Melati Fajarini
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

The Indonesian Version of Evidence-Based Practice Questionnaire (EBPQ): An Evaluation of Reliability Melati Fajarini; Sri Rahayu; Agus Setiawan
Indonesian Contemporary Nursing Journal Volume 5 No. 2 Februari 2021
Publisher : Faculty of Nursing, Universitas Hasanuddin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20956/icon.v5i2.10165

Abstract

Introduction: The use of evidence-based practice (EBP) has been demonstrated to increase the quality of patient care. However, the extent to which it is practiced in Indonesia is yet to be determined. It was necessary to develop a means of measuring EBP in order to acquire a profile of the use of EBP in Indonesia. The EBP questionnaire (EBPQ) developed by Upton and Upton was selected in the current study to evaluate the perceptions of healthcare workers regarding their knowledge of, attitudes toward, and practice of EBP. This questionnaire is widely recognized; however, an Indonesian version has not yet been developed. This study aimed to translate the EBPQ developed by Upton and Upton into Indonesian and to evaluate its reliability. Method: WHO framework on how to translate and adapt an instrument was applied. On completion of the forward translation and discussion process, backward translation of the EBPQ was performed, after which it was pretested and finalized. Reliability was tested by testing the questionnaire on 42 nurses at five hospitals in Depok and Jakarta. Result: Four words were changed. All items are valid. The reliability analysis resulted Cronbach’s a of 0.96 (a = 0.92, 0.80, and 0.96 for practice, attitude, and knowledge, respectively. Thus, 24 translated statements determined to be valid and reliable, were included in the final version. Conclusion: The Indonesian translated version of the EBPQ proposed by Upton and Upton was demonstrated to be valid and reliable. Further studies on the perceptions of healthcare workers  are warranted.
Metode Penelitian Eksperimental Yunitri, Ninik; Janitra, Fitria Endah; Kustanti, Christina Yeni; Nur Aini; Tiara Octary; Melati Fajarini; Hidayat Arifin; Putri, Alifiani Rahmi; Dluha Maf’ula; Yani Sofiani
Jurnal Kesehatan Vol 11 No 2 (2024): Jurnal Kesehatan
Publisher : STIKES Bethesda Yakkum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35913/jk.v11i2.453

Abstract

Praktik berbasis bukti dalam pengembangan ilmu kesehatan, menekankan perlunya penelitian berkelanjutan untuk memberikan dasar intervensi kesehatan terbaik. Keputusan klinis harus didasarkan pada bukti, bukan kebiasaan atau pendekatan tradisional, dan integrasi bukti dengan pengalaman klinis serta nilai-nilai pasien dapat meningkatkan kualitas pelayanan dan luaran klinik. Metode penelitian eksperimental dianggap sebagai standar baku karena bersifat objektif dan presisi dalam menjawab hipotesis sebab-akibat, dengan fokus pada pengaruh variabel bebas terhadap luaran yang diukur dan pengendalian variabel pengganggu. Saat ini terdapat variasi terminologi dalam metode penelitian kesehatan. Perbedaan istilah ini dapat menimbulkan kebingungan dalam memahami metodologi penelitian sehingga pemahaman perbedaan terminologi dalam metode penelitian eksperimental menjadi langkah awal dan penting. Telaah literatur ini memberikan penjelasan komprehensif terkait penelitian eksperimental untuk mendukung pengembangan pelayanan kesehatan.