Mien Rukmini, Mien
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

PARENTAL RESPONSIBILITY OF CHILDREN CRIME IN INDONESIAN CRIMINAL ADAT LAW Fardiansyah, Ahmad Irzal; Suseno, Sigid; Rukmini, Mien; Sulistiani, Lies
Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Children who are in conflict with the law cannot be separated from the responsibilities of parents as the first party in the childs environment. The relationship between parents and children is a harmonized relationship from a strong emotional connection on the basis of blood relations. This situation makes parents unable to release and be released responsibility for their childrens behavior. When children are faced with the law, policies to take over the responsibility of supervising children from parents, by denying that parents actually have the opportunity to deal with the problems of children who are dealing with the law are more often chosen. Even though the responsibility is transferred from the parents, they will find it difficult to rebuild the relationships they previously had with their children. This connection shows that parents also play a role when their children commit criminal acts indirectly.
Problematika Pengungkapan Rahasia Bank Antara Kepentingan Negara Dan Perlindungan Kepada Nasabah Fahrurrozi, Rizky; Murwadji, Tarsisius; Rukmini, Mien
Esensi Hukum Vol 2 No 1 (2020): Juni - Jurnal Esensi Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35586/esensihukum.v2i1.22

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian ini untuk menganalisis (1) penerapan rahasia bank sebagai bentuk perlindungan hukum kepada nasabah; (2) problematika pengungkapan rahasia bank antara kepentingan negara dan perlindungan kepada nasabah;dan (3) hak tolak bank untuk membuka rahasia bank. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum yuridis normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan (1) Penerapan rahasia bank sebagai bentuk perlindungan hukum kepada nasabah terdiri dari perlindungan hukum preventif dan represif; (2) Problematika pengungkapan rahasia bank antara kepentingan negara dan perlindungan kepada nasabah harus dilakukan secara seimbang agar tidak timbul opini publik bahwa seolah-olah rahasia bank sudah tidak relevan lagi keberadaannya dan (3) Hak tolak bank untuk membuka rahasia bank menunjukkan bahwa bank berhak menolak untuk membuka rahasia bank berdasarkan hubungan kontraktual antara bank dengan nasabahnya. Menurut Pasal 1338 KUHPerdata perjanjian mengikat bagi para pihak yang membuatnya, tetapi tidak mengikat bagi pihak ketiga dalam hal ini termasuk negara sebagai pihak ketiga.
Alat Bukti Mata Uang Elektronik Pada Proses Penyidikan Dalam Rangka Pembaharuan Hukum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Budiman, Arief; Rusmiati, Elis; Rukmini, Mien
Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum Vol. 12 No. 1 (2025): JURNAL ILMIAH PENEGAKAN HUKUM JUNI
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31289/jiph.v12i1.8950

Abstract

This study aims to examine the legality and function of electronic currency evidence in Money Laundering Crimes. Existing laws that regulate electronic evidence also do not provide a clear understanding of whether this electronic currency evidence is evidence that can stand alone or is included in electronic evidence that has been previously regulated. The problem is focused on Electronic Currency Evidence which is a new form of evidence whose existence has not been explicitly and clearly regulated in the Criminal Procedure Code, ITE and the Money Laundering Crime Law. In order to approach this problem, a theoretical reference is used from the Legal Certainty Theory. The research method used in this study is normative juridical. Data were collected through literature and field studies, and data collection tools were document studies and interviews and analyzed descriptively qualitatively. The results of the study show that the existence of Electronic Currency has not been explicitly recognized in laws and regulations, although electronic evidence has been recognized in various regulations in Indonesia.