Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.376
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Masalah-Masalah Hukum Jurnal Jendela Hukum Veritas et Justitia KISI HUKUM Sawwa: Jurnal Studi Gender Justitia et Pax SOEPRA Jurnal Hukum Kesehatan Jurnal Komunikasi dan Media
Rika Saraswati, Rika
Faculty of Law and Communication
Education Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 10 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Veritas et Justitia

 1 
PEMENUHAN HAK ANAK DI INDONESIA MELALUI PERENCANAAN PENGASUHAN, PENGASUHAN TUNGGAL DAN PENGASUHAN BERSAMA Saraswati, Rika; Boputra, Emanuel; Kusniati, Yuni
Veritas et Justitia Vol. 7 No. 1 (2021): Veritas et Justitia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Parahyangan Catholic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25123/vej.v7i1.4066

Abstract

In many countries, joint custody has replaced and is considered better than sole custody. It is also deemed more in line with the gender equality principle which demands both parents to share responsibility for the custody and care of the child post-divorce. This article discusses how judges in divorce cases decide on child custody, and the extent to which they consider the merits of joint or sole custody and demand divorcees to consider making a parenting plan in the best interest of their children.  Qualitative data is collected from the District Court and Religious Court at Semarang and by analysing 4 court decisions regarding child custody.  Interestingly, none of the Courts above possess or implements a policy or have some procedural ruling obligating judges in divorce cases to demand parents to consider joint custody or making a parenting plan post-divorce. Obligatory pre-trial mediation is geared more as a procedural-formalistic attempt to dissuade parties to continue with divorce.
PEMENUHAN HAK ANAK DI INDONESIA MELALUI PERENCANAAN PENGASUHAN, PENGASUHAN TUNGGAL DAN PENGASUHAN BERSAMA Saraswati, Rika; Boputra, Emanuel; Kusniati, Yuni
Veritas et Justitia Vol. 7 No. 1 (2021): Veritas et Justitia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Parahyangan Catholic University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25123/vej.v7i1.4066

Abstract

In many countries, joint custody has replaced and is considered better than sole custody. It is also deemed more in line with the gender equality principle which demands both parents to share responsibility for the custody and care of the child post-divorce. This article discusses how judges in divorce cases decide on child custody, and the extent to which they consider the merits of joint or sole custody and demand divorcees to consider making a parenting plan in the best interest of their children.  Qualitative data is collected from the District Court and Religious Court at Semarang and by analysing 4 court decisions regarding child custody.  Interestingly, none of the Courts above possess or implements a policy or have some procedural ruling obligating judges in divorce cases to demand parents to consider joint custody or making a parenting plan post-divorce. Obligatory pre-trial mediation is geared more as a procedural-formalistic attempt to dissuade parties to continue with divorce.
Co-Authors Arief Rahman E Simandjuntak, Marcella Emanuel Boputra, Emanuel Endang Wahyati Yustina, Endang Wahyati Hadiyono, V Hadiyono, V Kusniati, Yuni M.K. Wijaya, Emilia Marcella Elwina Simandjuntak Petrus Soerjowinoto, Petrus Sarwo, Budi Wahyati, Endang