Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.092
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JOURNAL OF QUR'AN AND HADITH STUDIES International Journal of Nusantara Islam Diroyah : Jurnal Studi Ilmu Hadis RELIGIA Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Ushuluddin Gunung Djati Conference Series Religia : Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman International Journal of Nusantara Islam
M. Dede Rodliyana
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Energy Engineering Environmental Science Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Mathematics Social Sciences Other

Published : 14 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 14 Documents
Search

 1   2 
The Stratification of Abu al-Shiddiq (w.108 H) and Qatadah (w. 118 H) in the Narration of the al-Mahdi Hadith Syamsudin, Kinkin; Rodliyana, M. Dede
Religia: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu KeIslaman Vol 25 No 1 (2022)
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri K.H. Abdurrahman Wahid Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28918/religia.v25i1.4235

Abstract

This article examines the influence of differences of rawi stratification on hadith narration, using Ibn Khaldun's stratification theory as outlined in his book entitled Muqaddimah. This study employs library research with a content analysis approach, focusing on hadiths about al-Mahdi narrated through the paths of Abu al-Shiddiq (d. 108 H) and Abu Nadhrah (d. 103 H). The findings reveal that Qatadah, the principal student of Abu al-Shiddiq, did not receive the narration about al-Mahdi from his teacher but rather from Abu Nadhrah. Although the three rawis differ in the number of narrations—Qatadah (12,209 narrations), Abu al-Shiddiq (183 narrations), and Abu Nadhrah (1,181 narrations)—all are considered thiqah (trustworthy narrators). The study concludes that differences of stratification among the three narrators are not the reason why Qatadah did not narrate the al-Mahdi hadith from Abu al-Shiddiq. This research contributes to academic discourse by offering a new perspective on the application of Ibn Khaldun's stratification theory in the study of hadith narration. It also highlights that the number of narrations and stratification positions do not always determine specific narration paths. Future research is recommended to expand the scope of analysis to other rawis using a similar approach to gain deeper insights into the relationship between rawi stratification and hadith narration.
Western Hadith Literacy In The 21st Century: A Survey of Periodical Journals Published in Europe and North America 2010-2023 Rodliyana, M. Dede
Diroyah : Jurnal Studi Ilmu Hadis Vol. 8 No. 2 (2024): Diroyah: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Hadis
Publisher : Prodi Ilmu Hadis Fakultas Ushuluddin UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/diroyah.v8i2.35677

Abstract

This article surveys the landscape of Western hadith scholarship in the 21st century by analyzing articles published in leading scholarly journals in Europe and North America from 2010 to 2023. Employing a bibliographic survey method, this study accesses and examines articles from prominent journals such as Der Islam, Arabica, Islamic Law, and Society. The approaches used in these articles include historical analysis and isnadmatn criticism. The findings reveal that contemporary Western hadith studies have progressed beyond debates about authenticity, and now encompass more nuanced thematic and contextual analyses. The diversity of approaches to assessing the authenticity and relevance of hadith reflects the maturation of hadith studies in Western academia. The current Western scholarship on hadith demonstrates a more integrative and comprehensive approach that can serve as a valuable reference for Indonesian hadith researchers seeking to develop richer and more in-depth studies. This survey highlights the evolution of Western hadith scholarship and its potential to inspire further research in the field
Reevaluating Gender Dynamics: A Critical Analysis of Misogynistic Narratives in Hadith Literature Rodliyana, M. Dede
International Journal of Nusantara Islam Vol 11 No 2 (2023): International Journal of Nusantara Islam
Publisher : UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/ijni.v11i2.31219

Abstract

The discourse on religion and feminism often includes an analysis of the social construction of women in religious teachings. Feminist scholars argue that religious doctrines and interpretations, including those in Islam, have historically propagated subordinate views of women. This study examines such perceptions within Islamic Hadiths, specifically focusing on hadiths deemed misogynistic, as reported by al-Nasā’ī and other primary sources. This qualitative study employs a bibliographic approach, scrutinizing the authenticity and contextual meaning of the Hadiths. It involves a critical examination of the chain of transmission (sanad) and the text (matan) of the hadiths. The study also considers the historical and cultural context of these narrations and engages feminist perspectives to offer alternative interpretations. The hadiths from al-Nasā’ī are generally classified as hasan (sound), based on the credibility of the narrators. Variations in the text across different reports are critically examined for consistency in meaning. The study finds that while the hadiths reflect the patriarchal culture of their time, their interpretation is subject to the context and can align with Islamic teachings on justice and gender equality. The analysis suggests that these Hadiths, when contextualized, do not inherently convey misogynistic intentions. The study concludes that the perception of misogyny in the hadiths is influenced by their interpretation and historical context. A more nuanced understanding reveals that these hadiths can be interpreted in ways that support harmony and equality within the family, aligning with broader Islamic principles.
Reevaluating Gender Dynamics: A Critical Analysis of Misogynistic Narratives in Hadith Literature Rodliyana, M. Dede
International Journal of Nusantara Islam Vol 11 No 2 (2023): International Journal of Nusantara Islam
Publisher : UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/ijni.v11i2.31219

Abstract

The discourse on religion and feminism often includes an analysis of the social construction of women in religious teachings. Feminist scholars argue that religious doctrines and interpretations, including those in Islam, have historically propagated subordinate views of women. This study examines such perceptions within Islamic Hadiths, specifically focusing on hadiths deemed misogynistic, as reported by al-Nasā’ī and other primary sources. This qualitative study employs a bibliographic approach, scrutinizing the authenticity and contextual meaning of the Hadiths. It involves a critical examination of the chain of transmission (sanad) and the text (matan) of the hadiths. The study also considers the historical and cultural context of these narrations and engages feminist perspectives to offer alternative interpretations. The hadiths from al-Nasā’ī are generally classified as hasan (sound), based on the credibility of the narrators. Variations in the text across different reports are critically examined for consistency in meaning. The study finds that while the hadiths reflect the patriarchal culture of their time, their interpretation is subject to the context and can align with Islamic teachings on justice and gender equality. The analysis suggests that these Hadiths, when contextualized, do not inherently convey misogynistic intentions. The study concludes that the perception of misogyny in the hadiths is influenced by their interpretation and historical context. A more nuanced understanding reveals that these hadiths can be interpreted in ways that support harmony and equality within the family, aligning with broader Islamic principles.
Co-Authors Agus Suyadi Raharusun Ayi Rahman Azmi Fathul Rohman Elisah Elisah Gina Giftia Azmiana Delilah Kinkin Syamsudin Kinkin Syamsudin Maulana Wahyu Saefudin Muhamad Ridwan Nurrohman Siti Rahmah Syamsudin, Kinkin