Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 25 Documents
Search

AKSIOLOGI HUKUM ISLAM DALAM UNDANG-UNDANG TIPIKOR DI INDONESIA Anisa, Lina Nur
Al-Mashlahah: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Pranata Sosial Vol 13 No 02 (2025): Al-Mashlahah: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Pranata Sosial Islam
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Al Hidayah Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30868/am.v13i02.7305

Abstract

Artikel ini mengeksplorasi tantangan dan peluang dalam mengintegrasikan nilai-nilai Hukum Islam ke dalam sistem hukum positif di Indonesia, dengan fokus khusus pada upaya pemberantasan korupsi. Pokok permasalahan yang diangkat adalah bagaimana nilai-nilai dasar Hukum Islam, seperti keadilan, tanggung jawab, dan transparansi, dapat diterapkan secara efektif dalam konteks hukum nasional yang sekuler. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis potensi kolaborasi antara Hukum Islam dan hukum negara dalam menciptakan sistem hukum yang lebih adil dan berintegritas. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah analisis kualitatif berbasis literatur yang mengacu pada sumber-sumber terpercaya dan terakreditasi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa meskipun terdapat tantangan signifikan, seperti perbedaan prinsip dan hambatan struktural, terdapat peluang besar untuk integrasi nilai-nilai Hukum Islam dalam hukum positif. Kesimpulannya, integrasi ini dapat memperkuat efektivitas penegakan hukum di Indonesia dan berkontribusi pada penciptaan sistem hukum yang lebih responsif dalam memberantas korupsi
The Social Gender Construction and Its Influence on Child Custody Determination in Religious Courts in Indonesia Anisa, Lina Nur
Mukaddimah: Jurnal Studi Islam Vol. 10 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Kopertais Wilayah III Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/mjsi.v10i2.4463

Abstract

This article discusses the academic problem of the dominance of social gender construction in determining child custody in Indonesia’s Religious Courts, which hinders substantive justice, especially for women and children. This research employs a library research method with a qualitative approach and socio-legal studies to analyze key literature, regulations, court decisions, and recent empirical studies. The analysis finds that legal argumentation and judges’ narratives often reproduce gender bias through interpretations of the Compilation of Islamic Law and patriarchal social doctrines, resulting in child custody decisions that are frequently not based on the principle of the best interests of the child. The main recommendations are the reformulation of gender-responsive interpretations and regulations of Islamic family law, increased gender literacy among legal practitioners, and cross-sectoral advocacy to create a more just and inclusive family law system. These findings highlight the urgency of reforming Islamic family law based on substantive justice and child protection and provide both conceptual and practical contributions to the development of progressive Islamic studies in Indonesia.
DECONSTRUCTING MU’ASYARAH BI AL-MA’RUF: TOWARD A GENDER-JUST FRAMEWORK OF ISLAMIC FAMILY LAW Anisa, Lina Nur
JURNAL HAKAM Vol 9, No 2 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Nurul Jadid

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33650/jhi.v9i2.12198

Abstract

This research offers a novel contribution to Islamic family law by deconstructing the concept of mu’asyarah bil ma’ruf as a normative foundation for addressing contemporary legal and social challenges. Departing from traditional textual interpretations, the study reconceptualizes mu’asyarah bil ma’ruf as a dynamic and inclusive ethical-legal framework grounded in justice, reciprocity, and gender equality. The scope of the research covers ethical, social, and legal dimensions of harmonious family life in Islam, with particular attention to husband–wife relations and family justice. Employing qualitative library research, this study utilizes content and critical analysis of primary Islamic legal sources, court decisions, and relevant family law policies. The findings reveal that classical normative frameworks often reflect patriarchal assumptions that constrain women’s rights and fail to respond adequately to contemporary social dynamics, resulting in legal and social inequalities. Through a deconstructive approach, the research exposes these biases and proposes an alternative interpretation that emphasizes mutual respect, proportional rights and obligations, and substantive justice within the family. This study concludes that reinterpreting mu’asyarah bil ma’ruf is essential for developing a more just and responsive Islamic family law. Practically, the findings contribute to Islamic legal reform by providing a conceptual basis for gender-sensitive legislation, judicial interpretation, and family law policies that protect women and children while remaining firmly rooted in Islamic values.
The CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF MARRIAGE DISPENSATION DUE TO ZINA: GENDER, CHILD PROTECTION, AND ISLAMIC LAW PERSPECTIVES IN INDONESIA Anisa, Lina Nur
Al Maqashidi : Jurnal Hukum Islam Nusantara Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): Al Maqashidi : Jurnal Hukum Islam Nusantara
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS NAHDLATUL ULAMA SUNAN GIRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32665/almaqashidi.v8i2.5484

Abstract

This study critically examines the practice of marriage dispensation due to zina (premarital pregnancy) in Indonesia through the integrated perspectives of gender justice, child protection, and Islamic law. Although Law No. 16 of 2019 raised the minimum age of marriage to strengthen child protection, empirical data show a continued increase in marriage dispensation applications and approvals in the Religious Courts, particularly in cases involving premarital pregnancy. Existing studies largely address marriage dispensation from doctrinal Islamic law or child marriage policy perspectives, while critical analyses of how judicial discretion operates in practice remain limited. The novelty of this study lies in its reconceptualization of judicial discretion as a mechanism of moral mediation rather than a rights-protective safeguard, and in its demonstration of how moral narratives surrounding zina shape judicial reasoning and marginalize child-centered assessments. Using a qualitative library-based method with a critical socio-legal approach, this study analyzes Religious Court decisions issued between 2019 and 2023, academic literature, and institutional reports. The findings show that marriage dispensation is frequently framed as an immediate response to social stigma and moral anxiety, causing the best interests of the child principle to function symbolically rather than substantively. This study contributes to Islamic family law scholarship by offering a new analytical lens for evaluating marriage dispensation practices and their implications for child protection and gender justice.
Maqāṣid Al-Syarī‘ah and Female Leadership in the Muslim Family: Towards an Integrative Conceptual Model Anisa, Lina Nur
Al-Mujtahid: Journal of Islamic Family Law Vol 5, No 2 (2025)
Publisher : IAIN Manado

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30984/ajifl.v5i2.3804

Abstract

This study aims to examine how women’s leadership roles in households can be conceptualized through the lens of maqāṣid al-syarī‘ah and modern sociology, offering an integrative framework that aligns normative Islamic principles with observed social dynamics. Using a library research approach, the study systematically analyzes authoritative Islamic legal sources, classical and contemporary sociological theories, and findings from existing empirical studies on family roles and gender relations. Rather than conducting original fieldwork, this research synthesizes prior empirical evidence to assess the normative legitimacy, functional dimensions, and societal implications of female leadership in the family. The analysis shows that the objectives of maqāṣid al-syarī‘ah—the protection of religion, life, intellect, progeny, and wealth—are compatible with sociological perspectives on gendered decision-making, role flexibility, and family well-being. This synthesis results in a conceptual model that supports equitable role distribution, promotes justice, and strengthens family resilience amid socio-cultural change. The study concludes that empowering women in family leadership roles, when grounded in both Islamic objectives and sociological insights, contributes to a more balanced and sustainable household structure, and it recommends future empirical research to test and contextualize this model across diverse cultural settings.