Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.012
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Gema Keadilan Jurnal Hukum Prasada Al-MIKRAJ: Jurnal studi Islam dan Humaniora International Journal of Advance Social Sciences and Education (IJASSE) Hakim: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Sosial Demokrasi: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Politik Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Indonesian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities
Sulistyanta Sulistyanta
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Sebelas Maret || Indonesia, Universitas Sebelas Maret
Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Social Sciences Other

Published : 12 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 12 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Pengaturan Ganja Medis dalam Hukum Pidana: Perbandingan Internasional dan Implikasinya bagi Indonesia Muhammad Irfan Kamil; Sulistyanta Sulistyanta
Indonesian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): Indonesian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (IJSSH)
Publisher : Indonesian Publication Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The regulation of cannabis in Indonesian positive law continues to classify *Cannabis sativa* as a Schedule I narcotic, prohibiting its use for medical purposes and creating legal issues when cannabis is used to address specific health needs. This study analyzes cannabis regulation in Indonesia and several other countries and examines the possibility of legalizing medical cannabis from the perspectives of criminal law and the right to health. Using normative legal research with statutory and comparative approaches, the study relies on literature review of legislation, court decisions, and relevant legal scholarship, analyzed systematically and prescriptively. The findings show that Indonesia maintains a repressive and prohibitionist approach under Law Number 35 of 2009 on Narcotics, which provides no legal basis for medical cannabis use. In contrast, countries such as Thailand, the Netherlands, and Turkey permit limited medical cannabis under strict state supervision. Constitutional Court Decision Number 106/PUU-XVIII/2020 affirms that legalization constitutes an open legal policy subject to legislative discretion based on scientific evidence. The study recommends revising Law Number 35 of 2009 to allow limited and controlled medical cannabis use, enhancing protection of the right to health and reducing criminalization. Its originality lies in integrating criminal law, human rights, and comparative law perspectives to support narcotics policy reform.
Perbandingan Pengaturan Tindak Pidana Judi Online Sebagai Cybercrime di Indonesia dan Brunei Darussalam Evan Adriawan Cipta Perwira; Hartiwiningsih Hartiwiningsih; Sulistyanta Sulistyanta
Indonesian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): Indonesian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (IJSSH)
Publisher : Indonesian Publication Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The rapid development of information technology has transformed conventional gambling into online gambling, which is characterized by its borderless nature, anonymity, and complex digital infrastructure. This phenomenon presents significant challenges for criminal law enforcement, particularly within the framework of cybercrime. This research aims to analyze and compare the regulation of online gambling offenses in Indonesia and Brunei Darussalam, and to identify constructive legal reforms that may be adopted in Indonesia. The study employs a normative juridical method using statutory, comparative, and conceptual approaches. The findings indicate that Indonesia adopts a total prohibition model, regulating online gambling through the new Penal Code and the Electronic Information and Transactions Law. Despite fulfilling the principle of legality, enforcement faces obstacles related to digital evidence, cross-border servers, encryption systems, and uneven targeting of offenders. Brunei Darussalam also applies a total prohibition approach but within a dual legal system integrating the Common Gaming Houses Act and the Syariah Penal Code Order 2013. The comparative analysis demonstrates that regulatory effectiveness depends not only on the severity of sanctions but also on normative consistency, institutional integration, and preventive strategies. This study concludes that Indonesia requires harmonization of legal provisions, proportional sentencing differentiation, and stronger institutional coordination to effectively combat online gambling as a form of cybercrime.
Co-Authors Cestri Enggardini Budiarti Chakim Yudha Perdana Dessy Permata Diani Diana Lukita Sari Evan Adriawan Cipta Perwira Fabyan Rayyan Aqila Hartiwiningsih Hartiwiningsih Hartiwiningsih Hasna Azahrani Maulidina Husodo, Jadmiko Anom Ismunarno Mei Rezky Kurnia Putra Mochamad Rizal Tsany Muhammad Irfan Kamil Nana Rosita Sari Sarah Azzahra Supanto Supanto Tika Andarasni Parwitasari Winarno MS SH Budyatmojo