Catur Ari Setianto
Universitas Brawijaya

Published : 6 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

TRIGEMINAL NEURALGIA CAUSED BY ARTERIOVENOUS MALFORMATION OF THE POSTERIOR FOSSA : A CASE REPORT Widodo Mardi Santoso; Opik Jamaludin; Catur Ari Setianto; Neila Raisa
Journal of Pain, Headache and Vertigo Vol. 1 No. 1 (2020): March
Publisher : Journal of Pain, Headache and Vertigo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (238.825 KB) | DOI: 10.21776/ub.jphv.2020.001.01.4

Abstract

Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is a sudden, severe, brief, stabbing, and recurrent pain within one or more branches of the trigeminal nerve. Trigeminal neuralgia has a prevalence of 0.1-0.2 per thousand and an incidence ranging from about 4-5/100,000/year up to 20/100,000/year after age 60. A 35 year old woman presented with 1 year history of right facial pain. Physical examination showed hyperalgesia and allodynia in all division of right trigeminal nerve. Magnetic resonance imaging with contrast demonstrated flow void signal in the right cerebellopontine angle. Computed tomography angiography confirmed the diagnosis of AVM (arteriovenous malformation), and demonstrated the malformed niduses were fed by the right posterior inferior cerebellar artery and the right superior cerebellar artery, and drained vein into basal vein of rosenthal, without hemorrhage or aneurysm intranidal appearance. carbamazepin 2x100 mg per oral for 7 days effectively decreased the facial pain significantly (from the numeric rating scale (NRS) score 8 to 5). Open surgical was not prefered for this patient because the AVM was small, unruptured, and located in eloquent area. Radiosurgery is considered if the medication fails. Trigeminal neuralgia with facial pain affecting all devision of nervus trigeminus with pulsatile headache can be suspected symptomatic TN. Radiological examination such as Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Computed Tomography (CT) angiography can be performed to detect the cause of TN.
STROKE AFTER ELECTRICAL INJURY : CASE REPORT Eko Arisetijono; Catur Ari Setianto; Sri Budi Rianawati; Masruroh Rahayu; Rodhiyan Rakhmatiar
Journal of Pain, Headache and Vertigo Vol. 1 No. 2 (2020): September
Publisher : Journal of Pain, Headache and Vertigo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (226.884 KB) | DOI: 10.21776/ub.jphv.2020.001.02.2

Abstract

Electrical injury ranging widely reported caused variety of clinical manifestations including brain. Cerebral infarction is one of the manifestation either after low or high voltage electrical injury. We report the case of 49 – year old male who suffered a household electrical injury (110 – 220 Volt) while he was installing the light bulb. He found unconsciousness with left hemiparesis and also central paresis of the left facial nerve (Cranial Nerve VII). The Head Computed Tomography Scan (CT scan) showed wide infarction at right hemisphere which the territory of right cerebral media artery which can be caused by electrical injury.     
COMPARISON OF HYDRODISECTION INJECTION BETWEEN TRIAMCINOLONE ACETONIDE VERSUS DEXAMETHASONE IN CARPAL TUNNEL SYNDROME Widodo Mardi Santoso; Badrul Munir; Catur Ari Setianto; Ria Damayanti; Sheny Agma
Journal of Pain, Headache and Vertigo Vol. 2 No. 2 (2021): September
Publisher : Journal of Pain, Headache and Vertigo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (329.781 KB) | DOI: 10.21776/ub.jphv.2021.002.02.1

Abstract

Background: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common nontraumatic peripheral neuropathy, which is caused by suppression of the median nerve below the transverse carpi ligament. Local corticosteroid injection is considered the fastest and most effective method for improving symptoms that occur in CTS. There are several corticosteroid agents that can be used, but there are no objective standards that can explain the most ideal drugs. Objective: To compare the effectiveness of hydrodisection injection therapy of triamcinolone acetonide versus dexamethasone on carpal tunnel syndrome. Methods: This study involved 30 participants who were diagnosed with CTS and fulfilled the inclusion criteria and no exclusion criteria were obtained. Participants were divided into two treatment groups; the first group (n = 15) injected with Triamcinolone Acetonide (TCA) 10mg / 1ml and lidocaine 1% 1 ml and the second group (n = 15) injected with Dexamethasone 4mg / 0.8ml and lidocaine 1% 1 ml. The NRS, FSS, and SSS parameters were assessed before injection and 4 weeks after injection in each agent. Then compared these parameters at 4 weeks after injection compared to the TCA group with the dexamethasone group. Results: NRS score before and 4 weeks after TCA injection (sig 0.000; p <0.05), SSS (sig 0.001; p <0.05) and FSS (sig 0.020; p <0.05), and NRS score before and 4 weeks after dexamethasone injection (sig 0.001; p <0.05), SSS (sig 0,000; p <0.05) and FSS (sig 0,000; p <0.05). At 4 weeks after injection of TCA compared to dexamethasone there were no significant results on NRS (sig 0.237; p> 0.05) and FSS (sig 0.119; p> 0.05), while SSS values were significantly different (sig 0.027; p <0.05). Conclusion: Significant improvement in NRS, FSS and SSS score was obtained at 4 weeks after hydrodisection injection, both with TCA and dexamethasone. At 4 weeks after TCA injection compared to dexamethasone, there were no significant differences in NRS and FSS scores, whereas SSS score differed significantly. Both injection agents are equally effective in treating CTS, but dexamethasone produces a better improvement in SSS score.
TRIGEMINAL NEURALGIA CAUSED BY ARTERIOVENOUS MALFORMATION OF THE POSTERIOR FOSSA : A CASE REPORT Widodo Mardi Santoso; Opik Jamaludin; Catur Ari Setianto; Neila Raisa
Journal of Pain, Headache and Vertigo Vol. 1 No. 1 (2020): March
Publisher : Journal of Pain, Headache and Vertigo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.jphv.2020.001.01.4

Abstract

Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) is a sudden, severe, brief, stabbing, and recurrent pain within one or more branches of the trigeminal nerve. Trigeminal neuralgia has a prevalence of 0.1-0.2 per thousand and an incidence ranging from about 4-5/100,000/year up to 20/100,000/year after age 60. A 35 year old woman presented with 1 year history of right facial pain. Physical examination showed hyperalgesia and allodynia in all division of right trigeminal nerve. Magnetic resonance imaging with contrast demonstrated flow void signal in the right cerebellopontine angle. Computed tomography angiography confirmed the diagnosis of AVM (arteriovenous malformation), and demonstrated the malformed niduses were fed by the right posterior inferior cerebellar artery and the right superior cerebellar artery, and drained vein into basal vein of rosenthal, without hemorrhage or aneurysm intranidal appearance. carbamazepin 2x100 mg per oral for 7 days effectively decreased the facial pain significantly (from the numeric rating scale (NRS) score 8 to 5). Open surgical was not prefered for this patient because the AVM was small, unruptured, and located in eloquent area. Radiosurgery is considered if the medication fails. Trigeminal neuralgia with facial pain affecting all devision of nervus trigeminus with pulsatile headache can be suspected symptomatic TN. Radiological examination such as Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Computed Tomography (CT) angiography can be performed to detect the cause of TN.
STROKE AFTER ELECTRICAL INJURY : CASE REPORT Eko Arisetijono; Catur Ari Setianto; Sri Budi Rianawati; Masruroh Rahayu; Rodhiyan Rakhmatiar
Journal of Pain, Headache and Vertigo Vol. 1 No. 2 (2020): September
Publisher : Journal of Pain, Headache and Vertigo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.jphv.2020.001.02.2

Abstract

Electrical injury ranging widely reported caused variety of clinical manifestations including brain. Cerebral infarction is one of the manifestation either after low or high voltage electrical injury. We report the case of 49 – year old male who suffered a household electrical injury (110 – 220 Volt) while he was installing the light bulb. He found unconsciousness with left hemiparesis and also central paresis of the left facial nerve (Cranial Nerve VII). The Head Computed Tomography Scan (CT scan) showed wide infarction at right hemisphere which the territory of right cerebral media artery which can be caused by electrical injury.     
COMPARISON OF HYDRODISECTION INJECTION BETWEEN TRIAMCINOLONE ACETONIDE VERSUS DEXAMETHASONE IN CARPAL TUNNEL SYNDROME Widodo Mardi Santoso; Badrul Munir; Catur Ari Setianto; Ria Damayanti; Sheny Agma
Journal of Pain, Headache and Vertigo Vol. 2 No. 2 (2021): September
Publisher : Journal of Pain, Headache and Vertigo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.jphv.2021.002.02.1

Abstract

Background: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most common nontraumatic peripheral neuropathy, which is caused by suppression of the median nerve below the transverse carpi ligament. Local corticosteroid injection is considered the fastest and most effective method for improving symptoms that occur in CTS. There are several corticosteroid agents that can be used, but there are no objective standards that can explain the most ideal drugs. Objective: To compare the effectiveness of hydrodisection injection therapy of triamcinolone acetonide versus dexamethasone on carpal tunnel syndrome. Methods: This study involved 30 participants who were diagnosed with CTS and fulfilled the inclusion criteria and no exclusion criteria were obtained. Participants were divided into two treatment groups; the first group (n = 15) injected with Triamcinolone Acetonide (TCA) 10mg / 1ml and lidocaine 1% 1 ml and the second group (n = 15) injected with Dexamethasone 4mg / 0.8ml and lidocaine 1% 1 ml. The NRS, FSS, and SSS parameters were assessed before injection and 4 weeks after injection in each agent. Then compared these parameters at 4 weeks after injection compared to the TCA group with the dexamethasone group. Results: NRS score before and 4 weeks after TCA injection (sig 0.000; p <0.05), SSS (sig 0.001; p <0.05) and FSS (sig 0.020; p <0.05), and NRS score before and 4 weeks after dexamethasone injection (sig 0.001; p <0.05), SSS (sig 0,000; p <0.05) and FSS (sig 0,000; p <0.05). At 4 weeks after injection of TCA compared to dexamethasone there were no significant results on NRS (sig 0.237; p> 0.05) and FSS (sig 0.119; p> 0.05), while SSS values were significantly different (sig 0.027; p <0.05). Conclusion: Significant improvement in NRS, FSS and SSS score was obtained at 4 weeks after hydrodisection injection, both with TCA and dexamethasone. At 4 weeks after TCA injection compared to dexamethasone, there were no significant differences in NRS and FSS scores, whereas SSS score differed significantly. Both injection agents are equally effective in treating CTS, but dexamethasone produces a better improvement in SSS score.