Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
1.168
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Civilia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan
Otto Yudianto
Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya
Humanities Computer Science & IT Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Other

Published : 7 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 7 Documents
Search

 1 
PEMERIKSAAN SAKSI DALAM PERSIDANGAN TELECONFERENCE PADA MASA PANDEMI COVID – 19 Mochamad Arief Setiawan; Otto Yudianto
Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance Vol. 2 No. 2 (2022): Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance
Publisher : Gapenas Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53363/bureau.v2i2.43

Abstract

The Covid-19 pandemic has made evidence through witness examination evidence encounter changes, which were followed by knowledge from experts in the field of science and technology. The influence of the advancement of today's science and technology into the practice of trial cases in the field of criminal procedural law that affects the proof of evidence by examining witness statements previously in the Criminal Procedure Code was required to be present in the courtroom and then examined and questioned by the judge and must also be sworn in in the room. The trial turns into witnesses who can be sworn in and asked for a statement by the judge via electronic means with the term being a teleconference trial. The practice of this teleconference trial still has to bring judges along with prosecutors and legal counsel to court, but defendants and witnesses are not welcome to come if they encounter obstacles to come and can be sworn in and asked for information via video telephone via cellphone or other electronic devices that can use the internet. The defendant and the witness still have to attend the trial directly, but it can be carried out from home or other supportive places because electronic devices are able to make judges and legal advisors and prosecutors see directly from a distance the witness and defendant through the cellphone screen. To keep up with the times, the government of the judiciary, namely the Supreme Court, issued PERMA No. 4 of 2020 concerning Administration and Trial of Criminal Cases in Courts Electronically as a regulation for holding teleconference trials. This poses a problem when viewed in the Criminal Procedure Code which requires the defendant to be present in the courtroom (Articles 154 and 196). In the criminal trial process is also based on the legal principles “Examinations are carried out directly and orally. The method used in this research is normative research method. Witness testimony delivered by teleconference is not regulated in the Criminal Procedure Code. LPSK regulates through Law 13 of 2006 article 9 emphasizing that there are 3 options for witnesses if they are not required to come in person during the trial. The Supreme Court through its regulations, namely PERMA No. 4 of 2020, explains the sequence and stages of court case affairs which are carried out by utilizing internet facilities starting from the beginning of the process to the procedure for asking witness statements via tele conference to fill legal voids that occur due to forced circumstances (Force Majeur). caused by the covid-19 pandemic
PENEMBAKAN POLRI DALAM MELAKSANAKAN TUGAS YANG DAPAT DI KATEGORIKAN SEBAGAI PEMBELAAN TERPAKSA Rachmadio Firmansyah; Otto Yudianto
Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance Vol. 3 No. 2 (2023): Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance
Publisher : Gapenas Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53363/bureau.v3i2.229

Abstract

Members of the police force are often blamed for actions taken with spontaneity in taking an action. Forced actions taken, such as shootings, are often questioned. Whether the action should have been taken or should it have gone through a special technical technicality so that members of the police force can take decisive action by carrying out a shooting. So it is felt that there must be rules that provide protection to police members so that police members can carry out their assigned duties properly, and police members are not always blamed for actions resulting from their actions to carry out their duties. The duties carried out by police members are indeed many directly related to the community so that people's opinions on the implementation of the duties of police members are indeed diverse and not all police members who are proven to have committed criminal acts such as shootings can be criminally charged. So there needs to be a legal protection for members of the police who carry out their duties, especially taking decisive action by forcibly paralyzing even resulting in a person's death
PRESPEKTIF HUKUM PIDANA DALAM MEMPERDAGANGKAN SPIRIT DOLL DI MEDIA SOSIAL Nofaziah Eky Pratiwi; Otto Yudianto
Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance Vol. 3 No. 2 (2023): Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance
Publisher : Gapenas Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53363/bureau.v3i2.250

Abstract

Cultural diversity is a reality that has existed throughout history in human life. Cultural diversity or what is called cultural diversity is a necessity that exists on Indonesian soil. Cultural diversity in Indonesia is something that cannot be denied and historically the Indonesian nation has a variety of cultural diversity in it. Cultural diversity gives birth to customs and beliefs. There are various types and variations in beliefs that grow among the community, both in the form of rituals or in the form of offering ceremonies, belief in spirits, and dealing with sacred objects that store supernatural energy. One example is belief in amulets. In this research, I will explain about amulets that are packaged very cute and have many forms, functions and so on. This modern talisman is known as a spirit doll
PENGATURAN PEMBERIAN RESTITUSI DALAM SUATU TINDAK PIDANA PEMBUNUHAN (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 22-K/PMT-II/AD/II/2022) Anissa Rahmawati; Otto Yudianto
Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance Vol. 3 No. 2 (2023): Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance
Publisher : Gapenas Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53363/bureau.v3i2.273

Abstract

Providing a justice or legal protection for victims of criminal acts is a form of right owned by the victim and the victim's family which can be called the right of restitution, which aims to alleviate suffering and losses caused by a crime. This study aims to determine the importance of granting restitution in a crime of murder. In Law Number 31 of 2014 concerning Amendments to Law Number 13 of 2006 concerning Protection of Witnesses and Victims (UU PSK), it is a concrete form that the Indonesian state supports protecting and providing justice for victims of a crime, for state accountability to the people. As for the processes or phases pertaining to the application for the awarding of rights to compensation and rights to restitution by victims, their families, or their proxies via the Witness and Victim Protection Agency (LPSK), they have the right to petition to court. Procedures for Completing Applications and Granting Restitution and Compensation to Crime Victims, as outlined in Supreme Court Regulation (Perma) No. 1 of 2022. The Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) in Article 98 paragraph (1) regulates the merger of cases for compensation. This writing finds the fact that in criminal justice in Indonesia it is still rarely applied by judges in deciding cases of merging compensation claims and in granting restitution to victims of criminal acts which is a form of state responsibility regarding effective protection of human rights (HAM) for victims. However, related to this, in practice, in the provision of restitution, there is still a lack of supervision by the LPSK towards victims after receiving restitution, because the available data is inadequate, as well as a lack of Human Resources (HR) and the lack of a supporting budget in granting restitution.
Akibat Hukum Bug Hunter yang Melakukan Illegal Access Terhadap Aplikasi Argo Cakra Wardaya; Otto Yudianto
Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Vol. 3 No. 6 (2023): Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research
Publisher : Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/innovative.v3i6.6402

Abstract

Menemukan celah atau bug terhadap suatu sistem atau aplikasi merupakan kegiatan yang positif yang sangat membantu bagi pemilik aplikasi yang diuntungkan dengan temuan tersebut. Bug hunter yang memiliki etika untuk melaporkan informasi hasil temuan bug terhadap suatu sistem atau aplikasi tetapi memasuki sistem atau aplikasi tanpa seizin pemilik aplikasi masih menjadi persoalan. Kegiatan yang dilakukan oleh Bug Hunter yang memasuki sistem aplikasi tanpa seizin developer untuk menemukan bug atau celah keamanan dilakukan dengan sengaja dan mengetahuinya. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif yang dilakukan dengan cara mencari dan meneliti bahan pustaka atau data skunder, menemukan aturan hukum, prinsip-prinsip hukum, dengan mengumpulkan bahan hukum berupa norma dan asas-asas hukum yang kemudian dianalisis untuk memberikan jawaban terkait isu hukum yang dihadapi. Kesengajaan yang menjadi dasar bagi Bug Hunter dalam melakukan aksinya inilah yang mengakibatkan Bug Hunter terjerat Illegal Access walaupun dilandasi dengan motif etika yang baik tetapi unsur kesengajaan yang dilakukan Bug Hunter dan memasuki sistem aplikasi tanpa seizin pemilik aplikasi inilah yang mengakibatkan Bug Hunter terjerat Illegal Access.
Analisis Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Memutus Perkara Terhadap Penyalahguna Narkotika Muhammad Fikri Fahrudin; Otto Yudianto
Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Vol. 3 No. 6 (2023): Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research
Publisher : Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/innovative.v3i6.6740

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pertimbangan hakim dalam memutus perkara terhadap penyalahguna narkotika.Topik ini menarik untuk diteliti karena adanya perbedaan putusan pengadilan nomor 154/Pid.Sus/2019/Pn Mam dan putusan nomor 389/Pid.Sus/2021/Pn Sgt.Dalam kedua putusan tersebut pelaku sama-sama merupakan penyalahguna narkotika. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum yuridis normatif (legal research).Sementara pendekatan yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah pendekatan kasus (case approach). Adapun bahan hukum yang digunakan adalah bahan hukum primer dan bahan hukum sekunder.Berdasarkan pembahasan pertimbangan dalam memutus perkara terhadap penyalahguna narkotika dalam menangani penyalahguna narkotika hakim dapat berbeda putusan.Dalam kasus penyalahguna narkotika hakim seharusnya memiliki persamaan dalam memutus perkara ini.Hasil penelitian ini adalah Putusan hakim dalam kasus penyalahgunaan narkotika seringkali tidak konsisten, karena dipengaruhi oleh Sejumlah faktor seperti kondisi ekonomi dan sosial serta fakta hukum ikut berperan dalam proses persidangan. Pertimbangan utama hakim dalam menentukan apakah seorang pelaku akan direhabilitasi atau dihukum adalah berdasarkan bukti bahwa ia benar-benar korban dan didukung dengan hasil pemeriksaan pusat rehabilitasi atau rumah sakit beserta ulasan dokter yang menjelaskan sejauh mana kecanduannya.Selain itu, permohonan rehabilitasi terdakwa juga harus dipertimbangkan.
Urgensi Pengaturan yang Mewajibkan Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Asal dalam Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Andy Putra Rusdianto; Otto Yudianto
Civilia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Vol. 1 No. 2 (2022): Civilia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan
Publisher : Civilia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.572349/civilia.v1i2.131

Abstract

Tulisan ini membahas pentingnya legalisasi yang menuntut bukti asal tindak pidana pada kejahatan pencucian uang. Ketentuan Pasal 69 F No. 8 Tahun 2010 tentang Pencegahan dan Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang menjadi topik dalam pembahasan penulisan. Banyak orang membaca Pasal 69 sebagai ketentuan untuk kebebasan tanpa perlu membuktikan tindak pidana yang mendasarinya. Sudut pandang ini menyoroti pentingnya Undang-Undang yang mensyaratkan adanya bukti tindak pidana asal, yang sulit dibuktikan karena karakteristik tindak pidana, asas praduga tak bersalah, selanjutnya konsep pembuktian pada mekanisme peradilan pidana Indonesia. Adanya tulisan ini bertujuan sebagai pernyataan bahwa pemikiran mengenai pentingnya suatu peraturan yang mensyaratkan adanya bukti tindak pidana asal pencucian uang mengingat tujuan pasal diatas, selanjutnya Mahkamah Konstitusi menyatakan mengenai konstitusional. Digunakan metodologi penelitian hukum normatif, serta pendekatan analitis terhadap hukum, peraturan, dan putusan pengadilan. Kesimpulan dari pasal ini adalah bahwa pembuktian asal tindak pidana pencucian uang harus terlaksana agar prosedur penegakan hukum dapat sesuai dengan benar sesuai dengan peraturan perundang-undangan Indonesia.
Co-Authors Andy Putra Rusdianto Anissa Rahmawati Argo Cakra Wardaya Mochamad Arief Setiawan Muhammad Fikri Fahrudin Nofaziah Eky Pratiwi Rachmadio Firmansyah