Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.92
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Awang Long Law Review Yuris: Journal of Court and Justice
M. Khoidin, M.
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 5 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search

 1 
SEMA BINDING STRENGTH NO. 2/2023 REGARDING THE JUDGE'S DETERMINATION IN APPLICATIONS FOR REGISTRATION OF INTERFAITH MARRIAGES Leonide, Cliff Ivan; Khoidin, M.; Zulaika, Emi; Poesoko, Herowati; Suci, Ivida Dewi Amrih
Awang Long Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2024): Awang Long Law Review
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/awl.v6i2.1166

Abstract

The state guarantees freedom of religion, as well as forming a marriage. Registration of marriages, especially mixed marriages, is regulated in Article 57 of Law no. 16 of 2019 concerning Marriage. This mixed marriage is also related to interfaith marriage which is also a right for Indonesian citizens. The Supreme Court in this case made SEMA No. 2/2023 dated 17 July 2023 concerning Appointments for Judges in Adjudicating Cases on Applications for Registration of Marriages Between People of Different Religions and Beliefs, at point No. 2 explains that "The court did not grant the request for registration of marriages between people of different religions and beliefs." If this SEMA is analyzed it is in conflict with Article 35 letter (a) of Law no. 23 of 2006 in conjunction with Article 50 of Minister of Home Affairs Regulation no. 108/2019. Therefore, the author analyzes the binding strength of SEMA No. 2/2023 dated 17 July 2023 regarding the failure to grant the request for registration of interfaith marriages. Meanwhile, Minister of Home Affairs Regulation no. 108/2019 states that interfaith marriages must be proven, which automatically results in an application being made to the court. This is also related to Article 35 letter (a) of Law no. 23 of 2006 concerning Population Administration which regulates marriages determined by courts for people of different religions. Therefore, the author analyzes the above problem with the problem, namely the binding force of SEMA No. 2/2023 regarding the judge's decision in the application for registration of interfaith marriages. The method used is normative juridical research, with an analysis of the theory of authority and legal certainty. The approaches used are the conceptual approach, statutory approach and case approach. The conclusion to be reached in this writing has future perspective value and is in accordance with its axiology, namely the aim of law is justice.
THE IMPLEMENTATION OF MATERIAL CRIMINAL LAW AGAINST CRIMINAL ACT OF EMBEZZLEMENT IN OFFICE Abrahams, Deny; Amiq, Bahrul; Prawesthi, Wahyu; Khoidin, M.
YURIS: Journal of Court and Justice Vol. 2 Issue 1 (2023)
Publisher : jfpublisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56943/jcj.v2i1.263

Abstract

The crime often committed is embezzlement, dishonesty by hiding other people's goods/assets by one or more people without the owner's permission to control or use it for other purposes. In Article 374 of the Criminal Code, the term embezzlement in the office can be said to be a crime of embezzlement with a weighting. The method used in this research is normative juridical research that examines or analyzes primary and secondary legal materials by understanding law as a set of rules or positive norms in the statutory system that regulates human life. Based on the research result, the application of material criminal law to cases of criminal embezzlement in the office is implemented based on legal facts, including the statements of witnesses, statements of the accused, letters, and the presence of evidence. Besides that, before the judge imposes a sentence, he needs to consider what can aggravate and mitigate the defendant to apply a sentence commensurate with the act and provide justice for the defendant and a deterrent effect against a decision.
LAW ENFORCEMENT OF ILLEGAL LOBSTER CLEAR SEED DISTRIBUTION CRIME Wahyudi, Tri; Prawesthi, Wahyu; Khoidin, M.
YURIS: Journal of Court and Justice Vol. 2 Issue 2 (2023)
Publisher : jfpublisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56943/jcj.v2i2.292

Abstract

Indonesia is an archipelago that is rich in flora and fauna both on land and sea. It causes some people to commit criminal acts, especially criminal acts in distributing lobster clear seeds illegally and not fulfilling fisheries licenses in Indonesia. Therefore, serious efforts are needed to tackle these fisheries crimes. The objective of this research is to find out the effectiveness of law enforcement regarding illegal distribution of lobster clear seed; and to observe the law enforcement attempts against its case. The approach method used in this research is juridical normative approach. The juridical normative approach is an approach that uses legislation by examining all laws and regulations related to the legal issues being addressed and conceptual approaches derived from views and doctrines that develop in legal science. The regulation on the prohibition of marketing clear lobster seeds is regulated in the Minister of Marine Affairs and Fisheries Regulation No. 12/PERMEN-KP/2020 concerning the Management of Lobsters, Crabs and Rajungan in the Republic of Indonesia and amended to the Minister of Marine Affairs and Fisheries Regulation No. 17/2021 concerning the Management of Lobsters, Crabs and Rajungan in Indonesian territorial waters.
THE IMPLEMENTATION OF RESTORATIVE JUSTICE SYSTEM TO RESOLVE DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ACTS Hardianto, Yoyok; Khoidin, M.; Prawesthi, Wahyu; Utami, Rahayu Sri
YURIS: Journal of Court and Justice Vol. 2 Issue 3 (2023)
Publisher : jfpublisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56943/jcj.v2i3.359

Abstract

Domestic violence is often referred to as a hidden crime because both perpetrators and victims attempt to hide their offence from public view. According to Article 28 of the 1945 Constitution, which regulates human rights, all forms of violence, especially domestic violence, are violations of human rights and crimes against human dignity. Restorative justice system is one of the approaches used to resolve case of domestic violence. The concept of a restorative justice system is used to resolve violations of the law that occur based on victims and perpetrators’ interests. The objectives of this research is to find out the implementation of restorative justice in managing domestic violence issues in society; and to analyse the restorative justice mechanism in domestic violence cases based on the Indonesian legal system. The approach method used in this research is a normative juridical approach based on laws and regulations related to legal issues. In addition, it is also used conceptual approach based on developed perspective and doctrines in legal sciences. The settlement of domestic violence cases using penal mediation method with a restorative justice approach was succesfully resolved the criminal cases occurred in community.
SEMA BINDING STRENGTH NO. 2/2023 REGARDING THE JUDGE'S DETERMINATION IN APPLICATIONS FOR REGISTRATION OF INTERFAITH MARRIAGES Leonide, Cliff Ivan; Khoidin, M.; Zulaika, Emi; Poesoko, Herowati; Suci, Ivida Dewi Amrih
Awang Long Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2024): Awang Long Law Review
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/awl.v6i2.1166

Abstract

The state guarantees freedom of religion, as well as forming a marriage. Registration of marriages, especially mixed marriages, is regulated in Article 57 of Law no. 16 of 2019 concerning Marriage. This mixed marriage is also related to interfaith marriage which is also a right for Indonesian citizens. The Supreme Court in this case made SEMA No. 2/2023 dated 17 July 2023 concerning Appointments for Judges in Adjudicating Cases on Applications for Registration of Marriages Between People of Different Religions and Beliefs, at point No. 2 explains that "The court did not grant the request for registration of marriages between people of different religions and beliefs." If this SEMA is analyzed it is in conflict with Article 35 letter (a) of Law no. 23 of 2006 in conjunction with Article 50 of Minister of Home Affairs Regulation no. 108/2019. Therefore, the author analyzes the binding strength of SEMA No. 2/2023 dated 17 July 2023 regarding the failure to grant the request for registration of interfaith marriages. Meanwhile, Minister of Home Affairs Regulation no. 108/2019 states that interfaith marriages must be proven, which automatically results in an application being made to the court. This is also related to Article 35 letter (a) of Law no. 23 of 2006 concerning Population Administration which regulates marriages determined by courts for people of different religions. Therefore, the author analyzes the above problem with the problem, namely the binding force of SEMA No. 2/2023 regarding the judge's decision in the application for registration of interfaith marriages. The method used is normative juridical research, with an analysis of the theory of authority and legal certainty. The approaches used are the conceptual approach, statutory approach and case approach. The conclusion to be reached in this writing has future perspective value and is in accordance with its axiology, namely the aim of law is justice.
Co-Authors Abrahams, Deny Amiq, Bahrul Emi Zulaika Hardianto, Yoyok Herowati Poesoko, Herowati Leonide, Cliff Ivan Suci, Ivida Dewi Amrih Tri Wahyudi Utami, Rahayu Sri Wahyu Prawesthi, Wahyu