Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.503
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Yustisia Law Research Review Quarterly Jurnal Konstitusi Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities Trunojoyo Law Review RechtIdee Jurnal Media Akademik (JMA) Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia
Nurus Zaman
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 13 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

 1   2 
URGENSI PENGATURAN REKLAMASI PANTAI DI WILAYAH PESISIR SELATAN MADURA Yulianti, Rina; Ikhwan, Mufarrijul; Zaman, Nurus
Yustisia Vol 4, No 1: April 2015
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v4i1.8626

Abstract

AbstractThis research aims to get the characteristic of the reclamation land tenure, inventorying policies related to the reclamation and legal regulation models of reclamation in Madura. This empirical legal research results that the most of land tenure reclaimed comes from the head of village permission. Policies of the reclamation in fact sectoral even though fourth districts having local regulation on spatial planning. Local regulation about reclamation is needed for coordination and synchronization between central and local authorities, for supporting Act No. 27 Year 2007 about Coastal Management Areas and Small Islands, also Presidential Regulation No. 122 year 2012 about Reclamation. AbstrakPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendapatkan karakteristik penguasaan hak atas tanah hasil reklamasi, inventarisir kebijakan terkait reklamasi dan rumusan model pengaturan hukum reklamasi di Madura. Hasil penelitian hukum empiris ini mendapati bahwa kebanyakan penguasaan tanah hasil reklamasi berasal dari ijin yang diberikan oleh Kepala Desa. Kebijakan terkait pelaksanaan reklamasi masih bersifat sektoral meskipun keempat kabupaten telah mempunyai Peraturan Daerah tentang RTRW. Diperlukan “Peraturan Daerah” tentang reklamasi untuk menciptakan koordinasi dan sinkronisasi antara kewenangan pusat dan daerah. Peraturan Daerah tentang reklamasi ini untuk mendukung pelaksanaan UU nomor 27 tahun 2007 tentang Pengelolaan Wilayah Pesisir dan Pulau-Pulau Kecil, juga Peraturan Presiden tentang reklamasi. 
THE MEANING OF AUTHORITY RELATION OF CENTRAL GOVERNMENT AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT IN THE LAND SECTOR ACCORDING TO THE 1945 CONSTITUTION OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA Zaman, Nurus
Yustisia Vol 6, No 3: December 2017
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v6i3.16788

Abstract

In this study, there are two (2) issues that were examined. First, how the Central Government and Local Government gained authority in the land sector. Second, how the meaning of the relationship of authority of the Central Government and Local Government in the area of land according to the 1945 Constitution, This study uses normative legal research. The results of research are: First, the authority of the Central Government in the land sector is the inherent nature of authority, because as the sole power in a unitary state. In the development of central government authority derived from attributive authority and Local Government authorities in the land sector sourced from attributive authority and discretionary. Second, the meaning of the relationship of authority between the central government and the regional government in the land sector as: (a) the relationship of subordination; (B) the relationship of supervision; and (c) the relationship of responsibility in achieving the objectives of the State.
MODEL PERADILAN NON NEGARA (NON-STATE JUSTICE) SEBAGAI ALTERNATIF PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA TANAH DI KABUPATEN PAMEKASAN Yulianti, Rina; Maharani MTVM, Sri; Zaman, Nurus
Yustisia Vol 2, No 1: April 2013
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v2i1.11078

Abstract

ABSTRACTDispute resolution has been formally institutionalized through the courts, but not all the people in Pamekasan can access easily judiciary. In Rural Society priority harmony as the basis for solving their problems, because these mechanisms more cheap, simple, accordance with their customs and culture but this mechanism not legitimated. Socio-Legal Research methods used to explore and examine the potential mechanisms of informal dispute based on customs in Pamekasan, through in-depth interviews and sec- ondary data collection obtained typology of dispute / disputes land based sources of conflict and Mapping Reformers. Statute Approach and case approach was to construct a new building for the legitimacy of non- state mechanisms (Non-State Justice) which dominates land disputes models in Pamekasan. Results of this study, Pamekasan society resistant to the land disputes culture involving figures outside the formal mechanisms. There are three options land disputes models in Pamekasan by using actor resolver likes kalebun/Village Head, “Kyai” and Judge of Court. This proves the existence of pluralistic legal system in Indonesia. Regional Autonomy Act number 32 of 2004 and Act No. 30 of 1999 on Arbitration and Alterna- tive Dispute Resolution provides an opportunity to build a judicial function at the village and to be access for justice to society and legitimated based on local wisdom.Key Words : Alternative, Dispute Resolution, Land DisputeAbstrakPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui  model  proses penyelesaian di luar pengadilan atau dalam bentuk peradilan non-negara (non-State Justice) sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Tanah di Kabupaten Pamekasan. Peneltian ini menggunakan metode sosio legal research.  Pengumpulan data melalui wawancara mendalam dan pengumpulan data sekunder . Pendekatan perundang-undangan (stat- ute approach) dan pendekatan kasus (case approach) dilakukan untuk mengkonstruksi bangunan baru bagi legitimasi mekanisme non negara (Non-State Justice) yang mendominasi pola-pola penyelesaian sengketa tanah di Kabupaten Pamekasan. Analisis dilakukan dengan menafsirkan data yang diperoleh secara induksi dan membandingkan, menguji atau memverifikasi dengan teori yang sudah ada. Pembandingan atau pengujian ini dimaksudkan untuk mengkaitkan temuan dengan teori yang mengkaji hal-hal yang menjadi fokus penelitian.  Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa masyarakat di Kabupaten Pamekasan resisten dengan budaya penyelesaian sengketa tanah yang melibatkan tokoh-tokoh diluar mekanisme formal. Terdapat tiga pilihan pola penyelesaian di Kabupaten Pamekasan untuk menyelesaikan sengketa tanah yaitu dengan menggunakan aktor penyelesai Kalebun/Kepala Desa, Kyai dan Hakim di Pengadilan. Hal ini membuktikan adanya pluralistis sistem hukum yang berlaku di Indonesia. Undang-Undang Pemerintahan Daerah nomor 32 Tahun 2004 serta Undang-undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 tentang Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa memberikan peluang untuk membangun fungsi yudisial di tingkat desa sebagai upaya untuk mendekatkan akses keadilan terhadap masyarakat dan melegitimasi berbagai pola penyelesaian yang berbasis pada kearifan lokal.Keywords : Alternatif, Penyelesaian Sengketa, Sengketa
Co-Authors Laila, Novi Eka Syarifatul Maharani MTVM, Sri Mareta, Moch. Firmandika Gita Melkiardo Febrian Tagung Mohammad Afrizal Mufarrijul Ikhwan Rina Yulianti Yudi Widagdo Harimurti, Yudi Widagdo