Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 11 Documents
Search

Implementation of Democratic Values in Determining the Political Direction of State Law Regarding General Elections in Indonesia Zaman, Nurus
Law Research Review Quarterly Vol 4 No 3 (2018): L. Research Rev. Q. (August 2018) "Law and Democracy in General Election: Between
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/snh.v4i03.27096

Abstract

In this study, there are 2 (two) problems that were examined, namely: First, whether the general election system in Indonesia has adopted values in a real democratic system. Second, what is the formulation for the adoption of democratic system values in the political law of the state regarding general elections. The results of the research can show: First, in determining the direction of political law regarding elections, the concept of democracy adopted by Indonesia uses Pancasila as the main guideline. Because the values in a real democratic system do not stop with the people who determine the leaders and policies of the country, but also in the context of democracy they contain a wider value than that. Second, as a state that adopts a civil law system, the political formulation of general election law is carried out by normalizing the basic law, namely the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and other laws and regulations.
Membangun Politik Hukum Administrasi Pemerintahan yang Bersumber dari Nilai-nilai Pancasila Nurus Zaman
RechtIdee Vol 10, No 2 (2015): December
Publisher : Trunojoyo Madura University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21107/ri.v10i2.1237

Abstract

Politik hukum dimaknai apa yang seharusnyadinormakan dalam peraturan perundang-undangan. Norma tersebut tidak boleh bertentangan dengan tujuan Negara. Tujuan Negara menjadi ukuran utama dalam setiap pembentukan peraturan perundang-undangan. Tujuan Negara selain bersumber dari hukum tertulis, juga bersumber dari nilai-nilai yang hidup dan berkembang di dalam masyarakat. Pancasila sebagai kristalisasi nilai-nilai yang hidup dan berkem- bang dalam masyarakat sejatinya menjadi sumber utama dalam pembentukan hukum.Secara umum, hukum bertujuan untuk menciptakan keadilan, kepas- tian hukum dan kemanfaatan. Tujuan tersebut harus tercermin dalam setiap pembangunan hukum. Bentuk penyimpangan hukum yang dikeluarkan oleh badan dan/atau pejabat pemerintahan semula tidak mendapat pengaturan dalam perundang-undangan. Undang-undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan mengelaborasi antara legalitas dan bentuk pe- nyimpangan hukum yang lazim disebut diskresi. Pelaksanaan Undang-un- dang tersebut mengacu pada legalitas, perlindungan terhadap hak-hak asasi manusia dan Asas-asas Umum Pemerintahan yang Baik (AUPB).Pembangu- nan hukum administrasi menyembatani dua kepentingan yaitu kepentingan badan dan/atau pejabat pemerintahan dan warga masyarakat.Kata kunci: Politik Hukum,Administrasi Pemerintahan,Pancasila
CONSTITUTION IN LEGAL POLITICAL PERSPECTIVE Zaman, Nurus
TRUNOJOYO LAW REVIEW Vol 4, No 1 (2022): Februari
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Trunojoyo Madura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (291.041 KB) | DOI: 10.21107/tlr.v4i1.16487

Abstract

In this study there are 2 (two) problems studied. First, what is the form or form of legal politics in the 1945 Constitution. Second, what is the nature of legal politics in the 1945 Constitution. This research uses normative legal research. The research results obtained: First, the form or form of legal politics in the constitution as a means in order to achieve the goals of the state, namely the interests of the nation and state, the basic law of legal politics in the constitution comes from the values and character of the nation, taking into account the legal system adopted. Second, the legal politics in the 1945 Constitution is not rigid or permanent, but the nature of legal politics in the constitution is open, that is, it can adapt to the situation and conditions of its era, either through the method of interpretation or through the method of change.
COMMUNITY PARTICIPATION IN THE FORMATION OF REGIONAL REGULATIONS IN BANGKALAN REGENCY IN THE FIELD OF TOURISM BASED ON SUSTAINABLE TOURISM Laila, Novi Eka Syarifatul; Zaman, Nurus
TRUNOJOYO LAW REVIEW Vol 5, No 1 (2023): FERUARY
Publisher : Faculty of Law Universitas Trunojoyo Madura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21107/tlr.v5i1.19412

Abstract

The legal basis for community participation is regulated in chapter XI of Law Number 12 of 2011 article 96 which states that the community has the right to provide input orally/in writing in the formation of laws and regulations. The problems studied in this research are: First, how is participation the people of Bangkalan Regency in planning, compiling and discussing local regulations on halal tourism. Second, what are the legal consequences if the formation of regional regulations in the field of tourism does not involve the participation of the community. The methodology used in this research is empirical juridical research with a normative/socio legal approach. The results obtained in this study are: First, how is the participation of the people of Bangkalan Regency in the process of forming regional regulations which are considered not fully in accordance with the provisions of Law Number 12 of 2011. Second, there are no rules regarding sanctions related to non-participation community participation in the process of forming local regulations/legislation. This is because the local government has not maximized the use of third party services in the process of forming local regulations in the preparation of academic papers and/or regional regulations.
Reformulation of Supervision of The Constitutional Court in Carrying Out Its Functions as Judicial Power Zaman, Nurus
RechtIdee Vol 19, No 1 (2024): JUNE
Publisher : Trunojoyo Madura University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21107/ri.v19i1.26243

Abstract

In this research, two issues will be discussed. First, the institutional position of the Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court, which are both regulated in the 1945 Constitution. Second, is it conceptually justified for the Constitutional Court to refuse external supervision like the Supreme Court. This research uses doctrinal normative legal research in collaboration with reform-oriented research methods. The results obtained in this research are as follows. First, the Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court institutionally have the same level; both have the same judicial authority to uphold law and justice. The Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court have the same basis for constitutionality, which is regulated in Article 24, paragraph (1) and paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution. The difference between the Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court lies in the scope of their powers. Second, the 1945 Constitution does not regulate the supervision of the Constitutional Court. However, the Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court are both regulated in the 1945 Constitution and have the same orientation, that is, to law and justice enforcement, so conceptually, there is no reason for the Constitutional Court to refuse external supervision like the Supreme Court.
A Politik Hukum Disseting Opinion Pengujian UU Terhadap UUD 45 Dalam Rangka Mencari Kebenaran Hukum: Peran Dissenting Opinion dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi: Perspektif Hakim dan Penafsiran Hukum Zaman, Nurus
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 21 No. 3 (2024)
Publisher : Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31078/jk2138

Abstract

The dissenting opinion of Constitutional Court judges in conducting judicial reviews of laws against the 1945 Constitution represents the freedom of Constitutional Court judges. These dissenting opinions are essentially aimed at seeking legal truth. This research addresses two main issues: First, the legal politics behind the occurrence of dissenting opinions by Constitutional Court judges in reviewing laws against the 1945 Constitution. Second, the methods of legal interpretation used by Constitutional Court judges in reviewing laws against the 1945 Constitution. This study uses normative legal methods, with statutory and conceptual approaches. The findings of this research are as follows: First, the provisions of Article 24, paragraphs (1) and (2) of the 1945 Constitution provide the constitutional basis for the dissenting opinions of Constitutional Court judges in reviewing laws against the 1945 Constitution. Second, Constitutional Court judges are not restricted nor bound by any single method of legal interpretation. The use of legal interpretation methods by Constitutional Court judges in reviewing laws against the 1945 Constitution is their prerogative, as, in principle, the use of such methods is aimed at seeking legal truth.
Preventing the politicisation of corruption crime law enforcement based on local wisdom Rusdiana, Erma; Zaman, Nurus; Darnela, Lindra; Hasanah, Uswatun
Legality : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 33 No. 1 (2025): March
Publisher : Faculty of Law, University of Muhammadiyah Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22219/ljih.v33i1.37429

Abstract

This study focuses on the phenomenon of politicised law enforcement in corruption cases during election years, where legal actions are suspected of being used as political tools to weaken opponents and maintain power. Consequently, law enforcement is perceived as "by order" and heavily influenced by vested interests. This entanglement between politics and law is attributed to a lack of integrity and moral values among the involved actors, further undermining democratic practices and justice. This study analyses how the politicisation of law occurs in the electoral context and its impact on law enforcement and proposes a solution to prevent the politicisation of corruption in law enforcement through local wisdom-based approaches. This research employs a socio-legal method, analysing secondary data from various corruption cases exposed ahead of the 2014, 2019, and 2024 elections. This analysis includes literature reviews, investigative reports, and data from law enforcement agencies. Findings indicate a consistent pattern where corruption in law enforcement involving public officials tends to intensify as elections approach, suggesting efforts to politicise the law. Such politicisation negatively impacts genuine anti-corruption efforts by casting the law as a political instrument rather than a means of upholding justice, thus degrading the dignity of law enforcement and affecting public perception. Taking Malaysia as an example in successfully improving its Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI), this study underscores the importance of strengthening integrity by instilling moral values rooted in local wisdom, such as "Hasta Brata" and the "nine anti-corruption values." These efforts are essential to establishing dignified democratic practices and fair law enforcement that are free from corruption, collusion, and nepotism.     
Pembukaan Undang-Undang Dasar 1945 Dalam Perspektif Kepastian Hukum Zaman, Nurus
Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia Vol 20, No 1 (2023): Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia - Maret 2023
Publisher : Direktorat Jenderal Peraturan Perundang-undang, Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54629/jli.v20i1.1007

Abstract

ABSTRAKPenelitian ini menganalisis keberadaan pembukaan UUD 1945 dihubungkan dengan nilai kepastian hukum. Pembukaan UUD 1945 sebagai sumber dari sumber hukum negara sudah barang tentu memerlukan nilai kepastian hukum, agar tidak selalu dijadikan obyek perdebatan dikalangan ahli hukum kenegaraan maupun di dunia akademik, karena bila dibiarkan membawa dampak pada munculnya keraguan dari masyarakat terkait dengan keberadaan pembukaan UUD 1945 itu sendiri. Pandangan tersebut beralasan karena perubahan ke empat UUD 1945 berdasarkan ketentuan Pasal 37 ayat (5) menyatakan: Khusus mengenai bentuk negara kesatuan Republik Indonesia tidak dapat dilakukan perubahan. Secara konstitusional UUD 1945 hanya mengatur yang tidak dapat dilakukan perubahan terbatas pada bentuk negara, berarti hal-hal yang diatur oleh UUD 1945 dapat diubah. Penelitian yang digunakan dalam tulisan ini penelitian hukum normatif yang menitikberatkan pada kajian kepustakaan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pembukaan UUD 1945 satu kesatuan dengan pasal-pasal yang ada, namun tidak dapat disederajatkan. Karena pembukaan sebagai basic nornm dari muatan materi yang ada dalam UUD 1945. Di samping itu, pembukaan UUD 1945 harus di nilai sebagai garis politik hukum negara yang sifatnya permanen. Kandungan nilai dalam pembukaan UUD 1945 tidak hanya sebatas pada pernyataan dari founding fahter ketika memproklamirkan kemerdekaan negara, tetapi dalam pembukaan juga ada nilai-nilai dan sila Pancasila sebagaimana terdapat pada Alinea ke IV. Kata Kunci : Pembukaan, UUD 1945 dan kepastian hukum
Settings On The Age Limit for Nomination as Regional Head or Deputy Regional Head in The Regional Government System in Indonesia Mareta, Moch. Firmandika Gita; Harimurti, Yudi Widagdo; Zaman, Nurus
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v6i1.2491

Abstract

The direct election of regional leaders, as mandated by Article 18(4) of the 1945 Constitution, aims to produce leaders with competence, integrity, and dedication in line with the people’s aspirations. However, debates have emerged regarding the correlation between young or new leaders and their performance, which has sparked discussions on revising candidate requirements, particularly age limits. This study examines (1) how the age limit for regional head and deputy nominations is regulated in Indonesian law, and (2) the reasons behind changes in these requirements. Using a normative legal research method with statutory and conceptual approaches, the study finds that Law Number 10 of 2016 sets the minimum age at 30 years for governor and deputy governor candidates, and 25 years for mayor, deputy mayor, regent, and deputy regent candidates. Following a Supreme Court decision (Case No. 23 P/HUM/2024), the age requirement is calculated based on the swearing-in date. The Constitutional Court emphasizes that Article 7(2)(e) of Law No. 10 of 2016 must be strictly applied during the nomination process. Furthermore, the amendment of age limits cannot be separated from potential conflicts of interest among office holders. Constitutionally, such amendments are legitimate, whether conducted through judicial, legislative, or executive review.
ANALISIS PRAKTIK PENETAPAN OBJEK SENGKETA OLEH PENGADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA DALAM PROSES PENYELESAIAN PERKARA Melkiardo Febrian Tagung; Mohammad Afrizal; Nurus Zaman
Jurnal Media Akademik (JMA) Vol. 3 No. 11 (2025): JURNAL MEDIA AKADEMIK Edisi November
Publisher : PT. Media Akademik Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62281/ewbftw15

Abstract

Dalam praktik penetapan objek sengketa masih terdapat ambiguitas dalam menentukan batas antara keputusan tata usaha negara (KTUN) yang dapat digugat dan tindakan administratif yang tidak termasuk dalam objek sengketa. Ketidakjelasan ini berimplikasi pada munculnya putusan niet ontvankelijk verklaard yang berulang, serta menimbulkan ketimpangan akses keadilan bagi masyarakat. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis konsep dan batasan hukum mengenai objek sengketa menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 51 Tahun 2009, serta menelaah implikasi hukum diskresi pejabat pemerintahan terhadap penetapan objek sengketa, khususnya yang berbentuk keputusan tertulis. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach) dan konseptual (conceptual approach), yang didukung analisis deskriptif terhadap doktrin dan praktik peradilan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penetapan objek sengketa harus memenuhi unsur-unsur KTUN, yaitu tertulis, konkret, individual, final, dan menimbulkan akibat hukum bagi seseorang atau badan hukum perdata. Namun, perkembangan hukum administrasi melalui Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan telah memperluas ruang lingkup objek sengketa hingga mencakup tindakan faktual pejabat (bestuur handelingen) dan diskresi pemerintahan yang berdampak pada hak warga negara.