Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 16 Documents
Search

PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM MENENTUKAN HAK ASUH ANAK AKIBAT PERCERAIAN AGAMA HINDU DI BALI Ni Putu Yuliana Kemalasari
Jurnal Aktual Justice Vol 4 No 2 (2019): Aktual Justice
Publisher : Magister Hukum Pascasarjana Univeristas Ngurah Rai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47329/aktualjustice.v4i2.546

Abstract

The prominent legal issues in balinese law can be classified in two problems, inheritance and purusa ( descendant ), purusa is an inherent status (comonly for male) after marriage. If there is later a divorce, the judge must consider the decision in applying the law that was enforced in deciding the divorce case. Referring to Balinese customary law, when there is a divorce, the child's custody will fall on the purusa / father because the child will become a descendant of the father's family, whereas in the Decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia number: 126K / Pdt. / 2001 dated August 28, 2003 states that "If the father and mother divorce, then the care of the underage child is left to the closest and familiar person to the child, namely the mother". Therefore, the basis for weighing judges in determining custody of children in Hindu religious divorce in Balinese customary law is to combine two legal mechanisms between customary law and national law, where from the aspect of Balinese customary law which adheres to the purusa system, the right is on the purusa party but because the child is still underage, the child is under the mother's care until the child become an adult, and mother can not prevent the child to exercising rights and obligations in the father's family as purusa.
KEPASTIAN HUKUM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA MEDIS YANG BERKEADILAN I Putu Harry Suandana Putra; Ni Putu Yuliana Kemalasari
The Juris Vol. 6 No. 2 (2022): JURNAL ILMU HUKUM : THE JURIS
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat STIH Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/juris.v6i2.664

Abstract

Article 14 of Law Number 29 of 2004 concerning Medical Practice states that the Indonesian Medical Discipline Honorary Council (MKDKI) is the body authorized to determine whether doctors and dentists have made mistakes in the application of medical and dental disciplines and to impose sanctions. This provision indicates that any medical dispute appears to be resolved through the Indonesian Medical Discipline Honorary Committee. However, the current medical dispute settlement through MKDKI is not in accordance with the principle of impartiality, as seen from the process of resolving medical disputes which takes a long time and may not necessarily be executed, including whether the applicant/patient won the case in the Indonesian Medical Discipline Honorary Council (MKDKI) session. What is the legal certainty of equitable medical dispute resolution? And how to realize a just MKDKI decision? The research method is carried out in a normative juridical manner. The results of the study show that justice can be obtained through civil lawsuits, either unlawful acts or defaults on the implementation of therapeutic agreements between patients and doctors in district courts. Legal certainty will be realized if medical dispute resolution arrangements are formed. Meanwhile, the applicant/patient in resolving medical disputes using the MKDKI mechanism, in this case between the patient and the doctor, has not received justice because the MKDKI decision does not contain an unlawful act clause, but rather the application of medical science to patients.
EFEKTIVITAS PENGAWASAN BPOM RI TERHADAP PEREDARAN OBAT DEMAM, FLU DAN BATUK YANG MENYEBABKAN KEMATIAN AKIBAT GAGAL GINJAL AKUT PADA ANAK Ni Putu Yuliana Kemalasari; I Putu Harry Suandana Putra; I Nengah Pasek Suryawan
Jurnal Hukum Saraswati (JHS) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2023): JURNAL HUKUM SARASWATI , MARET 2023
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Mahasaraswati University, Denpasar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Kasus kematian anak yang diduga akibat gagal ginjal akut menjadi persitiwa luar biasa dalam dunia kesehatan di Indonesia pada pertengahan tahun 2022. Berbagai spekulasi bermunculan sampai dengan adanya sebuah penelitian dan kajian dimana hal tersebut disebabkan oleh kandungan zat kimia etilen glikol (EG) dan dietilen (DEG) dalam obat sirup penurun demam yang dikonsumsi oleh anak-anak. Berdasarkan berita dalam media online setidaknya tercatat 324 anak dari 28 provinsi di Indonesia meninggal dengan gejala gagal ginjal akut. Peristiwatersebut menyorot badan pengawas obat dan makanan yaitu BPOM. Para pihak baik pemerintah, swasta, LSM dan komisi perlindungan konsumen meminta pertanggungjawaban kepada BPOM yang diduga lalai dalam melakukan pengawasan sehingga obat-obatan yang berbahaya tersebut dapat lolos izin edar dan izin produksi. Menyikapi permasalahan tersebut, telah muncul isu hukum mengenai pertanggungjawaban hukum BPOM terhadap peredaran obat sirup yang mengakibatkan gagal ginjal akut pada anak sehingga menyebabkan kematian. Untuk memecahkan permasalahan hukum tersebut, dilakukan dengan metode penelitian hukum yang bersifat yuridis normatif. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian ditemukan bahwa BPOM sebagai lembaga negara dan subjek hukum wajib melakukan pertanggungjawaban secara hukum akibat dugaan kelalaiannya dalam melakukan pengawasan dari obat-obatan yang mengakibatkan kematian pada anak.
Protection of Medical Record Data as a Form of Legal Protection of Health Data through the Personal Data Protection Act Ni Putu Yuliana Kemalasari; I Putu Harry Suandana Putra
Journal of Digital Law and Policy Vol. 2 No. 3 (2023): Journal of Digital Law and Policy - May 2023
Publisher : Catuspata

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58982/jdlp.v2i3.338

Abstract

This study aimed at analyzing government’s efforts to provide protection for medical record data of patients as a form of legal protection for patient’s medical data. In the midst of the flurry cases of personal data leakage by hackers, it has raised concerns from various parties about the possibility of medical records leaking of someone’s medical history. Medical history or medical record contains confidential information about a person’s condition related to health and the history of health care that has been carried out. It becomes particularly serious when it records certain diseases of the patient that should not be spread out to the public. In Indonesia, several regulations regarding the protection of personal data which is a person’s privacy rights have been formed. However, this is not enough to deal with the development of digital technology to provide legal certainty for the protection of personal data including medical records as one of the objectives of the law, namely to provide legal certainty and protection. Therefore, this study examines how the legal protection of medical record data based on legal protection according to positive law and the Personal Data Protection Act.
LEGAL CERTAINTY ON ASTRA CHILDREN'S INHERITANCE RIGHTS FOR RECOGNITION OF BIOLOGICAL CHILDREN BASED ON STATE COURT DECISIONS: KEPASTIAN HUKUM HAK MEWARIS ANAK ASTRA ATAS PENGAKUAN ANAK BIOLOGIS BERDASARKAN PUTUSAN PENGADILAN NEGERI ni putu yuliana kemalasari
VYAVAHARA DUTA Vol 18 No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Jurusan Hukum Fakultas Dharma Duta Universitas Hindu Negeri I Gusti Bagus Sugriwa Denpasar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

A child cannot choose where and when they are born, therefore there are often instances where a child is born in a situation that is deemed illegitimate according to the law, namely a child born out of wedlock. The Marriage Law stipulates that a valid marriage is one conducted between a man and a woman based on their respective religious beliefs and convictions, recorded according to the provisions of applicable regulations. In the context of Balinese customary law, there exists a term known as “anak astra” for a child born out of wedlock whose father belongs to a higher caste than the mother. The presence of “anak astra” leads to discrimination against the rights of such children. In society, “anak astra” cannot have the same rights as their legitimate siblings, even if their parents later formalize their marriage, including inheritance rights. To address this issue, a normative juridical research method with literature study is employed. Therefore, an effort to legitimize “anak astra” can be achieved by recognizing and confirming them as legitimate children through a court declaration, subsequently recorded in the child’s birth certificate. In civil law, a child born out of wedlock who has been legitimized by a court decree changes their status to that of a legitimate child and obtains their rightful legal entitlements, but this is not the case in Balinese customary law, which does not equate the rights of “anak astra” with those born from valid marriages. Keywords: child out of wedlock, Balinese Customary Inheritance Law, Determination of Biological Children
Hilangnya Bagian Tubuh Pasien Yang Mengakibatkan Kecacatan Permanen Akibat Kelalaian Medis Dalam Aspek Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Ni Putu Yuliana Kemalasari; I Putu Harry Suandana Putra
Jurnal Ilmiah Raad Kertha Vol 6, No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Mahendradatta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47532/jirk.v6i2.928

Abstract

Hilangnya bagian tubuh pasien akibat kelalian tenaga medis berdampak pada kecacatan yang disengaja, sehingga membutuhkan kepastian hukum kepada pasien yang dapat diperoleh dengan meminta pertanggungjawaban hukum baik secara pidana maupun perdata kepada tenaga medis akibat kelalaiannya tersebut. Pentingnya pertanggungjawaban hukum adalah untuk memberikan kepastian hukum kepada pasien sebagai korban atas tindak kelalaian dari tenaga medis sehingga mengakibatkan kecacatan permanen. Untuk menjawab permasalahan tersebut metode penelitian hukum yang dipergunakan adalah penelitian hukum yuridis normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach), dengan menelaah semua peraturan perundang-undangan dan regulasi yang bersangkutan dengan isu hukum yang diangkat. Pertanggungjawaban hukum akibat kelalian dari tenaga medis yang menyababkan kecacatan permanen pada pasien dapat mengacu kepada ketentuan Pasal 1371 ayat (1) KUHPerdata dan/atau Pasal 46 Undang- Undang No. 44 Tahun 2009 tentang Rumah Sakit jo Pasal 190 ayat (2) Undang-Undang No. 36 Tahun 2009 tentang Kesehatan. kecacatan permanen pasien yang diakibatkan hilangnya anggota tubuh pasien akibat kelalaian dari tenaga medis umum disebut dengan malpraktek. Malpraktek adalah kesalahan atau kelalaian yang disengaja atau tidak dengan sengaja oleh tenaga medis yang menimbulkan kerugian pada kesehatan atau keselamatan dari pasien sebagai korban. Bahwa dapat disimpulkan pertanggungjawban hukum yang dapat dijatuhkan kepada tenaga medis akibat kelalaiannya dapat dimintakan pertanggungjawaban baik secara pidana maupun perdata.
Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Pengelola Arisan Online Bermodus Investasi Yang Menimbulkan Akibat Hukum Kemalasari, Ni Putu Yuliana; Effendi, Irwan
Jurnal Preferensi Hukum Vol. 5 No. 2 (2024): Jurnal Preferensi Hukum
Publisher : Warmadewa Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22225/jph.5.2.10200.231-239

Abstract

Online lottery is an activity carried out by several people by utilizing the development of technological advances and information by using smartphones in its implementation. Recently, online lottery has been highlighted because it has caused legal consequences, including losses suffered by members, promises of attractive investments and used as a basis for committing criminal acts. The problem that becomes a case in relation to online lottery is the form of responsibility and legal efforts in overcoming it. This research aims to find out the criminal and civil responsibilities of the perpetrators of online lottery who use the argument of investment in deceiving their victims so that the best legal efforts can be found in overcoming this problem. To discuss the related problems, the author formulates them into two problem formulations: first, how is the regulation of online lottery according to positive law in Indonesia and second, how is the legal responsibility of online lottery managers with the investment mode that causes legal consequences. This research uses normative legal research. This normative legal research collects legal materials from primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials which are then collected and analysed and then described through a statute approach and case approach. The result of this research is that there is no specific regulation of online lottery according to positive law in Indonesia. However, it can be interpreted that online lottery is an agreement made based on Articles 1330 and 1338 of the Civil Code and is related to the principles and objectives regulated in Articles 3 and 4 of Law Number 1 of 2024 concerning the Second Amendment to Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions.
MEDICAL DISPUTE RESOLUTION BETWEEN PATIENTS AND MEDICAL PERSONNEL Putra, Putu Harry Suandana; Kemalasari, Ni Putu Yuliana; Putra, I Gusti Made Maha
JILPR Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review Vol. 5 No. 3 (2024): Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review (JILPR), June 2024
Publisher : International Peneliti Ekonomi, Sosial dan Teknologi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56371/jirpl.v5i3.252

Abstract

Hubungan antara dokter dan pasien terletak pada adanya persetujuan tindakan medis dan perjanjian terapeutik. Pelanggaran terhadap persetujuan tindakan medis atau perjanjian terapeutik dapat berupa perbuatan melawan hukum atau wanprestasi. Dokter dalam melakukan tindakan medis tidak luput dari kesalahan atau kelalaian. Kesalahan atau kelalaian dokter ini dapat juga dikualifikasi sebagai perbuatan melawan hukum. Untuk menentukan ada atau tidaknya kesalahan dokter dalam melakukan tindakan medis, maka pasien berdasarkan ketentuan Pasal 304 jo Pasal 305 ayat (1) Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2023 tentang Kesehatan dapat mengadukan ke Majelis Penegakan Disiplin Tenaga Medis dan Tenaga Kesehatan yang dibentuk Menteri Kesehatan. Namun, hingga saat ini mejelis tersebut belum terbentuk sebagaimana maksud dalam Pasal 304 ayat (5). Selanjutnya setelah melewati proses dalam Majelis Penegakan Disiplin Tenaga Medis dan Tenaga Kesehatan, pasien atau keluarganya yang mengalami kerugian akibat tindakan medis maupun tindakan dari tenaga kesehatan harus menyelesaikan perselisihan melalui alternatif penyelesaian sengketa di luar pengadilan. Tata cara alternatif penyelesaian sengketa medis hingga saat ini belum diatur dalam peraturan pemerintah. Bagaimana penyelesaian sengketa medis yang terjadi antara tenaga medis dan pasien? Bagaimana perlindungan hukum terhadap pasien yang menjalani rawat inap di rumah sakit? Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian yuridis normatif. Penyelesaian sengketa medis harus dilakukan sesuai dengan ketentuan Pasal 304 dan 310 Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2023 tentang Kesehatan. Sementara itu, perlindungan hukum terhadap pasien yang berada di rumah sakit dilakukan berdasarkan ketentuan Pasal 184 jo Pasal 189 Undang-Undang Nomor 17 Tahun 2023 tentang Kesehatan. Apabila terjadi sengketa antara rumah sakit, dokter, dan pasien, maka penyelesaian sengketanya harus diselesaikan melalui Majelis Penegakan Disiplin Profesi Tenaga Kesehatan dan Tenaga Medis serta terlebih dahulu dilakukan penyelesaian perselisihan sebelum ke pengadilan. Ketentuan Pasal 310 membuka peluang adanya pelbagai lembaga mediasi dan arbitrase kesehatan.
TINJAUAN YURIDIS TANTANGAN CROWDFUNDING DALAM RANGKA UPAYA PREVENTIF PENCEGAHAN KEJAHATAN EKONOMI Ni Putu Yuliana Kemalasari; I Wayan Gede Subawa
Jurnal Hukum Saraswati Vol 6 No 2 (2024): JHS SEPTEMBER 2024
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Mahasaraswati University, Denpasar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Peer to Peer Lending (P2PL) has emerged as a phenomenon in the financial landscape of Indonesia, providing easier access to funding for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). However, this service also brings risks such as financial crimes and data privacy violations. In this context, it is crucial to examine the contractual agreements in P2PL, particularly concerning fairness and legal security for both parties involved. This article proposes an analysis of standard contracts in P2PL, tracing their legal framework and discussing their implications for fairness, utility, and legal certainty. Furthermore, the article highlights the risks of financial crimes in P2PL, including the roles of illegal operators and data privacy breaches. Considering the role of the Financial Services Authority (OJK) in regulating technology-based financial services, this research offers insights into the challenges and opportunities in maintaining the integrity and security of P2PL services in Indonesia.
PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN BPOM TERHADAP PEREDARAN OBAT SIRUP YANG MENYEBABKAN KEMATIAN KEMATIAN PADA ANAK AKIBAT GAGAL GINJAL AKUT Kemalasari, Ni Putu Yuliana
Jurnal Aktual Justice Vol 8 No 1 (2023): Aktual Justice
Publisher : Magister Hukum Pascasarjana Univeristas Ngurah Rai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70358/aktualjustice.v8i1.1009

Abstract

Kasus kematian anak yang diduga akibat gagal ginjal akut menjadi persitiwa luar biasa dalam dunia kesehatan di Indonesia pada pertengahan tahun 2022. Berbagai spekulasi bermunculan sampai dengan adanya sebuah penelitian dan kajian dimana hal tersebut disebabkan oleh kandungan zat kimia etilen glikol (EG) dan dietilen (DEG) dalam obat sirup penurun demam yang dikonsumsi oleh anak-anak. Berdasarkan berita dalam media online setidaknya tercatat 324 anak dari 28 provinsi di Indonesia meninggal dengan gejala gagal ginjal akut. Peristiwa tersebut menyorot badan pengawas obat dan makanan yaitu BPOM. Para pihak baik pemerintah, swasta, LSM dan komisi perlindungan konsumen meminta pertanggungjawaban kepada BPOM yang diduga lalai dalam melakukan pengawasan sehingga obat-obatan yang berbahaya tersebut dapat lolos izin edar dan izin produksi. Menyikapi permasalahan tersebut, telah muncul isu hukum mengenai pertanggungjawaban hukum BPOM terhadap peredaran obat sirup yang mengakibatkan gagal ginjal akut pada anak sehingga menyebabkan kematian. Untuk memecahkan permasalahan hukum tersebut, dilakukan dengan metode penelitian hukum yang bersifat yuridis normatif. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian akan ditemukan bagaimanan BPOM sebagai lembaga negara dan subjek hukum wajib melakukan pertanggungjawaban secara hukum akibat dugaan kelalaiannya.