Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

APPOINTMENT AND DISCLAIMER OF VILLAGE EQUIPMENT BASED ON LEGISLATION IN INDONESIA: PENGANGKATAN DAN PEMBERHENTIAN PERANGKAT DESA BERDASARKAN PERATURANN PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN DI INDONESIA Muchlis Sadzili; Siti Khoiriah; Yhannu Setyawan
Constitutional Law Society Vol. 1 No. 2 (2022): September
Publisher : Center for Constitutional and Legislative Studies University of Bandar Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (250.441 KB) | DOI: 10.36448/cls.v1i2.32

Abstract

This study aims to find out the problems that occur related to the appointment and dismissal of village officials, provide suggestions regarding problems in South Sukadana Village and Bumi Nabung Village, and find solutions to differences in norms related to the laws and regulations governing the appointment and dismissal of village officials. This research is a legal research using a normative writing method using a statutory approach and empirically using a direct field investigation approach by conducting interviews with the South Sukadana Village Head, Bumi Nabung Village Head and Sukadana Sub-District Head. Based on the results of the study, there was an expansion of norms which then caused problems in each village in terms of recommendations issued by the sub-district head. The problem dragged on and there was a temporary stagnation of the wheels of government in South Sukadana Village and Bumi Nabung Village.
Politik Impunitas dan Stagnasi Akuntabilitas Konstitusional di Indonesia: Suatu Analisis Hukum Tata Negara Muchlis Sadzili; Yusdiyanto Yusdiyanto; Muhtadi Muhtadi
AKADEMIK: Jurnal Mahasiswa Humanis Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): AKADEMIK: Jurnal Mahasiswa Humanis
Publisher : Perhimpunan Sarjana Ekonomi dan Bisnis

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37481/jmh.v6i1.1874

Abstract

The persistence of unresolved gross human rights violations in Indonesia reflects a deeper structural problem within the constitutional system, where legal accountability mechanisms remain weak and vulnerable to political intervention. This condition has enabled the emergence and consolidation of a politics of impunity, further reinforced by state-sponsored symbolic practices that normalize authoritarian legacies and erode public demands for justice. This study aims to analyze how the politics of impunity is formed and reproduced within Indonesia’s constitutional framework and to examine the role of symbolic state practices in sustaining the stagnation of constitutional accountability for gross human rights violations. Methodologically, this research employs a normative juridical type of research using constitutional law and socio-legal approaches. The unit of analysis includes constitutional norms, statutory regulations, judicial decisions, state policies, and symbolic practices related to human rights accountability. The study utilizes secondary data obtained through documentary and literature-based research, including legislation, court rulings, official state narratives, academic writings, and reports from human rights institutions. Data are analyzed through qualitative normative analysis, complemented by critical discourse analysis to assess the interaction between legal structures and symbolic narratives. The findings reveal that impunity is reproduced through stalled legal processes, weak institutional independence of human rights bodies, and the dominance of political calculations in state decision-making. Additionally, symbolic practices such as the legitimization of authoritarian figures contribute to the preservation of impunity by obscuring collective memory, reducing the urgency of accountability, and weakening constitutionalism in Indonesia’s democratic order.