Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 22 Documents
Search

Implementasi Hak atas Kesehatan Menurut Undang-Undang Dasar 1945: antara Pengaturan dan Realisasi Tanggung Jawab Negara Hernadi Affandi
Jurnal Hukum Positum Vol. 4 No. 1 (2019): Jurnal Hukum Positum
Publisher : Prodi Magister Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35706/positum.v4i1.3006

Abstract

Perubahan UUD 1945 yang memasukkan materi muatan hak asasi manusia semakin menegaskan pengakuan dan perlindungan terhadap hak asasi manusia termasuk hak atas kesehatan di dalamnya. Ketentuan tersebut masih bersifat umum, sehingga memerlukan penjabaran dan pengaturan lebih lanjut ke dalam undang-undang. Selain itu, perlu pula mengetahui implementasi dari tanggung jawab negara dalam pemenuhan hak atas kesehatan. Penelitian ini memfokuskan kepada dua masalah, yaitu: pertama, bagaimanakah pengaturan hak atas kesehatan di Indonesia setelah perubahan UUD 1945; kedua, bagaimanakah realisasi tanggung jawab negara dalam pemenuhan hak atas kesehatan setelah perubahan UUD 1945.
Limitation of The President's Power to Declare a State of Emergency: a Comparison of France, India, and Indonesia Muhammad Yoppy Adhihernawan; Hernadi Affandi
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Vol 22 No 2 (2022): Edisi Juni
Publisher : Law Policy Strategy Agency, Ministry of Law of The Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30641/dejure.2022.V22.145-162

Abstract

The state must declare a state of emergency under certain conditions that endanger the safety of the state and society. Limiting the power to the declaration of a state of emergency is essential because this great authority cannot be used according to the President's will, so it is necessary to have restrictive mechanisms so that the President does not misuse the authority to carry out the emergency. However, the Indonesian constitution does not stipulate any restrictions on the powers of the President in declaring a state of emergency. This study aims to determine the dangers of not limiting the President's powers in declaring a state of emergency in the Indonesian constitution by using the arrangements and practices of emergency law in France and India. The approach used in this study is a comparative level that compares the contents of the constitution's text and compares the implementation and history of the constitution. The result of this study is limiting the power of the President in declaring a state of emergency is necessary based on a comparison of arrangements and experiences in France and India. Therefore, Indonesia must restrict the President's power in declaring a state of emergency to its constitution.