Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.817
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Patriot Lentera Negeri
M. Arie Desman
Universitas Negeri Padang
Humanities Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Pengaruh Aktivitas Sosial Media Terhadap Kesadaran Brand dan Loyalitas Brand Olahraga Eko Purnomo; Susanne Dida; Yanti Setianti; Firunika Intan Cahyani; M. Arie Desman
Jurnal Patriot Vol 4 No 4 (2022): Jurnal Patriot
Publisher : Jurusan Kepelatihan, Fakultas Ilmu Keolahragaan, Universitas Negeri Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24036/patriot.v4i4.885

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui hubungan aktifitas sosial media terhadap kesadaran brand dan loyalitas brand. Metode penelitian menggunakan kuantitatif dengan pendekatan korelasional. Sampel diambil dengan non-probabilitas jenis snowball. Oleh karena itu diperoleh responden sebanyak 154, yang merupakan mahasiswa Jurusan Kepelatihan FIK UNP. Hasil penelitian menjelaskan bahwa terdapat sebuah hubungan antara aktifitas sosial media terhadap kesadaran brand dan loyalitas brand. Hasil penelitian ini memberikan sebuah implikasi penting untuk dijelaskan bahwa penggunaan sosial media merupakan pengaruh penting untuk meningkatkan kesadaran dan juga loyalitas seseorang terhadap brand. Penelitian ini hanya sebatas mengetahui hubungan fitas sosial media terhadap kesadaran brand dan loyalitas brand dengan menggunakan angket sebagai alat ukurnya. Sehingga sangat direkomendasikan untuk masa depan dapat dilakukan penelitian lebih mendalam seperti studi kasus untuk mengetahui dan memperdalam hasil temuan yang diperoleh.
Effects of table tennis participation on balance and postural control in older adults: a systematic literature review Jeki Haryanto; Dally Rahman; M. Arie Desman
Lentera Negeri Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): Lentera Negeri
Publisher : Indonesian Institute For Counseling, Education and Therapy

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29210/992400

Abstract

It is known that the ability to balance and the control of one's posture tend to worsen as we get older, and as a result, the likelihood of falling, becoming less mobile, and ultimately, losing one's independence increases. Exercise programs that combine physical and mental challenges are now being advised to encourage healthy aging. Table tennis, a sport with a racket but involving low movement, that demands quickness, reflexes, hand-eye coordination, and also a certain degree of balance, has been considered an activity suitable for the elderly; however, the results of its effects are still in pieces. This systematic review was conducted to determine how table tennis impacts balance and postural control as well as other functional outcomes in the elderly. A Scopus search in line with the PRISMA 2020 guidelines yielded 661 records. Screening of titles and abstracts led to the exclusion of 614 articles and after full-text assessment of 47 articles, 40 were excluded leaving seven studies for the eligibility criteria. The studies that were included in this review demonstrated that table tennis, whether as a separate practice, part of multicomponent or exergame programmes, or through the players accumulated playing experience, was associated with improvements in both static and dynamic balance, lessened postural sway, quicker reaction time, better single-leg stance performance, and greater functional mobility. Other advantages were improved sensorimotor connectivity, better quality of life, and increased antioxidant levels. Though the studies reviewed were small in number and diverse in methodology, the results show that table tennis is a highly effective, low-risk way of helping older adults maintain their balance and postural control.
Artificial intelligence, algorithmic governance, and social inequality in sport: a systematic literature review Anisa Sholiha Mia; Ardo Okilanda; M. Arie Desman
Lentera Negeri Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): Lentera Negeri
Publisher : Indonesian Institute For Counseling, Education and Therapy

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29210/992680

Abstract

The accelerating integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and algorithmic decision systems into scouting, officiating, health monitoring, classification, and media representation has transformed athlete evaluation and governance, yet their implications for historically marginalised groups remain fragmented across disciplines. This systematic literature review examines how AI and algorithmic governance intersect with social inequality in sport, focusing on gender, race and ethnicity, disability and Para-sport, inclusion, accessibility, participation, and athlete rights. Following PRISMA 2020, a Scopus search identified 790 records; after screening and eligibility assessment, 10 studies met the inclusion criteria, with 50 additional sources providing contextual evidence. Eligible studies were English-language peer-reviewed articles and reviews published between 2016 and 2026. Two independent reviewers conducted screening and data extraction, achieving high inter-rater reliability (Cohen's κ = 0.86). Inductive thematic synthesis addressed how algorithmic governance shapes equity, reproduces bias, and informs governance responses. Four themes emerged: algorithmic talent identification may reinforce digital determinism and disadvantage under-represented athletes; AI-based health monitoring raises concerns regarding consent, autonomy, and sensitive data governance; machine-learning applications in Para-sport improve classification but remain constrained by limited datasets; and computational analyses reveal both discrimination and AI's capacity to detect it. The review proposes an equity-oriented framework and highlights priorities for explainable, auditable, participatory, and inclusive AI governance in sport.
Social inclusion, equity, and access in sport participation among marginalized communities: a systematic literature review (2022–2025) Anisa Sholiha Mia; Ardo Okilanda; M. Arie Desman
Lentera Negeri Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): Lentera Negeri
Publisher : Indonesian Institute For Counseling, Education and Therapy

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29210/992740

Abstract

This study employed a systematic literature review (SLR) following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. A thematic synthesis approach based on Thomas and Harden (2008) was used to integrate findings across studies. Two independent reviewers performed study screening and quality appraisal using the FICO framework, with disagreements resolved through discussion to ensure methodological consistency. We followed the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. A structured search on Scopus gave us 1, 281 records published between 2022 and 2025. We removed three duplicates and screened the remaining 1, 278 titles and abstracts. That led to 72 full-text articles that we assessed. Ten of those made it into our qualitative synthesis. The included studies represented diverse marginalized populations, including people with disabilities, ethnic minorities, LGBTQ+ individuals, refugees, socioeconomically disadvantaged communities, women, and older adults. We appraised study quality using the FICO framework and analyzed the data through thematic synthesis. Three themes emerged. First, barriers are multidimensional. They span structural, economic, spatial, cultural, and interpersonal factors. Second, the benefits of sport depend on prior inclusion. Sport tends to reflect social integration rather than create it. Third, inclusion policies can unintentionally reinforce inequalities because they often rest on assimilationist ideas. Pulling together perspectives from social inclusion, social capital, intersectionality, capability, and social-ecology, the review highlights the need for equity-focused, intersectional, community-driven approaches. Looking ahead, research should prioritize longitudinal studies, intersectional analyses, work from the Global South, and community-led projects.
Co-Authors Anisa Sholiha Mia Ardo, Okilanda Dally Rahman Eko Purnomo Firunika Intan Cahyani Jeki Haryanto Susanne Dida Yanti Setianti