Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

Inkonsistensi Penegakan Hukum terhadap Tindak Pidana Perkawinan Halangan Menurut Pasal 279 KUHP Di Provinsi Aceh Ahmad Buchori; Mohd. Din; Sulaiman Sulaiman
Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Batanghari Jambi Vol 23, No 1 (2023): Februari
Publisher : Universitas Batanghari Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33087/jiubj.v23i1.3124

Abstract

Obstacle marriage is a criminal act prohibited in Article 279 of the Criminal Code, categorized as a crime of origin of marriage. Law enforcement against perpetrators of criminal acts mentioned in Article 279 of the Criminal Code is still experiencing inconsistencies, considering that crimes against the head of marriage have different interpretations from law enforcers. The purpose of this study is to look at the law enforcement process against criminal acts as an impediment to marriage in Aceh and to find out the reasons for the inconsistency of law enforcement against marriage crimes. The method in this study uses an empirical approach, which this approach combines legal and empirical (field) studies. Data collection techniques in this study using interviews. The results of the study indicate that law enforcement carried out by law enforcement officers such as the police, prosecutors and courts still have different understandings of the elements of criminal acts in Article 279 of the Criminal Code. This difference can be seen from the understanding of Article 279 of the Criminal Code regarding barriers to marriage. The lack of consistency in the law enforcement process for violations of Article 279 is because the law in Indonesia does not adhere to a legally binding system of jurisprudence in imposing criminal charges so each judge can interpret the article differently. In this regard, policymakers should provide clear conditions regarding violations of the origin of marriage in Article 279 of the Criminal Code, so there is no interpretation among law enforcement officers.
TINDAK PIDANA PENIPUAN YANG DILAKUKAN OLEH SHOWROOM M. Ahlul Zikri; Mohd. Din
Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Bidang Hukum Pidana Vol 7, No 2: Mei 2023
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Syiah Kuala

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

 Abstrak – Penulisan ini bertujuan untuk menjelaskan apakah showroom mobil yang melakukan tindak pidana penipuan dapat dipidana dan untuk menjelaskan Bagaimana pertanggungjawaban pidana korporasi terhadap showroom mobil yang melakukan tindak penipuan.Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif. Untuk memperoleh data penelitian ini meggunakan data sekunder yang didapatkan melalui  metode dokumentasi dan studi kepustakaan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa berdasarakan kriteria-kriteria penjatuhan sanksi pidana terhadap korporasi serta Pasal 4 ayat 2 Peraturan Mahkamah Angung Nomor 13 tahun 2016 tentang Tata Cara Penanganan Perkara Tindak Pidana Oleh Korporasi yang menegaskan bahwa korporasi dapat dipidana jika mendapatkan keuntungan dari tindak pidana yang dilakukan untuk kepentingan korporasi, melakukan pembiaran terjadinya tindak pidana dan tidak mencegah terjadinya tindak pidana tersebut. Korporasi dapat diminta Pertanggungjawaban pidana korporasi jikalau tindakan yang dilakukan oleh pengurus yang berada dalam korporasi itu untuk kepentingan korporasinya, dilakukan oleh orang yang mempunyai dan tidak melampaui fungsinya, serta masih dalam batas-batas lingkup kewenanagan korporasi. Disarankan agar Pengaturan hukum dalam Perma Nomor 13 Tahun 2016 Tentang Tata Cara Penanganan Perkara Tindak Pidana Oleh Korporasi seharusnya dapat diatur lebih spesifik lagi dalam hal pertanggungjawaban pidana  agar korporasi dapat langsung dituntut, dan juga disarankan agar badan hukum maupun bukan badan hukum juga dapat dimintai pertanggungjawaban pidana jangan hanya sebatas kepada pengurus saja.Kata Kunci : Korporasi, Showroom, Tindak Pidana Penipuan.
Public Legal Awareness in Land Registration in Muara Dua Sub-District Yulia Sarah; Mohd. Din; Adwani Adwani
International Journal of Law and Society Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): International Journal of Law and Society
Publisher : Asosiasi Penelitian dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62951/ijls.v2i3.651

Abstract

Article 19 paragraph (1) of Law No. 5 of 1960 concerning Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA) explains that to ensure legal certainty, the Government conducts land registration throughout the territory of the Republic of Indonesia according to the provisions stipulated in Government Regulation No. 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration. However, based on data showing that in Muara Dua Sub-district, Lhokseumawe City, there are still 40% of land plots that have not been certified. The problems in this study are how the legal awareness of the community on land registration in Muara Dua District, Lhokseumawe City, how the role of keuchik as a committee in land registration in Muara Dua District, and how the government's efforts to increase public legal awareness in registering land. This research uses empirical legal methods with a field research approach and case studies. The results showed that public legal awareness in land registration in Muara Dua Kota village was quite high. Keuchik has an important role in increasing public awareness of registering land. Efforts that have been made by the government to increase public awareness in land registration are the Ministry of ATR / BPN conducting System Branding through advertisements, such as advertisements aired on TV.
Coaching Without Going Through the Court Against Suspected Jarimah Violators By Satpol PP and Wh Lhokseumawe Dirmawan Suryadi; Mohd. Din; Ali Abubakar
International Journal of Law and Society Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): International Journal of Law and Society
Publisher : Asosiasi Penelitian dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62951/ijls.v2i3.667

Abstract

In Aceh, the provision of guidance is regulated in Articles 5 and 6 of Gubenur Regulation Number 139 of 2016, which states that the main task and function of the Civil Service Police Unit and Wilayatul Hisbah Aceh is the guidance function. Article 1 point 14 of Qanun Number 7 Year 2013 on Jinayat Procedure Law states that the function of Wilayatul Hisbah (WH) is to socialise, supervise, enforce, and foster the implementation of Islamic Sharia. Therefore, there is a problem of interpreting the authority of coaching carried out by Satpol PP and WH of Lhokseumawe City. This study aims to determine the legal basis for the coaching of suspected jarimah violators by Satpol PP and WH of Lhokseumawe City and the legal consequences of coaching suspected jarimah violators without going through the judicial process carried out by Satpol PP and WH of Lhokseumawe City. The research method used is empirical juridical. Data sources are obtained through interviews with respondents and informants. The results of this study indicate that the coaching carried out by Satpol PP and WH of Lhokseumawe city against suspected jarimah violators does not have a clear legal basis. The coaching carried out is only based on a statement signed by the alleged jarimah violator during the investigation and the legal consequences of coaching against jarimah offenders by Satpol PP and WH of Lhoseumawe City without going through the judicial process is carried out without a legal basis which results in serious legal consequences such as the coaching is not legally valid (can be cancelled), violates human rights, and can be sued civilly or criminally prosecuted and reduces public confidence in Sharia law.
Law Enforcement Against Companies Accused of Illicitly Providing Facilities for Jarimah in Banda Aceh City's Jurisdiction Putri Amalina; Mohd. Din; Ali Abubakar
International Journal of Sociology and Law Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): August : International Journal of Sociology and Law
Publisher : Asosiasi Penelitian dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62951/ijsl.v2i3.711

Abstract

The special autonomy granted to Aceh Province allows for the implementation of Islamic criminal law (jinayat), yet challenges remain in law enforcement, particularly against corporations that provide facilities for Jarimah. Despite the enactment of Qanun Number 6 of 2014 on Hukum Jinayat, prosecutions have largely focused on individuals, while companies such as hotels, boarding houses, and cafés frequently escape accountability, even when their facilities are used to commit acts such as khalwat, maisir, and zina. This study aims to examine the enforcement mechanisms targeting such corporate entities within the jurisdiction of Banda Aceh City. Employing empirical legal research methods, the study utilizes qualitative analysis based on field observations, interviews with stakeholders, and a review of legal documents. The findings indicate that law enforcement efforts are hampered by five major factors: vague and incomplete legal provisions; limited knowledge and training among investigators; inadequate human resources and supporting infrastructure; a lack of public support; and deeply rooted cultural practices that often favor informal resolutions over formal prosecution. Despite the legal possibility of corporate liability under the qanun, enforcement remains weak due to unclear definitions, particularly concerning intent and the element of facilitation. The study concludes that the effectiveness of law enforcement in this domain is critically undermined by structural and normative deficiencies. Therefore, reform is urgently needed, including amendments to legal texts, comprehensive investigator training, and public engagement strategies to ensure corporate accountability in supporting the implementation of syari’at Islam in Aceh.
The Application of Qanun Jinayat Law in Handling Online Gambling Cases at West Aceh Syar’iyah Court Jurisdiction Rusnan Dinata; Mohd. Din; Teuku Saiful
International Journal of Law and Society Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): International Journal of Law and Society
Publisher : Asosiasi Penelitian dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62951/ijls.v2i3.721

Abstract

The phenomenon of online gambling has become a serious problem in various regions, including West Aceh Regency. data on cases handled by the West Aceh District Syar'iyah Court in the period 2021 to 2024 shows a significant increase in cases. Online gambling as part of jarimah maisir has different characteristics from conventional forms of gambling, namely digital, hidden, cross-regional, and difficult to detect by the naked eye by law enforcement officials and the general public. The problems in this study are How is the application of qanun jinayat law against online gambling offenders in the jurisdiction of the West Aceh District Syar'iyah Court, What are the obstacles faced in applying the law to online gambling offenders based on qanun jinayat law, and What are the efforts to prevent online gambling violations in the West Aceh area. This research uses empirical legal methods with a field research approach and case studies. The results showed that the application of Aceh Qanun Number 6 of 2014 concerning Jinayat Law against online gambling offenders was in accordance with the procedures of jinayat law, but its implementation was still not optimal. The Syar'iyah Court has handled a number of cases, but the number is not proportional to the potential violations. The main obstacles include limited regional authority in blocking sites, lack of digital forensic experts, absence of district-level cyber units, and weak coordination between agencies. Prevention is carried out through digital education by DISKOMINSA, thematic dakwah by the Islamic Sharia Office, as well as the Gampong Tolak Judi Online programme involving the community and the formation of the Gampong Pageu Task Force.