Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

THE PROPHETIC LAW, PANCASILA, AND INDONESIA’S SIGNIFICANT ROLE TOWARD INTERNATIONAL LAW IN ASIA-AFRICA, ASEAN, AND GLOBAL CONTEXT Jawahir Thontowi; Erna Wati
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2023): January
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v3i1.623

Abstract

There is an interesting relation between Prophetic Law and Pancasila as well as Indonesian government significant role towards international law, both in theoretical and conceptual perspective. In Indonesian politic nowadays, the government have played significant role not only in observing international treaty but played a big role to the establishment of cooperation between non-block nations in Asia and Africa. On one hand, the perspective of theory and concept of Prophetic law is relevant. Prophetic law can be explained particularly through Prophetic leadership that is based on the holy book of various religion such as Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. On the other hand, however there is a significant relation between Prophetic Law and Pancasila when the founding fathers designed to formulate Pancasila as the state ideology of Indonesia. The founding fathers are nationalists and ulama. They are involved to discus and formulate to agree which ideology would be adopted in Indonesia once gaining its independence. Prophetic Law can be defined as rule of law are based on revelation by God through the Prophet. Fundamental principles of Prophetic Law are (1) God made Law; (2) liberty and humanity; (3) actual values. Prophetic Law doesn’t believe rule of law is just human rule of law, but rather to consider prophetic values. So, truth, justice, and values are not separated from the substantive of law. Prophetic Law is national identity.
Pengaruh Undang-Undang Keistimewaan Jogyakarta Terhadap Kesejahteraan Masyarakat Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta Thontowi, Jawahir
UIR Law Review Vol. 3 No. 1 (2019): UIR Law Review
Publisher : UIR Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25299/uirlrev.2019.vol3(01).3413

Abstract

This study intends to analyze the relationship between Law Number 13 of 2012 concerning the Privileges of Jogyakarta to the conditions of social and economic welfare of the Jogyakartan communities. The problem that will be analyzed is why does Act Number 13 of 2012 not yet function effectively in improving the welfare of the Jogyakartan communities. This study uses the socio-legal method. The results of this study indicate that even though the existence of Law Number 13 of 2012 received a positive response from the Jogkartan communities, it has also been implemented in a number of Jogjakarta Special Regional Regulations such as the appointment of public offices, civil service and cultural civilization, but in its failed to improve the Jogyakartan communities welfare because of the availability of factors in the local representative people considering the conflict of interest between members of the Palace families.