Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

Penegakan Sempadan Sungai Dalam Mengurangi Persoalan Rob Di Kota Pekalongan Salman Al Farisi; Sri Puji Ningsih; Samian Samian; Izull Arob; Fajar Prasetyo; Ervi Ervi
Pena: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Teknologi Vol 37, No 2 (2023): PENA SEPTEMBER 2023
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/jurnalpena.v37i2.3553

Abstract

Kota Pekalongan merupakan salah satu kota dengan sungai yang cukup banyak ada  lima sungai yaitu : Sungai Loji, Sungai Asem Binatur, Sungai Meduri, Sungai Bremi dan Sungai Kalibanger yang mengalir membelah kota pekalongan dan sungai sungai kecil yang mengalirkan air sampai dengan area laut lepas yang ada di pesisir pantai Kota Pekalongan. Dengan sungai-sungai yang mengalir di Kota Pekalongan  sungai ini mestinya dapat mengontrol ekosistem lingkungan hidup dan Persoalan banjir dan ROB yang terjadi di kota PekalonganPeraturan pemerintah No. 38 tahun 2011 Tentang Sempadan sungai dimana sungai mempunyai peran penting dalam penangana banjir dan ROB Melalui sempadan sungai berbagai macam faktor yang di timbulkan dari tidak  adanya sempadan di sungai-suangai yang ada di Kota Pekalongan Terutama dalam penanganan dampak banjir atau rob yang masih menjadi sebuah problematika besar yang ada di Kota Pekalongan.
Pendampingan Manajemen Pengelolaan BUMDes untuk Meningkatkan Kesejahteraan dan Pengembangan Ekonomi Lokal di Desa Purworejo Salman Al Farisi; Sami’an Sami’an; Sri Puji Ningsih; M. Fatkhul Ibad; Muhammad Syakif Arsilan; Nadinil Hasna
KREATIF: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Nusantara Vol. 5 No. 4 (2025): Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Nusantara
Publisher : Pusat Riset dan Inovasi Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/kreatif.v5i4.5997

Abstract

Village-Owned Enterprises (BUMDes) are institutions managed by village communities that operate in the field of village economic resources, with the aim of maximizing village assets. BUMDes can directly foster business opportunities, create employment, and increase village income. Villages can become self-reliant and capable of alleviating poverty by improving community welfare—provided that BUMDes are managed properly, effectively, and efficiently. However, there is still a low level of knowledge regarding the management of business organizations developed by BUMDes. Due to this condition, BUMDes have not yet functioned optimally as a source of economic growth for the organization itself, let alone for the wider community. Providing management training and developing professional human resources to manage BUMDes effectively is essential. This includes the management of BUMDes administrative governance, understanding relevant regulations and legal frameworks, and improving the economy and welfare through the buying and selling of local products, especially those produced by village rice farmers.
Legal Understanding Regarding the Hazards of Drugs in the Framework of Community Development Sami’an Sami’an
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 20 No. 2 (2021): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v20i2.1728

Abstract

Drug misusse is a danger that is very alarming, because narcotics can damage the individual users, either physically or mentally. Misue and trafficking of narcotics illegally very detrimental to individuals and the wider community, particularly the younger generation, can even pose a greater danger for the life and cultural values of the nation that will ultimately undermine national security. Researchers divide the efforts of drug misuse prevention by the National Narcotics Agency part of the preventive and repressive. Both of these are key functions (operations) in accordance with the duties of the National Narcotics Agency. The misuse of and illicit traffic in narcotic drugs, psychotropic substances and other hazardous materials (drugs) with various implications and the negative impact is a global problem that threatens the life of the community, state and nation. The National Narcotics agency has mengakomidir theory such as that reflected from the division of tasks fields are categorized into the Areas of Prevention and Community Empowerment, Eradication, and Rehabilitation.
Comparative Analysis of the FIDIC Red Book Contract 2017 (Reprinted 2022) and the Indonesian National Construction Contract Wahyu Moerhadi Nugroho; Sami’an Sami’an; Sarwono Hardjomuljadi
Interdisciplinary Social Studies Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): Regular Issue: October-December 2025
Publisher : International Journal Labs

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55324/iss.v5i1.974

Abstract

The landscape of construction projects in Indonesia is becoming increasingly complex with the growing involvement of international funding and foreign contractors. The FIDIC Red Book 2017 has become the dominant global standard, while Indonesia operates under its own national construction law framework. This study aims to comparatively analyze the principles, mechanisms, and risk allocation in the FIDIC Red Book 2017 (Reprinted 2022) and the Indonesian national construction contract framework as reflected in the Construction Services Law and its derivative regulations. Using a normative literature study with a comparative law approach, the research identifies fundamental philosophical differences in risk management. FIDIC emphasizes fairness, balanced risk allocation, and structured procedural mechanisms (FIDIC, 2022; Soekotjo, 2019), whereas Indonesia’s national regulations tend to favor the Employer (government) with limited contractual flexibility (LKPP, 2021). The key findings lie in differences related to claim mechanisms, the role of the Engineer, and dispute resolution processes. This study contributes by providing a systematic comparative mapping useful for stakeholders—especially in hybrid international–national projects—and offers recommendations for harmonizing and improving contractual frameworks in Indonesian construction practice.
Retention in Construction Contracts: Legal Analysis and Implementation Practices in Indonesia Dina Silviana; Sarwono Hardjomuljadi; Sami’an Sami’an; Anik Kunantiyorini
Interdisciplinary Social Studies Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): Regular Issue: October-December 2025
Publisher : International Journal Labs

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55324/iss.v5i1.984

Abstract

Retention is a mechanism for withholding part of payments in construction contracts that is used to ensure the fulfillment of work maintenance obligations. In practice, retention often raises disputes, especially regarding late payments, detention without legitimate reasons, or unclear terms for release of retention. This study analyzes the legal position of retention, the legal basis that requires its payment, and the implications of default when retention is still withheld after the work is declared completed through the Final Hand Over (FHO). The research uses a literature study method on the Civil Code, the Construction Services Law, the FIDIC Red Book, procurement document standards, and contract law literature. The results of the study show that retention is a legal part of a contractual agreement that is subject to the principle of pacta sunt servanda based on Article 1338 of the Civil Code. Retention detention without a legal basis after the issuance of the FHO constitutes a default, which results in the obligation to pay retention along with compensation in accordance with Article 1243 of the Civil Code. The research concludes that the retention payment is an absolute obligation that must be fulfilled and its violation entitles the Contractor to demand performance and compensation.
Juridical Analysis of Abuse of Authority by Project Officials in the Perspective of Criminal Law Faal Murreyza D; Sami’an Sami’an; Sarwono Hardjomuljadi
Interdisciplinary Social Studies Vol. 5 No. 1 (2025): Regular Issue: October-December 2025
Publisher : International Journal Labs

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55324/iss.v5i1.1013

Abstract

Abuse of authority by project officials in construction works constitutes one of the primary patterns of corruption in public funds management. In practice, numerous cases demonstrate that budget users, delegated budget users, and commitment-making officials bear responsibility not only for tender decisions but also for controlling contract implementation, quality supervision, contract amendments, and payment approvals—creating opportunities for irregularities that result in state financial losses. This study analyzes the juridical construction of abuse of authority by project officials (Penyalahgunaan Wewenang oleh Pejabat Proyek) from the perspective of criminal corruption law, particularly Article 3 of Law No. 31 of 1999 as amended by Law No. 20 of 2001, in relation to the administrative framework under Law No. 30 of 2014 on Government Administration. Employing a normative juridical method with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches, it focuses on the Hambalang National Sport Training Center, e-KTP, and Banggai Laut Stadium projects. Findings reveal that (1) such abuse qualifies as corruption when involving deviation from authority's purpose, mens rea for undue benefit, and proven state losses; (2) boundaries between administrative misconduct and criminal corruption lack clear parameters; and (3) enforcement remains reactive, neglecting systemic governance improvements. Recommendations include clearer guidelines distinguishing errors from abuse, stronger oversight, and reforms to prevent corruption while protecting good-faith officials.