Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Penerapan Pidana Penjara terhadap Kleptomaniak: Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Syarif Saddam Rivanie; Slamet Sampurno Soewondo; Nur Azisa; Muhammad Topan Abadi; Ismail Iskandar
SIGn Jurnal Hukum Vol 4 No 1: April - September 2022
Publisher : CV. Social Politic Genius (SIGn)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37276/sjh.v4i1.169

Abstract

This study aims to examine and analyze the Judge’s application of imprisonment to kleptomaniacs based on Decision No. 574/Pid.B/2019/PN.Dps. This study uses a normative juridical research method. The data was collected using literature study techniques on primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The collected legal material is then analyzed using qualitative data analysis methods with a statute approach and a case approach which will then conclude the object of the research. The results show that the Judge’s application of imprisonment to the accused is based on Decision No. 574/Pid.B/2019/PN.Dps was the right decision. In this case, the problem of kleptomania currently ongoing in court should be proven with a Psychiatric Visum et Repertum. While the Letter of Statement No. 01/II.MR/RSPI/2019 cannot be the basis for the implementation of eliminating punishment. To determine that a person has kleptomania must undergo a process of examination for a minimum of two weeks to three months. Therefore, it is recommended that investigators provide the opportunity or take the initiative to prove the suspect’s mental condition before being processed to the following legal proof stage. So no more accused who prove their status as kleptomaniacs using the letter of statement. The Judge is also recommended to decide by giving measures sanction to the accused if proven to have kleptomania to avoid the recurrence of the crime of theft in the future.
Edukasi Hukum Hak Atas Tanah Individual Memitigasi Sengketa di Kelurahan Lumpue Parepare Mutiah Wenda Juniar; A. Suci Wahyuni; Andi Muhammad Aswin Anas; Ismail Iskandar; Arini Nur Annisa; A. Farina Aura Aulya; Dyandra Rayyani Hendra Putri; Abdi Ardiansyah; Tiara Karmen Visya Lagoan; Andi Besse Alfiyah
Jurnal Masyarakat Indonesia (Jumas) Vol. 4 No. 03 (2025): Jurnal Masyarakat Indonesia (Jumas)
Publisher : Cattleya Darmaya Fortuna

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54209/jumas.v4i03.333

Abstract

Land rights are part of human rights guaranteed by the constitution as stipulated in Article 28H paragraph (4) of the 1945 Constitution. However, practice in the field shows that many people still face land disputes due to weak administration and a lack of legal understanding. In the Lumpue sub-district of Pare-Pare city, there were overlapping claims of land ownership and transfers of land rights under the table without involving a notary. This community service activity was aimed at providing legal education in the form of interactive and participatory discussions on the theme of Land Rights as Human Rights: Mitigating Land Disputes. The activity was carried out in three stages: a pretest, legal counseling, and a post-test. The counseling and discussion activities were held at the Lumpue Village Office in Pare-Pare City and were attended by community members, village office officials, and resource persons from the Pare-Pare City Land Office as well as academics with expertise in land law. The land issues faced by the community are diverse, such as transfer of rights without going through a PPAT (Land Deed Official), lack of land title certificates, boundary disputes, land measurement, land use taxes, and land use in coastal areas. This program successfully built legal awareness and strengthened the community's capacity to avoid land disputes and conflicts. The handling of disputes through the district/city land office needs to synergize with the local government, especially at the village and sub-district levels, so that the resolution of disputes experienced by the community can be optimized
Persepsi mahasiswa sebagai pemilih pemula terhadap normalisasi politik uang dalam pemilihan umum Ahmad Fachri Faqi; Muh. Hasrul; Amaliyah Amaliyah; Ismail Iskandar; M. Aris Munandar
Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi Vol 9 No 1 (2023): INTEGRITAS: Jurnal Antikorupsi
Publisher : Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32697/integritas.v9i1.981

Abstract

The practice of money politics by some parties has been considered normal in elections in Indonesia. Money politics has been extensively discussed in the literature regarding voter behaviour in Indonesia from a political, sociological, psychological, and rational choice (political economy) perspective. Some studies focus on the influence of money politics in elections. Several international studies have also discussed academic explanations regarding the electoral impact of money politics. Beginner voters are a segment of voters who are considered more rational and not as pragmatic, with an increased awareness of the importance of holding elections with integrity. This study aims to determine students' perceptions as first-time voters of the normalization of money politics in elections. This research uses qualitative methods with a descriptive approach. The data used in this study is primary data in the form of structured interviews using questionnaires and secondary data. The research results show that most respondents know the prevalence and forms/types of money politics. Respondents have a perception that tends to be balanced regarding whether they agree or disagree that money politics is a common practice in elections in Indonesia. Factors that influence respondents' perceptions include elements in the respondent's self, factors on targets or objects, and situation/context factors.