Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap penjatuhan Pidana Penjara Dibawah Ketentuan Minimum Khusus Dalam Tindak Pidana Narkotika: ( Studi Putusan Nomor 58/Pid.Sus/2022/PN.Jmr ) purnamasari, oktavia intan; Suyatna
Indonesian Journal of Law and Justice Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): March
Publisher : Indonesian Journal Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47134/ijlj.v1i3.2067

One of the criminal regulations that adheres to a special minimum system is Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics, with the threat of a special minimum penalty, the judge may not impose a penalty under the special minimum provisions. In the case of narcotics crime decided by the court, namely in verdict number 58/Pid.Sus/2022/Pn.Jmr, the panel of judges actually imposed punishment under the special minimum provisions. This study aims to determine the consideration of judges in imposing imprisonment under the special minimum provisions in narcotics crimes in decision number 58/Pid.sus/2022/Pn.jmr. in this study using normative juridical research methods with a legal, case, and conceptual approach. Based on the results of this study, the judge in deciding a case should be guided by the laws that have been established and the Supreme Court Circular Letter (SEMA) Number 3 of 2015 as a guideline for the implementation of duties for the court, but the judge in his decision imposed a sentence under a special minimum provision, based on this statement it can be concluded that the judge in imposing imprisonment under a special minimum provision in decision number 58/Pid.Sus/2022/Pn.Jmr is not in line with and contradicts Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics and SEMA Number 35 of 2015

Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Menentukan Kematian Korban dalam Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor: 26/Pid.B/2014/Pn.Atb) Affiani, Rifrinda Nur; Suyatna
Indonesian Journal of Law and Justice Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): March
Publisher : Indonesian Journal Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47134/ijlj.v1i3.2070

People who commit legal errors and cause the consequences of these legal actions must be able to take responsibility for the consequences of their actions. Murder is the act of taking another person's life intentionally and the aim is to take someone's life, while the crime of assault is a crime whose target is the human body. The aim of this research is to find out how the judge views the death of the victim in the crime of murder. This research uses normative juridical methods, meaning library research that uses library legal material sources using a legal approach and a case approach. In this case the researcher does not agree with the judge's decision because according to the researcher what is meant by the crime of murder is the victim who should have died when the incident occurred, but at that time the victim also died. did not die immediately, therefore the appropriate charge is for committing a criminal act of serious abuse which resulted in death. The results of the research discussion can be concluded that the judge's consideration in handing down and determining the death of the victim was incorrect.

Tanggung Jawab Penjamin dalam Penanguhan atau Pengalihan Penahanan Tersangka atau Terdakwa Wirawan, Vian Nando; Suyatna
Indonesian Journal of Law and Justice Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): March
Publisher : Indonesian Journal Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47134/ijlj.v1i3.2071

The provisions of Article 1 point 21 of the Criminal Procedure Code state that detention is the placement of a suspect/defendant in a certain place by an investigator, public prosecutor or judge with his or her determination and in a regulated manner. in this law. Detention is the placement of a suspect/defendant in a certain place by an investigator, public prosecutor, or judge with his or her determination, with the conditions and methods regulated in this law. Therefore, detention is a form of deprivation of a person's freedom of movement and is a threat aimed at giving a feeling of regret to someone who has committed an offense. Detained suspects/defendants have several rights, one of which is the right to submit a request for suspension or the right to transfer detention. According to the provisions of Article 31 of the Criminal Procedure Code, a suspension of detention can be granted by investigators, public prosecutors or judges in accordance with their respective authorities with or without cash collateral or personal guarantees, based on predetermined conditions. The purpose of this research is to determine the responsibility of the guarantor if a suspect or accused who is detained or transferred to detention escapes. The research method uses normative juridical with a statutory and conceptual approach. The result of this research is that a suspension of detention can be granted by the police investigator as the detention institution, if the suspect/accused or guarantor has fulfilled the conditions that have been set. However, during the suspension of detention, the suspect/defendant escapes and is not found within a period of 3 (three) months, then (the guarantor) is responsible for bearing all risks and consequences that arise, namely by depositing the security deposit. in the amount specified in the agreement at the beginning. granting suspension of detention

Eksploitasi Secara Ekonomi Terhadap Anak Ditinjau dari Aspek Hukum Pidana (Studi Kasus di Kota Jember) Azzahrah, Danurjati; Suyatna
Indonesian Journal of Law and Justice Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): March
Publisher : Indonesian Journal Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47134/ijlj.v2i3.3707

Realita di masyarakat termasuk di kota Jember, adalah eksploitasi ekonomi anak sebagai pengamen dan pengemis. Hingga saat ini, eksploitasi ekonomi anak masih terjadi di beberapa tempat. Anak digunakan untuk meminta-minta kepada pengendara atau menjual barang-barang kecil seperti tisu atau barang lain kepada pengemudi saat mereka menunggu lampu hijau. Tujuan penelitian ini pertama, untuk mengetahui siapa pelaku eksploitasi ekonomi anak. Kedua, untuk mengetahui bagaimana pertanggungjawaban pidana pelaku eksploitasi ekonomi anak. Metode penelitian ialah pendekatan normatif – empiris dengan menganalisis peraturan perundang-undangan dan konsep hukum. Hasil penelitian bahwa di Kabupaten Jember, enam anak pengemis mengalami eksploitasi ekonomi karena kehilangan bapak atau tulang punggung keluarga, sehingga terpaksa bekerja di jalanan. Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini bahwa Pelaku eksploitasi ekonomi terhadap anak terdapat 2 kualifikasi, yaitu pleger dan doen pleger. Pertanggungjawaban pidana pelaku eksploitasi ekonomi terhadap anak hanya dibebankan kepada orang tua anak saja, baik sebagai pleger maupun doen pleger.

Penerapan Pasal 90 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana dalam Perkara Pidana Penganiayaan (Studi Putusan Nomor: 26/PID.B/2020/PN.TTN) Octavia, Priandini Nur; Suyatna
Indonesian Journal of Law and Justice Vol. 1 No. 1 (2023): September
Publisher : Indonesian Journal Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47134/ijlj.v1i1.1980

The crime of abuse is an act committed by someone in any form that causes pain or suffering, even resulting in injury to the victim. Like the criminal act of abuse committed by Herianto bin Safrijal against Mauliddin bin Taliwa Auri who was selling vegetables at the Fajar City Integrated Market Complex, which started with a conversation between the perpetrator and the victim which resulted in Herianto bin Safrijal getting angry and then beating the victim. This research aims to determine the application of Article 90 of the Criminal Code and the judge's considerations in qualifying serious injuries in criminal abuse case number: 26/Pid.B/2020/PN. Ttn. This research uses a legislative, case and concept approach method with a normative juridical research type. the judge's consideration in handing down a verdict against Herianto bin Safrijal (Defendant) on the primary charge as stated in Article 351 paragraph (2) of the Criminal Code, namely assault resulting in serious injuries, with serious injuries meaning that the victim witness is unable to carry out activities or search work (selling vegetables) continuously as stated in Article 90 of the Criminal Code is not appropriate. Because the judge in giving considerations in qualifying serious injuries was not careful. So, to create a fair decision, and avoid decisions that are not supported by supporting evidence, the judge should be more careful and precise in considering the matters contained in the trial facts.

Tuntutan Restitusi Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Anak (Studi Kasus Putusan Perkara Nomor : 298/Pid.B/2023/PN Jkt.Sel) Irgiyanuarini, Vinet; Suyatna
Indonesian Journal of Law and Justice Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): September
Publisher : Indonesian Journal Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47134/ijlj.v3i1.4572

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pertimbangan Hakim dalam menolak tuntutan restitusi yang diajukan oleh Anak Korban melalui LPSK dalam Putusan Perkara Nomor 298/Pid.B/2023/PN Jkt,Sel. Penelitian ini menggunakan jenis penelitian hukum normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan kasus, dan pendekatan konseptual. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian, Hakim dalam memutuskan hasil perkara hendaknya berpedoman pada ketentuan KUHP dan PERMA Nomor 1 Tahun 2022 Tentang Tata Cara Penyelesaian Permohonan dan Pemberian Restitusi dan Kompensasi kepada Korban Tindak Pidana. Penolakan tuntutan restitusi dengan pertimbangan bahwa Terdakwa bukan merupakan pelaku utama tidak tepat oleh karena menurut ketentuan Pasal 55 Ayat (1) ke-1 KUHP tidak dikenal kualifikasi pelaku utama, sedangkan dalam Perkara tersebut, Terdakwa telah terbukti sebagai orang yang turut serta atau bersama-sama melakukan, sehingga tidak sesuai dengan ketentuan Pasal 8 Ayat (15) Perma Nomor 1 Tahun 2022 dalam memberikan restitusi.

OPTIMALISASI KESEIMBANGAN KEADILAN RESTORATIVE SEBAGAI UPAYA PERBAIKAN PELAKU KECELAKAAN LALU LINTAS Fina, Fina Rosalina; Suyatna
Jurnal Yustisiabel Vol. 9 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Luwuk

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32529/yustisiabel.v9i1.3576

The theoretical weakness of the restorative justice mechanism is its lack of focus on the underlying cause of the crime. This has the potential to cause the failure of the concept of improving the perpetrators of the crime as well as protecting the community. Regarding the phenomenon of high-traffic accidents, one of the government's policies is to implement a restorative justice mechanism. However, no laws and regulations have been found that specifically regulate the improvement of the quality of driving. This study aims to improve the validity of restorative justice through a curative approach or self-improvement of the perpetrator. The concept of restorative justice through an approach to improving the perpetrator is important to be carried out in order to realize balanced justice. The method used in this study is normative juridical with a literature study approach and comparative law. The conclusion of this study is that no laws and regulations have been found that regulate the improvement of traffic accident perpetrators. It is necessary to combine sanctions, including a therapeutic approach (administrative sanctions), with legal and technological sanctions to be able to provide the best opportunity for violators to change their behavior

STUDI PENGELOLAAN SAMPAH DI TPS3R GO - SARI GUWOSARI DAN TPS3R KSM SEJAHTERA MANDIRI BANTUL Muhammad Laufin Zulfikar; Handayani Sriwinarno; Suyatna; Nurul Muyasaroh
Jurnal Rekayasa Lingkungan Vol. 24 No. 2 (2024)
Publisher : Institut Teknologi Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37412/jrl.v24i2.323

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui tingkat efektivitas pengelolaan sampah di kedua TPS3R berdasarkan aspek teknik operasional, aspek organisasi, aspek pembiayaan dan aspek peran masyarakat. Metode yang dilakukan dalam penelitian ini adalah pendekatan kualitatif dengan jenis studi lapangan. Teknik pengumpulan data menggunakan teknik observasi, wawancara, dan dokumentasi. Teknik analisis data yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah pengumpulan data, penyajian data, dan penarikan kesimpulan. Secara garis besar kedua TPS3R ini sudah efektif, tetapi untuk TPS3R Sejahtera Mandiri di aspek pembiayaan harus lebih dikelola lagi agar pemasukan dan pengeluaran perbulannya terdata dengan jelas. Untuk kegiatan yang dilakukan kedua TPS3R ini sudah sesuai dengan UU No 18 Tahun 2008 yang melaksanakan prinsip 3R. TPS3R Go – Sari Guwosari sudah berhasil tidak membuang sampah ke TPA sedikitpun, akan tetapi untuk TPS3R Sejahtera Mandiri masih membuang sampah residunya ke TPA Samas seminggu sekali. TPS3R yang sudah sesuai dengan persyaratan teknis penyediaan TPS3R sesuai Permen PU No 03 Tahun 2013 Pasal 30 ialah TPS3R Go – Sari Guwosari. Dan untuk TPS3R Sejahtera Mandiri ada beberapa kriteria yang belum sesuai contohnya luas TPS3Rnya masih dibawah 200m².

Title

Found 8 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 8 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 8 Documents
Search