Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 10 Documents
Search

RUANG PRIVAT INDIVIDU DALAM SISTEM KAWIN MAWIN MASYARAKAT SUMBA TIMUR Muthmainnah, Lailiy; Trisakti, Sonjoruri Budiani
Jurnal Filsafat "WISDOM" Vol 20, No 3 (2010)
Publisher : Fakultas Filsafat, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

AbstractEast Sumba people have strong kinship and marital system.All of the living aspect of the East Sumba people managed by their kabihu. The various rights and duties will be emerge in the kabihu, include of this point is the custom duties related to the marriage process. Marriage in the East Sumba people have great symbol, not only for having a child but also to keep save uma marapu. The kinship of East Sumba people is patriarchy and the marriage system is always exogamy. It is taboo for marriage in one kabihu. Related to the kinship system in East Sumba, when a woman get married with a man from a different kabihu and her husband finishes his duties (belis), the woman will join her husband kabihu. Then, there is no kinship relation again between her and her old kabihu.Consequently, almost of the yera (wife’s family) make belis isimpossible to pay. From material aspect, belis process will give an advantage for the woman’s family but for the couple it will restraint their freedom. There is no private sphere for them because all of their marriage process will be judged and done by their family and kabihu.Keywords: East Sumba, marriage, uma marapu, kabihu, belis, yera,private sphere.
THOMAS KUHN DAN TRADISI-INOVASI DALAM LANGKAH METODOLOGIS RISET ILMIAH Trisakti, Sonjoruri Budiani
Jurnal Filsafat "WISDOM" Vol 18, No 3 (2008)
Publisher : Fakultas Filsafat, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

AbstractThomas Kuhn divides scientific movement into normal science and revolutionary science. There is a difference between the type of scientific methodological research in normal scienceand that in revolutionary science. Scientists during normal science conduct their research activities restricted on the box of paradigmshared with the result that scientific research in normal science are always progressive in terms of cumulative progress. Scientists are tied to the tradition of paradigm-shared, and they difficult to release their dependence upon the paradigm-shared moreover to make innovation to the paradigm. Meanwhile, scientists during revolutionary science conduct their research activities based on the observations, experiments, and idea beyond the generally accepted paradigm which becomes questionable because of its failure to solve the crisis. Scientific research in revolutionary science is always progressive in terms of non-cumulative progress. Scientists become innovated person who see the crisis from a new perspective rather than from the tradition of the old-paradigm.Keywords: paradigm, normal science, scientific revolution
RUANG PRIVAT INDIVIDU DALAM SISTEM KAWIN MAWIN MASYARAKAT SUMBA TIMUR Muthmainnah, Lailiy; Trisakti, Sonjoruri Budiani
Jurnal Filsafat "WISDOM" Vol 20, No 3 (2010)
Publisher : Fakultas Filsafat, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (241.106 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jf.3421

Abstract

AbstractEast Sumba people have strong kinship and marital system.All of the living aspect of the East Sumba people managed by their kabihu. The various rights and duties will be emerge in the kabihu, include of this point is the custom duties related to the marriage process. Marriage in the East Sumba people have great symbol, not only for having a child but also to keep save uma marapu. The kinship of East Sumba people is patriarchy and the marriage system is always exogamy. It is taboo for marriage in one kabihu. Related to the kinship system in East Sumba, when a woman get married with a man from a different kabihu and her husband finishes his duties (belis), the woman will join her husband kabihu. Then, there is no kinship relation again between her and her old kabihu.Consequently, almost of the yera (wife’s family) make belis isimpossible to pay. From material aspect, belis process will give an advantage for the woman’s family but for the couple it will restraint their freedom. There is no private sphere for them because all of their marriage process will be judged and done by their family and kabihu.Keywords: East Sumba, marriage, uma marapu, kabihu, belis, yera,private sphere.
Konsep Materialitas-Spiritualitas dalam Historisitas Pierre Teilhard De Chardin Trisakti, Sonjoruri Budiani
Jurnal Filsafat "WISDOM" Jurnal Filsafat Seri 27 Maret 1997
Publisher : Fakultas Filsafat, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1577.768 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jf.31653

Abstract

Teilhard memandang kesadaran diri pada manusia sebagai perkembangan aspek spiritualitas yang didukung aspek materialitas.
THOMAS KUHN DAN TRADISI-INOVASI DALAM LANGKAH METODOLOGIS RISET ILMIAH Trisakti, Sonjoruri Budiani
Jurnal Filsafat "WISDOM" Vol 18, No 3 (2008)
Publisher : Fakultas Filsafat, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (170.492 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jf.3526

Abstract

AbstractThomas Kuhn divides scientific movement into normal science and revolutionary science. There is a difference between the type of scientific methodological research in normal scienceand that in revolutionary science. Scientists during normal science conduct their research activities restricted on the box of paradigmshared with the result that scientific research in normal science are always progressive in terms of cumulative progress. Scientists are tied to the tradition of paradigm-shared, and they difficult to release their dependence upon the paradigm-shared moreover to make innovation to the paradigm. Meanwhile, scientists during revolutionary science conduct their research activities based on the observations, experiments, and idea beyond the generally accepted paradigm which becomes questionable because of its failure to solve the crisis. Scientific research in revolutionary science is always progressive in terms of non-cumulative progress. Scientists become innovated person who see the crisis from a new perspective rather than from the tradition of the old-paradigm.Keywords: paradigm, normal science, scientific revolution
RUANG PRIVAT INDIVIDU DALAM SISTEM KAWIN MAWIN MASYARAKAT SUMBA TIMUR Lailiy Muthmainnah; Sonjoruri Budiani Trisakti
Jurnal Filsafat "WISDOM" Vol 20, No 3 (2010)
Publisher : Fakultas Filsafat, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jf.3421

Abstract

AbstractEast Sumba people have strong kinship and marital system.All of the living aspect of the East Sumba people managed by their kabihu. The various rights and duties will be emerge in the kabihu, include of this point is the custom duties related to the marriage process. Marriage in the East Sumba people have great symbol, not only for having a child but also to keep save uma marapu. The kinship of East Sumba people is patriarchy and the marriage system is always exogamy. It is taboo for marriage in one kabihu. Related to the kinship system in East Sumba, when a woman get married with a man from a different kabihu and her husband finishes his duties (belis), the woman will join her husband kabihu. Then, there is no kinship relation again between her and her old kabihu.Consequently, almost of the yera (wife’s family) make belis isimpossible to pay. From material aspect, belis process will give an advantage for the woman’s family but for the couple it will restraint their freedom. There is no private sphere for them because all of their marriage process will be judged and done by their family and kabihu.Keywords: East Sumba, marriage, uma marapu, kabihu, belis, yera,private sphere.
THOMAS KUHN DAN TRADISI-INOVASI DALAM LANGKAH METODOLOGIS RISET ILMIAH Sonjoruri Budiani Trisakti
Jurnal Filsafat "WISDOM" Vol 18, No 3 (2008)
Publisher : Fakultas Filsafat, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jf.3526

Abstract

AbstractThomas Kuhn divides scientific movement into normal science and revolutionary science. There is a difference between the type of scientific methodological research in normal scienceand that in revolutionary science. Scientists during normal science conduct their research activities restricted on the box of paradigmshared with the result that scientific research in normal science are always progressive in terms of cumulative progress. Scientists are tied to the tradition of paradigm-shared, and they difficult to release their dependence upon the paradigm-shared moreover to make innovation to the paradigm. Meanwhile, scientists during revolutionary science conduct their research activities based on the observations, experiments, and idea beyond the generally accepted paradigm which becomes questionable because of its failure to solve the crisis. Scientific research in revolutionary science is always progressive in terms of non-cumulative progress. Scientists become innovated person who see the crisis from a new perspective rather than from the tradition of the old-paradigm.Keywords: paradigm, normal science, scientific revolution
Konsep Materialitas-Spiritualitas dalam Historisitas Pierre Teilhard De Chardin Sonjoruri Budiani Trisakti
Jurnal Filsafat "WISDOM" Jurnal Filsafat Seri 27 Maret 1997
Publisher : Fakultas Filsafat, Universitas Gadjah Mada Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/jf.31653

Abstract

Teilhard memandang kesadaran diri pada manusia sebagai perkembangan aspek spiritualitas yang didukung aspek materialitas.
Pemberdayaan Pendidik Di Kalimantan Barat Dalam Menghadapi Kecerdasan Buatan di Era Disruptif Siregar, Alda Cendekia; Trisakti, Sonjoruri Budiani
Jurnal Medika: Medika Vol. 4 No. 3 (2025)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/2nsyyg84

Abstract

Perkembangan teknologi kecerdasan buatan (AI) telah membawa perubahan besar dalam dunia pendidikan, namun masih banyak pendidik di wilayah seperti Singkawang, Kalimantan Barat, yang belum siap menghadapi tantangan ini. Rendahnya literasi digital, minimnya pelatihan AI, serta keterbatasan infrastruktur menjadi hambatan utama dalam pemanfaatan AI oleh guru-guru setempat. Kegiatan pengabdian ini bertujuan untuk memberdayakan pendidik melalui pelatihan dan pendampingan penggunaan tools AI seperti ChatGPT dan Dreamina dalam kegiatan pembelajaran. Metode pelaksanaan mencakup observasi lapangan, workshop intensif, praktik langsung, serta evaluasi berbasis pretest dan posttest. Sebanyak 121 guru dari empat kabupaten mengikuti kegiatan ini, dengan hasil evaluasi menunjukkan peningkatan signifikan pemahaman peserta terhadap AI. Rata-rata skor posttest mencapai 88,71%, dengan mayoritas peserta menunjukkan pemahaman yang tepat terhadap konsep dan penerapan AI dalam pendidikan. Temuan ini menunjukkan bahwa pelatihan praktis dan pendampingan dapat secara efektif meningkatkan literasi AI guru, sekaligus menjembatani kesenjangan digital antara sekolah di perkotaan dan pedesaan. Hasil kegiatan ini menjadi dasar penting untuk pengembangan pelatihan lanjutan dan pembentukan komunitas guru AI di Kalimantan Barat guna menciptakan ekosistem pendidikan yang adaptif dan berkelanjutan.
Ethical Fragmentation and Public Moral Reasoning: Teachers, Religious Pluralism, and Kantian Evaluation in Indonesia Mujiharto, Samsul Ma’arif; Murtiningsih, Siti; Trisakti, Sonjoruri Budiani
Religious: Jurnal Studi Agama-Agama dan Lintas Budaya Vol. 9 No. 3 (2025)
Publisher : UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/rjsalb.v9i3.47898

Abstract

This study analyzes the ethical architecture of the teaching profession in Indonesia by examining how teacher ethics is governed and evaluated within a context of institutional and religious pluralism. It seeks to explain why teacher ethics has largely functioned as an instrument of professional governance rather than as a framework of public moral reasoning that supports teachers’ moral agency. This study adopts a qualitative normative–philosophical approach, analyzing Indonesian education policy documents—particularly the Regulation of the Minister of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology No. 67 of 2024—and codes of ethics issued by major teacher professional organizations (PGRI, IGI, PERGUNU, and Muhammadiyah). The analysis employs conceptual and argumentative methods, using Kantian ethics as an evaluative framework, while media-reported cases are referenced illustratively to contextualize normative tensions. The study identifies three central findings. First, teacher ethics in Indonesia is primarily framed in the language of compliance, discipline, and procedure, positioning ethics as a mechanism of professional governance. Second, the pluralism of organizational codes of ethics produces ethical fragmentation, whereby similar professional actions may be evaluated differently depending on institutional affiliation and adjudicative authority. Third, this configuration constrains teachers’ moral agency by prioritizing administrative conformity over rational moral justification that is public and universal in character. The findings suggest that addressing ethical fragmentation in the teaching profession requires more than regulatory harmonization or procedural standardization. Instead, there is a need for a shared framework of public moral reasoning that enables plural religious and institutional ethics to be evaluated through consistent and publicly justifiable criteria. Such a framework has implications for education policy, professional ethical governance, and the cultivation of teachers as autonomous moral agents in plural societies. This study contributes to religious studies and professional ethics scholarship by reframing ethical fragmentation not as a technical governance problem but as a problem of public moral justification within plural moral traditions. By employing Kantian ethics as an evaluative lens rather than a prescriptive doctrine, the study offers an original conceptual contribution to debates on religious pluralism, professional ethics, and moral agency in highly regulated educational contexts such as Indonesia.