’an; Sarwono Hardjomuljadi
Interdisciplinary Social Studies Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): Regular Issue: October-December 2025
Publisher : International Journal Labs

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55324/iss.v5i1.974

Abstract

The landscape of construction projects in Indonesia is becoming increasingly complex with the growing involvement of international funding and foreign contractors. The FIDIC Red Book 2017 has become the dominant global standard, while Indonesia operates under its own national construction law framework. This study aims to comparatively analyze the principles, mechanisms, and risk allocation in the FIDIC Red Book 2017 (Reprinted 2022) and the Indonesian national construction contract framework as reflected in the Construction Services Law and its derivative regulations. Using a normative literature study with a comparative law approach, the research identifies fundamental philosophical differences in risk management. FIDIC emphasizes fairness, balanced risk allocation, and structured procedural mechanisms (FIDIC, 2022; Soekotjo, 2019), whereas Indonesia’s national regulations tend to favor the Employer (government) with limited contractual flexibility (LKPP, 2021). The key findings lie in differences related to claim mechanisms, the role of the Engineer, and dispute resolution processes. This study contributes by providing a systematic comparative mapping useful for stakeholders—especially in hybrid international–national projects—and offers recommendations for harmonizing and improving contractual frameworks in Indonesian construction practice.
Retention in Construction Contracts: Legal Analysis and Implementation Practices in Indonesia Dina Silviana; Sarwono Hardjomuljadi; Sami’an Sami’an; Anik Kunantiyorini
Interdisciplinary Social Studies Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): Regular Issue: October-December 2025
Publisher : International Journal Labs

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55324/iss.v5i1.984

Abstract

Retention is a mechanism for withholding part of payments in construction contracts that is used to ensure the fulfillment of work maintenance obligations. In practice, retention often raises disputes, especially regarding late payments, detention without legitimate reasons, or unclear terms for release of retention. This study analyzes the legal position of retention, the legal basis that requires its payment, and the implications of default when retention is still withheld after the work is declared completed through the Final Hand Over (FHO). The research uses a literature study method on the Civil Code, the Construction Services Law, the FIDIC Red Book, procurement document standards, and contract law literature. The results of the study show that retention is a legal part of a contractual agreement that is subject to the principle of pacta sunt servanda based on Article 1338 of the Civil Code. Retention detention without a legal basis after the issuance of the FHO constitutes a default, which results in the obligation to pay retention along with compensation in accordance with Article 1243 of the Civil Code. The research concludes that the retention payment is an absolute obligation that must be fulfilled and its violation entitles the Contractor to demand performance and compensation.
Principle of Equality and Force majeure Clause: A Study of Standard Contracts in the Indonesian Government Construction Sector Kodrat Insany Taqwim; Sarwono Hardjomuljadi; Sami'a Samian
Interdisciplinary Social Studies Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): Regular Issue: October-December 2025
Publisher : International Journal Labs

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55324/iss.v5i1.989

Abstract

This research investigates the implementation of the principle of equality in force majeure clauses under Indonesian government construction standard contracts, namely those regulated by the General Conditions of Contract (SSUK). The research is based on the idea that the risk-sharing in public construction contracts is still not fair. Contracting authorities (PPK) have most of the ability to interpret the contracts, while contractors have very few options when it comes to negotiating the conditions. A normative legal method was used, which included legislative, conceptual, and case methods. The examination encompasses the Indonesian Civil Code, the Construction Services Law, the Ministry of Public Works and Housing Regulation No. 14 /2020, and foreign standards such as FIDIC. The study identified seven structural imbalances in force majeure provisions: (1) outdated risk definitions unsuitable for modern challenges like pandemics and cyber-attacks, (2) rigid and ambiguous notification procedures that disadvantage contractors, (3) disproportionate time extension calculations ignoring chain effects, (4) absence of cost compensation mechanisms for uncontrollable risks, (5) unilateral interpretation authority vested in PPK without independent review, (6) lack of transparent risk allocation matrices, and (7) slow and ineffective dispute resolution mechanisms. These findings were confirmed through Supreme Court Decision No. 2241 K/Pdt/2020, which nullified contractor sanctions for flooding-related delays. The study recommends adopting adaptive risk definitions, establishing reasonable notification procedures (28-day standard), implementing cost compensation mechanisms, creating independent adjudication bodies, developing explicit risk allocation matrices, and streamlining dispute resolution processes to achieve contractual balance and good faith principles.
The Principle of Good Faith and Construction Disputes: a Study on Dispute Boards and Digital Transformation Dharma Teguh Pribadi; Samian Samian; Sarwono Hardjomuljadi; Putra Amantha Hasibuan
Interdisciplinary Social Studies Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): Regular Issue: October-December 2025
Publisher : International Journal Labs

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55324/iss.v5i1.991

Abstract

This study examines the application of the principle of good faith in Indonesian construction contracts, highlighting the challenges it faces due to the technical complexity, high uncertainty, and financial risks inherent in construction projects. While the principle is affirmed in Article 1338 paragraph (3) of the Civil Code, its practical application remains unclear, often leading to disputes over delays, compensation claims, and unclear obligations. In modern construction contracts, particularly those based on international standards like FIDIC, good faith is emphasized as an operational principle, with dispute resolution mechanisms like Dispute Adjudication Boards supporting collaboration and early dispute resolution. However, empirical studies show that these boards are sometimes used for strategic delays and selective disclosures, highlighting the tension between theoretical principles and practical behavior. The study also explores how digitalization, through technologies like Building Information Modeling, audit logs, and blockchain, transforms project monitoring and verification, offering opportunities to redefine good faith as an objective, verifiable principle. This research aims to assess the role of good faith in construction contracts, dispute boards, and digitalization, providing insights into how digital tools can help objectify and enforce good faith in Indonesian construction practices.