Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
1.452
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Masalah-Masalah Hukum Jurnal Jendela Hukum Veritas et Justitia KISI HUKUM Justitia et Pax Lex Publica
Emanuel Boputra, Emanuel
Faculty of Law and Communication
Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 8 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 8 Documents
Search

 1 
UNDANG-UNDANG PERKAWINAN DAN PENGARUHNYA TERHADAP PRAKTEK POLIGAMI Boputra, Emanuel
KISI HUKUM Vol 14, No 1 (2015)
Publisher : Unika Soegijapranata

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Persoalan Poligami seringkali menimbulkan polemik dan memunculkan ragam pendapat di kalangan masyarakat. Hal ini sudah barang tentu tidak terlepas dari adanya sudut pandang yang berbeda dalam menilai dan memaknai poligami. Undang-undang No. 1 Tahun 1974 (UU Perkawinan) secara tegas telah mengatur perihal poligami, dan dari aspek legal formal terdapat ruang untuk itu. Ketentuan ini memberi peluang bagi sementara pihak (suami) untuk memanfaatkan peluang tersebut dengan beragam orientasi. Sebaliknya ada juga yang menilai bahwa pilihan untuk melakukan Poligami sesungguhnya tidak banyak manfaat manakala dinilai secara adil bagi kepentingan suami istri. Atas dasar ketidakadilan yang dirasakan pada giliranya menentukan pilihan untuk tidak melakukan poligami. Dengan demikian keputusan untuk melakukan atau sebaliknya tidak melakukan poligami juga lebih banyak dilandasi oleh pemikiran bahwa apakah poligami lebih banyak mendatangkan kebaikan dan keadilan bagi mereka atau sebaliknya terlepas dari dibolehkanya poligami oleh Undang-undang dan hukum agama bagi mereka yang hendak melakukanya
PERANAN MEDIATOR HAKIM DAN MEDIATOR NON HAKIM MELINDUNGI HAK-HAK ANAK DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PERCERAIAN Saraswati, Rika; Hadiyono, V; Kusniati, Yuni; Boputra, Emanuel
Justitia et Pax Vol 36, No 2 (2020): Justitia et Pax Volume 36 Nomor 2 Tahun 2020
Publisher : Penerbit Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24002/jep.v36i2.3164

Abstract

Based on Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2016 on the Mediation Procedurel in Court, mediation is a step that must undertaken before the court hearing process. Therefore, it is important to know the implementation of mediation in Semarang Religious Court and Semarang District Court, especially its role to resolve marriage disputes and child custody cases. The question of the study is how is the role of mediators (both judge and non-judge) in the mediation process of divorce and child custody disputes, and how the role of mediators in implementating of children's rights on the mediation process is. Data was obtained through a documentary research and distributed questionnaires to 3 (three) District Court Judges and 2 (two) Semarang Religious Court Judges, and 3 (three) mediators at Walisongo Mediation Centre (WMC). The findings demonstrated that the role of judge and non-judge mediators in the mediation process of divorce and child custody cases was only as a facilitator. The non-judge mediators held more strict principle of not giving advice in order to maintenance of their neutrality than that of the judge mediators. The mediator has implemented their role by conveying and explaining children's rights, encouraging the parties to put forward the best interests of the child, facilitating women disputant to be able to fight for themselves and their children’s interests and needs, and reminding the obligation of both parties to fulfil the needs and the cost of their children’s lives if divorce was undertaken as a final solution.
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM KHUSUS BAGI ANAK DALAM MASA PANDEMI COVID-19 OLEH DP3A KOTA SEMARANG Saraswati, Rika; Soerjowinoto, Petrus; Boputra, Emanuel
Jurnal Jendela Hukum Vol 10 No 1 (2023): JENDELA HUKUM
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Wiraraja

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24929/jjh.v10i1.2433

Abstract

Many Indonesian children lost their parents who died because of Covid-19. These children need special protection and have rights that must be fulfilled by governments (either central or local). The aims of this study are to: 1) find out the role of the Semarang City Women's Empowerment and Child Protection Service (DP3A) in carrying out special protection for children whose parents died due to the COVID-19 pandemic and 2) find out the obstacles that are faced by DP3A in implementing this special protection. This research is a non-doctrinal (empirical) legal research and the data used are primary and secondary data. Primary data was obtained through interviews with the Office of Women's Empowerment and Child Protection (DP3A) Semarang City. Secondary data was obtained through literature study related to legal materials according to the research topic. The results of the study demonstrate that the Office of Women's Empowerment and Child Protection (DP3A) has carried out an imperative role in accordance with its duties and functions in accordance with applicable laws and regulations, namely in the field of child protection. The obstacles faced by DP3A are: limited authority and incomprehensive policy.
PEMENUHAN HAK ANAK DI INDONESIA MELALUI PERENCANAAN PENGASUHAN, PENGASUHAN TUNGGAL DAN PENGASUHAN BERSAMA Saraswati, Rika; Boputra, Emanuel; Kusniati, Yuni
Veritas et Justitia Vol. 7 No. 1 (2021): Veritas et Justitia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Parahyangan Catholic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25123/vej.v7i1.4066

Abstract

In many countries, joint custody has replaced and is considered better than sole custody. It is also deemed more in line with the gender equality principle which demands both parents to share responsibility for the custody and care of the child post-divorce. This article discusses how judges in divorce cases decide on child custody, and the extent to which they consider the merits of joint or sole custody and demand divorcees to consider making a parenting plan in the best interest of their children.  Qualitative data is collected from the District Court and Religious Court at Semarang and by analysing 4 court decisions regarding child custody.  Interestingly, none of the Courts above possess or implements a policy or have some procedural ruling obligating judges in divorce cases to demand parents to consider joint custody or making a parenting plan post-divorce. Obligatory pre-trial mediation is geared more as a procedural-formalistic attempt to dissuade parties to continue with divorce.
AN ANALYSIS ON ONLINE CRIMINAL CASE HEARINGS: CAN JUSTICE BE SERVED ONLINE? Simandjuntak, Marcella Elwina; Saraswati, Rika; Soerjowinoto, Petrus; Boputra, Emanuel
Masalah-Masalah Hukum Vol 53, No 3 (2024): MASALAH-MASALAH HUKUM
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/mmh.53.3.2024.304-315

Abstract

This paper examines the accountability of online criminal case adjudication in Indonesia during the COVID-19 pandemic. Although normal court trials have resumed, the judiciary must prepare for the integration of online trials to improve efficiency and case management. This empirical study employs qualitative methods, collecting data through interviews with judges, prosecutors, and written interviews with lawyers, along with questionnaires. Conducted in three district courts in Central Java, it also incorporates secondary data from legal statutes and literature. Most judges, prosecutors, and attorneys found online trials accountable, with outcomes comparable to in-person hearings. However, challenges persist, such as administrative gaps, and technical disruptions. The study urges legislative action to establish procedural norms for online trials and recommends improving court decisions' quality and quantity to ensure justice. 
EVALUASI PENERAPAN DIVERSI DAN RESTORATIF JUSTICE 12 TAHUN BERLAKUNYA UU SPPA Saraswati, Rika; E Simandjuntak, Marcella; Soerjowinoto, Petrus; Boputra, Emanuel; M.K. Wijaya, Emilia

Publisher :

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24929/jjh.v12i1.4215

Abstract

Restorative justice with a diversion approach has been initiated since 2012 following the promulgation of the Juvenile Criminal Justice System Law. After twelve years of this system being implemented how far has it been implemented, 2) what does the law apparatus encounter the obstacles? This research falls into the realm of qualitative research. The research location was determined at the Semarang District Court, Semarang Prosecutor's Office, Bapas, Semarang City Regional Police. Qualitative research is written on the base of primary data and secondary data. Primary data was obtained through interviews with informants and respondents. The study has demonstrated that the application of diversion and restorative justice in resolving juvenile criminal cases is based on Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Criminal Justice System and other regulations issued by law enforcement agencies. Diversion is generally carried out using restorative meetings (restorative conferencing). Factors that become obstacles are legal regulations that do not fully and clearly regulate restorative justice and diversion, law enforcement officers who do not understand children's rights, lack of understanding from families and communities, and lack of facilities and infrastructure to support the Juvenile Criminal Justice System Law. The implementation of diversion and restorative justice must be based on the principles of the child's rights.
PEMENUHAN HAK ANAK DI INDONESIA MELALUI PERENCANAAN PENGASUHAN, PENGASUHAN TUNGGAL DAN PENGASUHAN BERSAMA Saraswati, Rika; Boputra, Emanuel; Kusniati, Yuni
Veritas et Justitia Vol. 7 No. 1 (2021): Veritas et Justitia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Parahyangan Catholic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25123/vej.v7i1.4066

Abstract

In many countries, joint custody has replaced and is considered better than sole custody. It is also deemed more in line with the gender equality principle which demands both parents to share responsibility for the custody and care of the child post-divorce. This article discusses how judges in divorce cases decide on child custody, and the extent to which they consider the merits of joint or sole custody and demand divorcees to consider making a parenting plan in the best interest of their children.  Qualitative data is collected from the District Court and Religious Court at Semarang and by analysing 4 court decisions regarding child custody.  Interestingly, none of the Courts above possess or implements a policy or have some procedural ruling obligating judges in divorce cases to demand parents to consider joint custody or making a parenting plan post-divorce. Obligatory pre-trial mediation is geared more as a procedural-formalistic attempt to dissuade parties to continue with divorce.
Clanless Children and Inheritance in the Indigenous Batak Community: A Case Study of Supreme Court Decision No. 1537 K/Pdt/2012 Naiborhu, Yoshua Putra Dinata; Saraswati, Rika; Nurhayati, B. Resti; Boputra, Emanuel
Lex Publica Vol. 12 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : APPTHI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58829/lp.12.1.2025.287

Abstract

The Batak people adhere to a patrilineal family system where the family system is drawn from the paternal line. The status of a child without a surname has consequences for inheritance, so that the inheritance process for descendants who do not have a surname causes problems in the future. The purpose of this study is to determine children without a surname according to the provisions of the Batak traditional community and the legal consequences for children without a surname as heirs. The approach method in this paper is normative-empirical research. The results of the study indicate that children can be born without a surname due to parental marriages that violate Batak customs, or lose their surname due to removal by traditional elders due to actions that embarrass, threaten, or provoke the community. Furthermore, Supreme Court Decision Number 1537 K / Pdt / 2012 in its decision, even if the child does not have a surname, as long as it can be proven that the child is the biological child of the deceased parent (heir) then the child has the right to appear as an heir.
Co-Authors E Simandjuntak, Marcella Hadiyono, V Kusniati, Yuni M.K. Wijaya, Emilia Marcella Elwina Simandjuntak Naiborhu, Yoshua Putra Dinata Nurhayati, Bernadeta Resti Petrus Soerjowinoto, Petrus Rika Saraswati, Rika