Mohammad Sarfan Basyir Putuhena
Universitas Islam Negeri Abdul Muthalib Sangadji Ambon

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

Effectiveness of Customary Law Hita La Uwa Uwato as A Form of Settlement of Pidana Theft in The Country of Iha Seram District of West Mohammad Sarfan Basyir Putuhena
Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist Vol 6 No 2 (2022): JUNE
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35326/volkgeist.v6i2.2028

Abstract

This paper explains about how the process of solving the crime of theft using the customary law of Hita La Uwa Uwato (Whip Law) of Iha State of Western Seram Regency, research methods is empirical research by a sociological juridical research approach, data collection instruments are carried out by interviews of predetermined respondents, review of legal documents and observations. The collected data is then analyzed qualitatively. This research shows that, the completion of the Crime of Theft by using customary law in the State of Iha District of Western Seram Maluku Province is very effective where the process is whipped using rattan in addition there are also additional sanctions given, namely indemnifying, as well as apologizing to the community, and the factors that affect its effectiveness are, the Legal factor, Law Enforcement, and Cultural and Community factors.
Upaya Penyelesaian Persekusi di Indonesia Menggunakan Pendekatan Analisis Hirarki La Sugi; Mohammad Sarfan Basyir Putuhena
Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS) Vol 5, No 1 (2022): Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS), August
Publisher : Mahesa Research Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (359.984 KB) | DOI: 10.34007/jehss.v5i1.1181

Abstract

This article aims to analyze efforts to solve the problem of persecution that often occurs in Indonesia. Persecution is a type of crime against humanity due to the deliberate deprivation of basic rights that is against the law. This article uses a qualitative approach with an Analytical Hierarchy Process from William Dunn (2003) as the unit of analysis. The results of the study indicate that the Possible Causes or causes that cause a problem are due to law (legal culture) and democracy. While the Plausible Causes or reasonable causes that can have a significant influence on the two causes are disobedience to law, universal truth claims, and majority domination. So that Actionable Causes or what needs to be followed up by the government in overcoming the problem of persecution is optimizing legal education and the state is obliged to provide protection for citizens.
Korelasi Asas Equality Before the Law dengan Affirmative Action dalam UU No. 7 Tahun 2017 tentang Pemilihan Umum: Studi Kritis atas Kuota 30% Keterwakilan Perempuan Muh Akbar Yanlua; Mohammad Sarfan Basyir Putuhena; Syah Awaluddin
Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 4 No. 4 (2025): JURRISH: Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jurrish.v4i4.6537

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the correlation between the principle of equality before the law and the affirmative action policy, which is expressed in the form of a 30% quota for women's representation in the political field, as stipulated in Law Number 7 of 2017 concerning General Elections. The focus of the study is directed at the extent to which this quota policy is in line with the principle of equality before the law and reflects substantive justice in democratic practices in Indonesia. The research method used is normative research by examining laws and regulations, legal doctrine, and relevant literature. This approach is used to assess whether the quota policy for women's representation is in accordance with the constitutional principle of equality, while also considering the challenges of its implementation in a socio-political context that is still gender biased. The results of the study indicate that the 30% quota for women in legislative candidacy is a form of positive discrimination intended to correct structural and historical inequalities in women's political participation. This policy is expected to open wider spaces for participation so that women have equal opportunities to play a role in the legislative process and public policy making. However, this policy has also drawn criticism. Some believe that the quota emphasizes fulfilling numbers rather than the quality and capacity of the individuals nominated. Therefore, the quota must be accompanied by efforts to improve the quality of women's human resources, political education, and transparent, merit-based selection mechanisms. This way, women's representation will not only be formal but also substantial and contribute significantly to democratic development. In conclusion, the 30% quota policy remains necessary as an affirmative step toward de facto equality. However, strengthening capacity and supporting systems is crucial for its implementation to align with the principle of equality before the law and achieve substantive justice.  
Pandangan Masyarakat Kota Ambon Terhadap Penikahan Beda Agama Dalam Tinjauan Soisologi Hukum Putuhena, Mohammad Sarfan Basyir
Al-Mizan (e-Journal) Vol. 20 No. 2 (2024): Al-Mizan (e-Journal)
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Institut Agama Islam Negeri Sultan Amai Gorontalo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30603/am.v20i2.5640

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the views of the Ambon city community towards interfaith marriage.This research uses empirical normative methods, both legislative and legal sociology approaches. The types of primary data sources obtained come from observations, and interviews as well as secondary data in the form of literature studies. Furthermore, data was collected and analyzed in a qualitative descriptive manner, the results of this study showed that, the public's perception and understanding of interfaith marriage all agreed that interfaith marriage is forbidden (haram) and automatically invalid, interfaith marriage is also one of the deviations that violate religious law and positive law in Indonesia.
Kematian Demokrasi Melalui Undang - Undang Nomor 3 Tahun 2025 : Mengurai Problematik Yuridis Terhadap Kekuatan Bersenjata Tentara Nasional Indonesia (TNI) Dalam Kedudukan pada Jabatan Sipil Sahad Azid Barakati; Muhammad Akmal Zawawi; Asrul Hatapayo; Ridwan Fauzy Lestaluhu; Mohammad Sarfan Basyir Putuhena
Indonesian Journal of Islamic Jurisprudence, Economic and Legal Theory Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026)
Publisher : SPT. haria Journal and Education Center Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62976/ijijel.v4i2.1996

Abstract

Penelitian ini menganalisis implikasi yuridis dari pengesahan Undang-Undang Nomor 3 Tahun 2025 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 34 Tahun 2004 tentang Tentara Nasional Indonesia (TNI), khususnya terkait perluasan jabatan sipil yang dapat diduduki oleh prajurit aktif. Permasalahan utama yang dikaji adalah potensi terjadinya kemunduran demokrasi akibat melemahnya kontrol sipil serta munculnya ketidakselarasan sistemik antara norma pembatasan jabatan militer dan praktik penempatan prajurit aktif di lapangan. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode yuridis-normatif dengan menganalisis sinkronisasi vertikal perundang-undangan dan pendekatan kasus melalui sengketa konstitusional di Mahkamah Konstitusi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penempatan prajurit aktif pada kementerian non-limitatif dan Badan Usaha Milik Negara (BUMN) yang didasarkan pada regulasi di bawah undang-undang (seperti Keputusan Presiden, Keputusan Panglima TNI, dan Keputusan Menteri BUMN) melanggar asas lex superior derogat legi inferiori. Praktik penempatan tersebut melemahkan prinsip supremasi sipil, memicu tumpang tindih fungsi pertahanan dan administrasi pemerintahan, serta menciptakan dualisme akuntabilitas hukum yang mencederai integritas negara hukum yang demokratis.