Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.383
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance Jurnal Mengkaji Indonesia Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Business Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Jurnal Cendekia Ilmiah
Ahmad Sholikhin Ruslie
Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya
Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Electrical & Electronics Engineering Engineering Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 16 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 16 Documents
Search

 1   2 
VISUM ET REPERTUM SEBAGAI ALAT BUKTI DALAM TINDAK PIDANA KEKERASAN DALAM RUMAH TANGGA Athaya Novita Andryanto Putri; Ahmad Sholikhin Ruslie
Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance Vol. 3 No. 2 (2023): Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance
Publisher : Gapenas Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53363/bureau.v3i2.257

Abstract

In realizing an orderly rule of law state to achieve the goals of the Republic of Indonesia, it is not uncommon to find very diverse problems in social life, even though everything has been regulated in each law, but it is not uncommon for crimes to exist in our country. One of them is crime in the form of domestic violence, which cases are very common nowadays. In the process of settling criminal cases, law enforcement officials have the obligation to collect evidence in accordance with the criminal cases they are handling. In accordance with Article 183 of the Criminal Procedure Code that a judge can impose a sentence on someone if there are at least two valid pieces of evidence against him. As for legal evidence, it has been determined and regulated in Law no. 8 of 1981 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) in article 184 paragraph (1). One of them is Visum Et Repertum which has a role for the benefit of the judiciary, meaning that Visum Et Repertum is very helpful to the police in solving and disclosing all the causes and effects of a crime so that the perpetrators of these crimes can be held accountable for their actions in accordance with applicable law.
Kewenangan Presiden dalam Menilai Kondisi Kegentingan Yang Memaksa Vikhy Koko Satriawan; Ahmad Sholikhin Ruslie
Jurnal Mengkaji Indonesia Vol. 2 No. 1 (2023): July
Publisher : CV. Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59066/jmi.v2i1.396

Abstract

Abstract: PERPPU is the authority of the President according to Article 22 paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia which can be stipulated based on a compelling condition of urgency. Purpose: The purpose of the research is to determine the compatibility of PERPPU Job Creation whit the Constitutional Court Decision Number 91/PUU-XVIII/2020. Design/Methodology/Approach: The type used in this research is normative legal research, and uses several approaches, namely the statute approach, conceptual approach, and historical approach. Findings: The results of this research show that in the formation of the Job Creation PERPPU there were no coercive conditions that forced it, and it was not in accordance with what was meant in the Constitutional Court Decision Number 91/PUU-XVIII/2020. Originality/Value: There has not been much research regarding the compatibility of PERPPU Job Creation whit the Constitutional Court Decision Number 91/PUU-XVIII/2020. Apart from that, this research will also explain the urgency that forced the formation of PERPPU Job Creation.
Penyelesaian Perselisihan Koperasi Syariah Yang Berkeadilan Di Indonesia Ahmad Sholikhin Ruslie; Rahadyan Widarsadhika Wisnumurti; Siti Badriyah
J-CEKI : Jurnal Cendekia Ilmiah Vol. 4 No. 1: Desember 2024
Publisher : CV. ULIL ALBAB CORP

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56799/jceki.v4i1.6493

Abstract

Keberadaan lembaga ekonomi syariah di Indonesia sangat penting untuk mendorong pertumbuhan ekonomi di negara ini, khususnya bagi para pelaku usaha kecil dan mikro. Lembaga keuangan syariah, yang mencakup sejumlah industri, termasuk perbankan, asuransi, dan koperasi Islam, beroperasi sesuai dengan prinsip-prinsip syariah. Lembaga keuangan syariah mengalami kesulitan karena, meskipun tujuannya adalah pembiayaan bebas riba, sejumlah operasi ekonomi syariah berpotensi menimbulkan risiko perselisihan, termasuk gagal bayar. Tantangan dalam penelitian ini adalah bagaimana menyelesaikan perselisihan dalam keuangan syariah di Indonesia. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian normatif hukum. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengkaji dan menentukan tindakan terbaik dalam skenario ekonomi syariah yang melibatkan keuangan syariah dan klien mereka. Menurut temuan penelitian ini, sengketa ekonomi syariah antara keuangan syariah dan klien mereka dapat diselesaikan melalui jalur litigasi Pengadilan Agama, yang mengutamakan nilai-nilai dan prinsip-prinsip syariah sebagaimana yang digariskan dalam Fatwa Dewan Syariah Nasional No. 04/DSN-MUI/IV/2000 tentang murabahah. Selain menempuh upaya non litigasi juga dapat melakukan upaya litigasi di pengadilan Agama untuk mengadili sengketa ekonomi syariah, sebagaimana diatur dalam “Pasal 49 Undang-Undang Nomor 3 Tahun 2006 juncto Undang-Undang Nomor 50 Tahun 2009 tentang Perubahan Kedua atas Undang-Undang Nomor 7 Tahun 1989 tentang Peradilan Agama,” dan putusan “Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 93/PUU-X/2012” yang menegaskan yurisdiksi peradilan agama dalam penyelesaian sengketa syariah melalui jalur litigasi, dengan tetap mengedepankan prinsip-prinsip syariah untuk memberikan kepastian hukum dan melindungi kepentingan semua pihak tanpa adanya pihak yang merasa dirugikan.
Pencantuman Syarat Berpenampilan Menarik Dalam Lowongan Pekerjaan Ditinjau dari Prinsip Non-Diskriminasi Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 dan Peraturan Menteri Ketenagakerjaan Nomor 14 Tahun 2025 Amaliano Galang Ramadhana; Ahmad Sholikhin Ruslie
Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Vol 4, No 2 (2026): June
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21299966

Abstract

The practice of including "attractive appearance" as a requirement in job vacancies is still widely found in the Indonesian labor market. Although considered normal by some employers, this requirement actually harbors potential for indirect discrimination due to its highly subjective nature. This study aims to analyze the legality of attractive appearance requirements in the recruitment process viewed from the non-discrimination principles regulated in Law Number 13 of 2003 concerning Labor and the Regulation of the Minister of Manpower Number 14 of 2025. The research method used is normative legal research with statutory, conceptual, and comparative law approaches. The results of the analysis show that the requirement of attractive appearance is a form of vague norm that violates the principle of legal certainty and undermines the meritocracy system in the workplace. Through Minister of Manpower Regulation Number 14 of 2025, the government explicitly prohibits physical requirements that are not directly related to the main function of the job (Bona Fide Occupational Qualifications). This study concludes the need for a reconstruction of recruitment patterns in Indonesia through the standardization of job vacancy language based on professional behavior, the implementation of anonymous selection (blind recruitment), and the optimization of digital inspection of job advertisements
Indonesia's Presidential Threshold: An Analysis of Legal and Political Dynamics Mohammad Akbar Maulana Rahman; Reinaldo Francisco Luis; Ahmad Sholikhin Ruslie
Jurnal Mengkaji Indonesia Vol. 2 No. 2 (2023): December
Publisher : CV. Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59066/jmi.v2i2.401

Abstract

Abstract: The presidential threshold is the nomination requirement employed by political parties to select the President and Vice President. In Indonesia, the regulation governing the presidential threshold is outlined in Article 222 of Law No. 7/2017 on General Elections. This article stipulates that candidate pairs must be proposed by political parties or a coalition of political parties participating in the elections, provided they meet the criteria of obtaining at least 20% of the total seats in the DPR (The House of Representatives of the Republic of Indonesia) or obtaining 25% of the national valid votes in the previous DPR elections Purpose: This study aims to determine the political dynamics of threshold presidential regulation law in Indonesia. Design/Methodology/Approach: The type used in this research is normative legal research, and uses several approaches, namely the statute approach, conceptual approach, and historical approach. Findings: In principle, the regulation of the presidential threshold is an open legal policy or open legal policy of the legislator, but its application in Indonesia, the presidential threshold has shortcomings because first, it makes legislative elections a prerequisite for the presidential election, and second, the legislative elections that are used as requirements have occurred in the previous election period, which in terms of political configuration is certainly different from the elections that will take place or are taking place. The application of the presidential threshold in Indonesia is also inappropriate because 1) it eliminates independent Presidential candidates; 2) it excludes the participation of non-parliamentary political parties to determine their own Presidential candidates; 3) it only benefits established/large political parties; 4) it is not suitable if applied in a presidential system, because the President in this system is not responsible to parliament; 5) the emergence of transaction politics; and 6) the limited number of choices of Presidential candidates offered. Originality/Value: There has not been much research on presidential threshold arrangements in their formation, especially based on the political dynamics of law that developed during the formation process
Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Direksi Perusahaan Umum atas Ketidakpastian Hierarki Tujuan Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2025 Ramadhani Dwi Pangestu; Ahmad Sholikhin Ruslie
RIGGS: Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Business Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): Mei-Juli
Publisher : Prodi Bisnis Digital Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/riggs.v5i2.11677

Abstract

Pasal 33 Undang-Undang Dasar 1945 mengamanatkan bahwa sektor produksi yang vital bagi negara dikelola demi sebesar-besar kesejahteraan rakyat, sehingga Badan Usaha Milik Negara (BUMN) dalam bentuk Perusahaan Umum (Perum) dibentuk sebagai instrumen negara dalam perekonomian nasional. Dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2003, tujuan Perum bersifat hierarkis dengan kemanfaatan umum sebagai prioritas utama. Namun, Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2025 tentang BUMN mengubah struktur ini menjadi dua tujuan yang setara, yaitu kepentingan umum dan keuntungan, tanpa menjelaskan urutan prioritas di antara keduanya. Ketidakjelasan hierarki tujuan ini menimbulkan persoalan mendasar bagi pertanggungjawaban hukum Direksi Perum, khususnya dalam penerapan doktrin Business Judgment Rule yang diatur dalam Pasal 9F. Penelitian ini mengkaji bagaimana ketidakpastian normatif tersebut memengaruhi efektivitas perlindungan hukum Direksi Perum. Metode yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif melalui pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan historis. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa doktrin Aturan Penilaian Bisnis dalam Pasal 9F tidak dapat berfungsi secara optimal karena tolok ukur itikad baik sebagai syarat utamanya menjadi tidak jelas ketika dua tujuan yang sama-sama sah secara hukum saling berbenturan. Kondisi ini diperparah oleh kerugian Perum Bulog sebesar Rp550 miliar akibat beban pelayanan publik yang tidak sebanding dengan laba yang diperoleh. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan penambahan penjelasan Pasal 36 yang menegaskan hierarki tujuan Perum serta penyusunan pedoman teknis penerapan doktrin Business Judgment Rule guna memulihkan kepastian hukum pertanggungjawaban Direksi.
Co-Authors Ahmad Rizal Awwalludin Ramadhani Amaliano Galang Ramadhana Anisa Dwi Andiani Athaya Novita Andryanto Putri Ferdy Putra Ernawan Ika Octavia Vidianingrum Hariyanto Khrisna Mulya Sanjaya Mohammad Akbar Maulana Rahman Mriya Afifah Furqania Nabila Annisa Noor Putri Rummana Humairo Rahadyan Widarsadhika Wisnumurti Ramadhani Dwi Pangestu Reinaldo Francisco Luis Rizqi Saniyyah Putri Siti Badriyah Valentino Ohoiwirin Vikhy Koko Satriawan