Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

KAJIAN HUKUM URGENSI KORPORASI DALAM MENCIPTAKAN LINGKUNGAN HIDUP YANG SEHAT Suwandoko Suwandoko; Destri Tsurayya Istiqamah; Desty Puteri Hardyati
Literasi Hukum Vol 6, No 2 (2022): LITERASI HUKUM
Publisher : Universitas Tidar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (558.577 KB)

Abstract

Permasalahan lingkungan hidup yang disebabkan oleh kegiatan usaha yang berhubungan dengan lingkungan hidup diantaranya pengelolaan lingkungan hidup oleh korporasi. Beberapa bentuk permasalahan lingkungan oleh korporasi yaitu pencemaran dan perusakan lingkungan hidup meliputi limbah dan pencemaran, kehutanan, dan pertambangan. Untuk menjaga kelestarian lingkungan hidup, pengelolaan dan pemanfaatan lingkungan hidup oleh korporasi harus dilakukan dengan Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). pada penulisan ini membahas mengapa urgen korporasi dalam menciptakan lingkungan hidup yang sehat?, serta bagaimana kewajiban hukum korporasi dalam menciptakan lingkungan hidup yang sehat melalui CSR? Penulisan akan dilakukan menggunakan metode yuridis normatif. Hasil penelitian ini yakni urgen korporasi dalam menciptakan lingkungan hidup yang sehat adalah menciptakan lingkungan hidup bersih, sehat dan berkualitas bagi masyarakat serta menciptakan masyarakat yang sejahtera secara berkelanjutan. Kewajiban hukum korporasi dalam menciptakan lingkungan hidup yang sehat melalui CSR adalah menjaga lingkungan hidup yang sehat untuk menjamin hak mendapat hidup sehat bagi masyarakat sekitar korporasi
Urgensi Pengaturan Mekanisme Ganti Rugi Dalam Ajudikasi Khusus Ombudsman Destri Tsurayya Istiqamah; Desty Puteri Hardyati
Sanskara Hukum dan HAM Vol. 5 No. 01 (2026): Sanskara Hukum dan HAM (SHH)
Publisher : Eastasouth Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58812/shh.v5i01.788

Abstract

Law Number 25 of 2009 on Public Services grants the Ombudsman authority to resolve public service disputes through mediation, conciliation, and special adjudication, including compensation for maladministration. However, its implementation remains suboptimal due to the absence of technical regulations on procedures, compensation standards, and enforcement, resulting in a legal gap and weakening the binding force of Ombudsman decisions. This study employs a normative legal method with statutory and conceptual approaches. The findings indicate that without implementing regulations, compensation mechanisms are ineffective. Therefore, further regulation is needed to ensure legal certainty, justice, and the protection of public rights in public service delivery.
Keadilan Substantif dalam Penetapan Ganti Kerugian Pengadaan Tanah Proyek Jalan Tol Yogyakarta-Bawen di Kabupaten Magelang Anugraheni Wardah Ulinnuha; Can Gita Yuliana; Kingkin Setyaningsih; Destri Tsurayya Istiqamah
Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora Vol. 5 No. 3 (2026): Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jurrish.v5i3.8605

Abstract

Infrastructure development as a National Strategic Project (NSP), such as the Yogyakarta-Bawen Toll Road, aims to improve public welfare but often faces a crucial issue in the land acquisition process, namely the determination of compensation. This research examines the application of substantive justice, which focuses not only on procedural compliance (procedural justice) but also on the fairness and adequacy of the final outcome for the entitled parties. Using a juridical-empirical approach, this article analyzes two main problems: first, how substantive justice is realized in the deliberation stage of determining compensation and what factors cause disagreement from residents. Second, how the overall stages of land acquisition affect the achievement of substantive justice and the obstacles encountered. The analysis shows that although the land acquisition stages have procedurally followed Law No. 2 of 2012, the achievement of substantive justice is still hindered. Factors such as the appraisal of compensation which is deemed not to cover non-physical losses, lack of transparency, and an imbalanced bargaining position in deliberations are the main causes of disagreement. Obstacles in the planning, socialization, and payment stages also impede the realization of a complete sense of justice for the affected communities. This study is expected to contribute to the development of land acquisition policies that prioritize fairness, transparency, and the protection of the rights of affected communities.