Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 12 Documents
Search

Law and Sovereignty of the State in the Renegotiation of Freeport Contracts in Papua Khamami Zada; Mustolih Mustolih; Diana Mutia Habibaty; Lukman Hakim; Desy Purwaningsih; Trini Diyani
Jurnal Cita Hukum Vol 9, No 2 (2021)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum, UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15408/jch.v9i2.21546

Abstract

The mineral and coal mines have long been managed by foreign contracts between governments and foreigners. The position threatens the state's sovereignty over the wealth of natural resources. The study was to analyze the renege-management of Indonesia's Freeport mines in Papua. Socio-legal methods were used to analyze the renegotiation of Indonesia's Freeport management. The study found that according to the principle of state mastery over natural resources as a common property of Indonesian people's prosperity as in article 33 verses (3) constitution of 1945, the Indonesian government officially took over its 51-percent share of Freeport. It is part of an expression of national sovereignty over the management of its natural resources. With this position, Freeport's mining management is no longer based on a contract of work, but a Special Mining Business License which provides guarantees to business holders to have their licenses extended to provide certainty to mining business actors in conducting mining business in Indonesia.Keywords: Renegotiation; Freeport; State Sovereignity Hukum dan Kedaulatan Negara Dalam Renegosiasi Kontrak Freeport Di Papua Abstrak      Pertambangan mineral dan batubara selama ini dikelola pihak asing berdasarkan kontrak antara pemerintah dan pihak asing. Posisi ini sesungguhnya mengancam kedaulatan negara atas kekeyaaan sumberdaya alam. Studi ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis renegosiasi pengelolaan tambang PT Freeport Indonesia di Papua. Metode socio-legal digunakan untuk menganalisis renegosiasi pengelolaan tambang PT Freeport Indonesia. Studi ini menemukan bahwa berdasarkan prinsip penguasaan negara atas sumberdaya alam sebagai common property bangsa Indonesia untuk kemakmuran rakyat sebagaimana pasal 33 ayat (3) Undang-Undang Dasar 1945, Pemerintah Indonesia secara resmi mengambil alih saham PT. Freeport Indonesia sebesar 51 %. Kebijakan ini merupakan bagian dari perwujudan kedaulatan negara atas pengelolaan sumberdaya alamnya. Dengan posisi ini, pengelolaan tambang Freeport bukan lagi berdasarkan kontrak karya, melainkan Izin Usaha Pertambangan Khusus yang memberikan jaminan kepada pemegang usaha untuk diperpanjang izinnya unutk memberikan kepastian kepada pelaku usaha pertambangan dalam melakukan bisnis pertambangan di Indonesia.Kata Kunci: Renegosiasi; Freeport; Kedaulatan Negara Закон и суверенитет государствапри пересмотре договоров Freeport в Папуа АннотацияДо настоящего времени управление добычей полезных ископаемых и угля осуществлялось иностранными сторонами на основании договоров между правительством и иностранными сторонами. Эта позиция фактически угрожает суверенитету государства над богатством природных ресурсов. Данное исследование направлено на анализ пересмотра условий руководства рудником компании Freeport Indonesia в Папуа. Социально-правовой метод был использован для анализа пересмотра условий руководства рудником компании Freeport Indonesia. Это исследование показало, что на основе принципа государственного контроля над природными ресурсами как общей собственностью индонезийского народа для процветания народа, как указано в пункте (3) статьи 33 Конституции 1945 года, правительство Индонезии официально приняло на себя акции из компании Freeport Indonesia на 51%. Эта политика является частью реализации государственного суверенитета над управлением своими природными ресурсами. С этой должностью управление горнодобывающей промышленностью Freeport больше не основывается на договоре на выполнение работ, а на специальной лицензии на горнодобывающий бизнес, которая предоставляет владельцам бизнеса гарантии продления их лицензий, чтобы обеспечить уверенность участников горнодобывающего бизнеса в ведении горнодобывающего бизнеса в Индонезии.Ключевые Слова: Пересмотр; Freeport; Государственный суверенитет
A Study of DSN-MUI Fatwa No. 153/2022 concerning Discounts on Early Settlement of Murabahah Financing, Ali Sajad; Ah. Azharuddin Lathif; Diana Mutia Habibaty
Al-Amwal : Journal of Islamic Economic Law Vol. 10 No. 1 (2025): Al-Amwal : Journal of Islamic Economic Law
Publisher : Prodi Hukum Ekonomi Syariah, Fakultas Syariah, IAIN Palopo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24256/alw.v10i2.8023

Abstract

Purpose - This study was conducted to clarify common misconceptions in understanding the distinction between the time value of money theory and the economic value of time theory in relation to DSN Fatwa No. 153/DSN-MUI/VI/2022 on the Early Settlement of Murabahah Financing, particularly with reference to the fiqih principle inna li al-zamani hisshotan min al-tsaman. Methods - This research constitutes a library study employing a normative approach in examining statutory regulations, scholarly books, classical fiqh works, DSN-MUI fatwas, and other relevant literature pertaining to the subject of this thesis. A descriptive analytical method was applied to elaborate on the central theme, providing an in-depth explanation based on the facts identified by the researcher. Results - The results of the research show that DSN’s Fatwa No. 153/DSN-MUI/VI/2022—specifically the fiqh principle inna li al-zamani hisshotan min al-tsaman—accommodates the theory of the economic value of time, rather than the time value of money. This conclusion is substantiated through a comparative analysis of several aspects shared between the economic value of time theory and the fiqih principle, namely: the role of money, the role of time, tangible assets/real effort, the distinction between cash and deferred prices, the practice of discounts, and the moral/maslahah dimension. Implications - As a practical implication, the results of this research can be used as a reference for the wider public and, more specifically, for financial practitioners, in order to avoid misinterpretations regarding the distinction between the time value of money and the economic value of time. Such understanding is essential to accurately identify which theory is accommodated within the fiqh maxim inna li al-zamani hisshotan min al-tsaman as reflected in DSN Fatwa No. 23/DSN-MUI/III/2002 on Discounts for Early Settlement of Murabahah Financing.