Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 8 Documents
Search

Perubahan Konstitusi Melalui Putusan MK: Telaah Atas Putusan Nomor 138/PUU-VII/2009 Wardaya, Manunggal K.
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 7, No 2 (2010)
Publisher : Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (828.03 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk%x

Abstract

The Constitutional Court’s decision state that the authority to examine Perpu is a positive new development in constitutional law not just Indonesia that not only binds the parties, but the jurisprudence of the constitutional law in Indonesia, with the decision, to the possibility of abuse of power through Perpu and systemic weaknesses in the UUD 1945 in overseeing the president is to be anticipated product which itself also will give more legal protection for the seeker of justice, the ruling which states the The Constitutional Court’s authorities to examine Perpu in testing comes as the functioning of the judiciary as an organ which not only uphold the  law but also justice, by therefore, the decision was inspiring for judicial power in Indonesia to capitalize on his power to find justice.
Perubahan Konstitusi Melalui Putusan MK: Telaah Atas Putusan Nomor 138/PUU-VII/2009 Manunggal K. Wardaya
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 7, No 2 (2010)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (828.03 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk722

Abstract

The Constitutional Court’s decision state that the authority to examine Perpu is a positive new development in constitutional law not just Indonesia that not only binds the parties, but the jurisprudence of the constitutional law in Indonesia, with the decision, to the possibility of abuse of power through Perpu and systemic weaknesses in the UUD 1945 in overseeing the president is to be anticipated product which itself also will give more legal protection for the seeker of justice, the ruling which states the The Constitutional Court’s authorities to examine Perpu in testing comes as the functioning of the judiciary as an organ which not only uphold the  law but also justice, by therefore, the decision was inspiring for judicial power in Indonesia to capitalize on his power to find justice.
The Right to be Forgotten as Protection for Children Victims of Non-Consensual Pornography Crime Renald Markus Sinaga; Manunggal Kusuma Wardaya
Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Vol 21, No 2 (2021)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20884/1.jdh.2021.21.2.2845

Abstract

Revenge porn refers to the distribution of sexually explicit images without the consent of the pictured individual, in most cases, this happens when someone decides to end the relationship with their partner, the partner who refused their decision then threatens to spread their sexually explicit images on the internet. So far, the existing legal system only accommodates aspects of criminal prosecution for non-consensual pornography offenders. However, if we conduct further observation, the protection that is most needed by the victims is how to reduce the negative impact of this which can harm their future. The right to forget is a right that gives a person the right to delete their data from search engines and other directories under certain circumstances. In a general context, this right is still problematic to adopt because it can threaten the rights for freedom of speech. However, in the context above, this right may be important to be applied for the protection of someone against mistakes made under the age of age. Convention on the Rights of the Child articles 16 & 40 (2) (b) (vii) as explained by the children's rights committee in General comment no. 10 (2007) on Children's rights in juvenile justice in the “Full respect of privacy” section guarantees the rights of child perpetrators of criminal offenses to be kept secret, even in the Beijing rules article 21.1 & 21.2 regulate to avoid stigmatization and/or prejudice or to increase penalties then the record of child offenders is not may be used in subsequent cases when the child is an adult.Keywords: child porn; human rights; nonconsensual pornography; porn revenge; right to be forgotten
Keadilan Bagi yang Berbeda Paham: Rekonsiliasi dan Keadilan Bagi Korban Tragedi 1965 Manunggal Kusuma Wardaya
Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada Vol 22, No 1 (2010)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (401.826 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/jmh.16211

Abstract

Human rights enforcement is one improperly- accomplished agenda in this post-1998 democratisation. Severe human rights violations such as 1965 Tragedy remain obscure, nonlitigation resolution (e.g. recognition and compensation) is considered the best solution. Recognition also is a form of respect to human rights and a stepping stone to resolve other tragedies.  Penegakan HAM merupakan salah satu agenda demokratisasi yang belum sepenuhnya tercapai. Pelanggaran-pelanggaran HAM berat seperti Tragedi 1965 masih belum jelas sehingga penyelesaian nonlitigasi (pengakuan dan kompensasi), dianggap sebagai solusi yang terbaik. Pengakuan tersebut merupakan bentuk tanggungjawab untuk menghormati HAM dan menjadi batu loncatan untuk mengungkap tragedi HAM lainnya.
Perubahan Konstitusi Melalui Putusan MK: Telaah Atas Putusan Nomor 138/PUU-VII/2009 Manunggal K. Wardaya
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 7, No 2 (2010)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (828.03 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/jk722

Abstract

The Constitutional Court’s decision state that the authority to examine Perpu is a positive new development in constitutional law not just Indonesia that not only binds the parties, but the jurisprudence of the constitutional law in Indonesia, with the decision, to the possibility of abuse of power through Perpu and systemic weaknesses in the UUD 1945 in overseeing the president is to be anticipated product which itself also will give more legal protection for the seeker of justice, the ruling which states the The Constitutional Court’s authorities to examine Perpu in testing comes as the functioning of the judiciary as an organ which not only uphold the  law but also justice, by therefore, the decision was inspiring for judicial power in Indonesia to capitalize on his power to find justice.
KEDARURATAN KESEHATAN MASYARAKAT DAN PEMBATASAN HAM DALAM PERSPEKTIF HUKUM KETATANEGARAAN INDONESIA Andi Daffa Patiroi; Riris Ardhanariswari; Manunggal Kusuma Wardaya
Veritas et Justitia Vol. 9 No. 1 (2023): Veritas et Justitia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Parahyangan Catholic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25123/vej.v9i1.5962

Abstract

The COVID-19 that spread in early 2020 made countries all over the world declare a state of emergency. In the context of Indonesia, President Joko Widodo declared COVID-19 as a type of disease that causes a public health emergency through Presidential Decree Number 11 of 2020 on March 31, 2020. This study aims to find out the status of public health emergencies from the perspective of Indonesian constitutional law. Furthermore, this research also aims to find out how the state's authority in limiting human rights in public health emergencies is according to human rights law. In its analysis, this research uses a normative juridical method with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The results obtained indicate that the status of public health emergency as stated in Presidential Decree Number 11 of 2020 is different from the state of emergency as stated in Article 12 of the 1945 Constitution. As for the limitation of human rights, the state has the authority to limit the human rights of its citizens in the COVID-19 public health emergency.
IMPLIKASI KEBIJAKAN PENGGUNAAN APLIKASI PeduliLindungi TERHADAP HAK ASASI MANUSIA Aji Bayu Mahendra; Riris Ardhanariswari; Manunggal Kusuma Wardaya; Tenang Haryanto
Soedirman Law Review Vol 4, No 4 (2022)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20884/1.slr.2022.4.4.218

Abstract

Penetapan pandemi Covid-19 oleh WHO membuat Indonesia menetapkan keadaan ini sebagai keadaan darurat melalui Keppres No.11 Tahun 2020 tentang Penetapan Kedaruratan Kesehatan Masyarakat Covid-19. Penetapan tersebut mengharuskan dilakukannya Pembatasan Sosial Berskala Besar (PSBB) yang kemudian digantikan dengan Pemberlakuan Pembatasan Kegiatan Masyarakat (PPKM). PPKM saat penelitian ini dilakukan ditetapkan melalui Instruksi Mendagri No.39 Tahun 2021 yang selain mengatur PPKM, juga mengatur kewajiban menggunakan aplikasi PeduliLindungi sebagai syarat masuk fasilitas umum bagi masyarakat. Pada sisi lainnya, data Badan Pusat Statistik (BPS) tahun 2020 menggambarkan jika sepertiga masyarakat Indonesia tidak memiliki ponsel dan terancam tidak dapat menggunakan PeduliLindungi. Kebijakan PeduliLindungi sebagai syarat masuk fasilitas umum tersebut menjadi inspirasi dimana dalam penelitian ini hendak dicari tahu implikasi kebijakan PeduliLindungi terhadap HAM, khususnya mengenai hak masyarakat non pemilik ponsel untuk bebas bergerak dan tidak mendapat diskriminasi. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian yuridis normatif ini adalah metode kualitatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan. Dari penelitian ini diperoleh kesimpulan jika kewajiban menggunakan PeduliLindungi berpotensi melanggar hak bebas dan dapat menyebabkan diskriminasi terkhusus kepada warga yang tidak memiliki ponsel.Kata Kunci: Covid-19, PPKM, PeduliLindungi, Hak Asasi Manusia
REVOLUSI MEDIA, JURNALISME GLOBAL, DAN HUKUM PERS INDONESIA Wardaya, Manunggal K.; Komari, Ahmad
Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Vol 11, No 2 (2011)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20884/1.jdh.2011.11.2.194

Abstract

The development in information technology influences many aspects of human life including news media. Various definitions in media have encountered significant changes and cannot anymore be us-ed. Press Law as a main regulation of news media Indonesia is no exception. Its relevancy is now be-ing questioned and even challenged when it fails to adopt with the changes in society. This article believes that the amendment of Press Law should be done so that it will be responsive towards the need of the constantly-changing society. Keywords: information technology, media, press, citizen journalism