Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.751
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Legitima: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam Ascarya: Journal of Islamic Science, Culture and Social Studies Legitima: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam
Sifa Mulya Nurani
Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Paradigma Keluarga Sakinah Mawaddah Wa Rahmah dan Relasinya Dengan Tingkat Perceraian Serta Pertumbuhan Penduduk di Indonesia Sifa Mulya Nurani; M.Muhsin
Legitima : Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021): Legitima : Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Tribakti Kediri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (958.039 KB) | DOI: 10.33367/legitima.v4i1.1860

Abstract

Angka perceraian di Indonesia yang mencapai 2.266 kasus pada 2019-2020. Menunjukkan bahwa Paradigma Sakīnah Mawaddah wa Raḥmah dalam konstelasi normatif kajian hukum keluarga Islam, belum dapat diimplementasikan dengan baik oleh pasangan keluarga. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan relasi paradigma keluarga Sakīnah Mawaddah wa Raḥmah dalam konteks psikologi Islam dengan tingkat perceraian serta pertumbuhan penduduk di Indonesia. Jenis penelitian ini adalah kualitatif yang bersifat library research, yaitu mengupas penelitian hukum keluarga Islam dengan kajian-kajian deskriptif. Data penelitian berupa literatur-literatur yang mengulas paradigma keluarga Sakīnah Mawaddah wa Raḥmah. Teknik pengumpulan data dengan dokumentasi. Sedangkan analisis data dilakukan dengan reduksi data, penyajian data, dan analisis data. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan, paradigma keluarga Sakīnah Mawaddah wa Raḥmah memiliki relasi signifikan pada dua kasus, perceraian dan pertumbuhan penduduk. Guna mencegah perceraian, maka turunan paradigma ini memeberikan resolusi; menguatkan agama, sikap saling percaya antar keluarga, memenuhi hak dan kewajiban, saling bertemu, dan menanamkan rasa cinta dan kasih. Sedangkan upaya preventif turunan paradigma ini guna menanggulangi pertumbuhan penduduk dapat dilakukan dengan menanamkan rasa tentram dalam berkeluarga, cinta kasih, dan ikut menyukseskan program pemerintah seperti Penyiapan Kehidupan Berkeluarga bagi Remaja (PKBR).
The Paradigm of the Sakinah Mawaddah Wa Rahmah Family and Its Relationship to Divorce Rates and Population Growth in Indonesia Sifa Mulya Nurani; M.Muhsin
Legitima : Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam Vol. 4 No. 1 (2021): Legitima : Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam
Publisher : Universitas Islam Tribakti Lirboyo Kediri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33367/legitima.v4i1.1860

Abstract

The divorce rate in Indonesia reached 2,266 cases in 2019-2020. Indicating that the Sakā “nah Mawaddah wa Raḥmah Paradigm in the normative constellation of Islamic family law studies, has not been implemented properly by family couples. This study aims to describe the relationship of the Sakā “nah Mawaddah wa Raḥmah family paradigm in the context of Islamic psychology with the divorce rate and population growth in Indonesia. This type of research is qualitative library research, which explores Islamic family law research with descriptive studies. The research data is in the form of literature that reviews the Sakā “nah Mawaddah wa Raḥmah family paradigm. Data collection techniques with documentation. While data analysis is done by data reduction, data presentation, and data analysis. The results showed that the Sakā “nah Mawaddah wa Raḥmah family paradigm has a significant relationship to two cases, divorce and population growth. In order to prevent divorce, the derivative of this paradigm provides a resolution; strengthen religion, mutual trust between families, fulfill rights and obligations, meet each other, and instill a sense of love and love. Meanwhile, preventive efforts derived from this paradigm to overcome population growth can be done by instilling a sense of peace in the family, love, and participating in the success of government programs such as the Preparation of Family Life for Teenagers (PKBR).
Preventing Harm or Securing Certainty? Disparities in Religious Court Rulings on Polygamy Permits Resulting from Pregnancy Out of Wedlock Sifa Mulya Nurani; Oyo Sunaryo Mukhlas; Siah Khosyi'ah; Ramdani Wahyu Sururie; Rohmad Nurhuda
Ascarya: Journal of Islamic Science, Culture, and Social Studies Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): Online First
Publisher : Perkumpulan Alumni dan Santri Mahyajatul Qurro'

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53754/iscs.v6i1.862

Abstract

The pregnancy of a prospective second wife outside of marriage is not explicitly regulated by law as a valid reason for permitting polygamy, thus creating a legal vacuum and disparities in rulings by religious courts. This study aimed to investigate the causes of these disparities by comparing the Karangasem Religious Court (PA) Decision No. 1/Pdt. G/2018/PA.Kras, which granted the petition, and the Kaimana Religious Court (PA) Decision No. 22/Pdt. G/2019/PA.Kmn, which rejected it. This qualitative study employed a juridical-normative approach. Data collection was conducted through a document analysis of primary legal materials—namely, the two rulings—which were then analyzed using content analysis through the lens of Satjipto Rahardjo’s Progressive Law. The results of the study revealed a sharp divergence in the judges’ legal reasoning. The Karangasem Religious Court judge demonstrated a non-positivist and contextual approach that prioritizes substantive justice by boldly making legal innovations to protect children. The judge applied the fiqh principle of dar’ul mafasid muqaddamun ‘ala jalbil mashalih (preventing harm takes precedence over seeking benefit). In contrast, the judge at the Kaimana Religious Court adopted a rigid, positivistic, and textual approach, strictly adhering to the formal requirements of Law No. 1 of 1974, without considering the sociological urgency of the pregnancy. This study concludes that a progressive legal perspective is highly relevant to this specific case, in which the law serves to protect human beings and prevent greater harm to the legal status of mothers and children.
Co-Authors M.Muhsin Mukhlas, Oyo Sunaryo Ramdani Wahyu Sururie Rohmad Nurhuda Siah Khosyi'ah