Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 16 Documents
Search

Inequality as a Construct of Customary Law: Access to Home Ownership Rights of Women in Lampung Napsiah, Napsiah; Muryanti, Muryanti; Wijayanti, Yani Tri
El-Usrah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Vol 7, No 1 (2024): EL-USRAH: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/ujhk.v7i1.22456

Abstract

The current study examined the challenges of women living under Lampung’s highly stringent customary law pertaining to the acquisition of home ownership rights in 3 villages in Hulu Sungkai, North Lampung, Indonesia. In Lampung customary law, the home is conferred to the male descendant. This study employed the constructivist perspective and used data collected from field observations, interviews, document analyses, and literature reviews to address the practices of traditional power among Lampung women. The research results indicate that the construct of customary law has positioned women and men differently, subsequently leading to unequal treatment of women in the family. Patriarchy’s dominance in Lampung customary law has made life more difficult for women, who are already responsible for housekeeping and enriching education. Still, customary practices provide them no opportunity of any kind, and this has negative consequences. Women are highly dependent on men, and women frequently become victims of domestic violence. The construct of Lampung customs has established how women are treated in society. Lampung’s customary construct needs to be counterbalanced by a better public understanding of property ownership laws so that people have more gender awareness regarding home ownership.
Indonesian Society is Not Disabled Friendly? Napsiah, Napsiah; Wijayanti, Yani Tri
JURNAL ILMU SOSIAL Vol 22, No 1 (2023)
Publisher : Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/jis.22.1.2023.147-164

Abstract

The case of a state official required a Deaf person to answer questions submitted to a Deaf person on World Disabilities Day in 2021 by using spoken language and refusing to use sign language because it was considered that the disabled have the same abilities as the non- disabled group. The perception of these state officials is a representation of the Indonesian population in understanding disabilities. The purpose of this research is to prove that Indonesia already has a policy to align the life positions of disabled people with non-disabled people, but these policies do not reach the community level, so that people are not friendly to people with disabilities. This research uses descriptive qualitative method by analyzing interview data and indirect observation, as well as combining secondary data obtained from previous research, the website found that facilities in the form of infrastructure were uneven and low sign language skills for non-disabled groups led to a lack of knowledge about the existence of disabilities. The result of this study shows that the disabled group cannot adapt to their own environment so that the existence of disabilities is not widely known by the public. The lack of knowledge about people with disabilities causes people to think that disabled groups are the same as non-disabled groups. Such perception is then considered by the people of Indonesia to be unfriendly to persons with disabilities.
Reconstructing the Ministry of Communication and Digital’s Image in the TikTok Live Controversy Solihah, Sopiyani; Wijayanti, Yani Tri
Communication Vol 17, No 1 (2026): Communication
Publisher : Fakultas Komunikasi & Desain Kreatif - Universitas Budi Luhur

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36080/Comm

Abstract

Freedom of expression in Indonesia is regulated under Article 28E (3) of the 1945 Constitution. On September 3, 2025, the Indonesian government disabled the live broadcast feature on the TikTok platform while the August 25, 2025 demonstration was still ongoing. This decision sparked public perception of restrictions on freedom of expression through digital media, because social media, including TikTok's live feature, is used by the public to share situations in real time. This phenomenon placed the Ministry of Communication and Digital Affairs (Komdigi) under public scrutiny and triggered a crisis. This study aims to analyze Komdigi's crisis communication strategy, as it directly relates to the sustainability of public trust, policy legitimacy, and the effectiveness of government functions in a digital era.. This study uses quantitative content analysis with research objects in the form of news published by detik.com during the period of August 26 to September 3, 2025. The results show that Komdigi predominantly used the Denial strategy with a percentage of 100%, meaning that in all 10 news articles containing Komdigi's response to the crisis, Komdigi consistently provided denials or rejections. Other strategies included Evasion of Responsibility (60%), Corrective Action (70%), and Reducing Offensiveness (90%). Meanwhile, this study found no use of the Mortification strategy, which was recorded at 0%. Overall, Komdigi relied heavily on denial, while simultaneously attempting to reduce allegations, reducing negative perceptions, promising improvements, and avoiding direct responsibility without apologizing.
Kampanye Digital, FoMO, dan Kesadaran Politik di Kalangan Generasi Z: Bukti dari Gerakan Viral “Brave Pink” Habib, Ahmad Fuad; Pratama, David Rino; Wijayanti, Yani Tri
Jurnal Mahasiswa Komunikasi Cantrik Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): Volume 6, No.1, May 2026
Publisher : Program Studi Ilmu Komunikasi UII

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20885/cantrik.vol6.iss1.art2

Abstract

The wave of national demonstrations in August 2025 prompted the emergence of the symbolic digital campaign Brave Pink which spread widely on social media and gained widespread engagement among Generation Z. This study is based on the Uses and Effects theory which explains the relationship between digital media exposure, psychological responses, and the formation of political awareness. This study aims to analyze the influence of the Brave Pink campaign on the political awareness of Generation Z with Fear of Missing Out (FoMO) as a mediating variable. The study used a quantitative approach with a survey design of 396 followers of the Instagram account @barengwarga. Data analysis was carried out using Structural Equation Modeling with the Partial Least Squares (SEM-PLS) approach. The results showed that the Brave Pink campaign had a significant effect on Fear of Missing Out (β = 0.910; p < 0.001) and a direct effect on political awareness (β = 0.622; p < 0.001). Fear of Missing Out also had a significant effect on political awareness (β = 0.370; p < 0.001) and acted as a partial mediator. The research model has very strong predictive power with an R² value of 0.943. This study provides a theoretical contribution by developing the Uses and Effects framework in the context of digital political communication, specifically through the integration of Fear of Missing Out (FoMO) as a psychological mechanism that bridges the relationship between exposure to symbolic digital campaigns and the formation of political awareness. These findings broaden the understanding of the role of emotional factors in strengthening media effects on Generation Z audiences.
The Relationship between Health Message Credibility in TikTok Short Video Content and Audience Anxiety Munajar Munajar; Deni Wirahadi; Yani Tri Wijayanti
SEARCH: Science Education Research Journal Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): April 2026
Publisher : IAIN Sorong

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47945/search.v4i2.2890

Abstract

The rapid growth of social media, particularly TikTok, has transformed how people access health information, especially among younger generations. While TikTok enables fast and engaging dissemination of health messages, it is also vulnerable to misinformation that may increase audience anxiety. This study aimed to examine the relationship between perceived credibility of health messages in TikTok short-video content and audience anxiety levels in Indonesia. A quantitative approach with a correlational cross-sectional survey design was employed. The sample consisted of 250 active TikTok users aged 18–40 years in Yogyakarta Special Region, Indonesia, who had previously viewed health-related content. Health message credibility was measured based on perceived expertise and trustworthiness of information sources, while anxiety levels were assessed using the GAD-7 scale. Data were analyzed using Pearson correlation and simple linear regression. The findings revealed a significant moderate negative relationship between perceived health message credibility and audience anxiety (r = –0.665; p < 0.05). Higher perceived credibility was associated with lower anxiety levels. These findings emphasize the importance of delivering credible health information through social media to support effective digital health communication.
Analisis Paparan Konten Instagram @narasinewsroom Mengenai Partisipasi Publik dalam Penyebaran Tagar #IndonesiaGelap Anang Rivai, Muhamad; Nurazizah, Siti; Wijayanti, Yani Tri
Jurnal Audiens Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): March
Publisher : Universitas Muhammdiyah Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.18196/jas.v7i1.764

Abstract

This research aims to analyze how exposure to Instagram content tagged #IndonesiaGelap on the @narasinewsroom account shapes public attention and participation in the digital space. The study applies the Agenda Setting theory, which emphasizes the media’s capacity to influence which issues are perceived as important by the public through content intensity, consistency, and prominence. The research employs a quantitative content analysis method on Instagram posts and audience comments by categorizing content themes, message types, and comment sentiments (positive, negative, and neutral). Data are analyzed based on frequency patterns and levels of audience interaction as indicators of the public agenda. The findings reveal that content exposure is predominantly centered on public policy issues, with negative sentiment emerging as the most dominant response among audiences. This dominance reflects heightened public attention and accumulated dissatisfaction with state policies that have become central within Instagram discourse. Overall, the study confirms that exposure to social media content plays an effective role in shaping the public agenda and stimulating digital audience participation.