Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
1.452
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Masalah-Masalah Hukum Jurnal Jendela Hukum Veritas et Justitia KISI HUKUM Sawwa: Jurnal Studi Gender Justitia et Pax SOEPRA Jurnal Hukum Kesehatan Jurnal Komunikasi dan Media
Rika Saraswati, Rika
Faculty of Law and Communication
Education Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 9 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 9 Documents
Search

 1 
KEBIJAKAN NO DROP DAN MANDATORY ARREST DALAM KASUS KEKERASAN DALAM RUMAH TANGGA Saraswati, Rika
KISI HUKUM Vol 14, No 1 (2015)
Publisher : Unika Soegijapranata

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Akses perempuan korban kekerasan dalam rumah tangga untuk mendapatkan keadilan menemui berbagai faktor yang menjadi kendala. Faktor utama yang sangat mempengaruhi dan menjadi kendala para perempuan yang mengalami kekerasan dalam rumah tangga untuk mendapatkan keadilan adalah tanggapan atau respon aparat penegak hukum. Respon aparat penegak yang dimaksud dalam hal ini adalah dari aparat kepolisian. Sebagian besar perempuan korban dalam penelitian tersebut menghadapi kenyataan bahwa laporan mereka tidak ditanggapi oleh polisi dengan serius. Respon aktif aparat penegak hukum sangat diperlukan untuk mencegah pelaku kekerasan mengontrol ‘keadilan’. Hal ini terjadi karena faktor ketidakseimbangan kekuasaan antara pelaku dengan korban
Penghargaan Hak Berpendapat Anak di Pengadilan: Studi Kasus di Pengadilan Negeri Semarang Saraswati, Rika; Hadiyono, V
Sawwa: Jurnal Studi Gender Vol 13, No 2 (2018): Oktober
Publisher : Pusat Studi gender dan Anak (PSGA) Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (145.92 KB) | DOI: 10.21580/sa.v13i2.3016

Abstract

The right of children to be heard are guaranteed by the Child Protection Act in Indonesia. This is very principle as the main factor for judges to make decisions regarding disputes over child custody. The purpose of this study is to examine the implementation of laws in Indonesia that regulate children's rights to be heard in court. Data was taken by conducting documentary research and field research by collecting several decisions from the District Court of Semarang and interviewing the judges who handled this matter. This research shows that children are rarely asked for their opinions in the courtroom; Their opinions are only considered information, not as witness statements. As a result, their opinions and expectations have no effect on court decisions. The study also shows that the law in Indonesia has regulated the obligation of judges to listen to the opinions of children in court, but judges never consider it.
PERANAN MEDIATOR HAKIM DAN MEDIATOR NON HAKIM MELINDUNGI HAK-HAK ANAK DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PERCERAIAN Saraswati, Rika; Hadiyono, V; Kusniati, Yuni; Boputra, Emanuel
Justitia et Pax Vol 36, No 2 (2020): Justitia et Pax Volume 36 Nomor 2 Tahun 2020
Publisher : Penerbit Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24002/jep.v36i2.3164

Abstract

Based on Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2016 on the Mediation Procedurel in Court, mediation is a step that must undertaken before the court hearing process. Therefore, it is important to know the implementation of mediation in Semarang Religious Court and Semarang District Court, especially its role to resolve marriage disputes and child custody cases. The question of the study is how is the role of mediators (both judge and non-judge) in the mediation process of divorce and child custody disputes, and how the role of mediators in implementating of children's rights on the mediation process is. Data was obtained through a documentary research and distributed questionnaires to 3 (three) District Court Judges and 2 (two) Semarang Religious Court Judges, and 3 (three) mediators at Walisongo Mediation Centre (WMC). The findings demonstrated that the role of judge and non-judge mediators in the mediation process of divorce and child custody cases was only as a facilitator. The non-judge mediators held more strict principle of not giving advice in order to maintenance of their neutrality than that of the judge mediators. The mediator has implemented their role by conveying and explaining children's rights, encouraging the parties to put forward the best interests of the child, facilitating women disputant to be able to fight for themselves and their children’s interests and needs, and reminding the obligation of both parties to fulfil the needs and the cost of their children’s lives if divorce was undertaken as a final solution.
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM KHUSUS BAGI ANAK DALAM MASA PANDEMI COVID-19 OLEH DP3A KOTA SEMARANG Saraswati, Rika; Soerjowinoto, Petrus; Boputra, Emanuel
Jurnal Jendela Hukum Vol 10 No 1 (2023): JENDELA HUKUM
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Wiraraja

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24929/jjh.v10i1.2433

Abstract

Many Indonesian children lost their parents who died because of Covid-19. These children need special protection and have rights that must be fulfilled by governments (either central or local). The aims of this study are to: 1) find out the role of the Semarang City Women's Empowerment and Child Protection Service (DP3A) in carrying out special protection for children whose parents died due to the COVID-19 pandemic and 2) find out the obstacles that are faced by DP3A in implementing this special protection. This research is a non-doctrinal (empirical) legal research and the data used are primary and secondary data. Primary data was obtained through interviews with the Office of Women's Empowerment and Child Protection (DP3A) Semarang City. Secondary data was obtained through literature study related to legal materials according to the research topic. The results of the study demonstrate that the Office of Women's Empowerment and Child Protection (DP3A) has carried out an imperative role in accordance with its duties and functions in accordance with applicable laws and regulations, namely in the field of child protection. The obstacles faced by DP3A are: limited authority and incomprehensive policy.
Implementasi Pemenuhan Hak Atas Pelayanan Kesehatan bagi Deteni di Rumah Detensi Imigrasi Semarang pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19 dan Post Pandemi Covid-19 Simandjuntak, Marcella Elwina; Saraswati, Rika; Yustina, Endang Wahyati; Sarwo, Budi; Rahman, Arief
Soepra Jurnal Hukum Kesehatan Vol 10, No 1: Juni 2024
Publisher : Universitas Katolik Soegijapranata Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24167/sjhk.v10i1.11878

Abstract

Deteni adalah penghuni rumah detensi imigrasi (Rudenim) yang sedang menjalani proses pendetensian karena melanggar Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2011 tentang Keimigrasian. Pelanggaran keimigrasian seperti berada di wilayah Indonesia tanpa memiliki dokumen perjalanan yang sah, ijin tinggal yang sah, atau ijin tinggal mereka yang sudah tidak berlaku lagi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk melihat implementasi hak atas pelayanan kesehatan bagi para Deteni di Rumah Detensi Imigrasi Semarang. Metode pendekatan yang digunakan dalam penelitian adalah metode kualitatif dengan spesifikasi penelitian deskriptif analitis. Data yang digunakan adalah data primer dan sekunder. Data primer dikumpulkan dengan melakukan wawancara dengan petugas di Rudenim Semarang. Data sekunder dikumpulkan dengan melakukan studi kepustakaan atau studi literatur dan studi dokumen peraturan perundang- undangan, Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa hak atas kesehatan denteni pada masa pandemic COVID-19 dibatasi geraknya untuk menghindari kontak dengan banyak orang, mengingat beberapa petugas Rudenim justru tertular virus ini dari luar. Rudenim Semarang sudah meningkatkan layanan kesehatan melalui berbagai inovasi, yaitu: Inovasi   Layanan   Rudi   Marang   Go   Green, Inovasi Layanan ACTivity Tenar, Inovasi Layanan Go Doctor,Inovasi Layanan Laras Tenar, Inovasi Layanan Joko Tenar dan Inovasi Inovasi Layangan Den Bagus. Inovasi ini mampu mewujudkan layanan kesehatan yang baik untuk para deteni.
PEMENUHAN HAK ANAK DI INDONESIA MELALUI PERENCANAAN PENGASUHAN, PENGASUHAN TUNGGAL DAN PENGASUHAN BERSAMA Saraswati, Rika; Boputra, Emanuel; Kusniati, Yuni
Veritas et Justitia Vol. 7 No. 1 (2021): Veritas et Justitia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Parahyangan Catholic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25123/vej.v7i1.4066

Abstract

In many countries, joint custody has replaced and is considered better than sole custody. It is also deemed more in line with the gender equality principle which demands both parents to share responsibility for the custody and care of the child post-divorce. This article discusses how judges in divorce cases decide on child custody, and the extent to which they consider the merits of joint or sole custody and demand divorcees to consider making a parenting plan in the best interest of their children.  Qualitative data is collected from the District Court and Religious Court at Semarang and by analysing 4 court decisions regarding child custody.  Interestingly, none of the Courts above possess or implements a policy or have some procedural ruling obligating judges in divorce cases to demand parents to consider joint custody or making a parenting plan post-divorce. Obligatory pre-trial mediation is geared more as a procedural-formalistic attempt to dissuade parties to continue with divorce.
AN ANALYSIS ON ONLINE CRIMINAL CASE HEARINGS: CAN JUSTICE BE SERVED ONLINE? Simandjuntak, Marcella Elwina; Saraswati, Rika; Soerjowinoto, Petrus; Boputra, Emanuel
Masalah-Masalah Hukum Vol 53, No 3 (2024): MASALAH-MASALAH HUKUM
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/mmh.53.3.2024.304-315

Abstract

This paper examines the accountability of online criminal case adjudication in Indonesia during the COVID-19 pandemic. Although normal court trials have resumed, the judiciary must prepare for the integration of online trials to improve efficiency and case management. This empirical study employs qualitative methods, collecting data through interviews with judges, prosecutors, and written interviews with lawyers, along with questionnaires. Conducted in three district courts in Central Java, it also incorporates secondary data from legal statutes and literature. Most judges, prosecutors, and attorneys found online trials accountable, with outcomes comparable to in-person hearings. However, challenges persist, such as administrative gaps, and technical disruptions. The study urges legislative action to establish procedural norms for online trials and recommends improving court decisions' quality and quantity to ensure justice. 
EVALUASI PENERAPAN DIVERSI DAN RESTORATIF JUSTICE 12 TAHUN BERLAKUNYA UU SPPA Saraswati, Rika; E Simandjuntak, Marcella; Soerjowinoto, Petrus; Boputra, Emanuel; M.K. Wijaya, Emilia
Jurnal Jendela Hukum Vol 12 No 1 (2025): JENDELA HUKUM
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Wiraraja

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24929/jjh.v12i1.4215

Abstract

Restorative justice with a diversion approach has been initiated since 2012 following the promulgation of the Juvenile Criminal Justice System Law. After twelve years of this system being implemented how far has it been implemented, 2) what does the law apparatus encounter the obstacles? This research falls into the realm of qualitative research. The research location was determined at the Semarang District Court, Semarang Prosecutor's Office, Bapas, Semarang City Regional Police. Qualitative research is written on the base of primary data and secondary data. Primary data was obtained through interviews with informants and respondents. The study has demonstrated that the application of diversion and restorative justice in resolving juvenile criminal cases is based on Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Criminal Justice System and other regulations issued by law enforcement agencies. Diversion is generally carried out using restorative meetings (restorative conferencing). Factors that become obstacles are legal regulations that do not fully and clearly regulate restorative justice and diversion, law enforcement officers who do not understand children's rights, lack of understanding from families and communities, and lack of facilities and infrastructure to support the Juvenile Criminal Justice System Law. The implementation of diversion and restorative justice must be based on the principles of the child's rights.
FULFILLING THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION FOR DETAINEES AT THE SEMARANG IMMIGRATION DETENTION CENTER Simandjuntak, Marcella Elwina; Saraswati, Rika; Wahyati, Endang; Sarwo, Budi; Rahman, Arief
Jurnal Komunikasi dan Media Vol 5, No 2: Mei 2025
Publisher : Universitas Katolik Soegijapranata

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24167/jkm.v5i2.13404

Abstract

Detainees are those who are currently undergoing a detention process for violating Law Number 6 of 2011 concerning Immigration. They are in Indonesian territory without valid travel documents or residence permits, or their residence permits are no longer valid. This research aims to determine the fulfillment of communication and information rights services (for Detainee) during the pandemic and post-pandemic COVID-19 and the obstacles in implementing these services. The method used in the research is a qualitative method approach with an analytical descriptive. The data used are primary and secondary. Primary data was collected by conducting interviews with Rudenim Semarang officers. Secondary data was collected by conducting literature studies. The research results show that the right to information and communication for Detainees is provided both during the COVID-19 pandemic and post-COVID-19 Pandemic, which includes the right to information regarding the continuation of cases faced by Detainees given by forwarding information to Detainees regarding the extent to which Rudenim communicated with the Detainee's country of origin to return the Detainee to his country. The right to communication is exercised by providing a teleconference room that Detainees can use to contact colleagues or relatives via the Internet. The obstacle is the complaint from the Detainee about the time limitation during video calls and the extended response from the Detainee's country/government of origin.
Co-Authors Arief Rahman E Simandjuntak, Marcella Emanuel Boputra, Emanuel Endang Wahyati Yustina, Endang Wahyati Hadiyono, V Hadiyono, V Kusniati, Yuni M.K. Wijaya, Emilia Marcella Elwina Simandjuntak Petrus Soerjowinoto, Petrus Sarwo, Budi Wahyati, Endang