Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.659
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Pranata Hukum JURNAL ILMIAH HUKUM DAN KEADILAN Journal of Constitutional Law Society (JCLS)
Yhannu Setyawan
Universitas Lampung
Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
RANCANGAN UNDANG-UNDANG OMNIBUS LAW CIPTA KERJA DALAM PERSPEKTIF UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 12 TAHUN 2011 TENTANG PEMBENTUKAN PERATURAN PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN Yhannu Setyawan
Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum dan Keadilan Vol. 7 No. 1 (2020): Hukum dan Keadilan
Publisher : LP3M STIH Painan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (547.445 KB)

Abstract

Pemerintah telah mengajukan RUU Omnibus Law Cipta Kerja kepada DPR RI. RUU Omnibus Law Cipta Kerja menghapus beberapa pasal yang ada dalam 82 Undang-Undang. Sebuah RUU dibentuk harus berpedoman kepada UU No 12 Tahun 2011 tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-undangan dalam UU No 12 Tahun 2011 tidak dikenal adanya bab didalam bab dan pasal di dalam pasal. Rumusan masalah artikel ini bagaimanakah efektivitas pelaksanaan peraturan perundang-undangan dengan metode Omnibus Law di Indonesia? dan bagaimanakah implikasi penerapan Rancangan Undang-Undang Omnibus Law tentang Cipta Kerja terhadap peraturan perundang-undangan yang lain? Kesimpulan dalam artikel ini pelaksanaan peraturan perundang-undangan dengan Metode Omnibus Law di Indonesia sudah pernah dilakukan dalam Tap MPR No 1 Tahun 2003, Undang-Undang Nomor 23 tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah dan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 20 Tahun 1994 tentang Kepemilikan Saham dalam Perusahaan dan dalam pelaksanaannya tidak efektif. RUU Omnibus Law Cipta Kerja tidak sesuai dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2011 tentang Pembentukan Peraturan Perundang-undangan, dikarenakan dalam UU No 12 Tahun 2011 tidak mengenal pengelompokan Bab didalam bab dan Pasal didalam pasal sebagaimana yang tercantum dalam RUU Omnibus Law Cipta Kerja.
APPOINTMENT AND DISCLAIMER OF VILLAGE EQUIPMENT BASED ON LEGISLATION IN INDONESIA: PENGANGKATAN DAN PEMBERHENTIAN PERANGKAT DESA BERDASARKAN PERATURANN PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN DI INDONESIA Muchlis Sadzili; Siti Khoiriah; Yhannu Setyawan
Constitutional Law Society Vol. 1 No. 2 (2022): September
Publisher : Center for Constitutional and Legislative Studies University of Bandar Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (250.441 KB) | DOI: 10.36448/cls.v1i2.32

Abstract

This study aims to find out the problems that occur related to the appointment and dismissal of village officials, provide suggestions regarding problems in South Sukadana Village and Bumi Nabung Village, and find solutions to differences in norms related to the laws and regulations governing the appointment and dismissal of village officials. This research is a legal research using a normative writing method using a statutory approach and empirically using a direct field investigation approach by conducting interviews with the South Sukadana Village Head, Bumi Nabung Village Head and Sukadana Sub-District Head. Based on the results of the study, there was an expansion of norms which then caused problems in each village in terms of recommendations issued by the sub-district head. The problem dragged on and there was a temporary stagnation of the wheels of government in South Sukadana Village and Bumi Nabung Village.
THE VIEW OF CONSTITUTIONAL LAW ON THE RETROACTIVE EFFECT OF MATERIAL CONTENTS OF LAWS AND REGULATION IN INDONESIA Randy Agus Setiawan; Yhannu Setyawan; Malicia Evendia
PRANATA HUKUM Vol. 18 No. 2 (2023): Juli
Publisher : Law Faculty of Universitas Bandar Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36448/pranatahukum.v18i2.309

Abstract

Retroactive regulation of the contents of laws and regulations in Indonesia based on the provisions of the non-retroactive principle and the principle of legality is not allowed as an embodiment of the protection of human rights which are non-derogable rights. This arrangement is confirmed in Article 28I paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution and Article 1 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code (KUHP). However, the fact is that there are still laws and regulations that are retroactively enforced and are still in effect today. The purpose of this research is to analyze retroactive provisions whether they may apply according to Constitutional Law. This research is a normative legal research by conducting a review of retroactively enforced laws and regulations using a statutory, case and conceptual approach. The results of the study concluded that retroactive validity is constitutionally not in line with the 1945 Constitution but may be enforced on the basis of its validity, namely the provisions of Article 28J paragraph (2) and Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code which transforms absolute provisions (non derogable rights) is relative.
Co-Authors Malicia Evendia Muchlis Sadzili Randy Agus Setiawan Siti Khoiriah