Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.552
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Gema Keadilan Jurnal Hukum Prasada Al-MIKRAJ: Jurnal studi Islam dan Humaniora International Journal of Advance Social Sciences and Education (IJASSE) Hakim: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Sosial Prosiding Seminar Nasional Ilmu Pendidikan Demokrasi: Jurnal Riset Ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Politik Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Indonesian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Smart: Journal of Criminal Law Review and Analysis
Sulistyanta Sulistyanta
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Sebelas Maret || Indonesia, Universitas Sebelas Maret
Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 17 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 17 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Pengaturan Ganja Medis dalam Hukum Pidana: Perbandingan Internasional dan Implikasinya bagi Indonesia Muhammad Irfan Kamil; Sulistyanta Sulistyanta
Indonesian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): Indonesian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (IJSSH)
Publisher : Indonesian Publication Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The regulation of cannabis in Indonesian positive law continues to classify *Cannabis sativa* as a Schedule I narcotic, prohibiting its use for medical purposes and creating legal issues when cannabis is used to address specific health needs. This study analyzes cannabis regulation in Indonesia and several other countries and examines the possibility of legalizing medical cannabis from the perspectives of criminal law and the right to health. Using normative legal research with statutory and comparative approaches, the study relies on literature review of legislation, court decisions, and relevant legal scholarship, analyzed systematically and prescriptively. The findings show that Indonesia maintains a repressive and prohibitionist approach under Law Number 35 of 2009 on Narcotics, which provides no legal basis for medical cannabis use. In contrast, countries such as Thailand, the Netherlands, and Turkey permit limited medical cannabis under strict state supervision. Constitutional Court Decision Number 106/PUU-XVIII/2020 affirms that legalization constitutes an open legal policy subject to legislative discretion based on scientific evidence. The study recommends revising Law Number 35 of 2009 to allow limited and controlled medical cannabis use, enhancing protection of the right to health and reducing criminalization. Its originality lies in integrating criminal law, human rights, and comparative law perspectives to support narcotics policy reform.
Perbandingan Pengaturan Tindak Pidana Judi Online Sebagai Cybercrime di Indonesia dan Brunei Darussalam Evan Adriawan Cipta Perwira; Hartiwiningsih Hartiwiningsih; Sulistyanta Sulistyanta
Indonesian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): Indonesian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (IJSSH)
Publisher : Indonesian Publication Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The rapid development of information technology has transformed conventional gambling into online gambling, which is characterized by its borderless nature, anonymity, and complex digital infrastructure. This phenomenon presents significant challenges for criminal law enforcement, particularly within the framework of cybercrime. This research aims to analyze and compare the regulation of online gambling offenses in Indonesia and Brunei Darussalam, and to identify constructive legal reforms that may be adopted in Indonesia. The study employs a normative juridical method using statutory, comparative, and conceptual approaches. The findings indicate that Indonesia adopts a total prohibition model, regulating online gambling through the new Penal Code and the Electronic Information and Transactions Law. Despite fulfilling the principle of legality, enforcement faces obstacles related to digital evidence, cross-border servers, encryption systems, and uneven targeting of offenders. Brunei Darussalam also applies a total prohibition approach but within a dual legal system integrating the Common Gaming Houses Act and the Syariah Penal Code Order 2013. The comparative analysis demonstrates that regulatory effectiveness depends not only on the severity of sanctions but also on normative consistency, institutional integration, and preventive strategies. This study concludes that Indonesia requires harmonization of legal provisions, proportional sentencing differentiation, and stronger institutional coordination to effectively combat online gambling as a form of cybercrime.
Rehabilitative Sentencing for Narcotics Offenders in Surakarta District Court: A Humanistic Approach Aurel Nur Latifa; Hartiwiningsih; Sulistyanta
Smart: Journal of Criminal Law Review and Analysis Vol. 1 No. 2 (2026): Smart: Journal of Criminal Law Review and Analysis (SCrim)
Publisher : Divisi Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Yayasan Cerdas Pedia Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65101/scrim.v1i2.47

Abstract

The handling of narcotics offenses in Indonesia faces a severe crisis due to the dominance of retributive reasoning, particularly in the Surakarta District Court. This doctrinal legal research aims to dissect the anomaly of subjective judicial considerations that disregard rehabilitation mandates for persons with pure drug dependency, while simultaneously formulating prescriptive legal parameters to limit such discretion. Utilizing statutory and case approaches, the analysis reveals that judges commit teleological judicial overreach. The medical authority of assessment institutions is marginalized by judicial ego and penal populism, which manipulate pretexts of public disturbance to imprison vulnerable end users. This malpractice dismantles restorative justice and exacerbates prison overcrowding. The study concludes that transforming into a humanistic judiciary necessitates three absolute restrictions: the obligation to hear independent medical opinions, establishing evidence thresholds as absolute presumptions for rehabilitation, and a total ban on subjective clauses to aggravate criminal sentences. These legal policies are crucial to restore human rights.
One Third Criminal Sentence Enhancement for Recidivists of Narcotics Crimes in Indonesia Erma Dwi Margareta; Hartiwiningsih; Sulistyanta
Smart: Journal of Criminal Law Review and Analysis Vol. 1 No. 2 (2026): Smart: Journal of Criminal Law Review and Analysis (SCrim)
Publisher : Divisi Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Yayasan Cerdas Pedia Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65101/scrim.v1i2.48

Abstract

The transition in Indonesian criminal law triggers a sharp clash of norms between Article 144 of the Narcotics Act and the new National Penal Code. Special statutory provisions mandate a mechanical one third sentence enhancement for recidivists within a three year interval, whereas the newly enacted code extends this period to five years while prioritizing individualization of punishment. This doctrinal legal research examines the juridical implications of this normative dualism on judicial discretion and sentencing disparities. Empirically, rigid mathematical sentencing exacerbates extreme prison overcrowding and defies humanistic global trends in narcotics justice. This article argues that sentence enhancement must no longer operate through a purely mechanical approach for the sake of illusory certainty. Instead, judges should adopt a systematic teleological interpretation grounded in corrective justice. This study reconstructs ideal sentencing guidelines to harmonize statutory imperatives with judicial discretion, ensuring that narcotics recidivist sentences are strictly evaluated through medical rehabilitation eligibility.
Criminal Liability of Mining Corporations for Post-Mining Environmental Damage Aji Wahyu Maarif; Hartiwiningsih; Sulistyanta
Smart: Journal of Criminal Law Review and Analysis Vol. 1 No. 2 (2026): Smart: Journal of Criminal Law Review and Analysis (SCrim)
Publisher : Divisi Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Yayasan Cerdas Pedia Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.65101/scrim.v1i2.57

Abstract

Mining activities frequently cause massive post-mining environmental degradation, yet criminal law enforcement remains trapped within weak administrative formalities. This research analyzes corporate criminal liability and the relevance of applying the lex specialis derogat legi generali principle between the Mineral and Coal Mining Law and the Environmental Protection and Management Law. Utilizing normative juridical methods with conceptual and statutory approaches, this study reveals that ambiguous jurisdictional boundaries are frequently exploited by corporations as an impunity shield to evade substantive environmental offenses. The findings assert that the urgency of integrating ecological investigations and applying the lex consumens derogat legi consumptae principle is necessary to supersede partial lex specialis doctrines. This legal paradigm transformation is crucial to ensure that criminal enforcement transcends mere administrative compliance, aiming to guarantee ecological justice, functional environmental restoration, and the sustainability of constitutional rights for future generations of impacted communities due to current systemic corporate crimes in Indonesia.
Tinjauan Filosofis dan Economic Analysis of Law mengenai Ketentuan Pidana Kerja Sosial dalam KUHP Nasional Ario Dwi Priyambada; Sulistyanta Sulistyanta
Indonesian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 2 (2026): Indonesian Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities (IJSSH)
Publisher : Indonesian Publication Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.67434/ijssh.v6i2.2619

Abstract

Pembaharuan hukum pidana nasional melalui Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP Nasional) menandai perubahan paradigma pemidanaan di Indonesia dari pendekatan retributif menuju restoratif. Salah satu bentuk pembaharuan tersebut adalah pengaturan pidana kerja sosial sebagai alternatif pidana penjara jangka pendek. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis landasan filosofis pengaturan pidana kerja sosial dalam KUHP Nasional serta meninjau ketentuannya berdasarkan perspektif Economic Analysis of Law (EAL). Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis-normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual. Bahan hukum diperoleh melalui studi kepustakaan yang dianalisis secara kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pidana kerja sosial mencerminkan nilai kemanusiaan, keadilan sosial, dan tujuan pemidanaan yang berorientasi pada pemulihan hubungan sosial sesuai dengan Pancasila dan Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. Pidana kerja sosial dari perspektif EAL dinilai lebih efisien dibanding pidana penjara karena mampu mengurangi biaya institusional, mengatasi overcrowding lembaga pemasyarakatan, serta meminimalisasi biaya sosial dan ekonomi bagi pelaku maupun masyarakat. Namun, efektivitas kebijakan ini bergantung pada kesiapan kelembagaan, pengawasan, dan koordinasi antarinstansi dalam pelaksanaannya.
Criminalization of Insults the President and Vice President in Indonesia Dewi Maesyaroh; Sulistyanta Sulistyanta
Prosiding Seminar Nasional Ilmu Pendidikan Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): Desember : Prosiding Seminar Nasional Ilmu Pendidikan
Publisher : Asosiasi Riset Ilmu Pendidikan Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62951/prosemnasipi.v1i2.62

Abstract

Law Number 1 of 2023 about Criminal Code (KUHP), standardizes the criminalization of insults head of state Indonesia, particularly in Articles 217 to 220. The rule is considered contradictory because it can limit criticism toward the government. This study aims to examine regulations akining castigations against the President and Vice President and evaluate the impact of criminalization on freedom of expression and human rights. The research method utilized normative legal research conducted by reviewing literature and focusing on the democracy principles, freedom of speech, and civil rights. The study results show that the criminalization of offences aim the President and Vice is considered a mechanism check and conducive balance, ensuring that criticism against the President is conveyed responsibly without violating ethics, and maintaining the honor and dignity of the president. In conclusion, insulting the President provokes great consequences, in regard to the constitution, freedom of speech is not as limitless, and not absolute and must be rationated by the human rights of others. Therefore the rules concerning the criminalization of insults aim the President and Vice are suitable to maintain stability and public interest and belongs to the process of legal reform.
Co-Authors Aji Wahyu Maarif Ario Dwi Priyambada Aurel Nur Latifa Cestri Enggardini Budiarti Chakim Yudha Perdana Dessy Permata Diani Dewi Maesyaroh Diana Lukita Sari Erma Dwi Margareta Evan Adriawan Cipta Perwira Fabyan Rayyan Aqila Hartiwiningsih Hartiwiningsih Hartiwiningsih Hartiwiningsih Hasna Azahrani Maulidina Husodo, Jadmiko Anom Ismunarno Mei Rezky Kurnia Putra Mochamad Rizal Tsany Muhammad Irfan Kamil Nana Rosita Sari Sarah Azzahra Supanto Supanto Tika Andarasni Parwitasari Winarno MS SH Budyatmojo