Rimanto Rimanto
Universitas Muhammadiyah Pringsewu Lampung

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

VALIDITAS TRANSAKSI CRYPTOCURRENCY (Studi Tentang Akad Dalam Transaksi Syariah) Rimanto Rimanto; Kholid Hidayatullah; Sumarni Sumarni
Madania: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman Vol 12, No 1 (2022): Madania
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Syarif Kasim Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24014/jiik.v12i1.19673

Abstract

Penelitian ini merupakan studi pustaka dan bersifat kualitatif. Teknik analisis data yang digunakan adalah deskriptif analitis dengan pendekatan hukum Islam yuridis normatif. Dari penelitian ini didapatkan hasil bahwa uang kripto bisa digunakan sebagai komoditas dalam perdagangan komoditi di Indonesia dengan syarat Pemerintah menciptakan uang kripto sendiri yang terlindung (underlying asset). Sementara itu, bitcoin tidak bisa dijadikan sebagai komoditas dalam Kontrak Derivatif Syariah, karena bitcoin masih mengandung unsur spekulasi (maysir) yang bersifat untung-untungan. Kedudukan hukumnya adalah haram lighairihi atau haram karena faktor luar.
ISLAMIC LEGAL REASONING IN DISPUTE RESOLUTION AND SHARIA FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT OF DSN-MUI FATWAS Bustanul Arifin; M. Muslih; Rimanto Rimanto; Eti Karini; Syeh Sarip Hadaiyatullah
JURNAL HAKAM Vol 10, No 1 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Nurul Jadid

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33650/jhi.v10i1.14447

Abstract

This study examines the institutional legal reasoning of the Indonesian National Sharia Council (DSN-MUI) in developing the normative framework for dispute resolution and risk management in Sharia finance. Through a qualitative corpus analysis of fatwas on taʿwīḍ (compensation for loss), debt restructuring, and debt transfer, the research argues that these fatwas do not function as isolated case-by-case rulings. Instead, they form a coherent body of evolving institutional reasoning that shifts Islamic financial law from a rigid, contract-validity-focused paradigm toward a dynamic risk governance paradigm. The findings reveal that DSN-MUI consistently distinguishes between involuntary and willful default, designs restorative rather than punitive compensatory mechanisms, and systematically integrates principles of maqāṣid al-sharīʿah and maṣlaḥah with modern financial governance needs. The analysis further contrasts DSN-MUI's contextualized legal reasoning with the standardized approach of AAOIFI, highlighting how DSN-MUI adapts Islamic legal principles to Indonesia's socio-economic and regulatory context. The study concludes that DSN-MUI fatwas collectively construct a distinct model of Fiqh al-Mukhāṭarah wa al-Nizāʿ (Fiqh of Risk and Dispute Resolution), positioning Islamic law as an integral instrument for systemic risk management, contractual sustainability, and equitable dispute resolution within a modern financial ecosystem.