Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

Disregarding the Constitutional Court Decision Concerning the Prohibition of Concurrent Deputy Minister Positions: Pengabaian Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Terkait Larangan Rangkap Jabatan Wakil Menteri Sari, Sonia Sekar; Ilmar, Aminuddin; Djafar, Eka Merdekawati; Faiz, Pan Mohamad
Jurnal Konstitusi Vol. 20 No. 4 (2023)
Publisher : Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31078/jk2043

Abstract

The presence of the deputy minister position in the Indonesian government system has been a constitutional issue, both in its appointment and the issue of the prohibition of holding multiple positions. This article discusses Constitutional Court Decision Number 80/PUU-XVII/2019, which provides clarity on the constitutionality of the appointment of deputy ministers and the prohibition of holding multiple positions, including as commissioners or directors in state-owned or private companies. Despite this decision, the analysis indicates that the prohibition of holding multiple positions for deputy ministers is still disregarded, as some deputy ministers currently serve as Commissioners in State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs). This research uses a normative approach by analyzing secondary data. The result is that the Constitution is ignored because the Constitutional Court Decision regarding the prohibition of holding multiple positions for deputy ministers is not implemented. To address this non-compliance, if deputy ministers continue to hold positions as commissioners, the President should be able to dismiss them based on the State Ministry Law and Constitutional Court Decision, and impose sanctions in the form of an obligation to compensate the state’s financial loss incurred during the concurrent positions.
ENHANCING CYBERSECURITY AND LEGAL INTEGRATION: REFORMING INDONESIA'S CYBER LAW TO FOSTER SUSTAINABLE GROWTH IN THE DIGITAL ECONOMY Widayanti, Tri Fenny; Rohman, Aditya Dwi; Haris, A. Nuril Zamharir; Djafar, Eka Merdekawati; Hakim, Muhammad Zulfan
Diponegoro Law Review Vol 10, No 1 (2025): Diponegoro Law Review April 2025
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/dilrev.10.1.2025.105-119

Abstract

The rapid advancement of digital technologies has reshaped the global economy, with the digital economy becoming a key driver of growth and innovation. Indonesia, as the leader in Southeast Asia’s digital economy, has immense potential, with projected growth at 40% by 2018. However, the country’s digital economy remains hindered by an inadequate and fragmented cyber law framework. The existing laws are sector-specific, leading to overlapping institutional authority, weak enforcement, and a lack of clarity in jurisdiction, particularly regarding cross-border cyber threats. This fragmented legal landscape impedes the integration of Indonesia’s digital economy and undermines cybersecurity efforts. This study examines the challenges within Indonesia’s current cyber law and argues for comprehensive reforms to provide clear institutional authority, enhance inter-agency coordination, and create laws tailored to the digital economy and cybersecurity. Drawing insights from international frameworks, such as the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and Australia's Critical Infrastructure Bill, the study advocates for a dual approach—ensuring both data privacy and critical infrastructure protection. Furthermore, the research highlights the need for collaboration between government, the private sector, and civil society, along with public education initiatives, to foster a secure and trustworthy digital ecosystem. By analyzing existing regulations and proposing targeted reforms, this study aims to contribute to improved cybersecurity governance, enabling sustainable digital transformation and economic growth in Indonesia.
SINERGI PELAKSANAAN PENEGAKAN HUKUM LINGKUNGAN INDONESIA Djafar, Eka Merdekawati
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 3 No 3 (2014)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.3.3.2014.237-242

Abstract

Enforcement of environmental laws is expected to be carried out in synergy by law officers who are scattered in various law enforcement agencies in general and particularly in relation to environmental management. Understanding of the substance of environmental law should not be done partially adherence to environmental laws, both by the public and law enforcement officers itself so to create a legal substance is completely and thoroughly that understanding can be removed to the sectoral legislation. Likewise strongly support the creation of culture law enforcement of environmental law implementation synergies among law enforcement officers. It is intended that the law enforcement agencies have the same perception of the implementation of environmental law enforcement. Keyword : “ Law enforcement” and “ Environmental Law”
GUARDIAN OF THE CONSTITUTION: REVIEWING THE ROLE OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT Mukhlis, Muhammad Mutawalli; Masum, Ahmad; Maskun, Maskun; Arowosaiye, Yusuf Ibrahim; Djafar, Eka Merdekawati
Diponegoro Law Review Vol 10, No 2 (2025): Diponegoro Law Review October 2025 (in progress)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/dilrev.10.2.2025.217-233

Abstract

The Constitutional Court of Indonesia is entrusted with safeguarding constitutional supremacy within Indonesia’s constitutional order, yet it does not possess the authority to review amendments to the 1945 Constitution. This institutional limitation creates a structural gap because constitutional amendments, despite their far reaching consequences, remain beyond judicial scrutiny. This study examines the constitutional feasibility of granting the Court authority to conduct procedural and substantive review of constitutional amendments. Using doctrinal legal research supported by comparative constitutional analysis, the article draws on Hans Kelsen’s theory of the hierarchy of norms and the Basic Structure Doctrine as developed in India and Germany to construct an evaluative framework suitable for the Indonesian context. The analysis demonstrates that the absence of judicial oversight over constitutional amendments weakens constitutional supremacy and increases the risk of democratic erosion through formally valid political processes. The article proposes a structured model of limited amendment review grounded in Indonesia’s constitutional identity, particularly the foundational principles embodied in Pancasila and the commitment to the rule of law. By articulating a contextually grounded doctrinal framework, this study contributes to contemporary debates on unconstitutional constitutional amendments and offers a normative pathway for strengthening constitutional guardianship in Indonesia.
Peningkatan Partisipasi Masyarakat dan Literasi Hukum melalui Sosialisasi Berbasis Good Governance di Kelurahan Talaka Fikri, Muhammad; Djafar, Eka Merdekawati; Adrian, Adrian; Budiman, Andi; Al Farisi, Muhammad Fathir; Suwandi, Maulana Dafa; Syekh, A. M. Randy; Amalia, A. Maisyah; Sari, Linda Sekar; Fidar, Athifah Putri; Djufri, Ismi Azizah; Alen Pratama, A. Putra; Rompon, Vega Sampe; Imran, Zhairah Zulaeyka
Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Nusantara Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): Edisi Januari - Maret
Publisher : Lembaga Dongan Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55338/jpkmn.v7i1.7905

Abstract

Kegiatan pengabdian kepada masyarakat ini diarahkan untuk memperkuat tata kelola pemerintahan di Kelurahan Talaka melalui internalisasi prinsip good governance yang menitikberatkan pada peningkatan kesadaran hukum dan partisipasi masyarakat. Permasalahan utama yang dihadapi adalah adanya kesenjangan antara idealitas partisipasi publik sebagaimana diamanatkan dalam peraturan perundang-undangan dan praktik di lapangan yang masih bersifat formalistik serta kurang melibatkan warga secara substantif. Untuk menjawab permasalahan tersebut, pengabdian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum kualitatif dengan pendekatan Participatory Rural Appraisal (PRA). Hasil pengabdian menunjukkan bahwa partisipasi masyarakat dalam tata kelola pemerintahan kelurahan cenderung bersifat administratif dan simbolik, yang dipengaruhi oleh terbatasnya akses terhadap informasi publik serta lemahnya pola komunikasi antara aparatur kelurahan dan masyarakat. Melalui pelaksanaan sosialisasi hukum berbasis PRA, terjadi peningkatan keterlibatan aktif peserta dalam forum diskusi, tumbuhnya kesadaran hukum masyarakat, serta terbukanya ruang dialog yang lebih setara antara aparatur dan warga. Oleh karena itu, kegiatan pengabdian ini berkontribusi dalam memperkuat kapasitas aparatur kelurahan sekaligus mendorong terwujudnya tata kelola pemerintahan yang lebih partisipatif, transparan, dan berkelanjutan di tingkat lokal.