Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Ratio Decidendi Dari Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2086 K/Pid.Sus/2023 Terhadap Penjual Dan Pembeli Jual Beli Konten Pornografi Mohammad Afrizal; Made Warka
JURNAL HUKUM, POLITIK DAN ILMU SOSIAL Vol. 3 No. 2 (2024): Juni: JURNAL HUKUM, POLITIK DAN ILMU SOSIAL
Publisher : Pusat Riset dan Inovasi Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jhpis.v3i2.3778

Abstract

The author raises a case from the Supreme Court Decision Number 2086 K/Pid.Sus/2023 with the defendant Gusti Ayu Dewanti with the pseudonym Dea Onlyfans who was proven to have legally violated a criminal act of pornography or committed a criminal act of pornography by offering and selling pornographic content on the onlyfans site. The author needs to consider in more depth the Ratio Decidendi or Consideration of the Judge who some time ago just handed down a decision on this case, considering the decision given to the litigants and also the decision made by the defendant and witnesses which was decided by the judge in relation to the case, one of the buyers in this case, one of the famous comedians, Marcel Widianto, was not involved in a crime. He was one of the buyers who indirectly supported what the defendant was doing. From this case, it was found that the existing law is unclear/vague under existing supervision, where someone who has supported a buying and selling transaction by purchasing pornographic content on social media can be free from criminal law. The impact that will occur if this happens in the future, many buyers or purchasers of pornographic content will have more opportunities to carry out their activities. This can also worsen the standards that apply in Indonesian society because the influence of explicit entertainment is very detrimental to the country's ethics, both adults and children. Therefore, the author wants to examine the formulation of the problem, namely, what is the Decidendi Ratio from the Supreme Court Decision Number 2086 K/Pid.Sus/2023 regarding Sellers and Buyers of buying and selling pornographic content?
Fenomena Alih Kode, Campur Kode dalam Penggunaan Unsur Bahasa Jawa dalam Novel Soedirman dan Alfiyah Karya E. Rokajat Asura Khoirun Nadia; Rintan Amalia Rohar; Tasya Madinah; Callista Azalia Nur Firdaus; Mohammad Afrizal
Morfologi : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, Bahasa, Sastra dan Budaya Vol. 3 No. 4 (2025): Agustus : Morfologi : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, Bahasa, Sastra dan Budaya
Publisher : Asosiasi Periset Bahasa Sastra Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61132/morfologi.v3i4.2008

Abstract

Code-switching and code-mixing are linguistic phenomena that reflect the cultural and linguistic diversity of Indonesian society, particularly within literary works. This study aims to analyze how elements of the Javanese language are employed through these phenomena in the novel Soedirman dan Alfiyah by E. Rokajat Asura. Using a literature review method, the study examines relevant theories and previous research on the use of regional languages, specifically Javanese, in literature. The findings reveal that both code-switching and code-mixing enrich character expression, serve as markers of cultural identity, convey emotional depth, and enhance the social messages embedded in the narrative. Visual markers such as italicized text are utilized to distinguish linguistic shifts, although inconsistencies in their application are noted. This research highlights the importance of preserving regional languages in literary works and emphasizes the need for consistent typographical presentation to improve readability and linguistic awareness among readers.
ANALISIS PRAKTIK PENETAPAN OBJEK SENGKETA OLEH PENGADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA DALAM PROSES PENYELESAIAN PERKARA Melkiardo Febrian Tagung; Mohammad Afrizal; Nurus Zaman
Jurnal Media Akademik (JMA) Vol. 3 No. 11 (2025): JURNAL MEDIA AKADEMIK Edisi November
Publisher : PT. Media Akademik Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62281/ewbftw15

Abstract

Dalam praktik penetapan objek sengketa masih terdapat ambiguitas dalam menentukan batas antara keputusan tata usaha negara (KTUN) yang dapat digugat dan tindakan administratif yang tidak termasuk dalam objek sengketa. Ketidakjelasan ini berimplikasi pada munculnya putusan niet ontvankelijk verklaard yang berulang, serta menimbulkan ketimpangan akses keadilan bagi masyarakat. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis konsep dan batasan hukum mengenai objek sengketa menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 51 Tahun 2009, serta menelaah implikasi hukum diskresi pejabat pemerintahan terhadap penetapan objek sengketa, khususnya yang berbentuk keputusan tertulis. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach) dan konseptual (conceptual approach), yang didukung analisis deskriptif terhadap doktrin dan praktik peradilan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penetapan objek sengketa harus memenuhi unsur-unsur KTUN, yaitu tertulis, konkret, individual, final, dan menimbulkan akibat hukum bagi seseorang atau badan hukum perdata. Namun, perkembangan hukum administrasi melalui Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan telah memperluas ruang lingkup objek sengketa hingga mencakup tindakan faktual pejabat (bestuur handelingen) dan diskresi pemerintahan yang berdampak pada hak warga negara.