Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.203
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Ajudikasi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Yustisia Merdeka : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Jurnal Yustisiabel JURMA : Jurnal Program Mahasiswa Kreatif Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Sosial dan Eksakta HUKMY : Jurnal Hukum
Fina Rosalina
Universitas Muhammadiyah Jember
Religion Humanities Computer Science & IT Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 6 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

 1 
Daluwarsa Tindak Pidana Korupsi Melalui Sudut Pandang Teori Hukum : Optimalisasi Pengembalian Kerugian Keuangan Negara Fina Rosalina
YUSTISIA MERDEKA : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol. 8 No. 2 (2022): JURNAL YUSTISIA MERDEKA
Publisher : Universitas Merdeka Madiun

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33319/yume.v8i2.169

Abstract

The imposition of the expiration date on the criminal act of corruption is still debatable whether it can enforce. The Corruption Eradication Act does not specifically regulate the expiration period, causing legal uncertainty and creating dualism of views on the application of the expiration period, which in turn has the potential to cause state financial losses. This study aims to find the expired concept of corruption through the point of view of legal theory. The legal theory used is the theory of consequences (leer van het gevolg). The critical use of the theory of consequences (leer van het gevolg) serves to embody the theoretical concepts and factual conditions of eradicating corruption in Indonesia. This study uses a normative juridical method that is prescriptive. This research found that the term act (feit) in the provisions of Article 79 of the Criminal Code means fulfilling all elements of a criminal act. Where the criminal act of corruption in the Law on the Eradication of Criminal Acts of Corruption is a material offense, must carry out the expiration since the result of state financial losses appears on the surface. The characteristics of white-collar crime in corruption are appropriate for applying the theory of consequences (leer van het gevolg). The jurisprudence of the Supreme Court's decision which states that the crime of corruption is a multi-national crime strengthens the implementation of the UNCAC international instrument regarding the extension of the expiration period of the criminal act of corruption. This study Concludes That the provisions of Article 79 of the Criminal Code regarding expiration are not suitable to be applied in cases of corruption in Indonesia
SANKSI PIDANA MATI PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI MELALUI SUDUT PANDANG NORMA-SUBTANTIF DI INDONESIA Fina Rosalina
HUKMY : Jurnal Hukum Vol. 1 No. 2 (2021): HUKMY : Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (980.845 KB) | DOI: 10.35316/hukmy.2021.v1i2.149-166

Abstract

Semangat untuk melakukan pemberantasan tindak pidana korupsi, terlihat melalui dijadikannya sanksi pidana mati menjadi salah satu jenis pidana dalam ketentuan Undang Undang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi (UU PTPK). Sanksi pidana mati tersebut merupakan gradasi tertinggi yang diberikan atas pemberatan terhadap unsur “keadaan tertentu”. Namun demikian, sampai dengan saat ini, kendati unsur “keadaan tertentu” telah terpenuhi, masih belum terdapat realisasi penerapan sanksi pidana mati. Terdapat kelemahan yurudis (subtantive-norm) dalam keberlakuan UU PTPK. UU PTPK sebagai sub-sistem tidak berjalan linear terhadap undang undang lain yang pada dasarnya masih memiliki keterkaitan. Hal lain, terdapat norma kabur (vague norm) atas karakteristik unsur “keadaan tertentu” sehingga menyebabkan ketidakpastian hukum yang menjadi dasar sulitnya diterapkan sanksi pidana mati pada pelaku korupsi. Hal tersebut cukup menjadi dasar pembuktian bahwa Negara Indonesia belum siap menerapkan sanksi pidana mati sebagai gradasi tertinggi atas sanksi pemidaan terhadap pelaku korupsi.
Mengembalikan Ide Dasar Keseimbangan Tujuan Pemidanaan: Koreksi atas Wacana Penerapan Restorative Justice Terhadap Tindak Pidana Korupsi Fina Rosalina
Ajudikasi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 6 No. 2 (2022): Ajudikasi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Serang Raya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30656/ajudikasi.v6i2.4717

Abstract

Corruption has a systemic impact, giving birth to a paradigm of case settlement using the Comprehensive Extra Ordinary Measures method which is repressive. However, in its development, the mechanism is considered ineffective to apply. Restorative justice was born as a substitute discourse for repressive mechanisms. However, in the development of the concept of restorative justice, it is described as the abolition of sanctions for perpetrators of criminal acts of corruption by prioritizing the return of state financial losses. The normative juridical method is the method chosen to answer the formulation of the problem in the form of whether the discourse on the application of restorative justice for eradicating corruption has been in accordance with the basic idea of ​​​​balancing the goals of punishment in Indonesia. The results of the study found that, theoretically, the application of restorative justice has been in accordance with the direction of the goal of punishment which is monodualistic in nature (daad en dader straftrecht). The concept of restorative justice does not abolish the imposition of sanctions for perpetrators of corruption, either in the form of criminal or non-criminal sanctions. Theoretically, the imposition of sanctions is an effort to consider the balance between the interests of the community and the interests of individuals (daad en dader straftrecht).
Socialization of Innovation in Village View Case Regional Jember Law Court Fina Rosalina; Lutfian Ubaidilah; Akbar Maulana
Jurma : Jurnal Program Mahasiswa Kreatif Vol 7 No 1 (2023): Juni 2023
Publisher : LPPM UIKA Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32832/jurma.v7i1.1660

Abstract

Simple, fast, and low-cost trials (Contante Justitie) are principles that must be fulfilled in the justice system. Often this principle is distorted due to the accumulation of cases in court. There is a renewable innovation for solving minor litigation cases in the jurisdiction of the Jember District Court, namely media services and information in applications. The innovation is called the Tilik Desa Application. The Tilik Desa program is a program that integrates judicial applications, service innovation, and information media in one application. One of the products of the Village View Application is light case services such as name changes or repairs which can be served through the village office where the case occurred. The purpose of this outreach is to disseminate information about the Village View Application and provide an understanding to the Jember Community about the Village View Application innovation. So that later the settlement of minor litigation cases, especially Applications for Change and Correction of Names, can be carried out simply, quickly, and at a low cost (Contante Justitie). This research concludes that, in addition to being able to realize the principles of simple, fast, and low cost (Contante Justitie), the Village View Program can minimize extortion at the level of village areas under the guise of being a service in completing small requests.
De-Orentasi Konsep Strict Liability dan Potensi Kerugian Perekonomian Negara : Koreksi atas Paradigma Perlindungan Lingkungan Hidup dalam Undang Undang Cipta Kerja Fina Rosalina
Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Sosial dan Eksakta Vol. 3 No. 1 (2023): September
Publisher : Indonesian Journal Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47134/trilogi.v3i1.113

Abstract

Prinsip pertanggngjawaban mutlak atau dikenal dengan istilah Strict Leability dianut dalam ketentuan Undang Undang No 32 Tahun 2009 Tentang Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup (selanjutnya disebut dengan Undang Undang Perlindungan dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup). Namun demikian prinsip tersebut tidak dianut dalam Omnibus Law. Ratio legis terbentuknya Omnibus Law Undang Undang Cipta Kerja, adalah peningkatan investasi untuk pertumbuhan perekonomian yang stabil Namun demikian, bilamana konsep tersebut tidak diimbangi dengan perlindungan atas pencemaran dan/atau kerusakan lingkungan apalagi merubah konsep strict Leability menjadi liability based on fault maka potensi kerugian perekonomian negara menjadi luas. Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan melakukan korelasi penerapan asas strict Leability dan potensi kerugian perekonomian negara yang mungkin akan diimbulkan. Metode yang digunakan dalah yuridis noratif dan doktrinal. Berdasarkan penelitian ini ditemukan bahwa paradigma pertanggugjawaban Omnibus Law Undang Undang Cipta Kerja telah menganut paradigma keadilan korektif, keadilan rehabilitatif dan keadilan restoratif namun tidak diikut dengan penorman yang tertuang dalam pasal, sehingga potensi kerugian perekonomian negara kerusakan lingkungan hidup lebih rentan terjadi
OPTIMALISASI KESEIMBANGAN KEADILAN RESTORATIVE SEBAGAI UPAYA PERBAIKAN PELAKU KECELAKAAN LALU LINTAS Fina, Fina Rosalina; Suyatna
Jurnal Yustisiabel Vol. 9 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Luwuk

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32529/yustisiabel.v9i1.3576

Abstract

The theoretical weakness of the restorative justice mechanism is its lack of focus on the underlying cause of the crime. This has the potential to cause the failure of the concept of improving the perpetrators of the crime as well as protecting the community. Regarding the phenomenon of high-traffic accidents, one of the government's policies is to implement a restorative justice mechanism. However, no laws and regulations have been found that specifically regulate the improvement of the quality of driving. This study aims to improve the validity of restorative justice through a curative approach or self-improvement of the perpetrator. The concept of restorative justice through an approach to improving the perpetrator is important to be carried out in order to realize balanced justice. The method used in this study is normative juridical with a literature study approach and comparative law. The conclusion of this study is that no laws and regulations have been found that regulate the improvement of traffic accident perpetrators. It is necessary to combine sanctions, including a therapeutic approach (administrative sanctions), with legal and technological sanctions to be able to provide the best opportunity for violators to change their behavior
Co-Authors AKBAR MAULANA Lutfian Ubaidilah Suyatna