Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
2.133
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum Al-Mawarid Jurnal Hukum Islam Al-Ahwal: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam Musawa : Jurnal Studi Gender dan Islam Asy-Syir'ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan Ahkam: Jurnal Hukum Islam Jurnal Konstitusi Empowerment : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Constitutional Review Al-Jinayah: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Islam Jurnal Yudisial Istinbath : Jurnal Hukum Jurnal Konstitusi Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum
Faiq Tobroni
FIAI UII
Religion Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 27 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Konstitusi

 1 
Kebebasan Hak Ijtihad Nikah Beda Agama Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Tobroni, Faiq
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 12, No 3 (2015)
Publisher : Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (451.821 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk1239

Abstract

This paper has three key issues. The first issue discusses the arguments constructed by applicant of judicial review (JR) to assess the constitutional rights’ violations caused by the application of Article 2 (1) UUP. The second issue discusses on how the Constitutional Court (MK) seated position of state associated marital affairs in the rejection of JR. The third issue discusses model of freedom of ijtihad (legal thought) on interfaith marriage as the impact of MK’s Decision. Based on    the discussion, regarding to the first issue, the applicant of JR assess the application of Article 2 (1) UUP has legitimized the state as the sole interpreters of religious teachings for a requirement validity of the marriage. According to the applicant,  the role is used by the state (The Office for Religious Affairs/KUA) to not accept interfaith marriage. This refusal led to the violation of some other constitutional rights. Furthermore, as the findings of the second issue, MK’s decision has placed   the real position of state not as interpreters of religious teachings, but merely to accommodate the results of religious scholars’s ijtihad regarding marriage into the state law. Thus, it is not true that the state has violated the constitutional right to more intervene the religious life of citizens. Last findings as the third issue, MK’s decision has affected the model of ijtihad freedom on interfaith marriage. Actually interfaith marriage can still be served through the Civil Registry Office (KCS). KCS could be an alternative way to facilitate the interfaith marriages for all religions in Indonesia. Special for KUA, the institution reject to record interfaith marriage.   In this way, it only accommodates freedom of ijtihad within the limits of ijtihad jama’i. KUA just accomodates ijtihad by institutions such as the Majelis Ulama Indonesia, Nahdlatul Ulama, Muhammadiyah and other similar institutions that reject interfaith marriage. Special for marriage in muslim community, ijtihad jama’i is better than ijtihad fardiy because the second could trigger the liberalization of marriage laws (temporary marriages, polygamy more than four, underage marriages and denial of recording).
Co-Authors Aktar, Md Nadim Fatma Amilia, Fatma Hamam Burhanuddin Iswantoro Iswantoro, Iswantoro Izzatin Kamala, Izzatin Nasrudin, Muhamad Salwa, Hana Zaida