Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.554
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Amicus Curiae
Sri Untari Indah Artati
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 15 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 15 Documents
Search

 1   2 
Indonesia Mohammad Rafli; Sri Untari Indah Artati
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 5 No 4 (2023): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v5i4.18405

Abstract

Comparative law is the activity of comparing laws from various countries, the purpose of which is to contribute to the development of new laws and regulations or their amendments and find how similarities and differences in concepts, legal institutions that contribute, legal systems used. In Indonesia, land law is regulated in Law Number 5 of 1960 concerning Basic Regulations on Agrarian Principles, hereinafter referred to as UUPA, while in Russia land law is regulated in The Land Of Code Russia No. 136-FZ of 2001. The formulation of this research problem is how are the similarities and differences in the regulation of buying and selling land in Indonesia and Russia, the research method uses normative juridical type, the nature of descriptive research is sourced from secondary data, the research data is analyzed qualitatively and the conclusion is drawn using deductive. In addition, there are differences in the sale and purchase of land in Indonesia and Russia, namely the regulation of land sale and purchase, the meaning of land, the object of land sale and purchase, the transfer of rights from the seller to the buyer, the initial agreement, the parties authorized to make the agreement.
TINJAUAN TERHADAP UPAYA PENANGKAPAN IKAN OLEH NELAYAN KECIL DI KABUPATEN PANGANDARAN BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 45 TAHUN 2009 Xaverius Yodi Marbun; Sri Untari Indah Artati
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 5 No 4 (2023): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v5i4.18575

Abstract

The Minister of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries issued KKP Regulation No. 2/PERMEN-KP/2015 which prohibits the use of cantrang as a Fishing method for capture fisheries. As with the use of trawl in Pangandaran Regency in 2001 - 2019, it has increased by 2 times since foreign vessels can enter the region freely. The problems are 1) are Fishing efforts by small fisherman in Pangandaran Regency in accordance with Law No. 45 of 2009? and 2) what are the obstacles and how can the government resolve the law against small fishermen who catch fish using trawl in Pangandaran Regency based on KKP Regulation No. 18 of 2021. This study uses a descriptive approach to normative legal research. It involves a qualitative analysis of secondary data obtained from the study of literature and logical inference. The decision is as follows: 1) Article 9 paragraph (1) and (2) of Law No. 45 of 2009 on fisheries does not permit the use of cantrang as a common Fishing technique in Pangandaran Regency. 2) people feel that government efforts limit their well-being because the use of cantrang gives greater results.
ANALISIS PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP KREDITUR SEPARATIS PEMEGANG HAK TANGGUNGAN YANG KEHILANGAN HAK EKSEKUSI DALAM PROSES KEPAILITAN: Luqyana Khalda Salsabila; Sri Untari Indah Artati
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 5 No 4 (2023): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v5i4.18702

Abstract

The Central Jakarta Commercial Court issued a decision Number 15/Pdt-Lawsuit Lain-Lain/2019/PN.Niaga.Jkt.Pst regarding bankruptcy asset disputes that have a negative impact on PT Maybank Indonesia Tbk., as a separatist creditor holding Dependent Rights (HT). The problems in this writing is in the form of, "how is the legal consequences for PT Maybank Indonesia Tbk. in the bankruptcy process and how is the legal protection for PT Maybank Indonesia Tbk. in the bankruptcy process". The research uses a juridical-normative type that is descriptive. The data used are secondary data which analyzed by qualitative analysis, and conclusions are drawn deductively. The result are PT Maybank Indonesia Tbk. suffered losses due to the decision given. The loss obtained was in the form of the loss of authority of PT Maybank Indonesia Tbk. in the control and management of assets owned. This is consequence to the lack of consistency in the provisions of the Bankruptcy Law (UUK). In addition, this can happen because there is a norm conflict between the Law on Dependent Rights (UUHT) and UUK. PT Maybank Indonesia Tbk. also did not get proper legal protection due to differences in views with those of UUK regarding deadlines in the asset execution process.  
USAHA PERIKANAN DI BIDANG PENANGKAPAN BIBIT LOBSTER TANPA SURAT IZIN USAHA PERIKANAN: Review Of Fishery Businesses In The Field Of Catching Lobster Swithout A Fishery Business License Nadhif Ardiyanto; Sri Untari Indah Artati
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 6 No 1 (2024): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v6i1.19480

Abstract

Every person who carries out a fishing business must have a Fisheries Business License, however there are still fisheries business actors who catch, lobster seeds without a license, as stated in Decision Number 44/Pid/Sus/2017/Pn .Rkb. The problems is What are the obstacles in managing license related to catching, transporting and marketing lobster seeds based on the Fisheries Law and What about fishing businesses in the field of catching, transporting and marketing lobster seeds without being accompanied by a license in Decision Number 44/Pid/Sus/2017/PN.Rkb based on the Fisheries Law? This research is normative legal research, descriptive in nature, using secondary data, supported by primary data in the form of interviews, analyzed qualitatively and conclusions drawn using the deductive method. The result and conclusion is the obstacles for fisheries business actors in arranging license are lack of socialization and minimal information from the government regarding the procedures for submitting that. In this case, it was proven that Apud, who is a lobster cultivator, violated Article 92 of the Fisheries Law. the government should re-socialize licnese and judges in deciding cases should consider the Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries Regulation Number 17 of 2017 concerning Management of Lobster and crab.
PEMANFAATAN AIR UNTUK KEPENTINGAN BISNIS (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 91/PID.B/LH/2021/PN TTE): Water Utilization for Business Purposes (Study of Decision Number 91/Pid.B/LH/2021/PN Tte) Dinda Nabila Ramadhanty Lazuardi; Sri Untari Indah Artati
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/amicus.v2i4.24686

Abstract

Utilization of groundwater for business purposes must have a permit, this is stated in Law Number 17 of 2019 related to Water Resources (UU SDA). Identification problems raised are what the legal consequences are for individuals who do not have a water utilization permit for business purposes and how sanctions can be applied to individuals who have utilized water for business purposes without a permit. To answer the problem, the normative juridical method is used, which is descriptive, using secondary data that is analyzed qualitatively and deductively concludes. By the findings result and conclusion of the analysis of Court Decision Number 91/Pid.B/LH/2021/PN Tte with Law Number 17 of 2019 related to Water Resources (UU SDA), the results obtained are that Iqbal Barady was found guilty of using groundwater without using a water utilization permit and selling the groundwater to residents. Iqbal Farady was sentenced to imprisonment by Law Number 17 of 2019 related to Water Resources (UU SDA).
Co-Authors Anak Agung Krisna Sumantri Bagas Arya Putra Dawat Christian Dinda Nabila Ramadhanty Lazuardi Ferdy Mahindra Azhary Luqyana Khalda Salsabila Mohammad Rafli Nabila Mardiyah Alkadrie Nadhif Ardiyanto Romariotua Sa’adatud Daroini Sheane Gunadi Wieke Septiani Putri Xaverius Yodi Marbun